Post: #26

Thing about language is that words only mean what the majority agree that they mean. Otherwise we wouldn't have valley girls to thank for Merriam Webster sanctioning "literally" and "figuratively" to be synonyms and antonyms at the same time. I never equated "hit that" with actual punching. At least until now... Someone should really ask UCD why they're using their platform to promote antiquated patriarchal and racial stereotypes and linking sex with violence.

Post: #27

This is so crazy.

I remember in college having alot of group projects, and having 1 or 2 girls in my groups at all times. I'd refuse to work with any girls if I were in college today due to false rape claims/misogyny risks. Bitches would have to work in all girl groups and fail out due to catfighting and missed deadlines...problem solved.

Post: #28

It's worst that you people think. As a college student I've gotten in trouble because I made a joke to an ugly girl and she thought it was sexual in nature "after the fact." This people are denying you free speech, a girl can say anything 'after the fact' and not confront you directly and then get you in trouble. That' why I practice game outside college since it's a more receptive environment to become a man.

Post: #29

i think they (law makers) pc left WING have gone too far. Although I do support laws for harrasment , I support it for all not just for women only.
Now let's say that a certain percentage of men get these bogus harrasment charges and are unable to finish university. That means more women will finish and take the jobs men otherwise would be doing. That is happening now but w these biased laws the economy will be skewed. Women will see that their tax dollars are being spent on more social programs and we all know women work less hours than men. I remember that women who is An anti feminist said that male doctors are worth more to society than women in terms of hours worked and taxes paid. Went off on a tangent a bit. ..,,,
Basically , some poor dudes will get kicked out and maybe charged on some silly harrassment charge of saying hello to a woman. Yet the same won't apply to a butch dyke...... If a woman digs you you have carte Blanche. If a woman dislikes you she can say harrassment and good luck defending yourself.
Maybe it is best that universities become like the ones in Saudi arabia. Segregated just to avoid any problems. Sounds silly but with these types of laws it's going to put a lot of poor dudes in hot water because of some cunt who didn't like that HE said hello or looked at her.

Post: #30

(03-03-2013 08:43 PM)WestCoast Wrote:  To be honest I really believe the single purpose of feminism is actually to continuously RAISE the bar on what "Alpha" is.

You must max out your looks, you must have game, you must work like a dog to get a job over a woman because on paper she will get priority over you.

As time goes on every single mistake you make will be magnified 100 fold in the future. This will include not staying in shape, not improving social skills and not grinding every single day to make money.

No lies, would not want to be a male college student today. Cannot fathom ever wanting to raise a boy into this environment.

In 50 years, this man will be considered a nerd:



What we know commonly know as nerds, dorks, herbs, nebbishes, spergs, etc. will be extinct.

Post: #31

(03-03-2013 08:43 PM)WestCoast Wrote:  To be honest I really believe the single purpose of feminism is actually to continuously RAISE the bar on what "Alpha" is.

You must max out your looks, you must have game, you must work like a dog to get a job over a woman because on paper she will get priority over you.

As time goes on every single mistake you make will be magnified 100 fold in the future. This will include not staying in shape, not improving social skills and not grinding every single day to make money.

No lies, would not want to be a male college student today. Cannot fathom ever wanting to raise a boy into this environment.

"To be honest I really believe the single purpose of feminism is actually to continuously RAISE the bar on what "Alpha" is."

It is. But it's now taking on a much more insidious and dangerous form. By creating rule after rule and law after law, feminists are making society totalitarian when it comes to men and men only.

As such, they've raised the bar by getting laws enacted to designated as Alphas the police, judges, and administrators. No matter how Alpha you are, you're Beta by default when staring down a judge or a cop who has the power to take your freedom away and wreck your reputation and career.

Look back at the Duke false rape case. The lacrosse players were classic Alpha campus guys, but when they were brought up on charges they looked like scared Betas with their tails between their legs.

Feminists were practically having orgasms over this. Their goal, it seems, it to break both the average and above average man and give all the power to the state. It's as if these women never matured from first grade and still want to play tattle-tale. Except their little game now has worse consequences for men than detention.

Post: #32

What I see happening is even scarier. I predict that this "rape culture" movement will progress towards federal "hate crime" legislation related to rape and attempted rape. It's a big power grab for the feds, so they will love it.

Take the already blurry lines about what is or is not a "hate crime" and combine that with the ever-loosening definition of rape or sexual assault. You will end up with federal authority to arrest a man for doing anything a woman considers "inappropriate" with some vague intent of sexual assault.

Then, even if the man beats the federal criminal charges, there will arise a civil cause of action based on the "hate crime" aspect, allowing a woman to sue a man for his "inappropriate" actions. So, basically, a woman will be able to divorce-rape a guy that she didn't even have to marry.