(03-03-2015 05:02 PM)Tresdus Wrote:  Having a 7+ figure net worth is more alpha than 99% of people on this forum.

It is extremely easy to get laid with women compared to actually making that kind of money.

No, it's that they're richer than 99% of the people on this forum.

Having money, in of it itself, isn't alpha, because everyone doesn't have to work to get rich. Some people are born into it. Some people have certain advantages/connections to be able to get rich that others will never have.

There are an innumerable amount of variables at play.

Your line of thinking would make sense if the playing field was level, but a level playing field doesn't exist, and it never will.

Furthermore, by your logic, all high-earning men should be able to fuck dimes whenever they want -- without incentives -- which we know to be factually incorrect.

If shitting on a beautiful woman isnt alpha, then I dont know what is.

(03-03-2015 05:16 PM)Pride male Wrote:  If shitting on a beautiful woman isnt alpha, then I dont know what is.

It isn't if you have to pay for it.

(03-03-2015 05:18 PM)Game_Started Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 05:16 PM)Pride male Wrote:  If shitting on a beautiful woman isnt alpha, then I dont know what is.

It isn't if you have to pay for it.

But chicks are fighting to get shit on.

Some of these instagram hoes being posted are advertising.
Putting in time, money, and effort to get chose.

Meanwhile Hassan is eating garlic and drinking milk, wondering who's gonna swallow the Sultan's next Kit Kat.

It's like the grocer thinking you're a sucker for buying his apples, meanwhile you baking a pie.

That's the danger with the whole "if he pays anything, he's a sucker" mentality.

If he buys an appetizer, gets a girl a drink, puts her in a car on his Uber account...

A chick think she's getting over, that she's really taking something from him, can't wait to get home and count them stacks - meanwhile a dude who has it ain't concerned.

Bitch bragging she had a lobster dinner, meanwhile your boy ordered Foie Gras and Caviar during lunch and didn't get a chance to finish it.

World of abundance.

WIA

At the end of the day, this is still P4P we're talking about.

I get the sense some guys are trying to spin this into some other-worldly form of game because Louis Vuitton duffle bags full of money are involved, Sheiks are involved, exoticals are involved, and exotic locales are involved, but it's still P4P.

(03-03-2015 05:04 PM)jariel Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 04:54 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  Those are transactions. Not really much of a social interaction. However you could still make a decent devil's advocate argument for that even.

It's not good or ideal game to only use money to impress or get women. We all know that, but it is still some kind of game.

Ok, let's say, you and I go out to a club, and we see a chick we both like. You go up to her, and spit, and she tells you, "Thank you for the compliment of coming over, but I have a boyfriend." I go up to her later, and she says "Here's my number, after I drop my home girl off, we can link up."

We both ran game, and she was feeling me stronger for whatever reason(s).

Ok, it goes down like that.

But if we both can go up to her, and she says "We can kick it, my hourly rate is $500."

Well if you can pay, you can get her. If I can pay, I can get her. If that dude over in the corner who's been loitering around pussy all night can pay, he can get her too.

I don't see how that's game.

We can disagree on the definition, but you know we're still homies, that's all that matters.

Ok what if you were wearing some expensive Ferragamos with the socks, while I was wearing some low end Steve Maddens or Cole Hans with black Hanes socks and she made the determination that you are higher value than I am. Is that money you spent on your clothes game? I'd say yes and you would have to date her long enough to find out she loved your fucking shoes and socks and that's how you got the number. I used to get white girl's full attention with my watches. What's so different?

I also disagree on her 500/hr rate point. There are so many escorts on BP that have ads that say no black or latin men. In Asia, they charge black men 2-4 times extra for big dick and social stigma tax. Whereas a tall and handsome white dude might be able to shore that same whore by saying nothing more than, "Hello, how are you doing?" In her native language. Is that not some kind of game?

What about everyone's favorite fight. Appetizers vs. No Appetizers. Just because the nachos are 5 dollars, and you make 150K a year, if it will help that bitch relax while you talk to her is that still game? Does it matter if it is a beer instead of nachos? What if it was a 20 dollar entree?

I once gave a my first Chinese girlfriend (and a former friend of 4 years), 800 dollars. Long story, short. The amount meant nothing to me back then, but it ruined our relationship and I had to cut her loose because she viewed me like a John or some simp/beta provider. The valuable lesson I learned in that mistake was that, the difference between tricking and treating is in the perceived value of that amount of money to the bitch herself. Not to you. Had I have given that same money or a gift that cost that much to the thick and curvy ex Chinese girlfriend I posted in the travel forum, she would have loved it and treated me no differently. Why? Because she is like 100 times richer than I am.

Just like with Dan. He comes out of the helicopter stuntin as we would say in the hood, but bitches expect some scratch at some point, if you want them to stick around. Some of these ONS guys get off really easy if they get quick lays off semi-buzzed alcohol drinking women, because sober, those bitches would bounce when the access to resources is not what it seemed it would be on first sight. (i.e they thought you were a mark, but you were not)

Money, image, language skills, etc. all these things are mere tools that make up your game in its entirety. We game aware at RVF just like to MIN/MAX everything to our advantage, therefore we tend to spend a great deal less to nothing on women (money wise)

(03-03-2015 05:33 PM)jariel Wrote:  At the end of the day, this is still P4P we're talking about.

I get the sense some guys are trying to spin this into some other-worldly form of game because Louis Vuitton duffle bags full of money are involved, Sheiks are involved, exoticals are involved, and exotic locales are involved, but it's still P4P.

p4p is still detrimental to game. There is no disputing that. It becomes a crutch for too many reasons to list.

If we are talking about sheer technicalities, it can still be arguably some form of shitty game.

I want to hang a Louis V duffel bag full of money inside my living room hanging from the ceiling. I want a level to pull that slowly lets money fly out and flicker down depending on how pleased on I am with the chick that is over.

Is That Game?

I think so.

Is Sultan flavoured Mountain Dew and his custom made Rocky Road Chocolate Log worth $50k? He serves warm.

(03-03-2015 05:07 PM)Sharkie Wrote:  This has been stated repeatedly on the forum and outside, but your core set of relationships is crucial to your existence.
Have a lot of connections, but put your faith in few.

Great post, Sharkie. I'd rep you again.

The failing of my younger years was believing people wanted to help themselves when they asked for advice, when they really just want to list the mental permissions they use to remaining average and stagnant to you, in an attempt to raise themselves in your eyes.

Note the recent ROK article where Jezebel readers were listing the worst guy they'd ever slept with, pretending they didn't recognise they were lowlifes and Nazis until after the act. That's the mental permissions they rationalise it with. Their attraction was simply like attracting like: "My arrogant, online bravado is cover for how much of a loser I believe I am. He's a loser too, so he won't judge me, and he can offer me self-destruction to reach the stigmatised martyrdom state I crave, where I can act morally-superior about my fallen status."

They're all modern day Hester Prynne's. I've noticed 'The Scarlet Letter' is a popular theme with goth girls and deviantart crazies.

(03-03-2015 10:17 AM)Menace Wrote:  There is nothing out there, just desert. It has no reason in the world to exist.

So people living in the desert for thousands of years should not build cities on their land because "there is nothing out there, just desert". What strange logic.

(03-03-2015 10:17 AM)Menace Wrote:  Their easy oil money bought them gleaming towers

Dubai in an international city with money from all over the world. Dubai has no oil, Abu Dhabi does.

Moreover, Arabia is not that rich with natural resources. Many places around the world such as, USA, Canada, Russia, South Africa, Brazil and more, are far richer than Arabia in natural resources.

Yes, envy is unbecoming, but in this particular case it's also unwarranted.

(03-03-2015 10:17 AM)Menace Wrote:  infrastructure, and all that crap. It's all an illusion

so infrastructure is "crap" and an "illusion". WTF

(03-03-2015 10:17 AM)Menace Wrote:  More to the point, it has a whiff of evil to it, if you are sensitive to these things. Most tourists of a lower class would be easily wowed by the malls, indoor skiing, infrastructure, and all that crap. It's all an illusion. At one point I wished that a squadron of B2's would descend on the place and turn it back into the dust from which it came.

Anyone who wants to see a squadron of B2s descend on any inhabited place on earth, should be the last one to speak about evil. That is unless he wants to talk about himself.

(03-03-2015 06:13 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  Ok what if you were wearing some expensive Ferragamos with the socks, while I was wearing some low end Steve Maddens or Cole Hans with black Hanes socks and she made the determination that you are higher value than I am. Is that money you spent on your clothes game? I'd say yes and you would have to date her long enough to find out she loved your fucking shoes and socks and that's how you got the number. I used to get white girl's full attention with my watches. What's so different?

I also disagree on her 500/hr rate point. There are so many escorts on BP that have ads that say no black or latin men. In Asia, they charge black men 2-4 times extra for big dick and social stigma tax. Whereas a tall and handsome white dude might be able to shore that same whore by saying nothing more than, "Hello, how are you doing?" In her native language. Is that not some kind of game?

What about everyone's favorite fight. Appetizers vs. No Appetizers. Just because the nachos are 5 dollars, and you make 150K a year, if it will help that bitch relax while you talk to her is that still game? Does it matter if it is a beer instead of nachos? What if it was a 20 dollar entree?

I once gave a my first Chinese girlfriend (and a former friend of 4 years), 800 dollars. Long story, short. The amount meant nothing to me back then, but it ruined our relationship and I had to cut her loose because she viewed me like a John or some simp/beta provider. The valuable lesson I learned in that mistake was that, the difference between tricking and treating is in the perceived value of that amount of money to the bitch herself. Not to you. Had I have given that same money or a gift that cost that much to the thick and curvy ex Chinese girlfriend I posted in the travel forum, she would have loved it and treated me no differently. Why? Because she is like 100 times richer than I am.

Just like with Dan. He comes out of the helicopter stuntin as we would say in the hood, but bitches expect some scratch at some point, if you want them to stick around. Some of these ONS guys get off really easy if they get quick lays off semi-buzzed alcohol drinking women, because sober, those bitches would bounce when the access to resources is not what it seemed it would be on first sight. (i.e they thought you were a mark, but you were not)

Money, image, language skills, etc. all these things are mere tools that make up your game in its entirety. We game aware at RVF just like to MIN/MAX everything to our advantage, therefore we tend to spend a great deal less to nothing on women (money wise)

When you said "money game only is still game", I said it wasn't because the context of that is just bringing money to the table and making a business agreement with a woman as to what she will do to you sexually for that money is game.

Again, I don't consider a guy who uses escorts and strippers to fulfill his sexual needs to be a guy who has game.

Now, if you're saying using your money to create a higher-level of self-presentation is game, then I agree with you there 100%.

Also, in conjunction with other factors, it is game. If you're a confident man, your money is right, your presentation is good, etc. then we're getting back towards what we would consider a high-value man who has game.

But I will never say a guy has game just because he has money he can use to get sex from hoes.

(03-03-2015 06:16 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 05:33 PM)jariel Wrote:  At the end of the day, this is still P4P we're talking about.

I get the sense some guys are trying to spin this into some other-worldly form of game because Louis Vuitton duffle bags full of money are involved, Sheiks are involved, exoticals are involved, and exotic locales are involved, but it's still P4P.

p4p is still detrimental to game. There is no disputing that. It becomes a crutch for too many reasons to list.

If we are talking about sheer technicalities, it can still be arguably some form of shitty game.

P4p is a crutch, but it's a crutch in that you're paying out resources to get something that men can get (ideally) without paying out for. But this begs the question: let's say you're a man with coffers that never go dry, then does it matter? Let's say these dudes are dropping 10k on a hooker when they've got billions in the bank, does it matter?

Obviously, it's beta to buy girls, but when you've got that sort of cash your last concern is women. You're thinking about how to keep that cash flow going so that you're great-great-great-great-great-great grandkids never even have to know what it's like to ever work.

I think their reality is just so different. You can literally buy a woman to impregnate at that point and she'll remain faithful because if she doesn't you can get her decapitated with the flick of a wrist.

(03-03-2015 09:17 PM)jariel Wrote:  When you said "money game only is still game", I said it wasn't because the context of that is just bringing money to the table and making a business agreement with a woman as to what she will do to you sexually for that money is game.

Again, I don't consider a guy who uses escorts and strippers to fulfill his sexual needs to be a guy who has game.

Now, if you're saying using your money to create a higher-level of self-presentation is game, then I agree with you there 100%.

Also, in conjunction with other factors, it is game. If you're a confident man, your money is right, your presentation is good, etc. then we're getting back towards what we would consider a high-value man who has game.

But I will never say a guy has game just because he has money he can use to get sex from hoes.

There was a good thread a while back about what people would do if they became wealthy. You can use the money to up your DHV. You could get a personal trainer, become a pilot, learn languages, afford the best clothes/shoes. This would all require quite a bit of time/effort in addition to the money.

The way I look at it is that if you're doing all of the above to up your DHV SOLELY to attract women, you may as well do p4p. If you're into constant self improvement to become that best version of yourself, then the women are just an extra benefit.

And I'll say again for normal girls (non-hooker/gold digger) game beats money almost every time. If the girl has had a few drinks then game wins easily. And money is a great cock-blocker. When girls know you're wealthy they put you in the mark/beta-provider role. You need more than average game to move into the fun-guy/alpha role.

My guess is that the guys doing this are only superficially happy. A common problem with people that were born rich is low self esteem. They degrade these girls and do the most extreme things because they are numb after indulging their desires for their entire lives. Like a crack addict needing more drugs they need larger orgies, more extreme sex acts, etc. just to feel anything at all. And the girls they hire are just as broken. Kinda sad all the way around.

(03-03-2015 09:17 PM)jariel Wrote:  Now, if you're saying using your money to create a higher-level of self-presentation is game, then I agree with you there 100%.

Also, in conjunction with other factors, it is game. If you're a confident man, your money is right, your presentation is good, etc. then we're getting back towards what we would consider a high-value man who has game.

But I will never say a guy has game just because he has money he can use to get sex from hoes.

Now, Jariel, we are at a certain level when you mentioned the bolded. We see game on a lower level because most of us are not insanely wealthy (I think and if so can a brother get a loan?). We are at the point where we want to leverage game to gain sex from attractive lizards. Now, the debate comes in when we talk about the amount of money used to get the sex.

Are we talking about the money in respect to what we have in total or are we talking about what we deem socially acceptable as a forum to create a higher level of self presentation?

Some guys will not buy a lizard a drink or order appetizers as they say it sets the wrong pretext and gives out a beta vibe. Others argue that buying a lizard drink (or drinks) won't put them in the poorhouse and it's small minded to even think that way.

Some guys claim that they work out and look good for their own self interests and that lizards play no part in the clothes that they pick out to wear.

Would those same guys wear the same type of clothing and apply the same cologne on a night out with the boys?

Let me get technical.

Guys on a higher echelon of finance actually deem the act of convincing and wooing lizards (game) to have sex tedious and time consuming.

Think about your weekly meals and house maintenance. It's better to prepare your own food and clean your own house. You get more of an intimate involvement with that process however there is a time cost involved. Now you had the money to do so and granted your time was spent maintaining and gaining on the money you possess enabling you to pay without concern, wouldn't you pay for a chef to have meals prepared for you when you want and a maid to clean up and keep your living establishment tidy?

Particularly in the West, paying for poon sets a bad precedent on many levels.

1) It spoils the market for other men and eventually creates a beta culture
2) Most men don't leverage the way they pay properly and it causes the lizard to see the man as inferior. Since he has used money as his sole bargaining chip and not leveraged the possession of this currency to lock her in emotionally and mentally, he becomes easily interchangeable to her.

However in certain countries where the economic scale is largely skewed in favour of men, usually true patriarchal countries, this is the norm. There may not be an explicit payment for the transaction of sexual intercourse but there is an understanding that the lizard's expenses will be covered by the man such as maybe gifts, outstanding bills and even spending money.

The thing with money and game is that we keep on going round and round and it's largely based on ego. We like to feel that those who pay don't have game and yet we buy clothes that depict a certain level of wealth, we wear certain clothes, drive certain cars, smell a certain way and live in certain locations.

Here is a question of the hour/day/week:

You have two men who are identical twins. They share the generous inheritance from their old man.
They both get the opportunity to fcuk 9s that night.

If one man directly offers his 9 100 dollars for sex and the other man comps a table for 4000 dollars, buys more shots, appetizers wowing a 9 and eventually banging her that night, who used the most/least game out of the two?

Again, I'm not a proponent of P4P. I lost a bang cos I wouldn't comp a lizard 10 bucks for gas and the forum guys ripped me apart for that but I did it on principle

(03-03-2015 11:41 PM)Moma Wrote:  Guys on a higher echelon of finance actually deem the act of convincing and wooing lizards (game) to have sex tedious and time consuming.

I don't agree. The enjoyment you get from closing a deal or making a sale is very similar to wooing a lizard. Most successful people are hardcore type A, they love the chase.

"I'd poop on that" is the new "would you bang?"

"Would you bang" is now a rape accusation, but no feminist will ever talk about rape committed by arabs (#Rotherham), so we should be safe if we just talk about shitting on girls.

(02-27-2015 07:29 PM)kaotic Wrote:  Sex is literally a transactional (fluidly speaking) action. If you aren't giving a woman cash money, you're exchanging resources in order to sleep with her, given its time or physical materialistic items.

Seems a woman never fell for you. It happened to me a few if not many times, and the "transaction" you are talking become completely one sided, but its directly from her to you. Not the other way around.

We all talk around here about women being very emotional and making decision with their emotions. Well you are probably about to guess what happens when they start feeling something.
Thats my reality, hope it will be yours some time.

I haven't read the whole thread, but I am surprised that so many posters here are shocked by the reality of the situation.

The only thing I am wondering about is the reason these women do this sort of thing?

Financial security? If so, is it worth sacrificing your dignity and sanity for it?
The opportunity to gain attention from extremely rich men?
Narcissism?
Or a combination of these factors?

(03-04-2015 03:34 AM)Biologist Wrote:  I haven't read the whole thread, but I am surprised that so many posters here are shocked by the reality of the situation.

The only thing I am wondering about is the reason these women do this sort of thing?

Financial security? If so, is it worth sacrificing your dignity and sanity for it?
The opportunity to gain attention from extremely rich men?
Narcissism?
Or a combination of these factors?

I'm not shocked that there are women who whore up to this level. If they were just beautiful women from poor corners of the world, I wouldn't even raise an eyebrow.

However, these are attractive women from rich Western countries that are collectively the richest and most spoiled in history of mankind. Yet they choose an extreme level of degradation just so they can attention-whore on social media and feed their materialistic black hole.

Man, I have only just made peace with their now openly displayed hypergamy plan of AFBB....

They do it to feed the endless void inside created by western society.

I think there are a plethora of reasons they do it, but ultimately it's the same old potion of nasty traits that emerge from a culture in decline - greed, sloth, envy, gluttony, pride etc

There are people and corporations who've figured out how to exploit flaws in humanity for various gains, and they're getting very good at it thanks to technology, both hardware and software.
Once they know how to exploit flaws in human nature, it's in their best interest to have more flaws in human nature.
I think they don't know they're part of the problem. Or even care.

"Woow our new divorce and abortion 2 for 1 kit is selling like hot cakes! And look at the spike in anti depressant sales!"
"Also, John, we need to come up with an easy blister pack suicide pill, I heard that more people are getting into that suicide thing, God knows why... but can I get a proposal by Monday?"

This thread is amazing! So much information. Knew the whoring exist, but not this sickness. The funny thing is girls are going broke overspending to match these girls. Not realizing "hard work and get money" is codeword for prostitution.

I want to know how often these tagthesponsor guys send a message to a girl, and get blown off or ignored.

Without that knowledge we have a very incomplete picture.

(03-04-2015 05:00 AM)Sooth Wrote:  They do it to feed the endless void inside created by western society.

I think there are a plethora of reasons they do it, but ultimately it's the same old potion of nasty traits that emerge from a culture in decline - greed, sloth, envy, gluttony, pride etc

There are people and corporations who've figured out how to exploit flaws in humanity for various gains, and they're getting very good at it thanks to technology, both hardware and software.
Once they know how to exploit flaws in human nature, it's in their best interest to have more flaws in human nature.
I think they don't know they're part of the problem. Or even care.

"Woow our new divorce and abortion 2 for 1 kit is selling like hot cakes! And look at the spike in anti depressant sales!"
"Also, John, we need to come up with an easy blister pack suicide pill, I heard that more people are getting into that suicide thing, God knows why... but can I get a proposal by Monday?"

I have been harping on about this for the past 3-4 years, it all comes down to self-esteem

Their self-esteem is externally derived to the point that any revolting, unsavoury and whore-ish behaviour is rationalized, post-event.

Therefore, all of these likes, all of this thirst just fuels their egos and creates a feedback loop in which they genuinely think that this is the best way forward.

Cash money = security
Likes = self-esteem

My sympathies to those whose bubbles have been burst by the thread but from a game/theoretical standpoint, it all checks out despite a lot of us not running in fecal-disposing circles.

Taking the IG example in which these girls have the basics, a smartphone to show off their goods and market that pussy, constant internet to receive the stimulus of thirst and envy etc.

Attention, Validation, Approval -> CHECK

Maslow's hierachy -> security -> self-esteem -> CHECK

Supply < Demand -> price (not financial necessarily) of pussy increases -> CHECK (higher barriers of entry to elite pussy)

Being spoiled and feeling special because their homegirls dream of flying on private jets etc. (girls what other girls want)-> CHECK

It's symptomatic of the:

a) 'highlight reel' culture of social media designed to make others envious and boost your own self-esteem hence: pictures of cool jets but no mention of getting gangbanged

b) materialistic climate which is further enabled by these sugar daddies. These guys provide the 'oxygen' of money/security/attention and these girls cling on to it.

c) collective thirst of guys as polarization occurs and the pareto principle (80/20) is evident. These girls flock to the richest, hottest etc. because of said enabling that it is just accepted. They can whore out as much as they want because so many guys are keen that they will STILL get what they want.

d) 'girls care about what other girls, not guys think of them'; they know that other girls who know how the game works, will respect it. If they don't, it's still drama and attention. If they do, they are winning in the social totem pole in which every woman is against each other. (see: materialistically)

e) these Arab sheikhs, Russian oligarchs, etc. already have status that this is on the down-low. Every woman wants this, to be able to do the nastiest, most deprived things and to get away with it. Us guys with game, just elicit emotions and trust and do it. These guys pay money and sign a non-disclosure agreement and that's it.

Rational (male behaviour) vs emotional (female behaviour).

A stockmarket of pussy, so to speak as women become more rational in their actions.

These are just some thoughts, applying concepts and whatnot.

I discussed how these girls play the game with my airhostess friend and her mother who is in the 50s.

I dropped "men age like wine, women age like milk" and they both looked down and nodded in agreement.

Girls know what’s up and the others who don't are in denial or were never properly ‘groomed’ for the game.

This whole whoredom fits in with the narrative of social dynamics, game and red-pill that it's cliche. Forget about Disney movies and shit, this is the real cliché. The Disney-esque exists to differentiate between men true to their desire and those who are reactive, pinging and thirsty.

In my opinion, most women are indeed red-pill. The fact that they encourage blue-pill behaviour is simply because it is in their own benefit. This is just our culture, a symptom of the 21st century and a whole bunch of stuff echoed by more experienced, repped members.

I don't even advise guys anymore; only my friends, if and when, they specifically request advice.

It's tough for a 23 year old out here when you see girls your age fucking 60 year olds for a glimpse of opulence. Not the fact that they do that, I can accept that but rather, the fact that to be fucked well, they will still come to us guys with game who can influence their state of minds for long periods of time rather than small spikes.

You cannot have your cake and eat it and furthermore, I find it hard be attracted to these girls. They don't deserve me. It's a privilege to be with me.

Zelcorpion mentioned trying to sleep with some slut who’s count was in the 3 digits? No thanks. (no hate, Zel, I think you are a solid guy from your posts)

Alas, this is the slut paradox of wanting a girl who knows how to please but hasn’t been around. Please. Do you think she was in her garden, sucking golf balls through the hose every evening?

I try to filter out these materialistic bitches (and avoid the showerless hobo masculine hoes too). All women like this exist but every woman has a phase in which they go through the gold-diggery. I think eventually, they do, for security as they increasingly understand that their opulent life they have been brainwashed into wanting is not obtainable on their own, without a man. If it is, then they want a guy with game, to fuck them.
I had a sugar momma who would take care of me and all I had to do is come over and blow her mind away. I got over it too, it’s just a phase. She knew the game too. I was one of these girls, for a few months. It was great, I had a temporary ego rush but that makes me a bitch. Once you rely on this stimulus, monetary or materialistic, your power is gone. The only power I had was my cock (like women with their pussy) and my game to fuck other women. Eventually it was another woman who held me down for a while. (read: challenged me)

Every now and then, I will go to a club and take a girl home, she might be materialistic or whatever, but its just an experience.

Women want to be challenged but rewarded. These guys are just rewarding them for being hot, perpetuating this circlejerk of thirst and making it harder for other guys. I can only imagine what my son will have to put up with one day.

Game is your behaviour. Money is an ancillary tool to filter certain traits in women but more importantly, to give you options. It can assist but it won’t get you laid unless you just want to fuck hookers. It will increase your pool but it won't filter the women for you alone; with game it will.

I learned game to not fuck hookers. I have been offered hookers countless times by uncles, family friends etc, culturally it is a thing. I have been to Amsterdam countless times, been in brothels in Germany and boy was I tempted but then you look around and consider how many cocks before you.

As for money in my life:

It's there for me to live the lifestyle I want and deserve. Game is a tool for me to include women into my life and mission. The more I have, the more options I have, the more enticing my journey becomes to women trying to join. Every bitch wants to have a cameo appearance when you got money and that is fine. I accept that I am the only main character in this.

I just feel sorry for the guys looking for a female protagonist because the odds are stacked against this.

No bitch gets a free pass for having won the genetic lottery. If I want to take a shit, I will just go to the toilet, thank you.

Just my opinion and what I try to apply to my life despite focused on money, hobbies, travel and pleasure. I am no king kong game master 9000 with a 10 inch cock and lots of cash.

Thanks WIA, jariel, AB, Moma and TravelerKai et al for the knowledge. It makes me honoured to be part of this forum.

Source code has a point, we got some extremely parched and thirsty bros down here in the south.

Inflating the egos of all these trick ass club rats.

Is it like this everywhere else?

P.s. I'm down here in the A.