Post: #51

Internal memo:


Interesting question is...who is taking over O'Reilly's primetime spot? Tucker Carlson? Hannity?

Post: #52

I haven't seen this, but here is something that I found particularly interesting on Yahoo while at work.

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/bill-...rc=fauxdal

Quote:The cable host’s ouster comes after a grassroots Twitter group called Sleeping Giants urged companies to pull their ads from the show. According to Sleeping Giants and Media Matters, 83 companies have pulled their ads from “The O’Reilly Factor” and just 49 are still pushing their ads on the show.

Sleeping Giants doesn’t have a website and operates solely on Twitter and Facebook, where it rallies people to tweet at and message individual brands that have advertised on questionable websites. The group, whose founders are anonymous, consists mostly of people in the marketing industry.

“We decided to get involved because there’s no larger, all-encompassing example of bigotry than sexual harassment at the workplace,” a Sleeping Giants co-founder told Yahoo Finance. “[Bill O’Reilly] has definitely proven to be bigoted in the past so it made sense for us to jump in.”

I looked at the linked Twitter account posted in my link above, and they are seem like the real deal as far as a boycotting body. Apparently, they are behind a similar boycott of Breitbart as well. I am not sold that O'Reilly is completely clean, however given the timing of the things, I tend to think that this has been orchestrated. To what end I have no idea.

Post: #53

How foolish do these people have to be?

Breitbart or some other conservative outlet can offer him a contract. Sure it will be less than what Fox paid, but his viewership will leave the channel with them.

It's like businesses have stopped caring about money and care more about bad press. Who gives a crap about bad press if it brings eyeballs to your advertisers?

Or is it more likely that the advertisers are too pussified to let themselves be seen next to things that might hurt feelings?

I sense there's a growing market for brands that make fun of wimps and snowflakes.

Post: #54

Not sure if this is true, but this is speculation I read earlier:

Fox is trying to buy some Sky network in Europe, and there's some approval process that determines if they're "the right sort of people" before they can complete the deal. So perhaps ditching O'Reilly over this convenient excuse is part of trying to secure that deal.

I doubt it's down to a single reason, it's probably a bunch of factors.

This obsession companies have with appeasing the vocal SJWs and trying to stop their ads from showing up on totally benign "hate speech" videos and sites is way out of control, though.

Post: #55

There's discussion that Roger Ailes is starting a new network and he'll bring on O'Reilly.

If he can bring over Hannity as well, Fox is done.

The Murdoch kids have fucked up dad's empire after less than a year of being in charge.

Post: #56

Have you seen the "poor, vulnerable harassed woman" that destroyed O'Reilly's prestigious career? An obese mama! Lol, who would sexually harass that, she must be kiddin!

https://variety.com/2017/biz/news/bill-o...202391224/

2-chinned whale claiming sexual harassment! And of course, added bonus, rayssism! So, O'Reilly is both Hitler-literally and Pepe-le-Pew literally...!?

Post: #57

Bill O'Reilly, world famous millionaire celebrity, goes out of his way at work to grunt at a landwhale black chick who can't even pull off the S in SIF in her Linkedin picture.

Sounds legit.

Post: #58

(04-20-2017 03:33 PM)weambulance Wrote:  Bill O'Reilly, world famous millionaire celebrity, goes out of his way at work to grunt at a landwhale black chick who can't even pull off the S in SIF in her Linkedin picture.

Sounds legit.

I was on the fence before, but now I really have a hard time believing he did anything wrong at all.

Bill got jungle fever? LMAO! For someone who has been called racist against blacks for decades, that is rich. She claims he called her hot chocolate? Grunting when he passed her? These claims are so wild, I have a hard time believing that. Her claims actually go back to incidents that occurred 9 years ago? Now she wants money? Sounds like Grade A Bullshit to me.

Well, wherever he goes next, he better request men as much as possible for his staff. Most companies refuse to even fight claims like this because doing so even costs alot of money. No man gets the benefit of the doubt in a female dominated dept. like HR. I don't speak to females on the job unless I have absolutely no choice and I always try to make sure it is on email or something record-able. No reason to get fired over dumb shit that is super preventable.

Post: #59

I may be in the minority here, but I don't doubt for a second that Bill tried to trade his celebrity and influence within the network to bag some poon. Unfortunately, he is in short supply of charisma or charm, and he became a petulant child when the women rebuffed him. He's like Anthony Weiner; another thirsty dude lacking in self-esteem and social intelligence, and horny as hell.

Having said that, the professional victims are acting like it was like the Holocaust - only worse, and the "grunting" thing is made up baloney. He called some fat black chick "hot chocolate". So fucking what.

Post: #60

I have watched O'Reilly for years. I absolutely believe he chased tail at work. But I don't believe it was dangerous or malicious. I think he should have been more careful and I think that once he and Fox started paying the girls, they opened the floodgates for additional "accusations". Just like with Roger Ailes, and Bill Cosby, once these washed up gals realize they can get 5 seconds of fame, fawning attention and maybe some money, they all pile on the outrage train.

Post: #61

Any accusations that can't be proven beyond a reasonable doubt are absolute bullshit to me. End of Story.

I'm sick and tired of this shit. Especially when it involves people like Cosby and O Reilly.

With all this he said she said bullshit passing through as enough evidence for someone to lose their job, is absoutely insane.

I guarantee you bitches around the country are blackmailing public figures to be blue pilled cucks over the threat of divorce/rape accusations.

And then the narrative continues, and men are left to live shitty lives and unable to live the American Dream.

Fuck Fox News.

Post: #62

I'd find this a lot more believable--but would not just believe without some proof--if the women were actually attractive. But as usual in a case like this, it's some 300 pounder who almost certainly dreamed the whole thing up.

Women are capable of amazing self delusion. Knew this girl once who grew up in an isolated town of like 300 people. No road system. She asked me to be lab partners in a class in college, and she was cute, so I agreed. At one point I needed to talk to her about our lab but didn't have good contact info, so I looked her up on facebook. We got along pretty well, but we never hooked up, because at the time I was not taking good advantage of the opportunities placed in front of me out of an outdated sense that it would be immoral. Long story how that came about.

Anyway, next semester, she's gone. Wouldn't talk to me anymore. I'd wanted to be lab partners again if we were in the same class because we worked well together, so I investigated a little, wondering if she'd died or something. I found her blog link on her regular facebook page, and she had apparently decided I was stalking her and transferred to another school over winter break.

What?

Like 80% of the time we spent talking on facebook was about the class. I never even asked the girl out. In fact, I was involved with someone else entirely. She'd somehow woven this elaborate fiction that placed enormous weight on every little thing I did, and decided because I went to the trouble of looking her up on facebook and flirted a little, I was some kind of dangerous stalker.

And that's when I learned girls from remote villages off the road system are fucking nuts. My subsequent adventures with bush village girls only reinforced that truth.

So any time there's one of these he-said, she-said bullshit stories, and especially if the women is deeply unattractive such that no red blooded male would give her a second glance on the street, I think it's probably all in the woman's head. Until I see hard proof, I'm going to assume the same is true here.

Post: #63

Want to See Where Fox News Is Likely Headed? Look No Further Than Kathryn Murdoch’s Twitter Account

Quote:
UPDATE: The Financial Times confirmed in January this is the real Twitter account of Kathryn Murdoch…
In September Kathryn tweeted: “A vote for Trump is a vote for climate catastrophe”, while on the night of the president’s stunning election victory she wrote: “I can’t believe this is happening. I am so ashamed.”

As I mentioned yesterday, and as you have no doubt already heard (unless you’re living under a rock), longtime cable news kingpin Bill O’Reilly was unceremoniously dumped from his primetime perch at Fox News Channel (FNC). I will say this upfront: I don’t really like Fox News all that much, besides Tucker Carlson’s show. However, they are useful as a counterweight against the extremely “progressive” mainstream media news organizations that comprise pretty much all of the TV landscape besides Fox. But they’ve sold plenty of bad goods over the years, like the Iraq War and various other Establishment GOP boondoggles. Let’s not let them off the hook for those disasters.

Still, reports in the wake of O’Reilly’s ouster are pretty worrying if you value the balance FNC helps provide. Apparently, the wives of the ascendant sons of Rupert Murdoch, James and Lachlan, have been making moves behind the scenes. First, they succeeded in their efforts to get the guy who helmed Fox News since its inception, Roger Ailes, shitcanned last summer. Now, they’ve gotten an arguably even bigger scalp…

Two powerful women quietly helped behind the scenes to bring Bill O’Reilly down.

Sarah and Kathryn Murdoch — the wives of the ousted talk show host’s young bosses — are at least partially responsible for his humiliating exit from Fox News Wednesday…

Behind the scenes, Sarah and James Murdoch’s wife, Kathryn, also pushed to sever the network’s ties to the prickly host, several sources said.

While Fox News politically leans to the right, the wives of its top executives lean to the left.

Kathryn and James Murdoch are the co-founders of the charity Quadrivium, which funds progressive causes like environmental protection, science, childhood health and equal opportunity in the workplace — issues not exactly aligned with many of Fox News’ biggest contributors.

Someone linked me to the Twitter account of Kathryn Murdoch earlier this morning, and at first, I thought this had to be a fake. How does it only have 227 followers, I asked myself. Then I went and looked at who those followers were. Two people who have written extensively about the Murdoch clan follow the account, as do bigwigs from the New York Post (a Murdoch property) and the Wall Street Journal (another Murdoch property).

I think it’s very safe to say this is her real account.

The most troublesome thing I see here is the globalist worldview that is represented in tweet after tweet. Such as her antipathy for so-called “fake news.” She means sites like mine, ones that deviate from the elitist narrative that is preferred by the jet-setting rich who have no real home country. They consider themselves citizens of the world.

She also prefers Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump to Steve Bannon, which is no surprise. It is kind of surprising that she tweets about that preference in such a flamboyant manner.

She also campaigned boisterously for Hillary Clinton and seems to just hate Donald Trump all the way around.

Oh, I bet you were very happy to see that on Fox, Kathryn. I think we can all see where Fox is headed if you and crew get their way.

This is from the night of the election, once it became clear Donald Trump was going to end up being President Trump.

Here she is the day after, whining about how the elites had been (rightfully) demonized.

The list goes on and on. She’s even taken to propping up the insane rantings of Louise Mensch.



Under normal circumstances, it might not be worth worrying about what Mrs. James Murdoch is tweeting out. But report after report emphasizes the outsize influence she has on Fox News and the Murdoch media empire as a whole.

And while Rupert had always considered [Roger] Ailes one of his closest allies, his sons had a more difficult relationship with him. James’s wife, Kathryn Murdoch, in particular had always disliked Ailes, according to the magazine.

And Lachlan Murdoch’s wife is no better, also injecting her progressivism into the Murdoch family business.



Lachlan and Sarah have been married for 18 years and while the former model holds no official position in her father-in-law’s company, she is close to Rupert and according to sources is a very trusted member of the family.

That is why her opinion about O’Reilly likely mattered so much much to Lachlan, who reportedly then banned together with brother James to convince their father that the host had to go.

If you want to see where Fox News is likely headed in the next 5-10 years, look no further than Kathryn and Sarah Murdoch.

UPDATE: While I was writing this, I was alerted to the top story on The Drudge Report. Check it out…


For James, 44, and Lachlan, 45, the hope is to reshape this legacy, to move Fox away from what they see as its retro, Trump-style views toward, well, something nicer (and to do this profitably, they hope, somehow).

MORE: A reader pointed out this tidbit to me on Twitter. Kathryn actually used to work for the Clinton’s…

Kathryn Murdoch is described as a former model and marketing executive. According to Wikipedia she works for the Clinton Climate Initiative, a charitable foundation set up by the former U.S. president, Bill Clinton in 2006.

Another link…

Between 2007-2011, Ms. Murdoch served as Director of Strategy & Communications for the Clinton Climate Initiative (CCI) where she also managed CCI ‘s partnership with Microsoft in the development of a global greenhouse gas emissions tracking software. Before beginning to work with the Clinton Foundation, Ms. Murdoch held a variety of senior management positions in marketing, communications and business development, primarily in the fashion and online media arenas.

Post: #64

One or both of those women likely leaked the story to the NYTimes. Looks like they're going to run the Fox Network into the ground because their husbands are unwilling and unable to stand up to them.

Post: #65

Looks like there is going to be an opening for a mainstream conservative news station.

Breitbart may want to consider getting on cable TV, but.... cable TV as a medium is dying. That is alot of the reason why InfoWars and Breitbart actually exist.

They will need to step their game up on video apps for mobile devices, Roku, FireTV, etc. Taking the crown will now be easier for those that already are poised to take over. Some of the smaller less video oriented can make a run at it too, like Daily Caller or Treehouse.

You know who else is about to get fired or pushed out of Fox News? Those editor in chiefs, and all of Daddy Murdoch's buddies that still run most of the ops. Them getting rid of/pushing out Kelly was their last conservative act. Looks like it is liberal bound from here on out.

If cable TV news ends up being 100% liberal, that will be a very large nail in the cable TV coffin. Liberals and Conservatives alike are ditching cable as a un needed luxury expense. ESPN is hurting Disney by getting too political and liberal. You would think these idiots would pay attention to these things, but they live in their own world.

Also, this is yet another reminder to those that still think there is a such thing as a Conservative American Woman. Unless they are super religious and their existence depends upon their husbands, they do not exist.

In the world of the rich and privileged, there is no reason whatsoever for a woman to vote or ideologically support views that remove her own power. Guys are getting redpilled in the Trump thread with his daughter. There are more redpills in here too. What is the worst thing you can ever tell a woman? The word No. Any woman with large wealth or power, would never accept such a word.

If any of you get rich and have children, you better teach your sons correctly, only give your daughters some money, but never power. If you are a true redpilled man, have conditions in your will/estate for positions of power to skip over your daughter and go to grandsons after your sons.

Post: #66

I'm mystified by the Murdoch fellas letting their wives influence personnel decisions. These progressive diva girls should really have no place within the Fox News model.
My wife doesn't dictate to me who works at my firm.
SMH

Post: #67

I also see something of a concerted effort for these RINO/Republican women to find a way to water down the Republican party. Ivanka, this lady, that other girl whose name I forget that publicly supported abortion, etc. Are all going to subvert from within. Unless they switch parties to Democrat, alot of them are going to try and make the Republican party more moderate than it already is.

Anytime men flock to something hard, women will always follow and try their hardest to water it down until it is unrecognizable. Comic Book Conventions? Political Parties? Same deal...

You can bet on more Lauren Southerns and similar types popping up in the next few years, but when you put screws to them, they are all liberal as a female Democrat. They cannot help themselves. It's part of the female imperative.

Post: #68

(04-19-2017 09:13 PM)Bluto Wrote:  I haven't seen this, but here is something that I found particularly interesting on Yahoo while at work.

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/bill-...rc=fauxdal

Quote:The cable host’s ouster comes after a grassroots Twitter group called Sleeping Giants urged companies to pull their ads from the show. According to Sleeping Giants and Media Matters, 83 companies have pulled their ads from “The O’Reilly Factor” and just 49 are still pushing their ads on the show.

Sleeping Giants doesn’t have a website and operates solely on Twitter and Facebook, where it rallies people to tweet at and message individual brands that have advertised on questionable websites. The group, whose founders are anonymous, consists mostly of people in the marketing industry.

“We decided to get involved because there’s no larger, all-encompassing example of bigotry than sexual harassment at the workplace,” a Sleeping Giants co-founder told Yahoo Finance. “[Bill O’Reilly] has definitely proven to be bigoted in the past so it made sense for us to jump in.”

I looked at the linked Twitter account posted in my link above, and they are seem like the real deal as far as a boycotting body. Apparently, they are behind a similar boycott of Breitbart as well. I am not sold that O'Reilly is completely clean, however given the timing of the things, I tend to think that this has been orchestrated. To what end I have no idea.

Be careful with that. It's often the case that all these "boycotts" just happen to be thousands of Twitter accounts all created from the same 2-3 offices.

Post: #69

(04-19-2017 01:07 PM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  Men have to assume that every woman in the workplace is waiting for her opportunity to sue you and the company for money and attention. Even if she's aggressively approaching you, a guy like O'Reilly can't fall for it. There's too much money (and your reputation) at stake. Plenty of pussy in the world, he can afford to past on the 7 at work.

Dude was making over $30 million a year. I'd hire a cameraman to document all interactions with female coworkers.

I hope we aren't seeing a complete shift at Fox. If so, Tucker will be next.


EDIT: I'll miss the Legends & Lies series. The one about the American revolution was pretty good.

One among many reasons why I am deliberately choosing to work in an industry that, although brutally competitive an demanding, is almost completely male and doesn't have as much in the way of harassment claims because women believe that this industry is "misogynistic" so that harassment claims will be ignored. The office that I'm going to is 100% male.

Let that sink in. I prefer rapey frat douchebags (the kind that seem like they actually might roofie someone) to dealing with women in the office, that's how unpleasant they've become.

Post: #70

Kai dropping all sorts of wisdom above. I especially loved:

Quote: If cable TV news ends up being 100% liberal, that will be a very large nail in the cable TV coffin. Liberals and Conservatives alike are ditching cable as a un needed luxury expense. ESPN is hurting Disney by getting too political and liberal. You would think these idiots would pay attention to these things, but they live in their own world.

Post: #71

Geeze, it blows my mind that such a thing like this can happen. Anytime a formally conservative entity goes liberal it makes the death of that entity.

I've come to understand liberalism as the destructive rot that brings down former greatness. It's part of that great cyclical nature of humanity.



Message rings true, and the cycle begins again!

Post: #72

(04-21-2017 09:31 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  I also see something of a concerted effort for these RINO/Republican women to find a way to water down the Republican party. Ivanka, this lady, that other girl whose name I forget that publicly supported abortion, etc. Are all going to subvert from within. Unless they switch parties to Democrat, alot of them are going to try and make the Republican party more moderate than it already is.

Anytime men flock to something hard, women will always follow and try their hardest to water it down until it is unrecognizable. Comic Book Conventions? Political Parties? Same deal...

You can bet on more Lauren Southerns and similar types popping up in the next few years, but when you put screws to them, they are all liberal as a female Democrat. They cannot help themselves. It's part of the female imperative.

This !

This is exactly what is going, basically castrating the Red Pill Republicans.

RINO's are ever growing cucks.

I don't like saying this but I hope the viewers punish Fox monetarily.

I personally don't even watch news on TV, let alone Fox.

Granted I don't think Bill was too smart either.

I'm glad to see Tucker and Hannity doing well on there, but if they don't stop all this feminist bullshit - the blowback from viewers will be unforgiving.

Post: #73

(04-21-2017 12:02 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

(04-21-2017 09:31 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  I also see something of a concerted effort for these RINO/Republican women to find a way to water down the Republican party. Ivanka, this lady, that other girl whose name I forget that publicly supported abortion, etc. Are all going to subvert from within. Unless they switch parties to Democrat, alot of them are going to try and make the Republican party more moderate than it already is.

Anytime men flock to something hard, women will always follow and try their hardest to water it down until it is unrecognizable. Comic Book Conventions? Political Parties? Same deal...

You can bet on more Lauren Southerns and similar types popping up in the next few years, but when you put screws to them, they are all liberal as a female Democrat. They cannot help themselves. It's part of the female imperative.

This !

This is exactly what is going, basically castrating the Red Pill Republicans.

RINO's are ever growing cucks.

I don't like saying this but I hope the viewers punish Fox monetarily.

I personally don't even watch news on TV, let alone Fox.

Granted I don't think Bill was too smart either.

I'm glad to see Tucker and Hannity doing well on there, but if they don't stop all this feminist bullshit - the blowback from viewers will be unforgiving.

Yes to both of you gentlemen. It's horrifying to watch every bastion of correct, red-pill ideology attacked and sublimated--you are correct, cucked.
Soon, if the libtards and feminists get their way, we won't be allowed to broadcast at all because the snowflakes will be too offended to even allow us our own networks. The internet won't even be truly safe because we'll be accused of cyber-bullying.
Thank God for RoK, where we can still have a place to express freely.
The time is coming, Brethren, when we are going to need to put the libtards back in their own safe spaces and reclaim the majority for ourselves. MAGA on steroids.

BTW, all the lib bitches are going on and on about this Handmaid's Tale. I looked at an online synopsis of the book... doesn't look like a bad life to me...LOL

Post: #74

Men like Bill O'Reilly don't have to chase tail. Tail often chases them. He has money and influence. Women are going to pursue him.

I don't buy this one at all. As someone else pointed out, the left has constantly accused him of racism. Now he's being accused of jungle fever. It doesn't make a lot of sense.

I'm getting tired of people saying shit like: "You are so courageous for speaking out." What is so courageous about it? Everybody makes these accusations nowadays. It reminds me of the people who call tattoos "rebellious."

Ultimately, we may get to a point where everything in the workplace is monitored in some way or another. If I was a guy like BOR, I would have a recorded on me at all times, especially in the workplace.

Post: #75

To amend my original post on this, as the allegations from the Kirsten Powers came forth as well as the allegations from the intern,(I can't find her name nor do I really care) I am very skeptical about all of this. In other news, Bill apparently will be back with a Podcast on Monday for his premium members.