Post: #201

Another girl throwing lobs for me:

   

   

Post: #202

(01-23-2014 08:03 PM)tmason Wrote:  

(01-23-2014 07:08 PM)zoom Wrote:  

And now I will proceed to continue my life of fucking femcunt fatties and pretending I love it.

As if the guy wasn't a manigina feminist before.

Post: #203

Misleading portrait. She looks like maybe an 8 in that picture, that would be a 9 if she grew out her hair.

https://twitter.com/the_real_JBALZ/statu...88/photo/1 - more like 6 that could push 7.5 with the right hair.

Looks fit, at least.

Post: #204

We really are their best friends...if only they knew it.

Post: #205

Hot chick blogger writes about how we're mean for telling other women how to be attractive to men.

http://katski.blogspot.com/2014/01/a-little-rant.html

Post: #206

And the manboob David Futrelle couldn't help himself so he responds:

Quote:Having previously taken on such dire threats to Western Civilization as “fat girls,” “manginas,” and “rape tourettes,” the pickup-artists-cum-worldly-philosophers over at Roosh Obama’s Return of Kings blog have decided to take on an even more insidious danger: Women — sorry, girls — with short hair.

In an alarming expose, guest blogger Tuthmosis reveals the shocking tuth, er, truth:

I particularly like these choice comments:

Quote:kellybarnhill | January 23, 2014 at 10:47 am:

I am cutting my hair TODAY.

BAM! She showed you, Tuthmosis! What you gon' say about her self-mutilation now??!!???

Quote:damselindetech | January 23, 2014 at 10:51 am

I’ll give him one thing (other than a swift roundhouse kick to the teeth), I got the most unsolicited attention from guys when I had long blond hair down to my butt. Ironically, I had grown it out and fashioned it like that specifically for my wedding. So, right after the honeymoon, I cut it all off and haven’t looked back. He’ll probably read that as misandrist deception, as opposed to someone who didn’t have the foresight to skip all the headaches (literally – hair that long is bloody heavy) and just invest in a wig for the big day.

Wait, so you mean cutting your hair does make you get less attention from men?

How can this be?

Quote:historophilia | January 23, 2014 at 10:51 am

Proud owner of a vile and hideous head of short hair here, and I will be growing it long again some time around when hell freezes over.

It’s actually a pretty good filter though, any guy who makes a big deal out of women having short hair is in-fallibly an arsehole and therefore I can pretend they don’t exist without a shred of guilt.

Only gay nancy-boys for me!!!

Quote:Malitia | January 23, 2014 at 11:24 am

I cut my hair short when I was 16 because of practical reasons… which turned out to be a good thing as thanks to stress much of it fell out in college some years later.

It didn’t even keep the creeps away, though.

Their thought processes were probably: Fat, not conventionally attractive, socially awkward she obviously won’t have any standards. But I had standards and thanks to bullying their creeping me out got nasty fight-or-flight reactions. :]

Being a loser had benefits too!!!!!

*cries herself to sleep*

Quote:emilygoddess | January 23, 2014 at 11:32 am

I think I look better, but I’m assuming my opinion doesn’t count. My stylist also thinks I look much better with short hair, but he’s gay and apparently has “no place” having an opinion.

I’ve been keeping my hair short because I like it better, but if it also serves as PUA repellent, so much the better!

Hair stylist: You look FABULOUSSSSSS!!! Now come here every two weeks so I can cut it and you'll pay me $200 dollars, dumb bitch.

Quote: si1verdrake | January 23, 2014 at 11:42 am

I’m quite sure my boyfriend isn’t lying to me when he says he prefers my hair short, but he’s bi, so clearly he’s secretly a mangina or something, and thus excluded from the “almost universal” love of long hair that all males have.

And, as a bisexual woman, the idea that “No woman in all of human history has ever looked better with short hair than she would with a head full of healthy locks.” makes me laugh. Since short hair on women is a major turn-on for me. But looking better is all in the eyes of the men, who are the only people that matter, right?

My gay boyfriend who is only with me to fake a straight relationship to the world likes it when I look like a boy so your argument is INVALIDZ...

Post: #207

Christ, how mentally unhinged do you have to be to cut your hair in protest to what some strange online said? Lol!

Post: #208

So according to woman logic, other women and gay guys know more about what is attractive to straight men than straight men.

Enjoy your cats.

Post: #209

Quote:shayla | January 23, 2014 at 12:08 pm

I love having long hair because I’m lazy, and a hairstyle that requires nothing more than a few trims, conditioning, and a bun at night is the winner for me. Clearly though my laziness was really just fertility and youth all along?

How cute when these people think the worst fate is not getting with a man like themselves, because they can’t imagine a life that doesn’t revolve around them.

Glad this one admits what men have suspected all along; despite all of their protestations women don't have to put much effort into being hot if they just keep the maintenance up.

Quote:auggziliary | January 23, 2014 at 12:10 pm

How is something an indicator of beauty? Like you see a woman with long hair from the back, and she’s statistically more likely to be “pretty”?
Also this is creepy as fuck. Friends and family should force women to keep themselves appearing beautiful and fertile? I think we should force shampoo in his hair, so he’s forced to wash it. That’s fair, right?

If I were a feminist I'd stop being one after reading that comment.

To think of how this one breaths without choking on herself...

Quote: tinyorc | January 23, 2014 at 12:29 pm

Hahaha, I also like the way Tuthy’s short-hair comparison picture of Anne Hathaway is of her in character as Fantine. She’s playing a dying 19th-century prostitute, she’s not exactly supposed to be glowing.

I also like the way Tuthmosis proved his point. I am going to laugh at him anywayzz!!!

High five lesbos!

Quote:Xen | January 23, 2014 at 12:33 pm

Roosh, I’m glad you posted your pictures online so now I can avoid you. And guess what? come summer the hair is being shorn. And a good thing too, I don’t want freaks like you to be attracted to me.

Seriously, what is up with all of these dumb bitches mutilating themselves after reading some shit online from someone they never met?

Quote: OH | January 23, 2014 at 12:50 pm

I am a man, I had short hair once, it was humiliating, being in a room with 5 other men who all had short hair and I was the only one with any sense how f—ed that was.

Manboobz attracts the weirdiest weirdos...

Quote: kittehserf | January 23, 2014 at 1:13 pm

I’ve had short hair (a 1920s-type bob) and long hair, and intend to stick to long hair for the forseeable future, but that’s because I’ve had a thing for long hair since forever – more on men than women, actually. I was born in the sixties, IT WAS A THING.

I look equally good with long or short hair, and have been mercifully free of creeps hitting on me either way.

The only man whose opinion matters has never spoken about it, but he has been seen by other people standing idly playing with my hair, twining a curl round his fingers. I suspect he prefers it long, but it’s not like he’d try to tell me how I’m “supposed” to have it cut.

I don't want to admit that this terrorist Tuthmosis is right, so I'll just dance around the topic with my little dandy tiptoes...

Post: #210

The power of this article is dumbfounding. I can't even process how women connect their personal lives to an online article.

Post: #211

I haven't been able to keep up with the comments, but this one is pretty kick-ass.

   

Post: #212

I'd like to rally off Fisto's idea. Have girls send in the before and after shots of their hair. Tuth could post the "16 ugliest haircuts/damaged women trying to shut me up." Like he did with the eating disorders.

Also, SHIRTS ARE AN AWESOME IDEA!

Post: #213

I hope the next follow up article is like Fisto/Snowplow suggest... "Proof that girls with short hair are damaged" featuring the very girls bitching about this article. Also would like to see a "Besides short hair, other signs a woman is damaged" released quickly.

Post: #214

(01-24-2014 04:11 AM)username Wrote:  Also would like to see a "Besides short hair, other signs a woman is damaged" released quickly.

Believe it or not, something like this is on my list of upcoming projects.

Post: #215

(01-24-2014 04:15 AM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

(01-24-2014 04:11 AM)username Wrote:  Also would like to see a "Besides short hair, other signs a woman is damaged" released quickly.

Believe it or not, something like this is on my list of upcoming projects.

Good very good

Post: #216

Post: #217

This time last year, The Last Psychiatrist released an article entitled, "No Self Respecting Women Would Go Out Without Makeup."

The first section is about makeup - which relates to the short hair issue:

Quote:For some reason, one of the most emailed articles from the NYT was an article about whether women should or should not wear make up. "New York Times? Sounds progressive." Yes.

Seven people were asked their opinion in a column called "Room For Debate," liars, there was no debate, all of them said "I guess so", their main contribution was the hedge: "it's a woman's choice." So while pretending this was some kind of debate with contrasting opinions, all of them had the same opinion, which should automatically signal to you it is the wrong one.

When they say, "it's a woman's choice" what they mean is "it's not a man's choice, it is thoroughly stupid to wear make up just for men, the only acceptable reason is if you do it for yourself, if it makes you feel better about yourself."

Let me offer a contrary position, unpalatable but worth considering: the only appropriate time to wear make up is to look attractive to men. Or women, depending on which genitals you want to lick, hopefully it's both. "Ugh, women are not objects." Then why are you painting them? I'm not saying you have to look good for men, I'm saying that if wearing makeup not for men makes you feel better about yourself, you don't have a strong self, and no, yelling won't change this. Everyone knows you shouldn't judge a book by its cover, now you're saying the cover of the book influences how the book feels about itself?

I am not doubting that in fact you do feel better about yourself, I am saying that that fact is both pathological and totally on purpose. Since this cognitive trick does help you feel better about yourself, by all means go ahead, but at what point will you stop pressuring other women to go along with it? When will you stop "requiring" it, like when you say, "oh, she's so pretty even without makeup" as if the default was makeup?

The fraud women now believe is that it is wrong to look good for men only, as an end in itself; the progressive delusion is that looking good for men is synonymous with submissiveness, so while you're allowed to look good to men, it should always be secondary to looking good for yourself. This is madness. You are enhancing your outward appearance, which is great, but then you pretend it's for internal reasons?

How would you like to live in a world where men had to wear make up? "Oh, I love make up on a guy, especially eyeliner." Of course you do, you're having a stroke. Ask it this way: how would you like to be in a world where men said," oh, I feel so much better about myself when I'm wearing makeup." You'd run for the nearest totalitarian regime.

The trick to the makeup debate is that it pretends to want to be free of male pressure, yet the pressure to look a certain way is actually much worse from women. So this result is that a "patriarchical", controlling force, unacceptable if coming directly from men, is maintained by giving the whip to other women. No boss man would survive if he said, "ugh, you should put on some makeup, doll yourself up a little bit" but women say this to other women all the time-- especially at work. "You look really tired," says a woman in MAC Greensmoke to another who isn't. Just once I wish the reply would be, "I am, your husband kept me up all night." Not very progressive, but hilarious.

The evolution from "enhances sexual attractiveness" to "doing it for yourself" is definitely a regressive step, and by regressive I here mean "regressing to age two", but it's the next step which reveals the presence of a neurosis: recruiting science as a justification for behavior: "Study finds makeup makes you appear more competent." Can't wait to read about that study in a Jonah Lehrer book. Ugh. So here's the evolution of feminist theory, take notes: "I want to look better" to "I want to feel better about myself" to "I want people to think I am better." Madness.

The further clue that the problem is not gender but... you... is that you find this pseudoscience while you are browsing the internet, i.e. it is your entertainment, your free time; your leisure time is spent justifying a behavior you can't not do. "But I wasn't looking for those articles, I just stumbled on them." Exactly.

The reason the makeup debate is insoluble is that it's not yours to solute. The choice to wear makeup is no choice at all, I know you think you came to it on your own but you live in America, you don't make free choices here, freedom is a brand. Makeup is an $8B/yr industry, that's face makeup alone, no way is it going to allow you to make a choice that doesn't involve a credit card, fine, if you don't like makeup here's a remover for $30, just remember that you're not doing it for men, you're doing it for yourself.

A few notes:

Notice how he puts patriarchy in quotes. The forces that place a preeminence on looks are narcissistic, not sexist or whatever rot feminists blather on about.

Further, the mindless chatter and foot-stomping over not doing this for men, but for themselves is madness. It isn't healthy and reinforces women only care about issues that affect them. They only get angry over family law when it hurts them -- i.e. their new husband. They don't care about the standards set out for men, that issue has never crossed their mind. They are only worried about getting the men that are attractive to them. A generation ago, they hit the gym. Now they pound the keys on their laptop, demanding media show off fat women so us men can finally start getting hard over their fat rolls.

Women's issues come from other women, not men. Notice how men can't get away with stating they like long hair, etc.? All that's left is media, narcissism and other women that are legitimate women's issues. You know what a shitfest it would be if women critiqued each other as hard as they do men. In light of that, they keep on critiquing men for "hyper-masculinity." Check out this link about some transbeta bitching about zir hyper-masculinity.

Truthfully, what fuels feminist and female fire is the real observation that they are not free and unlike in the past, they don't have children, family or spouses that they loved. They are alone, with nothing but flashing images on a TV screen and a clutch of material possessions. Many women have commented, "Yeah, I'm single but I have a fabulous career (no, you don't) and I totally love my life!" You hate both, which is why you need public forums to shore up your sense of self.

It is obvious that women, without even being aware of this, that there is only wifehood/motherhood or a full-time career in their mind. If they chose the career route, wifehood and motherhood come in second and third place to being a good capitalist. If they chose the former route, like the submissive woman from "Full House," they have to be careful they don't trigger any guilt in women who don't pursue that route.

Women know their primary goals in life are snagging the most sexually attractive male they can find and raising his brood. The problem is, they are socialized in ways that work cross-ways with this. They still get the "Disney Princess," but it is framed differently. One day, after watching Adult Swim all night, I flipped on the TV. The cartoon that was playing was bizarre. Young female scientists with adoring, clumsy male scientists that challenged the females but eventually submitted to the superior female character.

I've commented on this before, but what is most salient here is that the posture the modern female takes with men is unnatural; so media, government and corporations have to go out of their way to socialize women into their new roles. This isn't to say the women don't want to have jobs, volunteer and all that, but to force women -- as a class -- into the primary role of producer is unnatural.

Bringing it full circle, the short hair phenomenon is a social construction aimed at a few things. First, is women seeing with how much they can get away with while still getting male attention. Second, it is women who want to attract men who will worship them, only to ruthless devalue them once their worship gets old. They want to attract men that they will eventually hate for liking them.

Lastly, they know that this short hair situation is highly artificial. They are -- at best -- adolescent females thinking, "Well, Daddy doesn't like women with short hair! Let's see what he thinks once I cut it all off!!!" It is reactionary and reeks of a person who believes and acts as if they have no personal autonomy. At worst, it signifies a person whose self-identity is so weak that any perceived criticism, judgment or observation sends them off the deep end, with crippling levels of shame rocking their shaky identities. That is why you see dipshit comments saying, "UGH, so you are saying women with short hair are not deserving of love?!?!?! FUCK YOU TUTHMOSIS!!!"

They have yet to understand -- and they never will -- that one person can never determine your worth. One action of yours is rarely determinate of who you are. Shame-based people are not healthy. The fact so many women had such a meltdown against Tuthmosis is a testament to the culture of narcissism that is America. He tugged at one strand of the weak spiderweb that is American femininity and caused collective panty uproar.

As for me? I am sitting back, sipping a vodka/Sprite and watching Rome burn.

Post: #218

Tuthmosis is our JDAM for Feminist War. Brilliant work again Tuth.

What is perturbing, clearly, is the connection between the hamster

not slowing down for once and considering; "Wait, men don't like short hair and the attitude attached with it..?," and the beta manginas orbiting them like steril sperm that occasionally penetrate the egg wall, but lack the potency to make a better life for them.

Ladies, short hair is a death sentence to happiness. So quit bitching, and listen to men for once, if you can unprogram yourselves, instead of following your damaged inner Chi you absorbed from the toxic environment you so wisely chose to submerse yourselves in.

Post: #219

(01-24-2014 04:37 AM)Emancipator Wrote:  

Man, this is fantastic! Did you make this?

Post: #220

Another video response. This chick thinks I'm a lady.

(Also can't read aloud. What's happening to American education?)

Post: #221

^^This girl just proves everything that I wrote. In the first six minutes of her other video, you hear about:

1. Her first (much older) boyfriend supposedly beating her up because she didn't want to have sex

2. Dudes allegedly trying to "do things to her"

3. Her cutting herself

4. Her contemplating suicide

5. Her joining the lacrosse team to "beat up on other people without getting in trouble"

6. Her leaving her boyfriend for one of her female teammates.

It goes on.

Post: #222

Hey, just watched that video, she is a complete arrogant cow. Young women nowadays confuses arrogance with confidence her in particular referring to herself as awesome just because she is woman.

Look at the confidence of the women in the 50's, the likes of Sofia Loren and Ava Gardner their feminine grace was real confidence, they knew how to be sensual without it looking forced.

Personally we should just let those damaged women/feminists breed themselves out of the gene pool.(I think its gonna happen anyway) and focus our attention on the younger generation coming through to show them the light.

And anyway, men can potentially have children up until the day we die so if we can ride out this poisonous culture for a bit and keep ourselves fit and healthy we will be on the winning team.

Post: #223

This is really interesting to observe.

The girl's all say they dislike the article and won't stand for it, but they're all eerily drawn to the trough of self-abasement like so many moths to the flame.

It reminds me of times where a girl would tell me she doesn't swallow, and then right before you climax you just shove it in there and while she might act indignant she just likes you even more for shitting all over her boundaries.

Post: #224

This came up on my Facebook newsfeed today. The responses (which go on beyond this screencap) are typical white-knighting and "maybe my vote of support will get me a whiff of this broad's farts" level defense for this chick. Thought it was relevant.



A few more screenshots here: /thread-32198-...#pid636491

Post: #225

This is what the MSM is catering to, and why there have to be lies, the truth hurts too much.