(11-25-2013 04:18 PM)germanico Wrote:  

(11-25-2013 02:41 PM)Roosh Wrote:  .The U of Miami student who started the change.gov petition...

Ok, so they get five zillion signatures and then what? Send you an email to pretty please remove the post?

Thats what I dont understand. On the website it says that another 2,000 signatures are 'needed' before a change will be made, as though they have any control over Roosh or anyone else.

It sounds like a pretty good hustle.

I'm going to set up a webite "Down with Return of Kings - Help Raise $10,000 to Force Close".

Funds will be redirected here with 25% of funds pumped into fat shaming week 2014.

(11-25-2013 04:48 PM)Cyr Wrote:  Thats what I dont understand. On the website it says that another 2,000 signatures are 'needed' before a change will be made, as though they have any control over Roosh or anyone else.

No, you misunderstand; they set a target number of signatures, then when - and only when - it's reached, they can treat themselves to an extra large pizza. Unless they get hungry during the interim, that is...

(11-25-2013 04:54 PM)Que enspastic Wrote:  It sounds like a pretty good hustle.

I'm going to set up a webite "Down with Return of Kings - Help Raise $10,000 to Force Close".

Funds will be redirected here with 25% of funds pumped into fat shaming week 2014.

That's what the Koch Brothers do, if I'm not mistaken. It's definitely a slick hustle.

(11-25-2013 09:52 AM)master_thespian Wrote:  wow, AB, sorry you had to bury your buddy. I am starting to think there are women who behave worse than american woman: aussie women.

Thanks, but I'll clarify I wasn't writing that for attention. His death is what is is. I was just highlighting the difference between men and women, who are allowed to publicly break down into snot-running hysteria over minor trivialities, only to gain positive reinforcement about their 'strength' and 'bravery' when they do so.

If you're a man? The serious shit is just a little more weight for your shoulders to bear, and you walk alone.

I have to wonder if women understand the concept of self-cultivated strength at all, or do they see it as something that only exists via the attribution of an audience ie. You aren't strong unless someone sees you being strong when you publicly display your weakness so they can see the pain you have to deal with on a daily basis?

Weakness is strength. Very Orwellian.

(11-25-2013 04:54 PM)Que enspastic Wrote:  It sounds like a pretty good hustle.

I'm going to set up a webite "Down with Return of Kings - Help Raise $10,000 to Force Close".

Funds will be redirected here with 25% of funds pumped into fat shaming week 2014.

Kickstarter campaign.

Close ROK for a day. Pocket the proceeds and laugh all the way to Vegas.

Wald

(11-25-2013 03:08 PM)Enigma Wrote:  Let me get this straight...a newspaper is reporting on a random college student's reaction to a blog post by an anonymous writer?

The leftist, feminist-friendly media is simply selling an illusion of power to its readership, implying that something will be done due to the misguided belief that moral superiority alone is enough to create serious consequences for anyone who doesn't share their opinion. Meanwhile, they're indifferent to the fact that those with real power are starting wars in their name and stealing their retirement funds.

Also did anyone notice the image of her in the newspaper is much worse than her cherry-picked pictures from Facebook?

Before:



After:



A lot of guys will be tricked on Okcupid/tinder.

(11-25-2013 05:32 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  The leftist, feminist-friendly media is simply selling an illusion of power to its readership, implying that something will be done due to the misguided belief that moral superiority alone is enough to create serious consequences for anyone who doesn't share their opinion.

Excellent point. Reminds me of what Mencius Moldbug wrote last June:

Quote:Just the way Roissy is a sex addict, the civil-liberties zealot is a power addict. There is a difference, however. Roissy actually has sex. Or so I believe. There is unfortunately no word that means "porn" in the context of political power, but there should be. Being a slave to desire is a low condition of the human soul, but the only condition more pathetic is that of a slave to unfulfilled desire.

Masturbation in the context of political power is protest. It gives the powerless the illusion that something is being done, and that their voices actually have some weight, and in reality, it's all futile. But the powerless get their thirst for power sated, and become more docile. Just like a sex-starved man will get less horny and less aggressive after jacking off.

Interestingly, according to this theory, leftist media is essentially the political equivalent of porn mags. When the Jizzabellers bitch about men and organize online protests against "oppression", they are essentially jacking off. They get their dosage of power, feel less powerless, and can then live another day.

(11-25-2013 05:32 PM)Walderschmidt Wrote:  

(11-25-2013 04:54 PM)Que enspastic Wrote:  It sounds like a pretty good hustle.

I'm going to set up a webite "Down with Return of Kings - Help Raise $10,000 to Force Close".

Funds will be redirected here with 25% of funds pumped into fat shaming week 2014.

Kickstarter campaign.

Close ROK for a day. Pocket the proceeds and laugh all the way to Vegas.

Wald

This is a great idea. Kickstarter doesn't have much accountability (consider the woman who did the "feminist tropes in video games" fundraiser and sat on the money for a year, while failing to disclose that she was a paid consultant for EA - a maker of the games she was supposed to be reviewing).

You could easily do this if you execute fast, well, and make sure to get it reblogged by the haters.

AnonymousBosch - I am 'liking' almost every post you make these days. You're such an intelligent poster, thankyou for joining this forum, you make it a more intelligent place.

As was said by Tuth on another thread, the combined knowledge and intelligence of this forum is absolutely magnificent and what a pleasure it is to be a part of such a group. If you need help on how to get a girl to do X, you'll have several people willing to help. If you need help fitting a particular screw into a difficult lock (no pun), you'll have help. If you need help in your workout routine, you'll have help. ETC

Roosh (alongside mods), you've made the best forum for men, bar none. Roll on forum meetup 2014 in London!

(11-25-2013 02:41 PM)Roosh Wrote:  The U of Miami student who started the change.gov petition gets a favorable article published about her in a Rhode Island newspaper:

http://www.thewesterlysun.com/news/weste...ttons.html

Quote:“Its mere publication is a disgusting reminder to sane people that idiots like you exist in the world, the idiots that will perpetuate the popularity of eating disorders, which is something that I strive to help stop,” she wrote.

How articulate and intelligent of her.

Proceed from here to believe you are intellectually and morally superior, then perform a meaningless action to confirm your desperate attempt for the feelings of superiority.

Yep.

Only in a pussified beta culture could such a passage attain such worship.

ROK's been on fire lately. We're making inroads.

(11-25-2013 04:56 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

(11-25-2013 04:54 PM)Que enspastic Wrote:  It sounds like a pretty good hustle.

I'm going to set up a webite "Down with Return of Kings - Help Raise $10,000 to Force Close".

Funds will be redirected here with 25% of funds pumped into fat shaming week 2014.

That's what the Koch Brothers do, if I'm not mistaken. It's definitely a slick hustle.

This is how the most high profile non-profits work. For-profit does the fundraising and takes a huge cut. In some instances, over 100%. This dwarfs any non-profits' CEO's six or seven figure salary.

Political fundraising is similar. Consultants and for-profits pocket their share. The more you promote the candidate, the more people donate money, the more you spend on the campaign, the bigger your end take is. And the loop keeps going until the end. Candidates get national publicity at donor's expense allowing them to sell books and charge expensive public speaking fees even after losing. And when they drop out, they solicit funds for other candidates using their donor list and keep a cut.

(11-25-2013 06:17 PM)Libertas Wrote:  ROK's been on fire lately.

The eating disorders article has faded pretty quickly, but another Tuth post is more active than it ever was:

Wow, away for a few days and coming back to find this thread and all the ruckus it spawned, what an awesome way to start the week.

(11-25-2013 05:48 PM)Teedub Wrote:  AnonymousBosch - I am 'liking' almost every post you make these days. You're such an intelligent poster, thankyou for joining this forum, you make it a more intelligent place.

I fully agree, AnonymousBosch is definitely one of the best posters on this forum, and I would say Days of broken arrows has done a great job on this thread as well, among several other guys.

Obviously I don't agree 100% with everything anyone writes but honestly most of time I don't even post on threads because other guys already said everything I wanted to say in a much more intelligent, thorough, structured and clear way than I possibly could.

(11-25-2013 02:41 PM)Roosh Wrote:  The U of Miami student who started the change.gov petition gets a favorable article published about her in a Rhode Island newspaper:

http://www.thewesterlysun.com/news/weste...ttons.html

The hamsterism in this one is amazing.

Quote:As of Nov. 23, more than 11,000 supporters had signed the online petition. Servidio also said that since posting the link to her petition online, she has received flurries of text messages and emails from long-term friends, admitting to her their own struggles with body image and eating disorders.

“I’m so glad I was able to take a stand for all the people who have struggled with these issues,” said Servidio.

You didn't DO anything. The petition won't DO anything. You've accomplished nothing. All you've done is gotten a bunch of people who agree with each other to get offended together and talk about their feelings.

Is this what passes for a newsworthy accomplishment these days?

Quote:As a journalism major, Servidio said she is very aware of the need for freedom of expression, and is currently taking a class on such issues.

Ah, so she's an expert I see.

Quote:However, she said that even free speech should include a level of morality.

Morality as defined by who?

You?

Quote:“I just see it as ‘how can you publish that and still be happy with yourself,’” she said. “I think what I want most is for them to realize that this is wrong, that it’s gone too far. It’s not funny.”

So "morality" = "whatever I agree with".

In short, this "journalism major" understands the need for freedom of expression, but thinks it should be limited to whatever she deems inoffensive and proper. If she does not find it funny, then it is wrong and has "gone too far". If she can't see how you could say something and "still be happy with yourself" (because she's unhappy with you after you've said it), it shouldn't be said.

Quote:Servidio said she hopes to plan some correlating event to raise further awareness about the article and eating disorders in general with her Delta Phi Epsilon sorority sisters.

“I just really hope that this petition will make people more aware of the importance of these issues,” she said. “It’s everywhere; it could be your sister, brother, daughter or best friend.”

I think that before she does anything else she needs to go take a few more classes relating to her marvelous "journalism major" and come to get a better understanding of what "freedom of expression" actually is and actually means.

Until then, she can go somewhere and simply ignore the article if she doesn't like it. Ain't nobody got time for censorship.

I can't wait for this chica to put this online petition on her resume when she graduates from college.

(11-25-2013 08:03 PM)MaleDefined Wrote:  I can't wait for this chica to put this online petition on her resume when she graduates from college.

Let's have some fun guys. Let's start emailing her now from a variety of throwaway email addresses and making calls from burner phones telling her that we'd like to apply for a position at XYZ company and ABC non-profit, because we're so impressed with her efforts.

And then laugh at her.

(11-25-2013 06:29 PM)Roosh Wrote:  The eating disorders article has faded pretty quickly, but another Tuth post is more active than it ever was:

The eating disorders response is the result of an oversensitivity bubble-- a widely held moral fashion that nobody ever cared about challenging before. It shocked people into expressions of outrage and moral posturing. But once everyone who cared had taken their turn saying mean things about Tuthmosis in public, there's not much left to do. Anyone who still cares is off hugging each other or engaging in self-promotion like that chick from Miami. As we know, the overwhelming majority of responders did not have an eating disorder and were not personally affected by anyone with a serious eating disorder.

Slut concerns are personal and timeless. Girls know, deep down, that being seen as a slut hurts their own chances at real relationships with quality men. Also, men are much more likely to enjoy the article about slut tells, I think.

Great GIF selection and placement Athlone!

(11-25-2013 08:03 PM)MaleDefined Wrote:  I can't wait for this chica to put this online petition on her resume when she graduates from college.

I'm more concerned with her given the right to......vote.

I would like to see a follow-up article, part 2 if you will, that lists the top 5 eating disorders and rates them out of 10, with pros and cons for each one. Obviously with obesity, the cons far outweigh the pros, but with say anorexia, there are far more pros than cons etc.

Stoke that fire!

Oh, and to really piss them off, write something like, "due to the overwhelming popularity of my previous article, I have decided to write...." etc.

Once again proving the Dunning-Kruger effect: she's overestimating her intelligence, particularly based on her... absolutely fucktarded ... writing.

It's amusing being called 'undereducated' by someone who doesn't realise 'ill minded' requires a hyphen, and drops commas into the mix seemingly at random.