Post: #401

Post: #402

(05-13-2017 06:42 PM)911 Wrote:  pretty cool segment with the aurora from space at 2:30 ^^^^

Waiting for Mercenary to claim it was fake in some way. But it conclusive proves that stars can be seen when the glaring light of the sun is not beaming down at the earth.

Post: #403

(05-13-2017 03:29 AM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  

First of all, anyone who has flown on an airplane at night knows that lights from cities are not that bright. The brightness shown there would cause blindness in people on the ground. And from the alleged height they are "filming", the city lights would be even less bright than from an airplane.

Secondly, yeah, i can see some stars...but the constellations don't look right at all.

Thirdly, do you ever read the small fine print on NASA's official website ? They officially state words like "composite image" and "artist's rendering". They have freely admitted that most of what they show you has been altered, but they don't say by how much.

However, this brings me onto an interesting topic. In a few days or weeks i will try posting some reliable NON NASA sources to show what stuff really looks like from "space".

Just remember, when you only have one single source in the world that provides you with evidence of something, that source is highly susceptible to presenting things with its own subjective agenda. NASA needs more competition. They have had a monopoly on "truth" for too long.

Post: #404

(05-13-2017 08:17 PM)Suits Wrote:  

Interesting.
Some people have taken spirit levels on airplanes on long flights to test if the plane keeps dipping during flight to account for curvature of the earth.
It does not.

Airplanes always stay straight and level during cruising altitude no matter how far they fly.

Post: #405

(05-14-2017 02:44 AM)Mercenary Wrote:  However, this brings me onto an interesting topic. In a few days or weeks i will try posting some reliable NON NASA sources to show what stuff really looks like from "space".

Interesting, looking forward to it.

Post: #406

(05-14-2017 02:44 AM)Mercenary Wrote:  Just remember, when you only have one single source in the world that provides you with evidence of something, that source is highly susceptible to presenting things with its own subjective agenda. NASA needs more competition. They have had a monopoly on "truth" for too long.

On top of all your bullshit you are also a stereotypical American who thinks America is the whole world.

There is in fact competition to NASA - Russian and Chinese space programs respectively. Many other countries have their own satellites too.

Post: #407

(05-13-2017 08:17 PM)Suits Wrote:  

With round earth, top is everywhere on surface.

(05-14-2017 02:57 AM)Mercenary Wrote:  Interesting.
Some people have taken spirit levels on airplanes on long flights to test if the plane keeps dipping during flight to account for curvature of the earth.
It does not.

Airplanes always stay straight and level during cruising altitude no matter how far they fly.

If they wouldn't then they would be spacecrafts capable of tangentially escaping earths gravity. But they are but planes and share the same coordinate system as Earth. A person has to be rather dumb not to understand this.

Post: #408

(05-14-2017 04:42 AM)Mage Wrote:  

(05-14-2017 02:44 AM)Mercenary Wrote:  Just remember, when you only have one single source in the world that provides you with evidence of something, that source is highly susceptible to presenting things with its own subjective agenda. NASA needs more competition. They have had a monopoly on "truth" for too long.

On top of all your bullshit you are also a stereotypical American who thinks America is the whole world.

There is in fact competition to NASA - Russian and Chinese space programs respectively. Many other countries have their own satellites too.

It looks like you don't even read my posts.
A few pages ago in this thread i talked about the Russian MIR space station being fake and the air bubbles on Chinese space walks.

You got non NASA proof of round earth, then post it here.

Stop resorting to personal insults. Thats weak and small minded and is the feminist SJW method of arguing. Don't argue like a girl.

Post: #409

Merc isn't an American.

Post: #410

(05-14-2017 06:32 AM)Mercenary Wrote:  It looks like you don't even read my posts.
A few pages ago in this thread i talked about the Russian MIR space station being fake and the air bubbles on Chinese space walks.

You got non NASA proof of round earth, then post it here.

Stop resorting to personal insults. Thats weak and small minded and is the feminist SJW method of arguing. Don't argue like a girl.

You think of yourself too much if you think I would even try to remember what you wrote a few pages ago. I just respond to some of the ignorance and stupidity in your latest posts, for sake of truth and amusement and then forget what exactly did you wrote. There is nothing worth remembering in this mambo jumbo.

Whether or not Russia and China space programs are fake they are still organizations independent from NASA and thus my point remains valid. Also I just don't think they are fake.

Calling out stupidity and calling fool a fool is not weak and actually requires quite a lot of bravery in these sissified times when hurting feelings is almost a crime.

If someone here is to blame for not remembering former posts it is you. All your unscientific arguments here have been debunked by me or other members but you don't seem to remember that and ignore that completely pushing the same silly ideas again and again.

In my very last post I said that on round earth very point of surface is the top. But you didn't respond to that. You read it and ignored it. Soon you would have forgotten it. But that I called a person who doesn't understand something (implying you) dumb you did read and you did respond to that and you will remember that. You are very selective in your own remembering of things - in a way that benefits your delusion and your ego that has invested in it. You don't want to argue facts - you want to argue personalities calling those who disagree with you liars, conspirators, anti-free speech, prejudiced, mean, SJWs and other things. But when ever have you debunked an argument that debunks yours? When have ever you demonstrated any knowledge in any scientific field?

Mercenary, you should not get offended but take time to honestly introspect your intelligence and education carefully. You do not seem to have a good idea of how mathematics or physics and sometimes even logic works. You should look at yourself and ask yourself the question: "Am I on the level to discuss these questions?"

It is easy to call everything you don't understand lies and conspiracy but maybe the problem is not in the world around but in you. Maybe you just don't understand these things because you miss something? Maybe you should not accuse other people of being conspirators and lairs but rather humble down and learn something from them?

Post: #411

(05-10-2017 05:22 PM)Mercenary Wrote:  

(05-10-2017 04:03 PM)Atomic Wrote:  Why a barrier made of Ice? Why not rock? Or more firmament?

Is there anything under the ice, say a sea floor, or does the ice continue onto infinity? If there is a sea floor underneath the ice, how deep is it?

What caused the water to freeze at the edges of the FE and create the ice wall?

The THEORY goes like this:

The ice "wall" just holds in all the water of the oceans of the world, so there's no way you can "fall" off the edge with a boat. You can climb on the ice but not sail over it. See photo below:


The actual firmament wall is supposed to be anywhere from 100km to 1000km away from the water edge.

Theories as to what's under the ice vary greatly. Some people claim somewhere there is a lost civilization that got destroyed by "climate change" and post photos of pyramid formations under the ice like these below:

What about the guys who have traveled across Antartica? How come they didn't run into anything?

Ex: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/...xpedition/

You know who could settle this flat Earth debate right now?

Nasa Test Pilot!

*ducks*

Post: #412

(05-14-2017 06:32 AM)Mercenary Wrote:  You got non NASA proof of round earth, then post it here.

I posted a solid video that was promptly ignored.





Here is another, similar.





Believe that was the original, both short.

Post: #413

Post: #414

Jeez - there is a guy who proves that earth cannot be round as he pours water on a fruit and the gravitation pull of that fruit is not strong enough to keep that water attracted.

Trust me - if you had an orange of that gravity pull, then you would be in a different kind of trouble.

Seriously - that this even gets debated is a sad sign of our times of the globalists lying so much openly about so many things, that folk try to come up with more debunking where there is frankly no debunking necessary, because it is true for a change.

Post: #415

After read so much of what Elites are doing, its simply impossible for me to regard it as anything but cleverly designed psy ops.

Post: #416

(05-19-2017 06:16 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  



Jeez - there is a guy who proves that earth cannot be round as he pours water on a fruit and the gravitation pull of that fruit is not strong enough to keep that water attracted.

Trust me - if you had an orange of that gravity pull, then you would be in a different kind of trouble.

Seriously - that this even gets debated is a sad sign of our times of the globalists lying so much openly about so many things, that folk try to come up with more debunking where there is frankly no debunking necessary, because it is true for a change.

Besides finding out that everything I knew about physics is wrong, I also learnt that North America is bigger than the whole world.

Post: #417

Flat earthers are people who should be mocked endlessly to the ends of the earth. I am convinced that this idea is pushed by the (((usual suspects))) and their lackeys to discredit legitimate philosophies, ideas and organizations tied to Neomasculinity, white nationalism and even people who belive in aliens through alien intervention or the ancient astronaut theory.

Hollow earth on the other hand, the jury is still out.

Post: #418

For reference:

Height of Mount Everest:
29,000 feet
8,800 meters

Cruising altitude of most commercial airlines:
30,000 to 40,000 feet
9200 to 12200 meters

Highest altitude for spy planes and military fighter jets:
70,000 and 90,000 feet
21,300 to 27.400 meters



So here is an UNCUT video of a high altitude balloon launched in Califoria that allegedly reaches 115,000 feet (35,000 meters) before "popping" (or hitting the dome firmament if you are a flat earth believer) at minute 1:54:30 and coming back down to earth. Because the balloon is very light, the camera is not stable and often moves around. What's important here is that the video has no cuts or edits and the camera is free to move around.








A very interesting thing happens when the balloon reaches the so called "Kármán line" - the line between the blue earth atmosphere and the black "outer space". This is when the line above the horizon has no more traces of blue, but is totally black.

When the camera is level, the horizon is flat, no curvature at all.
When it pans sideways or slightly upwards there is the classic downwards curvature we see on all the Nasa videos.

And when it pans downwards it actually curves upwards slightly like a smiley mouth....which makes no sense. You can see this most accutely when the balloon begins to spin crazily when it reaches its altitude limit at minute 1:54:30 and begins going down.

It would seem to suggest, that at altitudes of around 100,000 feet all you have to do to achieve a downward curvature effect (rather than a flat horizon) is to position the camera in a fixed position at a slightly sideways and/or upward angle....and like magic you have curvature where there really is none.

However, to get the camera to stay fixed onto the "curvature view", so the "fake" effect is not revealed you need something really big to hold it totally steady so that doesn't move around at all....

....something like an "international space station."

Post: #419

Camera level, horizon not flat at all. It is curved quite obviously, and of the exact degree expected at that relatively low altitude. Hell even in the thumbnail of the video it is curved. LOL.

So even now, when you can see with your own eyes the curvature, with this objective balloon camera - not one of those jew'd NASA cams ammirite - you still manage to conclude flat Earth.

Post: #420

Merc, when the camera level is flat the earth is very clearly not flat. Maybe print a screenshot and use ruler if you can't see this.

Post: #421

^^^^ Merc - all the time it have been your eyes! Not the earth! Your eyes are flat! Your eyes are flat, not round like most people's eyeballs and therefore lines and angles seem to be distorted to you! You must literally see flat where there is convex and concave where there is flat!

Your eyes are flat! They could even be cubical inside your head! What a mystery! How is it possible? Alien genetic experiments? Mutation caused by Illuminati masturbating in your food? Or were you conceived by a lesser demon and a mortal woman? Oh ..mysteries.. mysteries...

Post: #422

(05-27-2017 08:22 AM)Repo Wrote:  Merc, when the camera level is flat the earth is very clearly not flat. Maybe print a screenshot and use ruler if you can't see this.

What proof do you have that NASA shills will not hack Merc's printer to make the horizon look curved?

Post: #423

I love that there's 17 pages in this thread--really busting this whole conspiracy wide open, Mercenary!

Post: #424

(05-27-2017 05:35 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  


Camera level, horizon not flat at all. It is curved quite obviously, and of the exact degree expected at that relatively low altitude. Hell even in the thumbnail of the video it is curved. LOL.

So even now, when you can see with your own eyes the curvature, with this objective balloon camera - not one of those jew'd NASA cams ammirite - you still manage to conclude flat Earth.

Post: #425

It’s my belief that the globalists want us to focus on made up stupid conspiracies like this to distract us from the real conspiracy theories. I wouldn't be surprised if this got funding from them.