(11-25-2013 08:03 PM)MaleDefined Wrote:  I can't wait for this chica to put this online petition on her resume when she graduates from college.

She won't have to. It'll be there online for all to Google. And as much as I criticize Blue Pill media editors on here, they don't take kindly to anyone who tries to censor any media because they think "What if it's me next?"

I've worked in newsrooms. NO ONE will want her in any newsroom anywhere. Even women's mags will run screaming -- no one needs a potential HR nightmare.

(11-25-2013 11:10 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

You should reply to her like this RVF poster (pointbreak) does :

http://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-23037-...#pid428143

unsubscribe.

(11-25-2013 11:10 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

Quote:Free speech is only free when you do no speak to harm others with it.

Who defines "harm" honey, you?

Our freedom is more important than your feelings.

Quote:You feed into this type of thinking, into jocks (who I see are most of your "likes" anyway) who continue to perpetuate these words into action.

"Jocks?" What is this? High school?

Although judging by her grammar, her being a high school student projecting her undesirability to the jocks she wants doesn't seem an unreasonable assumption.

Quote:I am speaking as a woman who has experienced an eating disorder, and a woman who comes from money.

Thanks for confirming what Tuth wrote in the article. This is a serious poor showing.

Quote:Let me leave you with one last thought.

What thought?

Quote:Women and especially women like me are strong, and intelligent

You're so strong that a little article by an anon on the internet has you breaking down into angry ranting. As for your "intelligence," perhaps it would be on better display if you try constructing paragraphs that logically follow each other.

Quote:*Insert common feminist insult here.*

Yeah, we know.

Her last name is Singleton.

How appropriate.

back in the late 1990's, Tom Leykis received a Class 5 $hitstorm for broadcasting a phone call from a listener who claimed he banged only chicks who were molested as little girls

Jezebel is mad at ROK:

http://jezebel.com/ladies-quit-paying-at...1469942571

(11-26-2013 12:39 PM)Libertas Wrote:  

Quote:You feed into this type of thinking, into jocks (who I see are most of your "likes" anyway) who continue to perpetuate these words into action.

"Jocks?" What is this? High school?

The irony being that by and large, many of the guys who are into the pickup lifestyle and participate in the RVF found and joined the community because they got tired of watching anorexic hotties banging the stupid high school jocks.

It was based on an awareness that nice guys finish last the created guys like Roosh. All of this is a means of bringing balance back to a system created by anorexic sluts who changed the rules via the sexual revolution/feminist family law to guarantee that the betas would get screwed.

(11-26-2013 04:34 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Jezebel is mad at ROK:

http://jezebel.com/ladies-quit-paying-at...1469942571

Their ongoing silence on the article was conspicious, so I figured they were playing this game.

I also knew a feminist's narcissistic compulsion to both speak her mind and flaunt her moral-superiority would override logic eventually.

We understand them better than they understand themselves.

(11-26-2013 04:34 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Jezebel is mad at ROK:

http://jezebel.com/ladies-quit-paying-at...1469942571

Quote:According to Quantcast, ReturnOfKings.com got an average of 35,000 daily unique pageviews for most of the month of November. (Jezebel, to compare, gets an average of about 500,000 uniques per day). Interestingly, on the 20th, Return of Kings' traffic jumped to 500,000. This meteoric rise took place over the course of three days. And that clearly has everything to do with the viral outrage to one of its truly, truly horrific pieces, which was titled "5 Reasons To Date a Girl With an Eating Disorder."

(11-26-2013 04:34 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Jezebel is mad at ROK:

http://jezebel.com/ladies-quit-paying-at...1469942571

hah psychopathic misogynist.

These websites just cannot help but spread the word. It is completely against their goals, but they have no choice but to abide to the almighty attention-whoring, money-grubbing hamster.

They are spreading the puppy who is spreading the shit all over the house.

It's like clockwork :
1- Don't see them! Don't give them views! Ignore them!
-Instint kicks in, like VTEC-
2- LOOOOK! LOOK! Look at how despicable and horrible they are! Look, OUTRAGE! ""What the actual fuck!!11!"

Then it's the same. If jezebel didn't siphon angry bitches from their more successful, less useless blogs (Lifehacker/Gizmodo/Gawker's Main), nobody would notice that pimple on the servers.

(11-26-2013 04:52 PM)soup Wrote:  They are spreading the puppy who is spreading the shit all over the house.

Exactly.

They'll keep reading because we fuel their persecution complex and, since they hold the power in society, we're one of the few places that can.

If they read, they'll have to break down and comment, because a) they need to be right in a way men don't; and b) women gain positive social reinforcement for publicly breaking down.

Did anyone notice the writer of the article? Beauty entirely-dependent on situational lighting and makeup, and she knows it.



more pics here

I've been with enough women to recognise insecurity and Dead Eyes, and they set off my 'issues' radar instantly. Rape? Sexual abuse? Daddy issues? It's the aura of unpleasant company, feeling-based political activism and eating disorders. WNB.

I've noticed all the empowered women on social media attacking Tuthmosis and Roosh make sure their main profile pic still fits the masculine idea of beauty. Chin down, eyes up = female submission.

(11-26-2013 04:45 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(11-26-2013 04:34 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Jezebel is mad at ROK:

http://jezebel.com/ladies-quit-paying-at...1469942571

Their ongoing silence on the article was conspicious, so I figured they were playing this game.

I also knew a feminist's narcissistic compulsion to both speak her mind and flaunt her moral-superiority would override logic eventually.

We understand them better than they understand themselves.

Jezebel put up some serious LMR, but eventually succumbed to ROK's implementation of the classic (and devastating) when-in-doubt-whip-it-out move. Our dick was out for the taking and, while they resisted grabbing it for a while, that only made them that much more ravenous when they finally gave into their lusts.

Now, they're screaming nasty bedroom obscenities as we crush their faces into the pillow while we pound it from behind. The whole Internet can hear them. Even our downstairs neighbors are hitting the ceiling with their broom.

(11-26-2013 05:38 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

(11-26-2013 04:45 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(11-26-2013 04:34 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Jezebel is mad at ROK:

http://jezebel.com/ladies-quit-paying-at...1469942571

Their ongoing silence on the article was conspicious, so I figured they were playing this game.

I also knew a feminist's narcissistic compulsion to both speak her mind and flaunt her moral-superiority would override logic eventually.

We understand them better than they understand themselves.

Jezebel put up some serious LMR, but eventually succumbed to ROK's implementation of the classic (and devastating) when-in-doubt-whip-it-out move. Our dick was out for the taking and, while they resisted grabbing it for a while, that only made them that much more ravenous when they finally gave into their lusts.

Now, they're screaming nasty bedroom obscenities as we crush their faces into the pillow while we pound it from behind. The whole Internet can hear them. Even our downstairs neighbors are hitting the ceiling with their broom.

hahahahaha, if only the staff from jezebel was as attractive as these eating disorder chicks, forum guys near there would be able to ONS them for real.

(11-26-2013 05:24 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  Did anyone notice the writer of the article? Beauty entirely-dependent on situational lighting and makeup, and she knows it.

If you are a delusional white cis-gendered poliamorous demiplatonic female and you know it clap your hands...

Clap clap...

If you are a delusional white cis-gendered poliamorous demiplatonic female and you know it clap your hands...

Clap clap...

(11-26-2013 06:50 PM)germanico Wrote:  

(11-26-2013 05:24 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  Did anyone notice the writer of the article? Beauty entirely-dependent on situational lighting and makeup, and she knows it.

If you are a delusional white cis-gendered poliamorous demiplatonic female and you know it clap your hands...

Clap clap...

She thinks she's Zooey Deschanel but she's only Tori Amos.

(11-26-2013 04:34 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Jezebel is mad at ROK:

http://jezebel.com/ladies-quit-paying-at...1469942571

Quote:MeganRiveraUCallie Beusman1861L
It IS cathartic to hate-read, but you did that for us here, and now we have absolutely no reason to give them any site traffic at all. Let's make a pact that NONE OF US will EVER go there, EVER EVER FOREVER. Today 11:46am

She has 180+ likes for this quote of hers. She wants to make a sisterhood pact never to visit ROK. Like a sisterhood pact has any strength or credibility. Women have no idea what integrity, loyalty or fidelity are. But they talk like they are all united. She got her moment - the most liked quote so far - probably all she really cared about anyway - getting some attention.

(11-26-2013 08:13 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  

(11-26-2013 04:34 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Jezebel is mad at ROK:

http://jezebel.com/ladies-quit-paying-at...1469942571

Quote:MeganRiveraUCallie Beusman1861L
It IS cathartic to hate-read, but you did that for us here, and now we have absolutely no reason to give them any site traffic at all. Let's make a pact that NONE OF US will EVER go there, EVER EVER FOREVER. Today 11:46am

She has 180+ likes for this quote of hers. She wants to make a sisterhood pact never to visit ROK. Like a sisterhood pact has any strength or credibility. Women have no idea what integrity, loyalty or fidelity are. But they talk like they are all united. She got her moment - the most liked quote so far - probably all she really cared about anyway - getting some attention.

EVER, EVER EVER FOREVER made me laugh. Between that, mentioning Harry Potter and quoting 'The Craft' earlier in the piece, I could only think "Who could ever take such an unprofessional writer seriously?" I'm old enough to remember pre-internet journalism.

There's also weasel tactics: such as accusing ROK of being full of grammatical errors; and, hilariously, telling the readers they can totally believe her that it's actually as bad as she's saying, so they don't need to go there to check things out for themselves and draw their own opinions.

Their enemy of the moment always represents absolute evil. There is no possibility of black and white to Jezebel writers. Narcissists reduce everything to extremes, and their false personas can't risk honest debate, in case they crumble entirely. They want to restrict others finding conflicting viewpoints to their own.

Look at me for example:

I find overweight women mentally-toxic and physically-unattractive.
EVIL!
Yet, somehow I nursed my mother in the last dying years of her life.

I think female-driven workplaces are toxic, unproductive enviroments for men to try and function in.
EVIL!
Yet, i'm sexually-successful with women, I'm always upfront with them about the realistic expectations of our relationship, I enjoy making them come, and try to always leave them in better state than which I found them.

Complexity isn't allowed to exist in their world, which is why they will always be disappointed with it. They think "With us or against us".

George Orwell knew the score with Marxists:

Quote:It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy.

(11-26-2013 05:24 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(11-26-2013 04:52 PM)soup Wrote:  They are spreading the puppy who is spreading the shit all over the house.

Exactly.

They'll keep reading because we fuel their persecution complex and, since they hold the power in society, we're one of the few places that can.

If they read, they'll have to break down and comment, because a) they need to be right in a way men don't; and b) women gain positive social reinforcement for publicly breaking down.

Did anyone notice the writer of the article? Beauty entirely-dependent on situational lighting and makeup, and she knows it.



more pics here

I've been with enough women to recognise insecurity and Dead Eyes, and they set off my 'issues' radar instantly. Rape? Sexual abuse? Daddy issues? It's the aura of unpleasant company, feeling-based political activism and eating disorders. WNB.

I've noticed all the empowered women on social media attacking Tuthmosis and Roosh make sure their main profile pic still fits the masculine idea of beauty. Chin down, eyes up = female submission.

She got a wickedy ass witch chin, but I'd still bang datazz.

Quote:MeganRiveraUCallie Beusman1861L
It IS cathartic to hate-read, but you did that for us here, and now we have absolutely no reason to give them any site traffic at all. Let's make a pact that NONE OF US will EVER go there, EVER EVER FOREVER. Today 11:46am

She sounds like a dramatic six year old.

(11-26-2013 09:44 PM)soup Wrote:  She got a wickedy ass witch chin, but I'd still bang datazz.

Was thinking the same. Make me remember of a critter i saw in a movie.

(11-26-2013 09:44 PM)soup Wrote:  She got a wickedy ass witch chin, but I'd still bang datazz.

Yeah, I know: "2/10 WNB"

Dead eyes and insecurity.

I've banged enough crazy to recognise the warning signs. All I see in hers picture is 'mid-week 2 am hysterical phone call threatening suicide.'

(11-26-2013 09:44 PM)soup Wrote:  

(11-26-2013 05:24 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(11-26-2013 04:52 PM)soup Wrote:  They are spreading the puppy who is spreading the shit all over the house.

Exactly.

They'll keep reading because we fuel their persecution complex and, since they hold the power in society, we're one of the few places that can.

If they read, they'll have to break down and comment, because a) they need to be right in a way men don't; and b) women gain positive social reinforcement for publicly breaking down.

Did anyone notice the writer of the article? Beauty entirely-dependent on situational lighting and makeup, and she knows it.



more pics here

I've been with enough women to recognise insecurity and Dead Eyes, and they set off my 'issues' radar instantly. Rape? Sexual abuse? Daddy issues? It's the aura of unpleasant company, feeling-based political activism and eating disorders. WNB.

I've noticed all the empowered women on social media attacking Tuthmosis and Roosh make sure their main profile pic still fits the masculine idea of beauty. Chin down, eyes up = female submission.

She got a wickedy ass witch chin, but I'd still bang datazz.

(11-26-2013 05:38 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  Jezebel put up some serious LMR, but eventually succumbed to ROK's implementation of the classic (and devastating) when-in-doubt-whip-it-out move. Our dick was out for the taking and, while they resisted grabbing it for a while, that only made them that much more ravenous when they finally gave into their lusts.

They HAD to take our dick, or, as Science proves it, they would have died :

http://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-30436....ght=ferret

"female ferrets will develop a medical issue if they have been waiting for a mate for too long: It's called "death." More specifically, the thing that kills them is a fatal state of too much horniness. Unlike human females, with their fancy and confusing system of spontaneous ovulation (which has the negative effect of making them not constantly fertile and infuriating iguanas), female ferrets have induced ovulation, meaning that they will remain in heat until they have sex.

Unfortunately, the hormones that flood their body during heat are toxic and will sooner or later kill them if a guy ferret doesn't come along and end their torment with a good dicking....

So, perhaps we in the Game community should be a just little more tolerant when the Jezzies and other hormone-addled feminists waddle over and bray nonsensical spittle at us. It's not entirely their fault that they're hopelessly illogical and deeply unpleasant, they're simply hormone-poisoned from their inability to attract men capable of giving them what they are desperately craving.

It is science. And we all know that you can't argue with science."

I don't get what ferrets and women have to with each other. Are you talking about the hamster thing ?