Post: #1

Is there ever a case to pity spinsters given that many of them were deceived by the Borg Feminist Collective's propaganda since school, Sex in the City in their early 20s and the unsustainable sense of entitlement that contaminated them when they began to search for a white knight once they tired of frogs?

Post: #2

If their sad, nice, and accepting of their condition sure pity away.

If they think they, "still have it" throw reality in their face.

Post: #3

(06-11-2014 04:51 AM)N°6 Wrote:  Is there ever a case to pity spinsters given that many of them were deceived by the Borg Feminist Collective's propaganda since school, Sex in the City in their early 20s and the unsustainable sense of entitlement that contaminated them when they began to search for a white knight once they tired of frogs?

Simply because they were deceived does not mean that at any point in their lives (I mean in their prime of course, not at 35) they should not have been self-aware enough to realize they were unhappy or were missing out on opportunities with the opposite sex.

Yes, it must be awful to be alone at that age and to suddenly realize that you are a "leftover woman", but hey, you have a career, a carousel and some cats right?

Post: #4

If they were deceived and were not bright enough or not strong enough to recognize the disaster they were headed into, then no. Better they didn't reproduce and pass along the genes or the thinking.

Post: #5

Society is full of self-deception, delusion, cognitive dissonance, and outright hypocrisy. It's not just the aging spinsters; the blue pill men are just as bad as the blue pill women. At some point the propaganda starts becoming self-sustaining and the crabs pull each other down into the bucket.

Do I feel pity? No. The information is out there for those who wish to find it. Nor do I feel animosity. People simply are a product of their times. I can't bring myself to feel any strong emotions toward them as individuals, even as I feel disgusted at the larger movements and trends that brought our society to this point. It's hard to get mad at a single raindrop when you know there's a storm pouring them down overhead.

The lack of self-awareness and introspection is more than a little disturbing on a macro level. It makes me think that Western society has taken a giant step backwards in terms of the evolution of human realization. A peasant 100 or 200 years ago would likely be more emotionally honest with himself or herself than the average person today. If you read any literature written in the last 200 years it's clear that people had a deeper and more nuanced understanding of human nature and human relationships. People are less fully realized these days than they were in the past. I'm not sure if the rate of mental illness is a symptom or a cause but my bet is on the former. Just as the bonds of community have been weakened or destroyed, the bond of the individual with himself has suffered. After all, how can you say you are an individual if you lack knowledge of your own self?

No sense of community. No sense of true self. If you peel back the mask of narcissism underneath you find... nothing at all. The mask is our only identity.

Post: #6

(06-11-2014 04:51 AM)N°6 Wrote:  Is there ever a case to pity spinsters given that many of them were deceived by the Borg Feminist Collective's propaganda since school, Sex in the City in their early 20s and the unsustainable sense of entitlement that contaminated them when they began to search for a white knight once they tired of frogs?

Fucking 'Sex and the City' was more devastating to Western Society than the atom bombs were to Japan.

Post: #7

(06-11-2014 11:48 AM)YossariansRight Wrote:  Fucking 'Sex and the City' was more devastating to Western Society than the atom bombs were to Japan.

At first I was thinking "that's just absurd" but the more thought I give it, it could be argued.

Post: #8

(06-11-2014 12:33 PM)Skye Wrote:  

(06-11-2014 11:48 AM)YossariansRight Wrote:  Fucking 'Sex and the City' was more devastating to Western Society than the atom bombs were to Japan.

At first I was thinking "that's just absurd" but the more thought I give it, it could be argued.

I've seen very clear, further decline in the Western women (and their attitudes) since that swill of a show (and subsequent movies) came out.

I've thought that long before I came across this website (or ROK or RooshV).

It make shit shittier.

Post: #9

(06-11-2014 01:14 PM)YossariansRight Wrote:  

(06-11-2014 12:33 PM)Skye Wrote:  

(06-11-2014 11:48 AM)YossariansRight Wrote:  Fucking 'Sex and the City' was more devastating to Western Society than the atom bombs were to Japan.

At first I was thinking "that's just absurd" but the more thought I give it, it could be argued.

I've seen very clear, further decline in the Western women (and their attitudes) since that swill of a show (and subsequent movies) came out.

I've thought that long before I came across this website (or ROK or RooshV).

It make shit shittier.

It's funny, long before I was red pill I had a visceral knee-jerk dislike for Sex and the City, even though I couldn't explain why. It was more than just SJP's horse face, something about the behavior of the women on that show seemed off, and I couldn't understand why the women that I knew enjoyed it and saw it as a lifestyle to emulate.

Post: #10

(06-11-2014 02:06 PM)dog Wrote:  

(06-11-2014 01:14 PM)YossariansRight Wrote:  

(06-11-2014 12:33 PM)Skye Wrote:  

(06-11-2014 11:48 AM)YossariansRight Wrote:  Fucking 'Sex and the City' was more devastating to Western Society than the atom bombs were to Japan.

At first I was thinking "that's just absurd" but the more thought I give it, it could be argued.

I've seen very clear, further decline in the Western women (and their attitudes) since that swill of a show (and subsequent movies) came out.

I've thought that long before I came across this website (or ROK or RooshV).

It make shit shittier.

It's funny, long before I was red pill I had a visceral knee-jerk dislike for Sex and the City, even though I couldn't explain why. It was more than just SJP's horse face, something about the behavior of the women on that show seemed off, and I couldn't understand why the women that I knew enjoyed it and saw it as a lifestyle to emulate.

Viewers saw AT BEST, one "good looking" slut (Kristin Davis); the other three - the dyke, the grandmother and horseface let their real-life counterparts think they could replicate their "successes".

I bet the least liked of the sluts is/was Kristin Davis, because she could actually make a man achieve a hard on without the use of pharmaceuticals.

Interesting that the show's creator, Darren Starr, is a poof. So, you have a fag scripting how women should treat (straight beta) men. That's realism for you...

Post: #11

Interesting conclusion to all of this. In Jan. 2013, the CW network debuted "The Carrie Diaries," a prequel to "Sex and the City," which showed the protagonist as a teenager in the '80s.

It was an attempt to market this show, and lifestyle, to a post-millennial generation.

Despite mega-hype -- like this breathless article on Teen Vogue -- the show was canceled last month, May 2014. It only ran a season and a half on the CW, a network that will keep a teen show on the air long past the point where the kids are in high school.

Today's teens said "no thank you" to more of this. What does this say? Do teenage girls see the morals of their aunts (or moms?) as something passe or irresponsible? Like the way conservative '80s teens saw their parents' freewheeling '60s lifestyles? Or was the show just lousy?

The Eldersluts of the Blue Pill media didn't examine the sociological implications of this. They only droned on about what would have become of the now-boring characters in their goodbye pieces.

Post: #12

(06-11-2014 02:32 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Interesting conclusion to all of this. In Jan. 2013, the CW network debuted "The Carrie Diaries," a prequel to "Sex and the City," which showed the protagonist as a teenager in the '80s.

It was an attempt to market this show, and lifestyle, to a post-millennial generation.

Despite mega-hype -- like this breathless article on Teen Vogue -- the show was canceled last month, May 2014. It only ran a season and a half on the CW, a network that will keep a teen show on the air long past the point where the kids are in high school.

Today's teens said "no thank you" to more of this. What does this say? Do teenage girls see the morals of their aunts (or moms?) as something passe or irresponsible? Like the way conservative '80s teens saw their parents' freewheeling '60s lifestyles? Or was the show just lousy?

The Eldersluts of the Blue Pill media didn't examine the sociological implications of this. They only droned on about what would have become of the now-boring characters in their goodbye pieces.

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Bravo! Well done!

Post: #13

(06-11-2014 11:44 AM)dog Wrote:  Society is full of self-deception, delusion, cognitive dissonance, and outright hypocrisy. It's not just the aging spinsters; the blue pill men are just as bad as the blue pill women. At some point the propaganda starts becoming self-sustaining and the crabs pull each other down into the bucket.

Do I feel pity? No. The information is out there for those who wish to find it. Nor do I feel animosity. People simply are a product of their times. I can't bring myself to feel any strong emotions toward them as individuals, even as I feel disgusted at the larger movements and trends that brought our society to this point. It's hard to get mad at a single raindrop when you know there's a storm pouring them down overhead.

The lack of self-awareness and introspection is more than a little disturbing on a macro level. It makes me think that Western society has taken a giant step backwards in terms of the evolution of human realization. A peasant 100 or 200 years ago would likely be more emotionally honest with himself or herself than the average person today. If you read any literature written in the last 200 years it's clear that people had a deeper and more nuanced understanding of human nature and human relationships. People are less fully realized these days than they were in the past. I'm not sure if the rate of mental illness is a symptom or a cause but my bet is on the former. Just as the bonds of community have been weakened or destroyed, the bond of the individual with himself has suffered. After all, how can you say you are an individual if you lack knowledge of your own self?

No sense of community. No sense of true self. If you peel back the mask of narcissism underneath you find... nothing at all. The mask is our only identity.

Post: #14

(06-11-2014 11:48 AM)YossariansRight Wrote:  Fucking 'Sex and the City' was more devastating to Western Society than the atom bombs were to Japan.

Apparently it was based on the NYC gay scene. So the female characters would have been acting as homosexual men.

Post: #15

(06-11-2014 12:33 PM)Skye Wrote:  At first I was thinking "that's just absurd" but the more thought I give it, it could be argued.

Yes, Sex in the City was weaponised entertainment.


How Soap Operas Changed the World

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ahaXpWlkL4

Soap operas are where women receive updated public information and politically correct downloads from.

Hence the initial question about pitying the beguiled spinster: are her thoughts even her own?

Post: #16

(06-12-2014 04:00 AM)N°6 Wrote:  

(06-11-2014 11:48 AM)YossariansRight Wrote:  Fucking 'Sex and the City' was more devastating to Western Society than the atom bombs were to Japan.

Apparently it was based on the NYC gay scene. So the female characters would have been acting as homosexual men.

And there it is.

Post: #17

Really, interacting with these types recently, just made my soul crash. These weren't even spinsters, but women and men in their mid 20s, living up the "dream". The impression I got, was that these people were incredibly unsatisfied and lonely. Despite them swapping these degenerate stories of how they have all this wild sex. They just all seem empty inside. Not failing to mention the androgynous nature of the interactions.