Post: #1

"That's what I love about these high school girls, man. I get older, they stay the same age." - Dazed and Confused

I think the ideal age in physical beauty of a girl is around 18-21 years, some girls maintain it after, but a lot of girls seem to let go, and then there is of course the normal progressions (regressions?) that come with age.

I seem to be most attracted to this age group, and as I'm getting older it doesn't seem to be getting harder to get with these girls.. in fact I think now that I'm over 25 it's becoming a lot easier hooking up with these girls.

Do you guys notice that as you're getting older your attractiveness goes up with these younger girls? What do you guys think about the physical qualities that come with age that help? Do you think wrinkles are a good thing on guys? Bruises? Scars? I know as we get older a lot of us become more comfortable in our skins so confidence is definitely a major key component, but I wonder if those of you who are advancing in age can chime in on things you notice younger girls like about you now that you are older.

Post: #2

I cant speak to being older making it easier, but I know as a younger guy this is by far the hardest age group for me to crack. 24+ is absolute cake. They all say something about me being "so young" but it never stops them. Younger girls another the other hands just look at me and go "meh"

Chef In Jeans
A culinary website for men

Post: #3

(04-17-2011 03:36 PM)kerouac Wrote:  Do you guys notice that as you're getting older your attractiveness goes up with these younger girls?

I'm 27. I feel more attractive, but it doesn't appear to be rubbing off on anyone. Ha!

Post: #4

Eh, 18 seems awfully young to me, but I don't know, I mean 18 is legal right? Should it matter?

Post: #5

To answer the OP, I too have noticed younger girls are more into me now than I was when I was younger. I think the reasons why are just general self-improvement with my identity, appearance, confidence, and being more interesting. Unfortunately, younger girls generally don't really do it for me like they used to. Too immature. For me, I get along best with girls that are very innocent yet very mature. Hard combination to find, I know.

Post: #6

(04-17-2011 04:00 PM)Chad Daring Wrote:  I cant speak to being older making it easier, but I know as a younger guy this is by far the hardest age group for me to crack. 24+ is absolute cake. They all say something about me being "so young" but it never stops them. Younger girls another the other hands just look at me and go "meh"

What's your personality style? And are you showing them how much you want them early on? Younger girls respond a bit differently from older girls. Older girls tend to respond a bit better to directness, whereas younger girls like to play games. If you can play their games better than they can play them, then you're gonna find you're going to get better responses from the younger girls.

Post: #7

I look about 18 (baby face) but I don't understand or have the patience for the games they play. I could do some damage if I found out how to work the game....

Post: #8

Here's a question, is it legal to bang a girl under 18 if the age of consent is say, 16 in a certain state?

Post: #9

(04-18-2011 04:03 PM)Fisto Wrote:  Here's a question, is it legal to bang a girl under 18 if the age of consent is say, 16 in a certain state?

Yes, but be sure to read the law. A lot of states have strange clauses that you must be within a certain # of years of the age of the girl you are boning if she is under 18 (like Texas, which has age of consent of 17, i think, but with a clause that you must be within 3 years of her age or some shit).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_con...ted_States

Overall, I just stick to the 18 and over girls. Far less legal headaches.

Still, there is this outlet mall where I sometimes shop, and I swear to god, most of the girls that work at the shops there are HB high school girls who seem all too eager to date older (college) guys.

The devil makes it too easy sometimes.

Post: #10

(04-18-2011 12:19 AM)kerouac Wrote:  

(04-17-2011 04:00 PM)Chad Daring Wrote:  I cant speak to being older making it easier, but I know as a younger guy this is by far the hardest age group for me to crack. 24+ is absolute cake. They all say something about me being "so young" but it never stops them. Younger girls another the other hands just look at me and go "meh"

What's your personality style? And are you showing them how much you want them early on? Younger girls respond a bit differently from older girls. Older girls tend to respond a bit better to directness, whereas younger girls like to play games. If you can play their games better than they can play them, then you're gonna find you're going to get better responses from the younger girls.

I'd never let a girl know I want her, but I dont even get a second glance from the youngins. I think its a status thing honestly. If you're a young girl banging an older guy, you become mature by association.

"Oh yeah Sara, you're parents might have bought you a new car but my bee eff is 28, so hmf"

Chef In Jeans
A culinary website for men

Post: #11

(04-18-2011 04:20 PM)Easy E Wrote:  

(04-18-2011 04:03 PM)Fisto Wrote:  Here's a question, is it legal to bang a girl under 18 if the age of consent is say, 16 in a certain state?

Yes, but be sure to read the law. A lot of states have strange clauses that you must be within a certain # of years of the age of the girl you are boning if she is under 18 (like Texas, which has age of consent of 17, i think, but with a clause that you must be within 3 years of her age or some shit).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_con...ted_States

Overall, I just stick to the 18 and over girls. Far less legal headaches.

Still, there is this outlet mall where I sometimes shop, and I swear to god, most of the girls that work at the shops there are HB high school girls who seem all too eager to date older (college) guys.

The devil makes it too easy sometimes.

Yeah just curious, 17 is probably the youngest I would go but, only if I wasn't going to get thrown in Jail. I've had a lot of these H.S. chicks coming up and flirting with me in different settings and I'm always thinking "bad news"

Post: #12

Don't do it..

Child pornography charges


Mug shot of R. Kelly taken in 2003
In February of 2002, a video allegedly showing Kelly engaging in sex with an underage girl, released by an unknown source, was sent to the Chicago Sun-Times; the newspaper that broke the story. Kelly denied that he was the man in the video.[32]
Bootleg copies of that tape became widely available on the black market and over file sharing networks. In June 2002, Kelly was indicted in Chicago on 21 counts of having sex with a minor, which were later reduced to soliciting a minor for child pornography, seven counts of videotaping the acts, and seven counts of producing child pornography.[33]
In January 2003, in Florida Kelly was arrested again on child pornography charges.[34] In June 2002, authorities searched his house in Davenport, Florida. Officers allegedly found pictures of an underage girl as well as a video of Kelly having sex with an underage girl on a digital camera – wrapped in a towel in a duffel bag.[35] In March 2004 these charges were dropped due to a lack of probable cause for the search warrants.[36]
After a number of delays, on October 27, 2006, a Cook County, Illinois, court hearing for pre-trial motions set the date of the actual trial to February 7, 2007.[37] On the date of the trial, Kelly's lawyer informed the court that his client was unable to attend because he was "undergoing surgery for a burst appendix". He also announced that Kelly was "in good condition and was expected to be released from the hospital later in the day." His attorney stated that Kelly (who pleaded not guilty) would be in attendance on the next trial date of February 21, 2007.[38] It had previously been announced by the court that the videotape that allegedly showed Kelly performing sex acts with an underage girl would be publicly shown as evidence in the trial. The trial, however, was delayed due to disputes over when the tape was made and to give medical recuperation time to the sitting judge following a fall resulting in broken bones. Later the case was set for a September 17 date.[39]
It took more than six years for the case to go to trial. Jury selection began on May 9, 2008, and the trial officially started on May 20 with opening statements from the prosecution and defense. After two weeks, the prosecution's case wrapped on June 3 while the defense's wrapped six days later, on June 9. After less than a day of deliberations, on June 13, 2008, a Chicago jury found Kelly not guilty of all 14 counts.[40]

Post: #13

I'd point you to my thoughts on this same subject in a related thread. They apply to this discussion as well:

From: "Girls and birthdays"
/thread-3790-p...l#pid44833

(02-26-2011 07:47 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

(02-26-2011 07:10 PM)oldnemesis Wrote:  Personally I think such America-specific age of consent laws are just silly.

Shit, don't get me started on that subject. It's absolutely, positively ridiculous. I'm in a state where the age of consent is 18. Are you kidding me? The presumption is that a girl younger than that is too inexperienced or lacks the judgment to bone down willingly. Maybe that remotely made sense 50 or 60 years ago, but these days it's not unheard of for an 18-year-old to have 10 or 12 sausages in her cap. In fact, it's rather common. So, by the time you can "legally" talk to her, she's likely demonstrated the judgment to not only have sex, but to do so repeatedly, with several partners, for years.

As we all know, a 16-year-old girl (especially a cute one) has more "game" than the average 25-year-old male. What's more, with an "expiration date" on the other side (in the mid-to-late 30s, on a case-by-case basis), they're really limiting our access to a girl's prime years. I'm not talking about lowering it to 13, but 16 seems reasonable. No?

Finally, 18 years of age is no guarantee that a girl is "mature" enough to do anything, much less have sex. How many of us have complained about the immature speech and behavior of post-college girls? Age, I'm afraid, is a poor indicator of maturity or decision-making skills.

If any of you guys ever get into a position of influence or in government, make these ridiculous laws your first order of business.

I promise the same.

Post: #14

An adult wanting to fuck a 15yr old girl is wrong in the head!

Post: #15

Posting this before the "P" word starts to fly...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia

Chef In Jeans
A culinary website for men

Post: #16

(04-18-2011 06:50 PM)Chad Daring Wrote:  Posting this before the "P" word starts to fly...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia

Thanks, actually. I can't tell you how many people I've had to school in the massive difference between the two.

Post: #17

The whole "dont like 16 year olds because its wrong!" argument is really just a crock that came up because we started coddling our kids. Modern society stifles maturity and drags out the process so they can slowly strangle the childhood out of children with homework, organized sports, and foam rubber.

Look at the depiction (yes I know that implies its fantasy) of most Victorian era girls in any historically accurate movie. Well dressed. Well spoken. Mature. Learned. And not plowed by everyone everywhere.

Chef In Jeans
A culinary website for men

Post: #18

(04-18-2011 06:36 PM)Gringo Wrote:  An adult wanting to fuck a 15yr old girl is wrong in the head!

How so?

Post: #19

Maybe I've been hanging around Europeans for a while, but it's strange that the idea of wanting someone as "young" as 18 is so sick for some people. For my European friends it seems almost normal to want to always get the prettiest and youngest girl (legally) you can get with. A French girl I know lost her virginity at 16 to her 26 year old P.E. teacher. She doesn't regret it.

Post: #20

(04-18-2011 06:36 PM)Gringo Wrote:  An adult wanting to fuck a 15yr old girl is wrong in the head!

Its already been said by others here, but this is simply not the case and there can be no rational argument supporting it. You do not have to be mentally ill to find sexual attraction with a female that young.
In fact, most men do at some point(ex. Selena Gomez, Miley Cyrus, etc).

It is the love of pre-pubescent children that indicates an illness, as it goes against the natural attraction to cues of fertility. 15 year olds have these cues because they have gone through puberty and are maturing physically. Pre-pubescent girls have no cues of fertility, which is why men generally aren't attracted to them...unless they're wrong in the head, in which case things will be inverted. Such men will find pre-pubescent girls who lack cues of fertility attractive, and actually will shy away from girls who show more maturity-we call these pedophiles. Most pedophiles by definition aren't too fond of 15 year olds. They prefer them at least 5 years younger.

America is one of the few places in the world where these pretty bvious realities are not acknowledged and serious terms like and rape are thrown around with abandon. The self-righteous (and often hypocritical) puritanism of such a phenomenon bothers me greatly, which is why I've went on with this rant. But I doubt things will change here anytime soon.

If you want a sane view on age of consent and sex, leave the anglosphere.

Post: #21

(04-18-2011 09:00 PM)Athlone McGinnis Wrote:  Its already been said by others here, but this is simply not the case and there can be no rational argument supporting it. You do not have to be mentally ill to find sexual attraction with a female that young.
In fact, most men do at some point(ex. Selena Gomez, Miley Cyrus, etc).

I'd add that dudes with a taste for older broads--or fat chicks, for that matter--are more likely to be "wrong in the head" than dudes attracted to a girl that is fully, and freshly, sexually mature and outwardly healthy.

It's hardly original to point out that the outright shaming directed toward men in this country for being (naturally) attracted to young, but sexually mature, women comes from the feminist movement, neo-religious non-sense (because the old religious scriptures flatly endorse it), and effeminized beta-male school of thought.

Women don't get the same shaming for being attracted to their equivalent: a strong, alpha man with social proof (like money or status). I'm frankly disappointed to find this tripe (which most of us see as a settled matter) still espoused by anyone on a board whose intent, at least in part, is to resist this overwhelming trend.

Post: #22

(04-18-2011 06:36 PM)Gringo Wrote:  An adult wanting to fuck a 15yr old girl is wrong in the head!

You're exaggerating. Note that adult is someone who just turned 18. Is it also wrong in the head?

BTW, do you know that age of consent is 16 in most countries around the world, including pretty much every first world country, and in over half of US states?

Post: #23

(04-18-2011 08:14 PM)kerouac Wrote:  Maybe I've been hanging around Europeans for a while, but it's strange that the idea of wanting someone as "young" as 18 is so sick for some people.

It is a typical American hypocrisy. And it results in The United States being the world's leader in child porn consumption.

(I agree the source is controversial, but I trust it as I'm sure they have the data to back this claim up as it likely to be questioned. However it wasn't.)

Post: #24

Quote:Note that adult is someone who just turned 18. Is it also wrong in the head?

When I was 18 I certainly wasn't attracted to 15 year olds. Even though it's only 3 year difference the difference in maturity is usually vast.

You can all justify it as much as you like but I think it's very strange, especially if you're considerably older than 18. Anyone who's in their 20s or beyond wanting to get with 15 year old girls would disgust me.

Post: #25

Personally the younger girls (16 - 20 say) are a bit too imature for me. But then I am in my 30's.

But as far as personal morality is concerned a man feeling sexual attraction for a girl/woman who has gone through puberty and is sexually mature is not "sick in the head". In practice it is obviously a very bad idea to ignore the age of consent laws, even if you do not believe they are sound. But please, no "sick in the head" comments for regular sexual attraction.

As someone said above. I thought most people here understood the hypocricy that fuells this. Older women especially have their own reasons for coming out against the older man - younger woman pairing. That's fine. It's in their interest to shame men for this so you can hardly expect anything different. But this is a male board. Our interests are different, and in this case oposed to theirs. Fight your own battles, not someone else's.