Gentlemen, I think Enigma raises several good points that shouldn't be easily dismissed. These situations are really a lot more complicated than most people care to admit.
To add to what was already excellently stated by Enigma, I'm of the belief that it's largely a matter of perspective and degree. Communication problems do not only arise between different cultures, they already happen within one culture, dependent on personality, age, gender, and the environment one grew up in. Looking at this, it should be apparent that even more tact and effort shall be required for situations involving differing foreign cultures, especially since communication with diverse cultures could easily lead to misunderstandings and frustrations. In the same way that an urbanite in the US might have a low opinion of the suburbs and the suburbanites living there, and in the same way that city slickers could be ridiculed by country townsfolk for being clueless away from their metropolis, can you just imagine the massive ravine separating an American Traveler from a Filipina
probinsiyana?
Not only are we dealing with one facet of differing cultures here... but a multitude of fronts! Consider that said American and said Filipina will be of differing actual languages, communication contexts, time orientation, and will have learned to respond differently to the same stimuli based on differing environmental factors and cultural upbringing. Let's tackle these.
Enigma already addressed the basic language differences. But taking that a step further, let's look at communication context. A fellow named Edward T. Hall wrote a couple of books on High and Low Context Cultures (refer to
The Silent Language and
Hidden Differences) where he principally differentiates high-context (contextual) and low-context (non-contextual) cultures.
Quote:The term “context” describes how communication takes place in situation of interactions and what meaning can be given to. Accordingly, high context (HC) communication is in particular, strongly implicit where non-verbal communication is very important. A low context culture (LC) is explicit and tends to place more importance on the words in their language.
Examples of LC cultures: Americans, Germans, Scandinavians.
Examples of HC cultures: Japanese, Filipinos, Arabians.
As an HC culture, the Filipinos rely on extensive information networks among tight-knit groups such as family, friends and clients who are deeply involved in personal relationships. As consequence, for most normal transactions in daily life they do not require or expect much background information. For Americans (LC), the contrary is the case. Communication is more explicit, straighter, clearer and non-verbal communication happens to a lesser extent. In conclusion, Americans need detailed background information before they can commit themselves to a cause or action. Simply put, Filipino culture places them in a sea of information whereas the Americans produce work with islands of information. Both can either lead to irritation by insisting to give information one doesn't need or on the other hand to a loss if not enough information is provided.
Furthermore, cultures tend to have different concepts of time that we'll refer to as time orientation. Mr. Hall distinguishes between monochronic cultures such as America, characterized by a rigid time management and a structured schedule as well as polychronic cultures such as the Philippines, characterized by a more flexible and less structured time management. The Filipinos have an attitude that we call the "
mañana habit" adpoted from the Spanish. It's part of the "Colonial Mentality" I keep mentioning. At the most basic level, it means putting something off for tomorrow that can be done today. It is said that the rich tropical soil of the Philippines where varieties of fruits and vegetables grow with little effort has influenced lazier instincts as opposed to say the Japanese who must discipline themselves to get up and work their mountainous non tropical lands to produce food.
Here are some other facets to take into account taken from a book by Geert Hofstede called
Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind:
Quote:Power Distance Index (PDI) - describing the degree to which extent less powerful members accept and expect that power is distributed equally and how that society handles inequalities among people.
Now, bear in mind that the Philippines has a very high population living in extreme poverty. Chances are, those of you reading this right now, are probably in the middle class-to upper middle class of your culture. Imagine a pyramid. Now imagine that 75% of that pyramid *from the base up* represents the extreme poverty in the Philippines. Certainly, the girl you're chatting up may have a smart phone, or even a (cheap) computer, but it is not that difficult to acquire that and it is obviously not representative of her being a well educated, high IQ person. A good majority of the girls you meet may seem middle class, but in reality are part of that monstrous chunk of poverty that partly explains what you've encountered over there and categorized as stupidity. I'm not saying that you are wrong, from your perspective you may well be correct. But there are factors to consider.
Anyhow speaking of extreme poverty, here's an anecdote from my last Philippines trip. I was hanging out with my fraternity brother near the Cubao slums. I asked him, a Filipino who is ex-US Navy, financially independent and drives around his Mercedes-Benz amongst the throngs of poor masses (called commonly known as "squatters"), how he could remain sane while living with the squalor and stupidity around him. I knew he was a very smart but impatient man. His condominium stands tall in the heart of flea markets and shacks. He stunned me with his reply. "I have to look at them as vermin," he waved off a grimy street urchin who face-pressed-to-window was peering into the car with his dirty hands on the glass, covering the side of his eyes so he can see inside the driver's side. "It's the only way I can rationalize why they choose to walk in the middle of the street when they know there are cars trying to get through. Why they are too lazy to work a living and beg instead. Why they remain stupid and uneducated instead of attempting to learn and rise above their hard lives. I say to myself, 'Ahhh! They're vermin. That's why they act so. That's why they sleep in the gutters and piss anywhere,' and thinking that way preserves my sanity." I let the shock of what he said to me sink into understanding as I watched him honk his horn at an obstacle on the road: a squalid, naked woman picking her nose.
Quote:Masculinity versus Femininity (MAS) - for which a high score society is called masculine with preference to a competition-oriented society, the opposite, a feminine consensus-oriented society stands for a preference for cooperation and quality of life.
Let's look at Case Study #1:
Christian, the president of the student organization at a private engineering university in Atlanta, was having problems with Nestor, a foreign exchange engineering student from the Philippines. During their last meeting, Christian asked Nestor if he could take on an extra project, to which Nestor agreed very graciously. It has been a month, however, and Nestor has not even organized a subcommittee.
Christian has had similar problems in the past where Nestor would pleasantly agree to help out with a project but would only provide minimal participation because of his many other commitments. Nestor is involved in over 10 other student organizations, occupying a significant role in each. Considering this, it is no wonder that he is unable to spare much time to any one organization.
Christian feels that if Nestor has committed himself to something, he should by all means take on full responsibility. If he cannot fulfill what is expected of him, he should simply say “No.” Nestor, however, is angry at Christian for accusing him of irresponsibility.
Anita, who is close to Nestor as well as Christian, receives a phone call from Christian. “Anita, I don’t know what to do! Nestor has done it again! He promised to head that project we talked about at our last meeting a month ago, and he still hasn’t done anything about it! Now it’s too late for me to find anyone else to do it... I just don’t know why he is so irresponsible! I have given him so many chances and he keeps on letting me down. The worst part of it is that even though it’s his fault, he is mad at me for some reason and refuses to talk to me anymore. This is getting ridiculous!”
Later during the day, she hears from Nestor. “Anita, I’m really disappointed with Christian. I thought we were friends so I have been agreeing to do all these projects he has been loading on me even though I don’t have the time to do it. He knows that. But he still gets upset when I don’t get it done on time! What does he think? Does he really think that it would be logically feasible for me to do all that considering my tight schedule? I’m really frustrated because he keeps on making unreasonable demands on my time even though he knows how swamped I am! You know, Anita, I have really had enough!”
Christian and Nestor seem to differ in their assumption of what a responsible individual is expected to do. According to Nestor’s definition, it is the leader’s responsibility to determine and assign only what his or her subordinate can reasonably handle. According to Christian’s definition, however, each individual is responsible for determining how much he or she should undertake.
Perspectives from differing cultures have caused this misunderstanding. American 'directness' and the high value they place on time are clashing with the Filipino culture that is influenced by Confucian teachings.
-End Case Study
Quote:Long-term versus Short-term Orientation (LTO) - describing the extent to which a society either thrifts and has perseverance opposite versus attendance to more short-term goals.
Quote:Indulgence versus Restraint (IND) - on the other hand deals with the extent to which people try to control their personal desires and impulses.
Quote:The Individualism and Collectivism Index (IDV) - individualistic cultures are at the high end of this dimension and characterized by loose ties between individuals of that culture in which they are expected to take care of only themselves and their immediate family. The low side, collectivism, however, emphasizes people’s self-perception in terms of “we”. Here, a direct link can be drawn from individualistic societies to low-context-communication, since verbal communication is particularly strong and speaking one’s mind openly is regarded as being honest. Moreover, different opinions are treated to be a good base for discussions leading to increased truth whereas view-less people are regarded as having a weak character. Collectivist societies, however, are dominated by the urge for harmony. Own opinions necessarily lead to direct and open confrontations and are therefore regarded as impolite. A “no” almost does not exist, a “yes” does not always mean approval but is used to maintain harmony and communication.
Here it becomes very clear that communication problems between Americans (high score) and Filipinos (low score) lie in between two different cultures determining communication manner as well. Our different communication styles lead to misunderstandings, possibly to disappointment and confusion. This can lead to "stronger feelings of distress, especially for expatriates right at the beginning of the acculturation process."
Let's consider Case Study #2:
Jared is an American engineering student on exchange to a Filipino university as part of a one-year-abroad studying program. It has been two months into the school year, and Jared feels settled into the routine life of a college student but now, as part of the program must start applying as an intern for his practicum.
Interview after interview, Jared would leave the building feeling confident that he would get the internship. The interviewers would not only seem extremely responsive but would also comment on his excellent qualifications. Each interview would end with something like: “Jared, we are very impressed by your qualifications; we will think about it and let you know.”
Infallibly, however, Jared would never hear back from them. After waiting a couple of weeks, he would try calling the companies to see if any progress was made. Each time, he would hear a rather baffled answer and would be told that they would have to think about it some more and call him back. Again, he would wait to no avail. Angry and frustrated, Jared mentioned this to friends he had met at the university, a Canadian named Andy and a Pinay, Malou. Here's their conversation:
Jared: I can’t believe it has been three weeks since I started interviewing and all of the places are “still thinking!” What is taking them so long???
Andy: You know what? If I were you, I would give up and try looking some more...
Jared: But there is still the possibility that I will get one of the position I have been interviewing for... right?
Andy: Not necessarily... these Filipinos can be really two-faced, you know. No offence Malou, but they tell you one thing and mean another. I have been through 20 different interviews myself, and the only time they actually called me back was when I got the position! Even though all the other places told me how qualified I was during the interviews, none of them had the decency to keep their promise of notifying me later.
Jared: I agree! Personally, I think it’s really rude that they don’t call me back after saying that they would! It’s so frustrating, because if they would tell us “Yes” or “No,” at least we would know whether we should keep looking for some other possibilities or not!
Malou: It was the same for me, when I got my job, they called me back almost immediately after the interview. The other places didn’t even bother writing or calling me. But what you have to understand is that in our culture, we value "Saving face".
Andy: ...
Jared: What do you mean?
Malou: We refer to it as "shame" and it is something that we prioritize in our society. We view arrogance as a very bad thing, such as when a wife cheats on her husband, we say "Walang hiya!" or something akin to "Has she no shame?!" So, when an interviewer tells you what you often hear, they are trying not to hurt your pride by giving you a direct "No." and are allowing you to "save face" so that you are not shamed and can walk forward to other interviews with dignity.
Andy and Jared: ...
-End Case Study
Quote:Uncertainty Avoidance Index (UAI) - describes the degree to which the members of a society feel uncomfortable with uncertainty and ambiguity. Cultures with a strong UAI try to control the future by maintaining rigid codes of belief and behavior, societies with a weak UAI tend to let the future just happen by maintaining a more relaxed attitude. In connection to intercultural communication, a high score implies that written communication is more favored than oral communication that relates to contractual finalization of processes and agreements and detailed documentation. Furthermore, rather anxious cultures are more expressive, often use their hands while talking and a loud speech is expected.
Filipino society is highly ritualized with lots of ceremonies and fanfare, they tend to "live in the now." which also speaks to their time orientation. Where as Americans in contrast, want to have a systematic overview that comes back to the point that a lot of background information is needed beforehand in order to understand what is presented. When you ask some chick in the Philippines what they think you should have for dinner (Which is not something you, as a true blooded Red-Piller, would normally do to American chicks.) you'll typically get the response "
Kahit ano. Ikaw?" ('Anything. What about you?'). Or have you ever heard of the common Filipino term "
Bahala na." ('Come what may.' or 'We'll see.')?
Not only are context, time orientation, and these other facets I've mentioned crucial to consider but also the factors of space and information flow. Which I'm not even going to get into... *breathes*
I put forward that you as the more worldly traveler (and an upright Red Pill digesting swashbuckler!) would need to adapt and reason based on above evidence that what you see isn't a simple case of low IQ. I remember vividly, when I was a FOB (Fresh Off the Boat) back in 2001 in Michigan, that I was eager to date American girls. I was aghast to find out that a good majority of them were fucking stupid, not even knowing the order of the planets in the solar system... something that I learned in first grade science at my runty little school in Quezon City. What I did not realize back then were the depths of perspective and degree which I've mentioned above. The different facets that explain cultural differences evolving to become what they are. And how I have been looking at the "stupid Americans" with a different lens. Ultimately, I've learned that as daring travelers and as proud and rational men, we must take it upon ourselves to learn and adapt to the cultures we find ourselves living in.
Let me leave you guys with a couple of quotes:
“It has been said that arguing against globalization is like arguing against the laws of gravity.”
-Kofi Anan (Ghanian Diplomat, 7th Sec Gen of the UN)
"We often use the phrase '
he/she is an intelligent person.' However, a truly intelligent person does not simply use the brain, but also uses his/her
ki (heart, mind, attention). In fact, the person who is the most intelligent is the one who uses his/her
ki towards other people."
-Suzuki (Japanese Philosopher)
Enigma, here is a nod of Respect, from one Pinoy at heart to another:
Inuman na tayo!
And finally, if you didn't bother to read all that... here's a 'Too Long, Didn't Read Version' for your convenience:
TLDR: Try dating a college graduate from U.P. or Ateneo and tell me if you still have the same opinion of them.