Post: #151

Thanks Gio and Soup. Some great input on this thread.

I like Soups analogy. I have probably more of a batman style of game as he discribes it.

Post: #152

I think he has good game.

Just because the guy is famous does not means he is not allowed to easy pickings.

"Im available now, want to fuck? yes-no"

Post: #153

(04-06-2014 02:02 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  I, for one, think it's a fun controversy. We should gin it up as a fake divide in the forum.

Like East Coast vs West Coast rappers.

Like Montagues and Capulets.

But I love both direct and indirect game! What shall I do?

Then biggie and tupac or Romeo and Juliet die in our awful war and we wonder what it was all for.

Can't we just see that despite our differences, we both love fucking women?

I see this as a tragic romance between us and game.

Post: #154

The best rappers are from the south anyways.

Post: #155

(04-05-2014 06:34 PM)Christian McQueen Wrote:  I disagree with saying Direct isn't Game.

Thank you.

"Game" is LIFE people, game is in everything, game as it relates to pussy is pretty much to following:

Rank lvl C: Getting my Man parts to penetrate the female parts of decent to hot looking women

Rank lvl B: Doing rank C as efficiently as possible without paying a lot of money. . .preferbly as little as possible(like paying for your gas money to the bar and back to your place.)

Rank lvl A: Having multiple women on a rotation (what every man should be shooting for)and be able to easily replace them once they blow out

Rank lvl S: Level A but with the added effect of having women DO SHIT FOR YOU, Cooking for you, cleaning for you, etc etc. . .(this level only applies to the West, as in asia, (and probably EE) women do this for you anyway)

Rank lvl S+(Optional): Getting women to pay you. Requires a totally but not unrelated skillset, and mindset. . .and it's not for everyone.

A lot of these milestones require a combination of direct vs indirect, some of these milestones value direct over indirect and vice versa.

Thing is, its all still game. Just because some people may prefer one type of game over the other, it's still game. People need to realize that the game is life. You can't seprate the two. Pretty much having "no game" is just, being "At" the game. . .on the sidelines, instead of being "In" the game on the court. Sure you can survive like that, but you have no control over life that way. Denying forms of game is dangerous and can force an "injury" forcing you to be "At" the game instead of scoring the points, and enjoying the game.



TL : DR The game is life, all forms of it are valid, you deny parts of the game, you deny yourself, and that will hurt you eventually. Ignorance is no excuse for not knowing the rules of the game.

Post: #156

(04-07-2014 06:59 PM)runsonmagic Wrote:  

(04-06-2014 02:02 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  I, for one, think it's a fun controversy. We should gin it up as a fake divide in the forum.

Like East Coast vs West Coast rappers.

Indirect Side till I die!!!!!

We need to come out with a call-out track like this:

Post: #157

http://www.xojane.com/issues/humbert-cul...mes-franco

"Make no mistake: we are living in a rape culture. Sexual violence is normalized in our legislation, in our language, in every aspect of our behaviour. Present within rape culture, and yet distinct enough to merit its own category, is a phenomenon that, in (dis)honour of Nabokov’s narrator, I’ve dubbed it “Humbert culture” -- society’s steadfast commitment to sexualizing young girls and protecting men who prey on them."

Post: #158

(04-06-2014 01:33 AM)MikeCF Wrote:  I'm no James Franco, but when I was in the zone game almost became a full time job and I got very direct and pushy to just smoke out the tire kickers.

If someone hacked my phone, probably there's a lot of things that would make guys say, "BAD GAME!"

And yet I banged out enough girls and did enough crazy stuff that most wouldn't even believe some of the stunts.

I have texted nothing but a picture of a ball gag and handcuffs and eye mask to girls after the perfunctory "hi" texts.

2 in 3 didn't reply but 1 in 3 would start asking questions. Some would be timid and some would say, "Hot! I've always wanted to do something like that but no guy would ever do it to me."

I throw our some pre-written fantasies. A paragraph or two at a time, to see what they say. Get them aroused.

Usually they say, "Then what?"

And then I'm at a hotel having a girl who has never met me in real life coming up to live our her darkest fantasies.

Bad game because it didn't "work" 2 out of 3 times? Well, I got what I wanted...and so did she.

And I didn't waste time at wine bars.

Or have to drink alcohol or engage in other unhealthy activities to get laid.

Basically...Work, shoot out some "bad game" texts like that....and then meet girls for sex.

Heck, how often do I even complain about American girls?

Once your game is tight and you screen out certain girls, you just don't even have these problems that other guys complain about.

So maybe going direct offers a lot of benefits, too.

It sets a masculine frame. I'm a man. I don't ask permission. I take what I want.

Girls who are put off by that are going to be gone. Disgusted. Maybe tell me I'm a horrible person.

Girls who like that are going to be the more feminine, submissive ones. They like to call you daddy.

I could go on all day, but it seems like "indirect v. direct," like "lifestyle v. game" strikes a nerve.

But I know what worked for me and my theory is that it worked because it sets a masculine frame from jump.

No nonsense. It's game that doesn't look like game.