Post: #51

She was part of the team of first employers that started with Google when created, she was dating Sergey Brin at the time, that is how she got the job in the first place.

Next to her then boyfriend Brin in the pic below


So, like always, a women got access in the first place thanks to her pussy.

Post: #52

(08-23-2013 02:21 AM)Gold Doubloon Wrote:  and this is my own pet peeve, but why do all fucking midwestern girls have to have a lump or globulous fat plastered around the frame of their face, under their chin, and a perpetual muffin top, no matter how thin their legs and ass are.

I've wondered the same. Tom Leykis once observed that in certain mid-western cities with a large polish immigrant stock and where they make and consume a lot of kielbasa...the girls also look like kielbasa :/

Post: #53

(08-23-2013 11:04 PM)phil81 Wrote:  I think she is one of the few women that knows how to think for herself instead of following the herd. Masters in CS from Stanford requires some pretty high level logic and reasoning skills. I think she knows that being a woman has been a net positive for her so she isn't going to be hypocrite by endorsing feminism.

Then again maybe I hate Sheryl Sandberg so much that I can only see the positives in Mayer since they are so different.

Sandberg is old-school corporate feminist: Fugly as sin, loud, jewish (why do the most annoying, outspoken feminists seem to be jewish...like jews haven't had ENOUGH persecution, they need more??)

Mayer is nouveau corporate feministe: Reasonably attractive, doesn't screech when she puts the knife in your back, pretends not to be a feminist, but exhibits tendencies toward classic feminist aims: works 80 hrs per week, chucks her baby in day care 30 seconds after its out of her vagina, and you just KNOW when she gets fired in few years for not meaningfully improving Yahoo, she'll wallow in the self-pity of "ITS BECAUSE I'M A WOMANNNNNN!!"

Post: #54

(12-19-2014 08:03 PM)Soberane Wrote:  She was part of the team of first employers that started with Google when created, she was dating Sergey Brin at the time, that is how she got the job in the first place.

Next to her then boyfriend Brin in the pic below


So, like always, a women got access in the first place thanks to her pussy.

Your facts are way off. She dated Larry Page, and that was after she joined the company.

http://www.quora.com/Google-Company-Hist...lationship

Post: #55

Apparently the newest part of this story is that she's pregnant, and is only "taking a few weeks off" and woman are shitting bricks saying she's making them look bad for not taking more time off to "raise her kids". The facebook comments on the news stories are quite comical.

http://techcrunch.com/2015/08/31/yahoo-c...-children/

Quote:What a sad example she is setting for parents at yahoo. Children, not shareholders, should come first, and her example sets the expectation yahoo has for all parents moving forward. My advice - Leave yahoo and join Adobe, or Netflix, while you can.

https://www.facebook.com/techcrunch/post...5637532952

Quote:It's sad that she puts work above family and will lose that precious bonding time with her babies.

While most families are fighting for longer maternity/paternity leave, she's basically bragging about not taking any and setting women back a decade in the process, feeding into this corporatocracy BS that values profit above all.

Quote:I feel like I could run Yahoo with my eyes closed and it would feel like a vacation compared to what I tackle daily.

Quote:Some of these comments are really sad.. intolerant women are women's worst enemy. Wondering if raising daughters to think mothers who are different from you are selfish is really helping matters.. probably just set "women" back a decade right there..

Quote:Ugh. This woman. Good for her for making the rest of us women feel "weak" for wanting proper bonding with our infant(s).

Post: #56

Is she pregnw again? Didn't she get blasted for a previous kid and building some expensive in-house nursery at Yahoo so she could work with her kid there?

She is milking this hard if so. Just like how Bhsh Ade hisbramch a official WH Office so could chill and avoid to much work.

Post: #57

What's really shitty about this bitch is that she doesn't even care about other parents at yahoo. Before her, people could work from home, but she cancelled it. It's all about this bitch and her offspring and fuck everybody else because she can.

Stupid feminist cunts still love her though.

Post: #58

It's easy to have a kid and only take a few weeks off when you can use the corporate coffers to build an expensive nursery to look after your kids.

Mayer is a hack. I can't stand her as a CEO.

Post: #59

Here's the latest news from Yahoo!: They failed to get their desired ruling from the IRS on the tax implications of their planned spin-off of their Alibaba stake, so the deal may not look so good now.

By the way, that stake is now worth $23B, as opposed to $40B when they first considered the transaction, due to the drop in Alibaba's stock price and the drop in the Chinese currency.

Even casual stock-watchers know that the Alibaba stake, and the Yahoo! Japan business, are really the only value in Yahoo! -- the core business is worth pretty much zero, or perhaps even less than zero.

We could, as this forum has discussed, call Marissa Meyer a mediocrity who has failed Yahoo!, though that would be a bit harsh since it wasn't in great shape when she arrived and it's not clear what she might have done differently.

But you can't argue with the fact the she has gotten far less criticism than she would have if she were a man instead of a reasonably attractive woman. (A dilemma for feminists, I suppose.) Even the New York Times article linked above won't dare criticize her -- it dutifully refers to "some progress in the three-year effort by Marissa Mayer, Yahoo’s chief executive, to revive the moribund company" but does not specify what form that progress has taken. In fact, she has made a series of questionable decisions (many of which reflect typical of female decision-making) and not really done anything praiseworthy, yet of course continues to be fawned-over by the media.

Post: #60

(09-11-2015 04:12 AM)Oswaldo Guimaraens Wrote:  Here's the latest news from Yahoo!: They failed to get their desired ruling from the IRS on the tax implications of their planned spin-off of their Alibaba stake, so the deal may not look so good now.

By the way, that stake is now worth $23B, as opposed to $40B when they first considered the transaction, due to the drop in Alibaba's stock price and the drop in the Chinese currency.

Even casual stock-watchers know that the Alibaba stake, and the Yahoo! Japan business, are really the only value in Yahoo! -- the core business is worth pretty much zero, or perhaps even less than zero.

We could, as this forum has discussed, call Marissa Meyer a mediocrity who has failed Yahoo!, though that would be a bit harsh since it wasn't in great shape when she arrived and it's not clear what she might have done differently.

But you can't argue with the fact the she has gotten far less criticism than she would have if she were a man instead of a reasonably attractive woman. (A dilemma for feminists, I suppose.) Even the New York Times article linked above won't dare criticize her -- it dutifully refers to "some progress in the three-year effort by Marissa Mayer, Yahoo’s chief executive, to revive the moribund company" but does not specify what form that progress has taken. In fact, she has made a series of questionable decisions (many of which reflect typical of female decision-making) and not really done anything praiseworthy, yet of course continues to be fawned-over by the media.

I find this hilarious. If she is ever criticized her defender say just look how much the stock value increased with her at the helm. It is true it near tripled at one point, but it is still double where it was when she took over. However, it was all because of actions taken prior to her being CEO. When she sold half the position of alibaba it was a fraction of what it would IPO at just a couple years later. I do say that with the benefit of hindsight though.

Post: #61

Recent Vanity Fair Op-Ed piece:

http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/01/m...e-replaced

Quote:Pretty much all the investors I’ve spoken to agree that Yahoo’s current management team and board aren’t working. The company’s revenues and profits drop each quarter as the spending remains stubbornly high. In the year before Mayer started as C.E.O., Yahoo’s profits (or E.B.I.T.D.A.) were $1.5 billion. Last year, after you discount the executive stock compensation costs and onetime blips, SpringOwl estimates that Yahoo’s total profit was only $190 million. (Yahoo disputes this figure...

...In the end I expect there to be big job cuts, and shareholders will push for the removal of Mayer. If the board refuses to do that, it will be setting the stage for a proxy fight formally announced by the end of March. Forget about four more years. Mayer’s leadership run at Yahoo might only have four more weeks.

Post: #62

About damn time. Maybe I'll actually purchase some stock. If she gets the boot, it will bounce.

Post: #63

She's nice looking for a wall approaching geek.

WB

That fucking laugh though... sweet jesus...

Post: #64

(01-20-2016 12:10 AM)Hotwheels Wrote:  

She's nice looking for a wall approaching geek.

Cosmetics, Generous Lighting, and Photoshop, or, The Art Of Dressing Mutton Up As Lamb.

Post: #65

I'm older than her by a fair bit.

Would bang and let her buy me Lambos and such.

Post: #66

I'll say this much, the Vogue shoot does suggest she has an ass twice the width of her head. This is not bad if, like me, you prefer a decent cushion to absorb the shock of the inthrust.

Post: #67

Has anyone read Milo's piece on her at Brietbart News Definitely worth checking out. The first paragraph is hilariously sarcastic and cruel -- and true.

"How does one go about finding a CEO? If you’re Wal-Mart, you designate your heir like a Viking chief, picking the strongest of your children. If you’re Yahoo!, however, you put “Affirmative Action Hire” or “Easy, Breezy, Covergirl” in your third-rate search engine and hope for the best. What dubious specimen does the search engine spit out? One Marissa Mayer."

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/01/18...-tokenism/

Post: #68

(01-20-2016 12:22 AM)Hotwheels Wrote:  I'm older than her by a fair bit.

Would bang and let her buy me Lambos and such.

I always have been curious what would be to be a normal guy marrying or dating a multimillionaire woman, for women that idea is always in their mind, mostly while young, but just curious reversing the sexes.

Would marry, and then live with trust fund.

Post: #69

‘No layoffs … this week’: Marissa Mayer’s creepy comment kills morale

You’re not getting fired this week — feel better now?

That was the creepy message Yahoo! boss Marissa Mayer had for employees at a companywide meeting earlier this month, drawing nervous chuckles from workers who fear for their jobs, sources told The Post.

“She said there are going to be no layoffs ‘this week,’ and many of the employees laughed at her,” said one insider, who, fearing retribution, asked not to be named.

“This is the reason employee morale is so low,” the insider added, noting that most workers took the scary remark as twisted confirmation that Yahoo!’s embattled chief executive is sharpening the ax.

Mayer, who returned to her duties at the struggling Internet pioneer just a few weeks after giving birth to twins on Dec. 10, made the less-than-reassuring comment in response to a question at an internal “Friday FYI” meeting on Jan. 8, sources said.

Word of the gaffe has been “spreading like wildfire” through Silicon Valley, another insider said, calling it the latest example of a chronically tone-deaf CEO in a crisis.

Indeed, some in the audience laughed precisely because “she wasn’t trying to be funny,” according to the second source. “She was trying to make us believe it.”

Early last week, just a few days after the meeting, Business Insider reported that Yahoo! is planning to lay off 10 percent of its workforce. The report couldn’t be confirmed, but rumors amid a nervous workforce have since swirled that the number is actually closer to 20 or 25 percent, insiders said.

“We don’t comment on rumors or speculation,” a Yahoo! spokeswoman, asked about Mayer’s comments to employees as well as recent reports and chatter about layoffs, told The Post on Monday.


Marissa Mayer in 2014Photo: AP
Mayer’s taste for word games when it comes to firing people — in the past, she has insisted on calling layoffs “remixes” — has been a growing source of exasperation inside the company, according to current and former employees.

“I don’t think people want to be mollified — they want to be respected and trusted with facts so they can plan their lives — and also help,” one source close to the situation said.

Meanwhile, Mayer — scrambling to prepare a turnaround plan to present to investors on a quarterly earnings call slated for next week — faces intensifying pressure from activist hedge funds led by Starboard Value LP.

Earlier this month, Starboard explicitly demanded that Yahoo!’s board oust Mayer and sell the company. Weeks before, SpringOwl Asset Management called for firing as many as 9,000 of Yahoo!’s workers, who numbered 11,000 last June.

“By definition, their plan can’t be good enough if it’s anything short of, ‘We’re hiring bankers to explore selling the core business,’” a source close to Starboard said.

Some impatient investors are growing hopeful that Yahoo!’s board is beginning to listen.

After initially announcing plans to spin off Yahoo!’s core business, directors are now leaning toward selling it outright in accordance with activists’ wishes, sources said.

“The game has changed, the tail is no longer wagging the dog,” one shareholder exulted, blasting Mayer’s outsize influence over the board.

Still, another insider says Mayer “will never quit — it’s not who she is.”

Post: #70

Someone needs to put together an index of companies all run by female CEOs and have it work like one of those market ultrashort indices.

When the companies' stock plummet as they run it into the ground the value of the ultrashort index goes up.

I'd definitely buy shares of that index.

Post: #71

If Yahoo exists in its current capacity this time next year I will be surprised. It is a non-existent platform. The yahoo chat and messenger craze was around when I was in my teens along with MSN chat.

So what does Yahoo offer? News? Better news outlets out there and MSM sites are suffering views and subscribers and even moreso because they're liars and peddlers of deceit.

Search engine? A dozen search engines exist and the biggest being Google just shits all over it.

They offer email but lets be honest, email means sweet FA. Do they offer a business platform? No, they're not Microsoft/Google/Apple.

So yeah, what does Yahoo do in 2016 apart from live off ad revenue?

Post: #72

(01-21-2016 05:39 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  So what does Yahoo offer?

Tumblr.

More seriously, I would say that they used to have Flickr. Was a great site, particularly for learning about photography. Until Marissa Meyer got her hands on it.

Then it got lobotomized and tabletized and moronified until it morphed into the gene-spliced monster-baby of Instagram and Tumblr.

Yahoo! was dead to me after that.

Post: #73

6/10 WMTDR (would marry then divorce rape)

Post: #74

If she would only turn her looped laughter into a torture device for the CIA, Yahoo!'s stock would jump to $1000 overnight.

Post: #75

(01-22-2016 09:43 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  



If she would only turn her looped laughter into a torture device for the CIA, Yahoo!'s stock would jump to $1000 overnight.

Can you imagine what kind of noises she makes while getting banged out? That amped up turkey gobble would kill my boner.

Also, she is a genuine socially awkward nerd that has had her ego over inflated by others.

For example, watch this old interview at about 1:44 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-oFrPAwx_eE

I am 99% certain that she is wearing her sweater fucking backwards like some 6th grader with aspergers.



This woman should not have been allowed to leave the Dungeons and Dragons table, let alone be a CEO.