Post: #101

(11-19-2013 02:13 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  Let the video responses begin! Would definitely smash.

http://triggerwarnings.wikispot.org/Browse_by_trigger

here is a list of triggers.

an article for each would bring all the girls to the yard

Post: #102

That girl is pretty cute.

Too bad.

Post: #103

double

Post: #104

(11-19-2013 02:55 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  [quote='scorpion' pid='582354' dateline='1384879995']
I love how these women don't understand the internet. When they see something they think is horrible, they want to share it far and wide and get as many eyeballs as possible on it. It would be like if their was a little dog with explosive diarrhea sitting by itself in a corner, and instead of leaving it alone, they pick it up and carry it across the entire house, spreading shit all over the floor, saying "OMFG everyone look at this dog that keeps shitting all over the place! Can you believe this? OMG!"

The female imperative that craves drama and emotional solidarity from peers overrides all logic. And so it is that feminists unwittingly find themselves foot soldiers in the RoK army, helping to spread our message far and wide. Thanks bitches.

The conclusion I've drawn from this - and which I've long suspected anyway - is that if women feels upset about something, she'll deliberately set out to make everyone around her upset too, including husband / boyfriend, children, friends. There's no border between her feelings and everyone else's due to narcissism / solipsism, to the extent that they often don't seem to be able to comprehend there's even an alternative point of view to be had. Nothing is more important to her than her feelings.

Women seem clueless as to how repulsive their addiction to screeching emotion and dreary drama is to men. This is why I deliberately restrict their influence on my life beyond casual sex / dating. The constant toxic negativity would mean I'd never achieve a damn thing.

Post: #105

Fat Shaming Week hater



Eating Disorder hater

Post: #106

(11-19-2013 02:13 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  Let the video responses begin! Would definitely smash.

She's solid 8 potential. Makeup, sexy dress, heels, I can just see it now.

She's also about as typically American as they come. Completely self-absorbed and constant navel-gazing. Everything is about her "struggle", as if there's any struggle involved with being an attractive white American female.

She's got the same weird speech and facial tics typical of American girls, where they attempt to mimic the speech patterns and mannerisms of people on T.V., but it just comes across as incredibly awkward and uncomfortable. She's mostly incoherent, taking up to 45 seconds just to finish a single sentence and make her point. Again, something I see very commonly with American women and effeminate men. "So...like....here's the thing...I'm like....doing so much better....and...like...". One thing I notice with red-pill men is the ability to form concise statements that are devoid of McLanguage and get straight to the point. I think it's another reason why these bed-wetters get so upset at websites like ROK; we're able to blatantly speak our minds and, god-forbid, be offensive with zero regard to people's feelings or being PC. All of that indirect, insecure, and unintelligible McLanguage is the speaker's brain racking itself to make a point without potentially offending someone. Our brains aren't wired to do that very well though; noone should have to go through a laundry list of potentially offensive language just to speak their mind.

It's amusing to observe.

Regardless, she only reinforces Tuth's article. If anything, she's the POSTER CHILD for girls with an eating disorder. In fact, let's go down Tuth's list as it relates to her:
5. Her obsession with her body will improve her overall look
Check. This girl is super cute.
4. She costs less money
Check. I can't imagine this girl plowing through a 3 course meal with wine pairings at every course and two cocktails before and after and then stopping at a cupcake dispensary after the meal. Unlike her fat feminist counterparts.
3. She's fragile and vulnerable
Check. This girl made a video response just to show how offended she is.
2. Probably has money of her own
Check. Look at her other videos. She's obviously in an upper class household.
1. She's better in bed
Double Check. Just listen to the pent-up angst in this girl's voice. You can imagine all kinds of crazy she brings to the bedroom. Something about her face just screams, "Handcuffs and skullfucking".

So while she's making a video trying to tell us how inaccurate Tuth's article, what she's really doing is showing us that in reality, Tuth fucking NAILED it.

Post: #107

(11-19-2013 02:13 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  Let the video responses begin! Would definitely smash.

I would bang. And while banging I would say everything from this thread.
/thread-30238-...#pid582546

Post: #108

That girl who made the video to Tuth can't be very bright. I wrote:

"@MeaganGunnip Just watched your video. Interesting how eating disorders aren't prevalent in the 3rd world. They ARE first world problems."

...She 'favorited' the tweet.

Post: #109

Can anyone verify her age before I start trolling her?

Post: #110

(11-19-2013 03:21 PM)McQueensPlayboyRules Wrote:  Can anyone verify her age before I start trolling her?

She's 18
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Meagan-Gu...9104759929

And of course she's delusional that she's a "musician".
Just like every other American Girl


In her video: "Like any normal person I clicked on the link

Post: #111

Says she's 16yo.

There goes my hysterical trolling. Dammit.

Post: #112

(11-19-2013 03:31 PM)McQueensPlayboyRules Wrote:  Says she's 16yo.

There goes my hysterical trolling. Dammit.

Where did you get that?
From her Facebook Bio: Meagan Gunnip is an 18 year old singer-songwriter

Of course she fits Tuthmosis's description perfectly, from Connecticut spends time in LA/NYC, doing "music" with daddy's $$$. Was also probably sent to treatment with daddy's $$$ too.

The article reached HuffPo:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/19...03442.html

Post: #113

The page I got the pic from says 18 years old.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=...=3&theater

But I won't post the pic if there's doubt about her age.

Post: #114

16 or 18, she's still bangable. Not suggesting anyone go and commit any crimes, but she proves Tuthmosis' point.

Post: #115

At 16, she's legal in most of the world. However, it says on her FB that's she 18. Therefore, by this forum's rules - WB!

Post: #116

I'm surprised this is the article to blow up. It's kind of common sense advice. The whole reason girls get eating disorders is because they want to feel pretty and so that someone will be attracted to them and make them feel loved. Isn't the whole point of an eating disorder to get guys to want to date you? This seems like win-win.

Post: #117

A suggestion for stage 2 trolling/inflammation would be to pretend to respond to requests that the article be taken down Tuth be 'fired' etc and post something like "The board of directors of ROK takes the feedback on this article very seriously and will be presenting an official press release on the matter at XX:00pm central time".

Then post such a press release essentially saying "go fuck yourself, private ownership, free speech..if you don't like it for god's sake stop retweeting it..."

Post: #118

(11-19-2013 04:03 PM)wiscanada Wrote:  A suggestion for stage 2 trolling/inflammation would be to pretend to respond to requests that the article be taken down Tuth be 'fired' etc and post something like "The board of directors of ROK takes the feedback on this article very seriously and will be presenting an official press release on the matter at XX:00pm central time".

Then post such a press release essentially saying "go fuck yourself, private ownership, free speech..if you don't like it for god's sake stop retweeting it..."

The ROK Board of Directors sincerely apologises for the offending article and, having discussed matters with legal counsel, agreed to rescind the article on condition that ten attractive girls send in pics of their naked bodies tagged with the following reconciliation message: "I <3 ROK".

Post: #119

(11-19-2013 03:54 PM)soup Wrote:  16 or 18, she's still bangable. Not suggesting anyone go and commit any crimes, but she proves Tuthmosis' point.

There aren't many girls in that age range that aren't bangable. If a girl isn't bangable at 18, god help her.

Post: #120

Surprised that this chick is rather bangable shame though the cute ones are becoming as crazy as bull dyke femtards though

Post: #121

"If a girl isn't bangable at 18, god help her."

^Excellent point Speakeasy.

Post: #122

(11-19-2013 04:20 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

(11-19-2013 03:54 PM)soup Wrote:  16 or 18, she's still bangable. Not suggesting anyone go and commit any crimes, but she proves Tuthmosis' point.

There aren't many girls in that age range that aren't bangable. If a girl isn't bangable at 18, god help her.

That's how bad it's getting in the Anglosphere. Miley Cyrus is praised as having an "incredible body" - She's fucking 20 years old, how else should she look?

That sort of media statement is a combination of the pedestalization of all women, and that fact that being chubby is now the average.

I'm so happy I found the manosphere, as it has given me the insight into reading into these seemingly insignificant things for what they are.

Post: #123

Do you guys think this represents a big bang moment of game?

Tuth is now on par with Christopher Hitchens for inciting the soaking of panties across America with his precise articulation of female ridiculousness. There are now legions of girl fantasizing about him- what he looks like, if he lives near them.. all that stuff.

ROK is like a big mirror for hamsters.

The hamster thinks in it's mind that it is a lion until it see's a pathetic little sniveling creature in the mirror.

Post: #124

(11-19-2013 03:45 PM)Emancipator Wrote:  

(11-19-2013 03:31 PM)McQueensPlayboyRules Wrote:  Says she's 16yo.

There goes my hysterical trolling. Dammit.

Where did you get that?
From her Facebook Bio: Meagan Gunnip is an 18 year old singer-songwriter

Of course she fits Tuthmosis's description perfectly, from Connecticut spends time in LA/NYC, doing "music" with daddy's $$$. Was also probably sent to treatment with daddy's $$$ too.

The article reached HuffPo:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/19...03442.html

You had to know this would be the case. Ignorant chick doing something useless & irrelevant with her life made possible only because daddy has a shitload of money & allows her to leech off of him trying to censor the thoughts of other that give her teh bad feelz. Quelle fucking surprise

Post: #125

(11-19-2013 01:12 PM)kosko Wrote:  My sides hurt. Evreybody should know about the "petition" on Change.org to remove the article. Silly Kids... Free speech and private ownership means your petition mean jack shit...,

We should all sign the petition.