Now even Jon Stewart is throwing Rolling Stone under the bus.

Quote:"You can't just deal with it by issuing a correction like the time you spelled [pop star] Ke$ha's name with an '&' instead of '$,' " Stewart said. "Someone's got to go."

I believe this is what they call the SJW red zone. If even your own tame comedians are throwing razzies at you, it's time to start issuing pink slips.

It is interesting that in a recent case an Uber driver was charged of rape and spent 4 months in prison after having fucked one woman he drove home:



http://chicago.suntimes.com/news-chicago...ber-driver

He was only released due to a recording he supposedly made of them talking AFTER their night together. The woman had a boyfriend, so it was likely a regret-slut-cover fake-rape.

The man was released instantly by the police. (Why he only issued the recording after 4 months in jail I don't know and the media strangely does not tell. He was an immigrant and maybe he feared deportation. It's also possible that he gave the cops the recording much sooner, but they only reacted after 4 months and the DA gave gave him cash or the promise not to deport him, in order for him to remain silent about the mishap. The other possibility is to get the recorded call from the NSA - hehe - but that is not happening, since they don't give shit about such things unless you are the German ambassador.)

But the thing is this: Most of those rape allegations from college girls are happening with plenty of evidence that the girls continued to contact the men - like Nungasser (Mattress girl) as well as Haven Monahan (heh) - they all continued to have contact with the "survivor". To the feminists and the college "courts" this is still not substantial evidence that rape may not have happened.

Fortunately so far to the police it is evidence enough that there was no real rape. But how long before they themselves tow the party line and still give the guy 10 years despite having recorded conversations AFTER THE RAPE?

Fuck them - in the West anyone should be a walking pornographer recording every bloody encounter. It would have saved Haven Monahan's life as well - heh.

I don't think Fouhounhedo even had sex with the girl in that story, Zelscorpion. I think he literally just drove her home and she made the accusation.

(04-10-2015 03:23 AM)iamdegaussed Wrote:  I don't think Fouhounhedo even had sex with the girl in that story, Zelscorpion. I think he literally just drove her home and she made the accusation.

No, from the story it seems that he and the woman spent the night together, then on the drive home she started talking about her "boyfriend" and he got rightfully worried.

Women sometimes cry rape to cover up one-night-stands and affairs. For instance, wasn't there an instance of a teenage girl who claimed a boy in her bed was a "rapist" when her dad walked in -- and the dad then shot him? I remember a story like this. Of course, she wasn't charged with a crime.

We need to start keeping a log of these stories "The False Rape Chronicles." If people saw a roll call of this bullshit, the tide would turn as to how they look upon these situations.

(04-10-2015 03:23 AM)iamdegaussed Wrote:  I don't think Fouhounhedo even had sex with the girl in that story, Zelscorpion. I think he literally just drove her home and she made the accusation.

You're not the only person who has called him "Zelscorpion".

I laugh whenever it happens, because "Zelscorpion" is a Frankenstein-like combination of esteemed RVF members Zelcorpion and scorpion - and that frightening creature would destroy even Little Dark.

Pussy Pass for Jackie

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/09...37282.html

UVA Fraternity Won't Pursue Honor Code Charges Against 'Jackie'

Quote:A University of Virginia fraternity will not pursue an honor code violation against a student who told Rolling Stone for a story that has since been retracted that several brothers gang-raped her during a party, a spokesman said.

Virginia has the oldest student-run honor code in the country, which prohibits lying , cheating and stealing. Those who are found guilty of violations by a panel of students are faced with a single penalty: expulsion

Women are held to a lower standard I'm shocked. I'm sure Teresa and Emily Renda will keep their jobs too.

(04-10-2015 01:01 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  Now even Jon Stewart is throwing Rolling Stone under the bus.

Quote:"You can't just deal with it by issuing a correction like the time you spelled [pop star] Ke$ha's name with an '&' instead of '$,' " Stewart said. "Someone's got to go."

I believe this is what they call the SJW red zone. If even your own tame comedians are throwing razzies at you, it's time to start issuing pink slips.

The truth is that all smart SJWs (including fanatics like Jessica Valenti) are happy to "throw Rolling Stone under the bus". That's the most correct party line for them: to blame Rolling Stone for "lapses" in their "reporting" and demand that there should be "accountability" for said lapses (and why? because their "negligence" "will hurt future victims"). That makes it seem as though the whole case is some sort of exception, as if what Rolling Stone did was go out and somehow find the one and only case in the midst of an epidemic of actual rapes that was a fabrication. In fact that is precisely what the SJW Jon Stewart said:

Quote:This isn’t a gaffe or a brain fart or an oopsy-daisy … Campus rape happens with shocking frequency … Victims need help and support yet somehow in a sea of verifiable assaults you’ve managed to ‘Where’s Waldo’ the only rape story that not only would fail to get your point across but set the cause back. Someone’s got to go.

See, that's the point -- there is a "sea of verifiable assaults" and they somehow, because of their "shoddy reporting" managed to find the only one that wasn't "verifiable", and therefore "set the cause back" (which is of course the only thing that matters to these people).

But it's all a lie. There is no "sea of verifiable assaults"; the Rolling Stone hoax is the rule, not the exception -- it's only the most visible example of what "reporting" on the supposed "epidemic" of sexual assaults on campus has been like everywhere; indeed, none of it can be properly characterized as "reporting" at all -- it's just propaganda designed to advance the "cause". And the cause is not one of protecting women from a non-existent "rape culture", but of whipping up an evil misandrist hysteria that allows for extraordinary measures, such as arbitrary kangaroo courts, that enable these SJW bureaucrats at US colleges -- and elsewhere-- to consolidate their power and gain control over people's lives without having to navigate the rigors and protections provided by the American legal system.

(04-10-2015 01:57 PM)Disco_Volante Wrote:  Pussy Pass for Jackie

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/09...37282.html

UVA Fraternity Won't Pursue Honor Code Charges Against 'Jackie'

Quote:A University of Virginia fraternity will not pursue an honor code violation against a student who told Rolling Stone for a story that has since been retracted that several brothers gang-raped her during a party, a spokesman said.

Virginia has the oldest student-run honor code in the country, which prohibits lying , cheating and stealing. Those who are found guilty of violations by a panel of students are faced with a single penalty: expulsion

Women are held to a lower standard I'm shocked. I'm sure Teresa and Emily Renda will keep their jobs too.

(04-10-2015 01:57 PM)Disco_Volante Wrote:  UVA Fraternity Won't Pursue Honor Code Charges Against 'Jackie'

I'm not surprised. There would be hell to pay from the people who run that university, starting from Teresa Sullivan and on down, if they pursued such charges which would be considered to have a "chilling effect" on the willingness of future "survivors" to come forward.

The guys who run these frats realize very clearly who's in charge, and act accordingly. Not to mention that many of them are white-knights and probably believe the "1 in 5" propaganda and all the rest.

Again, the "lapses" of Rolling Stone are a convenient scapegoat for everyone, as if the quality of their so-called "reporting" were the only or the main problem.

(04-10-2015 05:42 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  

(04-10-2015 01:57 PM)Disco_Volante Wrote:  UVA Fraternity Won't Pursue Honor Code Charges Against 'Jackie'

I'm not surprised. There would be hell to pay from the people who run that university, starting from Teresa Sullivan and on down, if they pursued such charges which would be considered to have a "chilling effect" on the willingness of future "survivors" to come forward.

The guys who run these frats realize very clearly who's in charge, and act accordingly. Not to mention that many of them are white-knights and probably believe the "1 in 5" propaganda and all the rest.

Again, the "lapses" of Rolling Stone are a convenient scapegoat for everyone, as if the quality of their so-called "reporting" were the only or the main problem.

"I'm not surprised. There would be hell to pay from the people who run that university, starting from Teresa Sullivan and on down..."

Not if the honor code charges are filed by a graduating senior. Graduation is the weekend of May 16-17 at UVA. Anyone who is ready to get their diploma can file the charge Friday, May 15 and be pretty secure he will still receive a diploma.

In fact, I would urge ALL graduating members of the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity do this this. Hell, I'd urge all men who are graduating UVA next month to do this. If hundreds of complaints were filed, what could the administration do? Take their own graduates to task? How would that make them look?

In case any of you are reading, here is the link to file such complaints. Just save it till May 15:
http://www.virginia.edu/honor/honor-comm...ch-1-2012/

Excellent post on COTWA (Community of the Wrongly Accused) making the exact same points I've been making above. The Rolling Stone hoax is not an exception -- it's business as usual.

http://www.cotwa.info/2015/04/weve-learn...l?spref=tw

Quote:Monday, April 6, 2015
The Rolling Stone rush to judgment wasn't "isolated and unusual," it was business as usual in our culture

The Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism issued a scathing report Sunday on the editorial breakdown at Rolling Stone magazine that allowed publication of a story about a purported gang rape of a woman named "Jackie" at the University of Virginia that never really happened. The magazine said it considers the whole affair "an isolated and unusual episode."

And once again, we've learned nothing from yet another in a long line of high profile rape accusations that imploded under the weight of its own prevarications. The fact that "Jackie's" outlandish rape tale was so readily believed by the article's author, by Rolling Stone's editors, and by vast segments of the American public wasn't "an isolated and unusual" phenomenon. It was business as usual in our culture. If you can stomach an example, read the chilling transcript of Bonny Ghosh's television news report about the Hofstra "rape" case shortly before it imploded. (It's little wonder that after Danmell Ndonye swore under oath that she lied about the rape, the falsely accused young men were booed on a national television program.)

The real lesson of the UVA "gang rape" that never really happened isn't about Sabrina Erdely, Rolling Stone or its lax editors. It isn't about reporters who take liberties with the facts, and it's not about "editorial breakdowns." And it isn't about "expert fabulist storytellers" who tell rape lies but who seem like credible people. Those are pieces in a much larger puzzle.

The real lesson of the "gang rape" at UVA that never really happened is about a culture happy to reduce an entire gender to vile caricature any time an allegation of a sex offense is made. The usual suspects who write for news outlets and popular websites do it routinely. It's about a culture that happily rushes to judgment and assumes that men and boys accused of sex offenses are guilty by reason of penis without considering even the possibility that it may not have happened the way the accuser said. It's about a culture where keeping an open mind about a rape allegation is branded "victim blaming" and "rape culture."

Read this and you'll understand where the Rolling Stone article came from--you can see example after example of the twisted mentality that led that article to be written and believed every day of the week in newspapers, magazines, and on popular websites.

The sneering mob at the hanging trees of the Old South never really left us. They became the sneering mob quick to believe Ruby Bates and Victoria Price, Tawana Brawley, Crystal Gail Mangum, Wanetta Gibson, Danmell Ndonye, and too many others to chronicle. Sometimes, as at Duke University, the sneering mob gussies itself up with PhDs and tenure and assumes guilt because the accused penises are attached to white, "privileged" lacrosse players. The sneering mob invariably rationalizes its rush to judgment by citing wildly inflated statistics and pointing to other, unrelated cases and insisting that since it happened there, it must have happened here, too.

It's too easy to cluck our tongues and tsk-tsk Sabrina Erdely and Rolling Stone and pretend what they did was "isolated and unusual." The real lesson of the Rolling Stone debacle is that it's neither. It's business as usual.

On a similar tangent Jon Hamm of Mad Men is accused of violent hazing 24 years ago at his alma matter frat. Now they are going after old frats. http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/jon-hamm-acc...-1.3028117

Of all the hundreds or thousands of books I have read in my life, very few affected me the way, "The Gulag Archipelago" by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn has. In the section about the great purges and show trials, Solzhenitsyn mentions that after the Bolsheviks took power, they dispensed with the notions of "guilt" or "innocence" and even "truth" as bourgeois concepts in favor of using political objectives as the primary consideration in their determination of how someone should be treated.

The crazy thing is - this absurd idea was not shared by the majority of the Russian people - it was imposed from above by the tiny class of professional revolutionaries that took over - the Bolsheviks. What astounds me is that this exact same notion is being willingly accepted by our greater institutions of learning, not from above, but from below - by the masses of students. They are willingly calling for this nonsense in the form of 'arbitration' hearings and Title IX enforcement.

Truly fucking frightening.

In another section, Solzhenitsyn talks about how the Russians could have stopped all the mass arrests, the ridiculous show trials, the random executions, the implacable vengeance of the Bolsheviks - by just fighting back. The people outnumbered the CCCP and the NKVD by a measure of hundreds of thousands to one, but they didn't - they accepted it. Out of meekness? Out of inherent trust of authority? Probably a mixture of a lot of things. But the point is they could have stopped it by simply standing up and asserting themselves; something they never did. The people willingly marched off to the Gulags and to their mass graves and in a lot of cases even assisted the authorities.

Let's not make that same mistake. Fight these totalitarian monsters in any way you can.

I know I'm preaching to the choir but I'm currently reading "The Gulag Archipelago" again and some of the parallels that I see with this current hysteria are quite prescient indeed.

Farmageddon, the analogies are certainly there, and there is no question that these people are driven by Year Zero ideologies that are every bit as vicious and demented as those of the Bolsheviks. And it is true that they should be resisted at every step.

But there is a crucial difference which must be noted to keep things grounded in reality. Unlike the Bolsheviks, western progressives and Year Zero ideologues are pretty strongly committed (for reasons related to the nature of their particular ideologies) to non-violence and to achieving their ends through legal political means. This is especially true for the manginas and white-knights at the heart of the movement -- the females would use any and all means necessary in a heartbeat, but unfortunately they need the smart white-knights and manginas or nothing at all would work. And these are intelligent dudes who take their commitments seriously. I don't see any of that changing anytime soon.

Of course they are having a lot of success getting their ends achieved through legal political means, but it's a slow and uncertain process with reversals, and with vested interests that can sometimes overrule the ideology, especially when real money is at stake. It is no surprise that they've had the most success by far imposing their will on college campuses, places wholly run by true believer Year Zero academic elites, and spurred on by fanatical female ideologues at the Department of Education using Title IX as their cudgel. This is terrible -- one of the very worst things about the country right now -- but it is also true that it will not be easy to replicate this kind of dominance in other contexts. For example it is very unlikely they will be able to get much of the lunatic environmentalist agenda seriously underway, because there is real money involved, and it can fight back. To get that far, you need to be able to impose your will through the threat and the reality of real bloodshed and real violence, and they just don't have those kind of Stalinist chops and will not get them in the foreseeable future.

So while things are bad and likely to get worse, it is also important to keep a sense of proportion. We are very far away from the Gulag Archipelago, and there is really no plausible path that takes us close to it. There are great evils afoot, for sure -- but they are still different in kind from a true totalitarian society. It is important to recognize the differences even as we fully understand the similarities.

(04-10-2015 05:25 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  But it's all a lie. There is no "sea of verifiable assaults"; the Rolling Stone hoax is the rule, not the exception

Great post, LoZ.

repped. +1

I didn't mean to imply that we are even anywhere in the same league, ballpark, or sport as what happened in the Leninist/Stalinst USSR, I just meant to point out the similarities in the ideologies and thought processes; which you did a fine job of clarifying for the board.

(04-15-2015 10:04 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  western progressives and Year Zero ideologues are pretty strongly committed (for reasons related to the nature of their particular ideologies) to non-violence and to achieving their ends through legal political means.

Respect the hell out of you, Lizard, but I'll disagree here.

My observation would see that as the previous generation of progressives.

The rhetoric of post social-media progressives (2005 onwards - the SJW kids) is overwhelmingly-violent in nature, and lacking any detectable empathy to whomever they'd decided was to be Unpersoned, and, as such, the ends justify the means, including fighting to change the legal process and free speech amendments. This is the discussion I'm seeing again and again over the last two years: free Speech hurts feelings and should be outlawed.

If you challenge a SJW, they will wish death on you - literal, serious, actual, legitimate death - for simply disagreeing with their beliefs. When they say "kill yourself", they mean "I would feel genuine satisfaction and no remorse if you were dead."

Margaret Pless and Zoe Quinn tried to have Mike Cernovich swatted. They downplay it as a prank, but felt no empathic concern that someone might have been hurt / killed in the name of their feelings, which matches the pattern of behaviour Quinn's ex-boyfriend attributed to her.

These degenerate kids - always talking of killing and castrating and exterminating their enemies, thoughts that never cross my mind - are violent fascists. I spoke about theorising on the Degenerate Triad in the past: their minds are more easily primed for fascism, as they have a particular aversion to the natural order. The extreme class stratification that encourages the current Cult of Sensibility I've also spoken of encourages emotionalism over reason, which is part of the triad. Hitler knew how to engage the emotions of his listeners.

This is only the first wave. We will see the damage of the second wave. Kids who were only 13 when they got onto Tumblr as the Unpersoning Social Justice Trend increased, who are now learning that you can't be sexist against men, or racist against white people, and every day read nothing but hate and blame, hate and blame, never once realising how nasty and toxic human beings they are when everyone is constantly praising them for their Goodperson, morally-superior status.

Give them 5 years of that, then 4 years of University, and they're going to come out the other end as unempathic, violent fascists.

If the Boomers and Gen X Progressives don't get these narcissistic brats under control - and there is an increasing sense of horror from the moderate left over what they have raised but the usual ineffective prissiness over trying to establish boundaries over anyone - then I predict rhetorical violent fantasy will become deliberately-enacted violence against Unpersons from about 2020 onwards. These children will simply have never known normality, and won't believe what they're doing to an Unperson is a criminal act. It's not like they're human.

70's / 90's diversity:



2010's diversity:

AB, they absolutely wish death on you and don't see you as human if you're on the other side. The question is what are they willing to do about it.

Certainly, they may attempt to suppress free speech and the like, although that is a pretty tall task in the US because of the Constitution and the way it's interpreted by the Supreme Court (which has been aggressively pro First Amendment for quite a while). But that still falls within the framework of "legal political means". To really get things done in a big way, they would need to dispense with such niceties altogether.

It is also worth noting that the very young are usually more ready to fantasize about violence than other generations -- this was also true about the would-be hippie revolutionaries of the '60s and '70s, many of whom were not at all content to just be flower children. But the very young don't wield all that much power, and they change when they get older. When you see the generations currently in their prime truly willing to contemplate wholesale violence, that is when things get really hairy. We have to watch out for that, obviously, but I don't think we're there yet or particularly close.

These SJW "swatters", as vicious as they are, are also keyboard warriors. You can only get so much done via Twitter and even via making false complaints to the LAPD. It takes some real hot action -- and a lot of it -- to really get things done on a grand scale, and I don't see them having those kinds of chops. You will note that even "swatting" amounts to trying to get the law enforcement authorities to do their dirty work for them, rather than doing it themselves. They are privileged brats who have never encountered a whiff of real violence in their lives.

The classic quote from George Orwell comes to mind:

"So much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot."

I think that applies to these people to a large extent.

(04-15-2015 10:57 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  Give them 5 years of that, then 4 years of University, and they're going to come out the other end as unempathic, violent fascists.

If the Boomers and Gen X Progressives don't get these narcissistic brats under control - and there is an increasing sense of horror from the moderate left over what they have raised but the usual ineffective prissiness over trying to establish boundaries over anyone - then I predict rhetorical violent fantasy will become deliberately-enacted violence against Unpersons from about 2020 onwards. These children will simply have never known normality, and won't believe what they're doing to an Unperson is a criminal act. It's not like they're human.

I agree - those new generations are utterly fascist - they even adore and submit completely to the corporate world in most countries. In South America the same ones espouse communist ideals and claim that they will do it differently this time around.

The current SJW youth are absolute fanatics. And they don't even need to be the ones willing to do the dirty deed. It is enough if they are the brain-washed denouncers, spies and willing mobs of the coming dictatorship. They more and more remind me of the Children of the Corn:



with the only difference that the government will of course do the violent bidding for them.

The new generation are perfect slaves - they will feel outrage when the media tells them to feel outrage and they will be furious when the media tells them do so. They exist on vapid emotions long away from reason. Hitler & Stalin would have loved youth like that.

I had an interesting discussion on Skype last night with some prominent people in GamerGate. Even regarding Millennials, we generally agreed that the 80's born Millennials who could remember most of the 90's were far less bad. A lot of us, including myself, fall into that cohort. I imagine a good amount of the guys on this forum do too. There might be some overly inflated self-esteem of course, but there is a contrast between us and the 90's born Millennials that are coming of age now that are the toxic narcissists that AB described above.

Ultimately I think the older Millennials will have to be part of smacking some sense into their younger brothers and sisters.

(04-10-2015 04:37 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(04-10-2015 03:23 AM)iamdegaussed Wrote:  I don't think Fouhounhedo even had sex with the girl in that story, Zelscorpion. I think he literally just drove her home and she made the accusation.

No, from the story it seems that he and the woman spent the night together, then on the drive home she started talking about her "boyfriend" and he got rightfully worried.

Women sometimes cry rape to cover up one-night-stands and affairs. For instance, wasn't there an instance of a teenage girl who claimed a boy in her bed was a "rapist" when her dad walked in -- and the dad then shot him? I remember a story like this. Of course, she wasn't charged with a crime.

We need to start keeping a log of these stories "The False Rape Chronicles." If people saw a roll call of this bullshit, the tide would turn as to how they look upon these situations.

Guys need to start practicing casually turning on the record button on your phones.

(04-16-2015 07:25 AM)samsamsam Wrote:  Guys need to start practicing casually turning on the record button on your phones.

As I saw another article by the Washington Examiner that said that colleges are starting to brand all men as rapist, I realized that maybe all of this is intended to achieve a different goal than just simple misandry, mayhem and destruction.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/califo...le/2563092

Quote:Last year California passed a law that defined nearly all sex on college campuses as rape unless proven otherwise. Now, in addition to making it easier to label someone a rapist for just about every sexual encounter, state legislators want to go further to ensure that accused students' lives are severely disrupted — if not ruined — by introducing mandatory minimums for their punishment.

The mandatory minimum would be a suspension of two years for students found responsible for sexual assault. But bear in mind that the burden of proof already lies with the accused, thanks to California's "yes means yes" law. Accusers do not have to provide any proof that that they failed to give consent or were unable to consent due to incapacitation, and now a guilty finding would carry a minimum punishment under this new proposal.

First they made it easier to brand a student a rapist, and now they want to make it easier to ruin that student's life.

Essentially an accusation by Mattress girl would have now resulted very quickly to 2 years suspension minimum by Nungasser. In Jackie's case - who knows maybe suspension of the entire fraternity?

Today I was indeed wondering that maybe they are after something else - together with the increased reports of police body cameras, maybe they want total 1984 surveillance at all colleges.

Think about it - you effectively expect all men to record all sexual encounters - heck all dates and interactions with women on campus. Often girls accused men of rape after being together for months and years.

(By the way - men are suing California colleges now - here a list of those together sometimes with screenshots of text messages AFTER THE SUPPOSED RAPE : http://www.avoiceformalestudents.com/lis...l-assault/)

In any case - what if what they really want is total surveillance and bugging of all rooms and public places at US colleges? Then everyone can feel safe finally in a dystopian world. It also adds something else to the mix. When the youth gets used to it, then they won't mind installing cameras at home - it won't be just the new TV-sets watching you, it will be made via direct links to Big Brother.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/c...-home.html

Wouldn't that make all those cupcakes feel safe?


Look at Winston all safe and sound at his place only having to hide his illegal book there.

And why not go a few steps further and give each male student a mandatory drug that lets them feel less "aggressive", masculine, less horny and more "at peace" with his female nature? Why stop with Ritalin in childhood? Give every "walking dildo" Ritalin 3.0 - yeah sometimes men will just sit on a stool staring at a wall in deep contemplation as spit dribbles down his face, but hey at least women will feel safe then.



And why not go a step further and chip each and everyone with a GPS chip that monitors your vital data and records/transmits sounds and words spoken - whether you have heard all the nice YesYesYesYes confirmations at each and every fucking step of the way of sex. All the technology czars make it soooo much fun to be chipped and constantly under surveillance - thus it must be great I guess.

(04-15-2015 11:10 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  They are privileged brats who have never encountered a whiff of real violence in their lives.

The classic quote from George Orwell comes to mind:

"So much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot."

I think that applies to these people to a large extent.

Point taken. I just see a pattern of them overestimating their power and influence in society, which I suspect will eventually lead to them going too far in small group situations.

And down the spiral we go Zelco, it's happening.

Not sure if someone called it already or.. well,just in case... just have a look guys:

Fraternity to sue Rolling Stone over discredited rape article

Oh oh. Can this be the beginning of repercussions for ruining someone's life or organization based on feels?

This outta be good