(06-14-2017 05:36 PM)Transsimian Wrote: (06-14-2017 02:47 PM)rotekz Wrote: (06-11-2017 06:50 PM)Latinopan Wrote: GOT costs around 10 millions per episode, most of the cost is cast salaries, CGI and the different location the have to shoot, they have to limits the CGI a lot, the dragons are expensive to make which is why they limit their scenes a lot.
A series about Witcher will cost a lot with the CGI it demands.
Netflix will not spend the required cash for high quality magic and monsters in every episode. The other big way they will fuck up is casting. GOT has god-tier casting. The Witcher Series is massively dependent on the same quality but will not get it.
It depends how pretty they want it to look.
Doctor Who has a relatively low budget but lots of monsters.
Besides, they did a Polish low budget Witcher series before, (called the Hexer) and it seemed to work well.
They called it the Hexer because that's the more theoretically accurate translation of
Wiedzmin, the original name of the Witcher in Polish. And that low budget Witcher series has taken a lot of flak over time, partly because of shit acting, partly because of, well, low budget.
Doctor Who does have a pretty fucking low budget, but that's arguably part of its charm. (The Doctor Who movie with McGann as the Eighth Doctor had a massive and absolutely gorgeous TARDIS set, but it was just too corporate and US-ified.) It's basically a planet-of-the-week costume drama with mostly practical effects like the original run of
Star Trek was, and it shows ... but you buy it because typically they pick a Doctor who wet girls' panties (See: Nine, Ten, and Eleven) or one who rules over the show by sheer force of personality (see: the current iteration and the Fourth Doctor).
Witcher is going to be a different beast again. I agree with Latinopan, GOT has incredibly good casting (the first season had fucking Sean Bean for Christ's sake; Charles Dance and Diana Rigg wouldn't have come cheap either) and it doesn't have the persistent, common magic that the Witcher setting has, which means GOT's special effects bill is going to be less than that of a Witcher series. If you think back, there hasn't been
any blasty magic thrown around throughout GOT, not one obvious Gandalf/Merlin type shitting fireballs out his arse. Compare that to the Witcher where Geralt himself can perform low level magic and where there's at least four or five women (of whom roughly 50% or more he has personally fucked) who are demigods of magical power. To say nothing of the Wild Hunt.
My main hope for Netflix!Witcher is that they don't just try to clone GOT's approach, that they instead understand what I think is the Witcher's real genre: horror. Some of the most effective storylines in Witcher 3 are where you deal with Lovecraftian horrors like the Ladies of the Wood, which in turn are drawn from Slavic/Polish Baba Yaga myths. There's no real ultimate win against such forces, only pyrrhic ones: consider how the Family Matters quest ultimately turns out - someone winds up dying no matter what you do, and in one of these cases, an entire village gets consumed. The Witcher is more horror than fantasy: hell, insofar as there's a Chosen One in the series, it's Ciri, not you - Geralt at best is a supporting character in Ciri's story if you interpret the Witcher as high fantasy. The game, at least, works best when you're on Witcher contracts, especially the individual nightwraiths like Jenny o' the Woods and similar - where you get a good dose of tragedy and sadness in the mix.