Post: #176

(01-23-2014 01:42 PM)frenchie Wrote:  Lana del Ray commented about the article?!

Shit, celebrities are starting to get a look at us.

Roosh, you've started a cultural revolution.

We will also have a real-time measure of success on this article; I wonder if she will cut her hair in the next ten years?

Post: #177

(01-23-2014 02:02 PM)tmason Wrote:  

(01-23-2014 01:42 PM)frenchie Wrote:  Lana del Ray commented about the article?!

Shit, celebrities are starting to get a look at us.

Roosh, you've started a cultural revolution.

We will also have a real-time measure of success on this article; I wonder if she will cut her hair in the next ten years?

Really? That's definitely getting into big territory.

Post: #178

(01-23-2014 11:42 AM)LeightonBlackstock Wrote:  Ever watched Next Top Model?

When they cut a woman's hair short, the others all SCREAM!

Says it all really

(The American videos are often better but I like Asian girls so you're getting an Asian one)

The American version ruined a girl who used to compete in beauty pageants.

   

Post: #179

(01-23-2014 01:42 PM)frenchie Wrote:  Lana del Ray commented about the article?!

No she didn't. That's a Lana del Rey tribute account, not the actual chick.

Post: #180

Does hair length make a difference?

Take a look at these Mila Kunis photos, and then decide....

Post: #181

Mildly annoyed by some of the comments in that misc. thread comparing RoK to Jezebel. There are some huge differences...

Post: #182

(01-23-2014 10:31 AM)Enigma Wrote:  Feminist: "...deep genetic programming at work? Wow, I didn't know females were robots..."

That's the irony. They all fucking love Richard Dawkins until they realise that the same biology and science he uses to debunk religion also debunks all their stupid gender theories.

Post: #183

Another day in the office at RoK (Tuth on the right):

Post: #184

(01-23-2014 02:21 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  Does hair length make a difference?

Take a look at these Mila Kunis photos, and then decide....

Well and makeup, sleep and photoshop, but I agree long hair is better!

Post: #185

(01-23-2014 02:41 PM)Teedub Wrote:  

(01-23-2014 10:31 AM)Enigma Wrote:  Feminist: "...deep genetic programming at work? Wow, I didn't know females were robots..."

That's the irony. They all fucking love Richard Dawkins until they realise that the same biology and science he uses to debunk religion also debunks all their stupid gender theories.

Though, since they have little concern for consistency nor any real intellectual curiosity, this sort of thing rarely poses a problem for them.

Post: #186

(01-23-2014 03:03 PM)darklightdispatch Wrote:  Though, since they have little interest in consistency nor any real intellectual curiosity, this sort of thing rarely poses a problem for them.

Feminist atheists a la Rebecca Watson are the WORST atheists. Their disbelief boils down to not seeing a female pastor/minister preaching while they had to show up to Church on Sundays.

Post: #187

We're going to throw some more tinder on the fire tomorrow morning with a fast-tracked submission.

Post: #188

In the future RoK will be a great case study of successful alternative media.

Post: #189

Googled 'Asian girls with short hair':



Then Googled 'Asian girls with long hair':

Post: #190

What's interesting about this viral episode is that we did not get a plug from any large blog. Not one. They purposefully blacklisted us, but as you can see, that didn't stop the ROK train. Surely we got less hits from not getting on Buzzfeed or Huffington Post, but we really don't need them to spread our message. Fuck 'em.

Post: #191

(01-23-2014 03:47 PM)Roosh Wrote:  What's interesting about this viral episode is that we did not get a plug from any large blog. Not one. They purposefully blacklisted us, but as you can see, that didn't stop the ROK train. Surely we got less hits from not getting on Buzzfeed or Huffington Post, but we really don't need them to spread our message. Fuck 'em.

They're like children. The teachers (other blogs) are telling the kids to not let the bully's teasing affect them.

However, it always gets under their skin

Post: #192

From Roosh's Publisher's Response:

Quote:Lastly, I reminisced on previous women I have had sex with (it took about four hours)

Post: #193

(01-23-2014 03:47 PM)Roosh Wrote:  What's interesting about this viral episode is that we did not get a plug from any large blog. Not one. They purposefully blacklisted us, but as you can see, that didn't stop the ROK train. Surely we got less hits from not getting on Buzzfeed or Huffington Post, but we really don't need them to spread our message. Fuck 'em.

This also indirectly proves that they are FAR more coordinated than they would have folks believe.

Grassroots my ass. I wouldn't be surprised that they have secret mailing lists run by the elite few.

Post: #194

(01-23-2014 03:47 PM)Roosh Wrote:  What's interesting about this viral episode is that we did not get a plug from any large blog. Not one. They purposefully blacklisted us, but as you can see, that didn't stop the ROK train. Surely we got less hits from not getting on Buzzfeed or Huffington Post, but we really don't need them to spread our message. Fuck 'em.

And yet Brandon Wade, the owner of Seeking Arrangement, is on HuffPo quite often with articles pushing his site that many might say devalue women.

Go figure.

Post: #195

(01-23-2014 03:47 PM)Roosh Wrote:  What's interesting about this viral episode is that we did not get a plug from any large blog. Not one. They purposefully blacklisted us, but as you can see, that didn't stop the ROK train. Surely we got less hits from not getting on Buzzfeed or Huffington Post, but we really don't need them to spread our message. Fuck 'em.

I noticed that, and I've been waiting for one of the bigboys to pick up the story.

But remember, it took some time last time for Jezebel to give in and blast RoK. But the wave of anger grew to such heights that even they couldn't resist.

Give it time. I think the level of public outrage will reach a crescendo and they won't be able to help themselves.

Think of RoK as a celebrity. There's only so much saturation the market can take. I'm sure Paris Hilton is doing scandalous shit every day, but if the tabloids don't pace themselves then their articles lose effectiveness.

If RoK continues along this path, they'll have no choice but to join in the orgy of drama.

Post: #196

(01-23-2014 01:40 AM)thedude3737 Wrote:  ...aaaaand another repeat performance as last time:

The article went from 3000 to 4000 comments really quickly. That means there are 1000 women who saw that there were 3000 comments, and STILL thought that it was imperative that they comment or that they could bring something unique to the table.

Obviously this is true.

However, it's worth considering that Disqus sort of facilitates these little "chat bubbles" where a few people can argue with each other and nobody else sees it since it's off the front page. Responses all get sent over email or in "my discus" so it doesn't feel as much as if your voice is being lost in the din. Some of the additional comments are probably just responses to earlier comments.

Post: #197

Post: #198

This tweet here explains this viral episode and its predecessors:

   

Post: #199

That tweet is the quintessential definition of why game is effective.

Post: #200

(01-23-2014 07:08 PM)zoom Wrote:  

And now I will proceed to continue my life of fucking femcunt fatties and pretending I love it.