Post: #1

If they had a magic wand...what would they do?

A. Turn all men (alpha/beta) into sassy gays
B. Turn all men (including alphas) into supremely beta personality types
C. Turn all men (including alphas) into super fatboys with zero appeal to women, but let them keep their former personality?
D. All men become full time cross dressers to shun their masculinity
E. Shanghai' all men to a deserted island (with the exception of flamboyant queers) so men have no influence on the world

All of the above?

Personally, I think they have momentum in A & B, the amount of gays seems to be at an all time high in the west.

There's more beta guys than ever these days as well, but there are still a lot of alphas.

As society gets fatter, men get fatter too. Fatness always makes a man more beta - attractive women don't take fatboys seriously. Feminists probably don't take up much issue with fat men since they know fat men have very little appeal to women.

Realistically, what is their ultimate goal?

Post: #2

Their ultimate goal is to land a ultra in demand alpha that every women desire but only have eyes for her.

Post: #3

Permanant victimhood: The complete and total abdication of personal responsibility for the female gender.

Post: #4

There is no endgame. Women are never satisfied. I don't remember who said it, but every woman wakes up in the morning and thinks to herself "How can I have more today than I had yesterday?"

That's 3rd (4th?) wave feminism in a nutshell.

Post: #5

I dont even understand what the modern feminists argue about. Its just nonsense.

Post: #6

They have no goal. They just have severe penis envy. The best thing we can do is ignore them and let them die a swift death.

Post: #7

Feminists want control. Control of everything: how we reproduce, freedom of speech and assembly, how we run our business, what we can say and do sexually, and how we educate our kids. (I'm sure you all can think of more examples.)

This is what makes them so lethal. And this is why feminists cannot really compare to gay rights advocates or the African-American race crowd. The main thrust of those movements (except for some outliers) is that they seek equality. Feminism has degenerated into intellectual fascism that I don't think has any parallel.

I'll present one example that came up today. Blogger Matt Walsh wrote a post defending his wife, a stay-at-home mom. According to this Yahoo piece (written by a feminist) he was "blindsided by critics." Why? Because (get this), he was "wading into a discussion that should be left to women." Huh? WTF?

According to feminist author Leslie Morgan Steiner, who is quoted: "Really, it's none of Matt Walsh's business what other moms think. I am not even sure it is his business what his own wife thinks—that's HER business. We all, as individuals and as a society, need to butt out of moms' personal decisions about how to raise their kids." (Emphasis mine.)

So, in other words, men shouldn't even be allowed to comment on what their wives do. What other group can you think of that thinks this way? There is NO equivalent of this type of control-seeking anywhere, except perhaps by Muslim extremists.

Post: #8

The basic feminist argument is me,me,me.

They want privilege without loss of victim-hood
They want Supreme Authority without responsibility

Feminists are toxic people who should be avoided. I wouldn't argue with a 5 year old and neither will I a feminist.

Post: #9

A thousand year Reich

Post: #10

(10-12-2013 12:01 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  So, in other words, men shouldn't even be allowed to comment on what their wives do. What other group can you think of that thinks this way? There is NO equivalent of this type of control-seeking anywhere, except perhaps by Muslim extremists.

This post hits on something that I've been thinking a lot about lately. I don't think women are consciously aware of this quality of theirs, I think it has more to do with the female sense of Justice. It seems to me that female Justice is more suited to being in charge of children and raising a family than making decisions that have an impact of groups of people. This is why feminists are so quick to endorse things like censorship as long as it's beneficial to them.

They seem to want to make all men beta because its impossibly hard for a woman to raise an alpha man who is appealing to women, they don't know how and the discussion of certain things feels wrong to them, even if they respond favorably to the results of the things discussed (like game in general).

I think in general feminism is an odd misdirection of women's unused maternal energy.

Post: #11

I think that they'd shut up if they got fucked well.

Post: #12

Feminism doesn't have a goal. It's simply the political and ideological manifestation of female solipsism. It's what you would expect to happen if you started to take women's opinions on important issues seriously, as our society unfortunately did. To put it another way, it's the mother of all shit tests.

Imagine an ideology called "Childism" that was conceived of and proposed by children, and which would attempt to "redress the wrongs" that children have historically faced.

No more bedtimes!

Dessert for all meals!

Video games all day instead of school!

A huge allowance and no chores!

They would take, take, take with no thought for the consequences.

Feminism is essentially the exact same thing, and is equally as absurd and as damaging to society in the long run.

Post: #13

A facade to hide their insecurities and deficiencies.

Highly successful or beautiful women rarely play the feminism card.

Post: #14

Another way to look at it, when will it reach a tipping point? Almost all of their agenda is in place to varying degrees (depending on region), or very close to it.