I get approached by slightly chunky girls both offline and online. At this point, I've been getting more with skinnier girls that I'm turned off by chunky girls who are even touching 130 or more. It's like getting rid of sugar, and then not being able to stomach candy anymore.

(07-09-2018 09:20 PM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  

(06-24-2018 10:42 PM)Rhyme or Reason Wrote:  ^ Your problem is that you're using OKcupid in 2018.

What is there to use?

Don't you use SA, Rustler? OKC is nothing but fatties and trannies the last time I checked. It had gotten progressively worse over the years with more and more of them.

(07-09-2018 12:32 PM)ChefAllDay Wrote:  

(07-09-2018 11:20 AM)bbgun Wrote:  

sure, why not

I a pretty sure they never missed a meal, let alone 3 meals in their lives.

Yeah, pretty sure neither of them has ever missed a meal in their lives. Or that not being able to cook stopped them eating.

(07-10-2018 03:25 AM)Roardog Wrote:  

(07-09-2018 12:32 PM)ChefAllDay Wrote:  

(07-09-2018 11:20 AM)bbgun Wrote:  

sure, why not

I a pretty sure they never missed a meal, let alone 3 meals in their lives.

Yeah, pretty sure neither of them has ever missed a meal in their lives. Or that not being able to cook stopped them eating.

I'm betting their "child alter-egos" know how to find the number for pizza delivery in the phone book.

(07-09-2018 11:20 AM)bbgun Wrote:  

sure, why not

Hopefully their alter ego's forget how to breathe.

(06-25-2018 03:34 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  

(06-22-2018 08:37 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  http://www.foxnews.com/travel/2018/06/22...stays.html

Maldives resorts fed up with Instagram models requesting free stays


Jariel said it years ago. These hoes are all broke as fuck.

Check the article and look at the pictures of these dumb hoes. They are utterly retarded.

Funny stuff - I wonder how much they are truly "influencing" with many of those posts - the pictures frankly would have to be taken by a professional photograph with constant reminders where it is, booking info of the hotel etc.

Also 100.000 followers on Instagram is chicken-shit. Those hoes could have fooled many resorts initially as they had no data on how much business could be generated by the publicity, but I am sure that by now the data is starting to creep in.

In addition aside from specific pics that need to be posted (not just on the beach somewhere), you would have to check out what target demographic the hoe reaches.

Kristina Basham for example is dating Scott Adams and has 4.5 mio. followers. Her target demographic might include actually corporate VPs across the world, but her boyfriend who is worth 100 mio. $ pays for travel anyway, so it's a moot point for her. But she could do it and a free stay for her might be profitable.

The rest of the hoes can go back to what they know - taking a dump in the face.

One of the InstaHoes received the following response from a resort owner

Quote:Owner Paul Stenson responded publicly.

“Thank you for your email looking for free accommodation in return for exposure. It takes a lot of balls to send an email like that, if not much self-respect and dignity,” he wrote on The White Moose Facebook page.

“If I let you stay here in return for a feature in a video, who is going to pay the staff who look after you? Who is going to pay the housekeepers who clean your room?

“The waiters who serve you breakfast? The receptionist who checks you in? Who is going to pay for the light and heat you use during your stay?”

“P.S: The answer is no.”

^
Perhaps that 'babe' should do a wide ranging poll of modern chicks who have slept with 25 or more men & then failed to find a meaningful marriage?
But y'know, whatever...

Online hamster - Before leftie education:



Mental illness however was already there:



Mentall illness fully taking hold:

Re: the previous bald headed freak on page 142.

Better for them to actively display their derangement as opposed to some poor schmuck finding out the hard way I suppose...?

70 Women Ages 5-75 Answer: What Advice Do You Have for Men?

https://video.glamour.com/watch/70-women...ve-for-men

What's it say?

Trash. Don't watch it. Time I will never get back. Basically women bitching about men without offering anything practical.

I saw the first 1 or 2 5 year olds say "always be nice to girls" and shut it off (15 seconds or whatever.)

   

Instagram vs Reality - I met some Instagram hotties - some were the real deal, many were highly over-valued.

I'm at the point now where every picture I see of a female on Social Media I just assume that it's filtered.

Just like how make-up became socially acceptable way back in the day, now these filters are being socially accepted. Beta faggots don't care, they just want pretty pics of girls so they can rub their dicks and dream; other girls love it because they can get away with it like the other fake whores.

It's a lie. And these girls filter their pics so much they probably actually think others see them like that. "Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes truth"

I strongly advocate fat shaming and filter shaming.

Has to be a different girl right? I can't see it being any other way...

There is no better way to explain the word: NUANCE

(07-23-2018 03:22 PM)Vladimir Poontang Wrote:  70 Women Ages 5-75 Answer: What Advice Do You Have for Men?

https://video.glamour.com/watch/70-women...ve-for-men

Imagine how much of a SoyFag a guy's gotta be to take that shit seriously

Jesus you think that dumb cunt would have airbrushed off that shitty tattoo, who does that to their arm and expects to be taken seriously by anyone (especially employers). You basically are saying to the world "The best job I'll ever get is barista".

Old Poontang strikes again with another city beta thread :

http://www.city-data.com/forum/relations...y-not.html

They banned me after 11 pages and 13 posts. But the show goes on, at least for now.

Enjoy.

(08-12-2018 06:57 PM)Vladimir Poontang Wrote:  Old Poontang strikes again with another city beta thread :

http://www.city-data.com/forum/relations...y-not.html

They banned me after 11 pages and 13 posts. But the show goes on, at least for now.

Enjoy.

^^^^^
Very amusing. And now for a completely different perspective.

Age and experience have altered my views about this subject. When you're in your teens and twenties, single mothers are a must to avoid. They're usually the irresponsible party girls who want Alpha Fux/Beta Bux.

But...a funny thing happens on the way to your forties. Child-rearing humbles women. It forces them to confront the real world and think about someone other than themselves. By contrast, spending decades single and childless allows women to become selfish, self-important, and often irresponsible.

Excluding welfare queens, the single (or divorced) mother spends her prime years dealing with schools and teachers, learning to be a neighbor and/or homeowner, being responsible at work, and becoming an integral part of the larger society.

The childless woman, on the other hand, indulges herself with fake tans, endless vacations, too much alcohol, and idiotic "classes" about flaky bullshit. Whereas most single mothers choose men who will be good for their kids, the childless woman dates bad boy after bad boy and has no qualms about completely mistreating everyone else. (And if you think *you're* the bad boy, chances are, she'll already know someone badder and try to emasculate you with that. Whenever you think these women can't get any lower, they find another basement -- to paraphrase F. Scott Fitzgerald.)

As such, the eternally childless woman becomes the center of her own universe, the star in her own soap opera, and the martyr in her own self-made bible. If you meet up with her at 48 (as I just did -- don't ask), it's as if she's still mentally and emotionally 18. That's not pretty. In fact, it's sort of grotesque. But what did we expect?! She never really had to grow up.

The single mother, though, had to grow up -- and fast. At 40 (or even 30), she's likely to have little patience with games or general stupidity. If you're a hardworking, honest man, she'll more than likely treat you respectfully in return. Life forced her to appreciate good things, not take them for granted.

This type of reflexive reciprocity is what makes society work. Without it, we'd have the law of the jungle. This is what a society of single, childless women would lead us to: No one treating anyone good and honest with any respect and everyone sucking the (metaphorical or real) dicks of criminals and troublemakers. This might seems amusing when you're 18 and sort of a badass yourself, but it really doesn't work when you become an actual adult.

So, to wrap this all up, once you hit age 40 or so, it's single mothers or divorced women with kids who are most likely to be decent women. It's the eternally childless wench you'll want to avoid.

I should really write an article expounding on the details of this. At 23, I wouldn't have believed it myself. But since all of you will be older someday, keep this in the back of your mind.

This forum is now ten years old, and I think it's time we step back and try to get a wider-screen view on some subjects we've long discussed. So, while Vladimir might be right to call out single mothers from his perspective, we need to acknowledge there are other points-of-view from men with other experiences.

DOBA I see what you're saying but I have got to say it's a tough sell you're attempting.

Single mothers are more grateful for the cock they get from higher value guys, as they see it. They have less free time on their hands and therefore want to get straight to it which can be a good thing when you're exactly what they're looking for.

Doesn't make them any better as far as dating prospects go, however.

They're as fickle and unreliable as any childless woman, just with an extra burden to carry. Which she will have no qualms about dropping said burden on whomever is dumb enough to take her seriously.

That being said if we're talking 40+ I really don't see what difference it makes if she's got kids or not...because it's a non starter for serious relationship at that point either way.

One of my cousins became pregnant with a real Bad Boy Alpha at age 18. He is an intelligent but crazy occasional criminal (rare combo since most criminals with impulse control issues are dumb). Still - after the inevitable split she still kept on looking for Alpha cock until age 30.

And keep in mind that she is above average in intelligence. Only past 30 did she try to get a more sensible man. It took her another 5 years to strike luck and find a well-off bloke aged 37 who had enough Game to satisfy her Alpha-widow-state.

She is lucky that she looks good for her age, but you know that she is super-desperate to make this relationship worth his while. I agree with Days that women after a certain age are super-desperate to keep that bloke - especially because they have been single for so long and high-value men for her don't come along that often - at least those that want to settle down with them.

I even told her 37yo boyfriend, that he could get a 22yo girl easily enough. It's good that they have a good sexual chemistry and I think that she would let it slide if he bangs a hottie on the side, so long as he does not leave her.

However - I am not so sure how old you would need to get to really go that way. Maybe if you are 60, still bangable as a man, and want to get a woman who is sort of attractive, but does not want to have any more children. Then the 30yo single mother with a 10yo kid may be an option.

It probably depends on your raw sexual market value, wealth at that age (this becomes more important the older we get unless you are the clear fuckboi hardcore biker over 50), genetics and how you held up in terms of looks etc. Because a good-looking wealthy 50yo man should rather pick the 25yo hottie from a less feminist country -in fact he can pick two and live in a hard harem.

(08-13-2018 12:55 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  ...once you hit age 40 or so, it's single mothers or divorced women with kids who are most likely to be decent women.

Divorced single moms come with their own problems, though. For instance, moms may be able to handle household responsibility but they also tend to want to live vicariously through their children. Their own sense of identity dissolves in favor of the kids. These are the factors that probably led to the marital breakdown in the first place. So they're not as self-centered, but in its place they are parenting-centered. They might be exhausted and frustrated by not having me-time, but their sense of obligation to parenting (pretty much the only sense of duty a woman's instinct gives her) means they'll be at the little league game or chaufferring the kids around on a weekend instead of giving you sex. That might make for a "decent" woman but not one who is in a position to give a guy what he values most.