Post: #301

It's funny hat 60 minutes is doing a story about fake news intended to affect the presidential election.

That's the show in 2004 that found "explosive" documents about Bush's National Gaurd service. An October surprise.

The documents were 1973 memos written with Microsoft 2003 software. fake!

Literally fake news intended to affect the election.



https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killian_...ontroversy

Post: #302

I just watched it again. I like this guy.

I was just reading through his info. Can somebody tell me if he was in the Army? I don't need that anywhere.

Great job though. I hope he still reads this.

EDIT: I just talked to the other Trump supporter in Hawaii and he watched it too. He says Mike killed it.

I know my grandma will watch sixty minutes in a few hours, but she doesn't care.

Aloha!

Post: #303

I like his reaction to what is the truth. Big words delivered towards a small man.

I posted this before but hey CBS , remember this fake news segment you guys ran!?!? No, not at all?





https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tet_Offensive

Quote:The leadership in Hanoi was despondent at the outcome of their offensive.[158][159] Their first and most ambitious goal, producing a general uprising, had ended in a dismal failure. In total, about 85,000–100,000 communist troops had participated in the initial onslaught and in the follow-up phases. Overall, during the "Border Battles" of 1967 and the nine-month winter-spring campaign, 45,267 communist troops had been killed in action.[160]


The keys to the failure of Tet are not difficult to discern. Hanoi had underestimated the strategic mobility of the allied forces, which allowed them to redeploy at will to threatened areas; their battle plan was too complex and difficult to coordinate, which was amply demonstrated by the 30 January attacks; their violation of the principle of mass, attacking everywhere instead of concentrating their forces on a few specific targets, allowed their forces to be defeated piecemeal; the launching of massed attacks headlong into the teeth of vastly superior firepower; and last, but not least, the incorrect assumptions upon which the entire campaign was based.[161] According to General Tran Van Tra: "We did not correctly evaluate the specific balance of forces between ourselves and the enemy, did not fully realize that the enemy still had considerable capabilities, and that our capabilities were limited, and set requirements that were beyond our actual strength.[162]

How about this gem from NBC

NBC Admits It Rigged Crash, Settles GM Suit

Quote:In its apology, NBC admitted that it had used incendiary devices to ensure that a fire would erupt if gasoline leaked from the truck being hit by a test car. The 15-minute segment was addressing critics' charges that GM's full-size pickup trucks built between 1973 and 1987 are unsafe because their gasoline tanks are on the sides of the trucks, outside the frame.

Post: #304

(03-26-2017 09:02 PM)Kona Wrote:  I was just reading through his info. Can somebody tell me if he was in the Army?

From 31 Random Facts About Mike Cernovich:

Quote:23. I graduated Army Officer Candidate School.

From What Does It Mean to Be a Man?:

Quote:“I miss my dog,” my commanding officer said while we were in the field. He and the other married men laughed. They all could relate, although I was too young to understand. None of them missed their wives but they all missed their dogs.

Post: #305

Mahalo. ^^^

It was different seeing him on the full size TV instead of just screens and phones.

Looking at him I thought "hey he's gotta be army" and my woman's intuition was spot on.

Aloha!

Post: #306

They let him speak just enough, which is a bit of a surprise.

Cernovich showing the difference here that body language makes, before Milo got blown up his MSM appearances were lacking due to his shifty, slouched body language, flamboyant behaviour, and lack of eye contact. Cernovich did a much better job holding frame.

Post: #307

(03-26-2017 08:10 PM)Thrill Jackson Wrote:  MIKE CERNOVICH RETWEETED ME

Rather amusing that Cernovich causes so much angst & triggers so many.
A mere retweet will cause those same triggered folk to then bitch & moan to you instead.
As if they expect you to disavow the guy purely cause they don't like him.

Damn his Twitter influence is vast though.
Any given day I may get 500 to 5000 "impressions" depending on how I "game" popular trends or whether I'm one the first five to respond to a popular individuals tweet.

A simple, single retweet by Cernovich meant I wound up with 50,000 impressions instead!

Post: #308

He did a great job. Hats off.
He had a clear plan and killed it.

Post: #309

Great interview.

I can't believe they didn't edit out the nuclear bomb Mike dropped on them about believing the Clinton campaign team.

   

Post: #310

(03-26-2017 07:59 PM)Thrill Jackson Wrote:  

Had to show 60 minutes the facts for them. Can't even do their own damn research.

Not only that, look at how low CBS is. Talk about fake news and bots....

Post: #311

Looks like CBS recently put their 60 Minutes episodes behind a pay wall so I haven't been able to watch it.

Post: #312

To be honest, I haven't been following Mike since that Deploraball cucktastrophe, but there's no denying this was a masterstroke.

Great performance. He even made the interviewer's eyes water. His lisp is completely gone too.

Post: #313

^ Speaking of the Deplorable and the civil war that flared about around it, Baked Alaska had this to say about Mike's 60 Minute appearance:

Post: #314

Hopefully the full clip will come on line soon.

Mark Dice gives his take on the 60 mins piece

Post: #315

Disclaimer: this is an irrelevant observation and doesnt really add to anything

It's rather peculiar to see what a feminine expression this interviewer has, his voice tone reveales insecurity being covered by a low pitch, and his biting his glasses is the cherry on top that demonstrates his anxiety...

Mike beat him fair and square in his own field

Post: #316

(03-27-2017 11:54 PM)Wutang Wrote:  ^ Speaking of the Deplorable and the civil war that flared about around it, Baked Alaska had this to say about Mike's 60 Minute appearance:

Isn't that PewDiePie? Baked Alaska is the same guy?

Post: #317

Nah, Baked Alaska just used Pew's photo doing the OK sign.

Post: #318

Post: #319

^There's no way the rest of that interview will see the light of day, he crushed it. Especially the child trafficking stuff Pelley had to resort to just saying "That's fake" with nothing to disprove what Mike just said and then finally had to just change the subject. They really underestimated him

Post: #320

Mike has been killing it lately and he's blowing up.

Kellyanne Conway tweeted the link to the 60 Minutes Transcript above:

Also, he broke the Susan Rice unmasking story yesterday. Let's see how the MSM handles this:

Post: #321

I've been spreading the Susan Rice story via Twitter and Facebook. My liberal friends aren't arguing about whether it's true or not. I expect the Wash Post and NYTimes are still in editor councils trying to figure out how to spin it.

Post: #322

(04-03-2017 09:30 AM)C-Note Wrote:  I've been spreading the Susan Rice story via Twitter and Facebook. My liberal friends aren't arguing about whether it's true or not. I expect the Wash Post and NYTimes are still in editor councils trying to figure out how to spin it.

Come on, Rice is black, we already know how they will spin it.

If you think she did anything wrong, YOU'RE A RACIST!!*

* the word "lynching" will get bandied about liberally as well.

Post: #323

(04-03-2017 09:30 AM)C-Note Wrote:  I've been spreading the Susan Rice story via Twitter and Facebook. My liberal friends aren't arguing about whether it's true or not. I expect the Wash Post and NYTimes are still in editor councils trying to figure out how to spin it.

There's nothing to spin. She didn't do anything illegal.

Post: #324

(04-03-2017 03:53 PM)Zebra_Cakes Wrote:  

(04-03-2017 09:30 AM)C-Note Wrote:  I've been spreading the Susan Rice story via Twitter and Facebook. My liberal friends aren't arguing about whether it's true or not. I expect the Wash Post and NYTimes are still in editor councils trying to figure out how to spin it.

There's nothing to spin. She didn't do anything illegal.

Unmasking of the names?

Post: #325

(04-03-2017 06:40 PM)Turnus Wrote:  

(04-03-2017 03:53 PM)Zebra_Cakes Wrote:  

(04-03-2017 09:30 AM)C-Note Wrote:  I've been spreading the Susan Rice story via Twitter and Facebook. My liberal friends aren't arguing about whether it's true or not. I expect the Wash Post and NYTimes are still in editor councils trying to figure out how to spin it.

There's nothing to spin. She didn't do anything illegal.

Unmasking of the names?

She's authorized to unmask names. She just has to say that she had legitimate concerns and needed the perspective of other intelligence analysts on the information. However, it is unethical, because she was basically facilitating spying of the opposition political party.