Post: #1

Brought about by this reddit thread.

Quote:My girlfriend, a hyper-intelligent and vocal feminist, and me got into a spat this morning. It began after we woke up and made our way into the living room of my apartment. She was wearing her boy short panties and, after I told her they made her ass look nice, I reluctantly told her that it made uncomfortable for her to be wearing so little in the potential presence of my roommate.

She complains that I was expecting her to compromise her comfort for my sake. I anticipated this and mostly just said I'm sorry, I really didn't think her wearing something else was such a concession to make. It didn't seem like she would be any less comfortable wearing a pair of my shorts or sweats.

Anyway, my roommate comes downstairs (right on cue) in his boxers. She points to him and incredulously asks if I'm going to tell him to put on pants. I can already sense the futility of this argument, but she demands an answer.

Leaving aside the fact that dating a feminist is a relationship death wish for any guy with a decent pair, how comfortable are you with your girl being "comfortable" in front of your friends or roommates?

If this came out of nowhere to me and she gave me lip when I asked her to cover up, I would either tell her to leave immediately and she can cover up on the way home if she likes, or mentally next her and never invite her over again.

Post: #2

You got it right. It's disrespectful, unclassy and inappropriate.

The dumb sonofabitch from the Reddit thread is in for a world of turmoil with that broad.

Post: #3

I thought this was going to be about a girl wearing something slutty while going out. In my opinion if the girl dressed like a slut when you met her, she's probably still going to dress like a slut when she's out with a guy unless he's bought her all new clothes.

This example is a whole new level of disrespect. Some women just can't be wrong, especially in the eyes of someone they have no respect for. Its not cool and despite the obvious the guy shouldn't have gone with a jealously angle. I would have gone with something like " I don't want to look at your ass cheeks while I'm eating breakfast, put some pants on"...even if her ass did look good. Then I could also say I didn't want to see my roomate's balls when i was eating breakfast.

Plus, I also love self described intelligent women for situations like this because a man can always say "you are smart, you know exactly what you're doing." when they plead ignorance.

Post: #4

In keeping with my Classics streak, Julius Caesar divorced his first wife because there was a hint that she was part of a public scandal.

To quote Julius, "Caesar's wife must be beyond reproach."

If your girlfriend pulls that, the next time you see here spit that line in her face and walk away without a backwards glance.

Post: #5

"My girlfriend, a hyper-intelligent and vocal feminist...."

Make that "drama-seeking, stubborn attention whore." "Intelligence" in females does not equate to life skills...in fact, it's often the opposite, as I learned the hard way.

"... I reluctantly told her that it made uncomfortable for her to be wearing so little in the potential presence of my roommate. She complains that I was expecting her to compromise her comfort for my sake. I anticipated this and mostly just said I'm sorry..."

And he loses. Wrong answer. The correct answer is: "Too bad. That's how I feel." And if she questions it: "I'm not gonna pretend I don't have instincts as to what's right and wrong." The wrong answer was "I'm sorry."

"Anyway, my roommate comes downstairs (right on cue) in his boxers. She points to him and incredulously asks if I'm going to tell him to put on pants. I can already sense the futility of this argument, but she demands an answer."

Answer: "I'm not dating him. So I don't care what he wears."

Notice that she didn't perceive there should be any difference in priorities between caring about someone you're dating and someone you're not. Hmmm... what was that he said about her being "hyper-intelligent?"

This sounds hyper-small minded and willfully oblivious to me. Exactly what passes for "intelligent" in our schools, come to think of it.

We need to strike down the concept that "intelligence" means that a woman knows what she's talking about. It usually means she can memorize stuff and spit it back to teachers who are biased towards women anyway. This is what gives women these oversized ego.

Post: #6

I wouldn't care if she wore boy pants like that. If she was walking around stark naked, I probably wouldn't mind as well. Just my style.

However, I cannot tolerate disrespect. Any attitude and out the door she goes. I have little patience for BS. Just because I have a live and let be attitude doesn't mean I appreciate being talked down to.

Rough sex is the solution here. Make her submissive.[/quote]

Post: #7

Both prancing around in their underwear?

She's banging the roommate.

Post: #8

I think it depends on the kind of relationship you have with her. If she's just your hoe, than I like her to dress like one, to show her off to others like a prize. I'll put my finger in her ass crack in public and slap it, she will pretend to be offended. But if I'm in it for the long term, she has to be presentable to my mother.

Post: #9

Quote:My girlfriend, a hyper-intelligent and vocal feminist,

Thats the problem right there.

Post: #10

In a relationship men lead and women follow.That means ultimately what a man says goes.That's that,final word,end of discussion.If a man voices a dislike or vocalizes that he's been disrespected by his woman and she doesn't correct her behavior and or apologize than she ain't really HIS WOMAN.Women need to be lead.It's in their physiological make up.