Christian McQueen
International Playboy
     
Posts: 3,176
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation: 170
|
RE: Why is the Manosphere anti-Vegan?
Steak, cigs, vodka and fucking women raw were good enough for the Rat Pack...
...and it's damn good enough for me.
I could care less if other people eat meat or not; it's their rightful choice, but I love meat, especially a medium rare steak.
Ironic though how in this day and age, EVERYTHING is bad for you, based on which study that comes out.
If I die early because of having refreshing smokes, drinking top shelf smooth vodka, eating juicy mouth watering steaks, or fucking fresh tight pink pussy, then so be it.
I'll have had a helluva time doing it.
|
|
| 12-12-2013 04:54 AM |
|
The following 9 users Like Christian McQueen's post:9 users Like Christian McQueen's post
2Wycked, FretDancer, roberto, NY Digital, Quintus Curtius, Beyond Borders, Nevsky, Conquerer7, Built to Fade
|
Mr. Calicoat
Recovering Beta

Posts: 152
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 3
|
RE: Why is the Manosphere anti-Vegan?
(12-12-2013 04:54 AM)McQueensPlayboyRules Wrote: Steak, cigs, vodka and fucking women raw were good enough for the Rat Pack...
...and it's damn good enough for me.
I could care less if other people eat meat or not; it's their rightful choice, but I love meat, especially a medium rare steak.
Ironic though how in this day and age, EVERYTHING is bad for you, based on which study that comes out.
If I die early because of having refreshing smokes, drinking top shelf smooth vodka, eating juicy mouth watering steaks, or fucking fresh tight pink pussy, then so be it.
I'll have had a helluva time doing it.
That's cool bro, and you have my support. However;
The way I look at things, is that if I leave out the smoking, eat less meat and drink less whiskey (I'm more of a whiskey guy than a vodka guy), I'll be looking younger longer and I'll stay healthy and fit for a longer period, meaning I'd still be able to game young chicks and keep up with them when I'm in my forties.
Not to mention that smoking really has become an inconvenience here in West-Europe. You're not allowed to smoke anywhere anymore. I can't even smoke inside my own home because the house owner doesn't allow it. So because of that I stopped smoking. I feel a lot better ever since.
|
|
| 12-12-2013 05:31 AM |
|
|
FretDancer
True Player
    
Posts: 2,505
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 25
|
RE: Why is the Manosphere anti-Vegan?
(12-11-2013 07:05 PM)Mr. Calicoat Wrote: Eskimos are an exception to the rule really, they're not the ultimate proof that humans can (or are meant to be) eat tons of meat without getting health problems.
While it's true that diary products, grain and corn are a lot worse for us than meat, and while it's true that meat in small amounts is very healthy, especially if you work-out, eating lots of meat is by no means healthy, especially not red meat, which is the worst kind of meat for us humans.
You can see that a high-fiber diet is much more important for human-beings who want to live healthy, while carbs on the other hand are better cut low. The idea that meat is the best source of food for muscle-growth is quite frankly, a myth. High-fiber products such as broccoli, berries and spinach is what you need for muscle gain. Red meat can be beneficial too, but only if it's grass-fed and occasional. Everyone knows that eating lots of red meat is directly related to many of the health problems we often see in our modern-day western society. Just look at the diet of an average obese fat-ass cunt who suffers from type 2 diabetes and a high cholesterol. They're all primarily meat eaters, red meat eaters.
Now of course if you live an active life, you sleep enough and at regular times, work-out and eat enough high-fiber products, you're not gonna notice the negative effects of too much red meat. You're probably gonna feel just fine. But if you don't have such a lifestyle and you still eat too much (red) meat, then you can bet your sweet cheeks that sooner or later you're gonna notice the negative effects of it.
Being healthy is all about balance, and in this case, an occasional home-made hamburger 3-4 times a week is the correct balance to gain all the benefits of eating meat, while not suffering from the negatives.
I am sorry but this is a load of bullshit.
|
|
| 12-12-2013 06:01 AM |
|
|
Mr. Calicoat
Recovering Beta

Posts: 152
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 3
|
RE: Why is the Manosphere anti-Vegan?
(12-12-2013 06:01 AM)FretDancer Wrote: (12-11-2013 07:05 PM)Mr. Calicoat Wrote: Eskimos are an exception to the rule really, they're not the ultimate proof that humans can (or are meant to be) eat tons of meat without getting health problems.
While it's true that diary products, grain and corn are a lot worse for us than meat, and while it's true that meat in small amounts is very healthy, especially if you work-out, eating lots of meat is by no means healthy, especially not red meat, which is the worst kind of meat for us humans.
You can see that a high-fiber diet is much more important for human-beings who want to live healthy, while carbs on the other hand are better cut low. The idea that meat is the best source of food for muscle-growth is quite frankly, a myth. High-fiber products such as broccoli, berries and spinach is what you need for muscle gain. Red meat can be beneficial too, but only if it's grass-fed and occasional. Everyone knows that eating lots of red meat is directly related to many of the health problems we often see in our modern-day western society. Just look at the diet of an average obese fat-ass cunt who suffers from type 2 diabetes and a high cholesterol. They're all primarily meat eaters, red meat eaters.
Now of course if you live an active life, you sleep enough and at regular times, work-out and eat enough high-fiber products, you're not gonna notice the negative effects of too much red meat. You're probably gonna feel just fine. But if you don't have such a lifestyle and you still eat too much (red) meat, then you can bet your sweet cheeks that sooner or later you're gonna notice the negative effects of it.
Being healthy is all about balance, and in this case, an occasional home-made hamburger 3-4 times a week is the correct balance to gain all the benefits of eating meat, while not suffering from the negatives.
I am sorry but this is a load of bullshit.
How about you tell me how I'm wrong rather than just blatantly claiming it's bullshit without offering a counter-argument?
I can speak from personal experience that I never was able to get a nice six-pack, until I started to cut back on the red meat and ate more spinach, broccoli, almonds, soy products and occasionally fish such as salmon. How do you explain that?
|
|
| 12-12-2013 06:48 AM |
|
The following 2 users Like Mr. Calicoat's post:2 users Like Mr. Calicoat's post
Starke, Beyond Borders
|
Peregrine
Alpha Male
   
Posts: 1,493
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 65
|
RE: Why is the Manosphere anti-Vegan?
(12-12-2013 06:48 AM)Mr. Calicoat Wrote: How about you tell me how I'm wrong rather than just blatantly claiming it's bullshit without offering a counter-argument?
I can speak from personal experience that I never was able to get a nice six-pack, until I started to cut back on the red meat and ate more spinach, broccoli, almonds, soy products and occasionally fish such as salmon. How do you explain that?
The fabled "six pack" is largely a result of diet, not muscle gain. You cut fat by reducing caloric intake. Not surprising. (Though congratulations are in order as it's not an easy achievement.)
Forget the six pack. What do you bench, squat, and deadlift?
(This post was last modified: 12-12-2013 06:58 AM by Peregrine.)
|
|
| 12-12-2013 06:57 AM |
|
The following 3 users Like Peregrine's post:3 users Like Peregrine's post
FretDancer, Generation21stCentury, Built to Fade
|
Veloce
International Playboy
     
Posts: 5,899
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 181
|
RE: Why is the Manosphere anti-Vegan?
(12-12-2013 03:02 AM)AnonymousBosch Wrote: Yeah, any grains. Vegetables don't seem to be enough fibre alone for me, which is odd considering the amount I eat. I'm going to try Paleo again after christmas to get very cut for a movie role I'm doing and I'll try to figure out the constipation problem in the process. I'll admit it could be a problem unique to me. I'm sure there's enough information in the forum for me to read up on with some searching.
Isn't Green Juicing the latest fad? I eat kale or spinach, courgettes, brocolli, brussell sprouts, snow peas or beans and apples on a daily basis anyway. Cabbage now and then. I love the individual texture and tastes of vegetables, (particularly my homegrown seasonal ones), and know how to cook them to bring out or compliment their flavours, so I don't see the advantage of mashing up something I already enjoy into a sludge. I can see it appealing as a trend to female cubicle workers for the laziness of it. Sell me on the pluses of it from your viewpoint.
Are you using a blender? Traditional juicers would remove the fibre - soluble vegetable fibre lowers your blood pressure and cholesterol.
I use a champion juicer. It removes some large fibers but I don't buy that notion that a super high fiber diet is necessary.
If you're eating a large amount of vegetables and you're having issues with regularity, something is off. I've always found eggs to be a natural laxative, as well as hot tea.
Green juice may be a recent fad, but the amount of vegetables that I pack into one quart of juice is far more than you could ever eat in a sitting. Since I don't sit down and eat full proper meals, I like being able to consume concentrated nutrition like that.
Try it for yourself.
"...so I gave her an STD, and she STILL wanted to bang me."
TEAM NO APPS
TEAM PINK
|
|
| 12-12-2013 12:42 PM |
|
The following 1 user Likes Veloce's post:1 user Likes Veloce's post
Master Of My Own Kingdom
|
Suits
Innovative Casanova
      
Posts: 9,726
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 239
|
RE: Why is the Manosphere anti-Vegan?
(12-12-2013 05:18 AM)johnwu Wrote: because bacon
I'm the King of Beijing!
|
|
| 12-12-2013 01:27 PM |
|
The following 1 user Likes Suits's post:1 user Likes Suits's post
Shotgun Styles
|
deathtofatties
Wingman
  
Posts: 710
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 22
|
RE: Why is the Manosphere anti-Vegan?
(12-11-2013 06:32 PM)Aliblahba Wrote: This thread needs more masculinity.
Red pill=red meat
Who's with me?
I evolved from:
And no amount of science can prove otherwise. My only purpose in life is to kill, eat meat and fuck. People that think we came from monkey are just scared and want to live in trees. Just don't come down to ground level, or you'll have to deal with the Alisaurus.
|
|
| 12-12-2013 08:23 PM |
|
The following 1 user Likes deathtofatties's post:1 user Likes deathtofatties's post
Starke
|
Shotgun Styles
Banned
Posts: 351
Joined: Oct 2013
|
RE: Why is the Manosphere anti-Vegan?
(12-12-2013 01:27 PM)Suits Wrote: (12-12-2013 05:18 AM)johnwu Wrote: because bacon
![[Image: IMG_0385.jpg]](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-E6czFO62ZPE/UR0PlT-oXII/AAAAAAAABN8/y7jjDi8ocMI/s1600/IMG_0385.jpg)
![[Image: IMG_0391.jpg]](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-jVnlhxX51TY/UR0PlilYBkI/AAAAAAAABOA/BKZmwqxyuyE/s1600/IMG_0391.jpg)
Oh, fuck you!
Fuck you, fuck you, fuck you for posting that!
Now all I can think about are delicious bacon roses.
I will have dreams about this.
Damn YOU!
|
|
| 12-17-2013 05:55 PM |
|
The following 1 user Likes Shotgun Styles's post:1 user Likes Shotgun Styles's post
Suits
|
deathtofatties
Wingman
  
Posts: 710
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 22
|
RE: Why is the Manosphere anti-Vegan?
|
|
| 12-18-2013 05:37 PM |
|
|