I'm 6'6 myself , give me all the tall chicks guys, give me all the tall chicks

What about pancake-tits? WB

There is nothing borderline about those girls. They may have sweaty faces and pinned back hair, but if you can correctly extrapolate, they are probably 7s. Nowhere near the 4-5's this thread is supposed to cover. This is what Tuthmosis meant when he said, most guys cannot extrapolate well. Just because they are flat chested, it does not change their numbers. Worst case they are 6's. Still above average.

Damn, I thought I had actually banged the girl on the left. I had to zoom way out and see a better angle. I am still not sure actually.

5'11", small tits, goofy tongue behind the teeth smile.... its all too familiar. So obviously would bang.

^^^ They are twins right? If not, they look so much alike it's crazy. Those chics are 5s at best to me. Who knows, maybe dolled up they'd be 6.5s. But they just aren't doing anything for me. Would only bang if it was a layup and no real effort required. Those chics definitely ain't worth chasing after.

Travelerkai, if those are 7s to you as is, I think you are giving them some serious blonde inflation.

speakeasy is right.

That is our typical Blonde or Asian inflation of a +1.

Those chicks teeth and faces doesn't matter what you do. Like speak says they are 6.5's dolled up and low 6's as is. Faces are a bit homely with no real soft features, plus their facial skin has already been beat to shit by the sun.

They are tan, thin, and blonde, but those alone a 7 does not make!

I'd bang both but if i had to choose, i'd pick number 2. I find her just a liiiiittle bit more attractive.

(01-15-2015 08:39 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  ^^^ They are twins right? If not, they look so much alike it's crazy. Those chics are 5s at best to me. Who knows, maybe dolled up they'd be 6.5s. But they just aren't doing anything for me. Would only bang if it was a layup and no real effort required. Those chics definitely ain't worth chasing after.

Travelerkai, if those are 7s to you as is, I think you are giving them some serious blonde inflation.

Dude I do not even like blonde women. They are both sweaty as hell with no makeup on, but they have good facial symmetry not to mention good bodies.

Whoever posted that, can you possibly find a non sport photo of those two women?

They could be 5's in Sweden but that would be due to local competition. Anywhere else they are nothing under a 6. You guys cannot extrapolate a sweaty woman with sweaty pinned back hair at all. Do you guys ever train your eyes by going to the local park trail where the rich women like to jog? They wear athletic gear and tennis/baseball caps. No make up on, etc. The ones with Yoga pants on, usually catch the most attention, but the ones in loose fitting shirts and shorts don't.

You have to train your eyes to look at their facial symmetry. The distance between the eyes, nose, and mouth. If you can spot the difference between a 5 wearing yoga pants and a 8 milf dressed way down at a jogging path, you know how to extrapolate.

Women should not need to be dolled up in order to get an appropriate number, if you can extrapolate well enough to catch that talent dressed down.

I'd smash but I would need a couple drink first....

(01-15-2015 04:23 PM)Erasmus Wrote:  I'm 6'6 myself , give me all the tall chicks guys, give me all the tall chicks

What about pancake-tits? WB

How is this even borderline?

The point of this thread is not to argue if they are above 5, it's would you hit it?

no effort required, naked on your bed or begging you to fuck her ... would you? maybe my standards are too low but I can't see myself saying no.

WNB the swedes. Trifecta of too thin lips, bad teeth, and zero tits makes me prefer to game than bang em.

6'5" Christina? Yeah, if you look at other pictures she has a great smile. Only downside is the big nose for me. I'd climb that girl!

Indian girl? Absolutely WB.

I would bang the swedes, but would not pursue.

I disagree on giving them a 7

Even with make up on. They just have the awkward goofy look.
They also don't appear to have much in terms of body.

They are the girl I would pull when I run out of better girls on okc..I would meet her. But not pot much effort into it.
Probably double book a date.

I would more than likely completely pass over then in a bar

(01-15-2015 04:23 PM)Erasmus Wrote:  I'm 6'6 myself , give me all the tall chicks guys, give me all the tall chicks

What about pancake-tits? WB

All you people look alike to me

(01-19-2015 02:24 PM)marlon Wrote:  

Even if the gender wasn't highly suspect that's going to be a big nope from me

   

Face down ass up ^^

^ WB without a second tought.

(01-19-2015 02:24 PM)marlon Wrote:  

(01-19-2015 08:13 PM)Joga Bonito Wrote:  

If her skin as is flawless as it is photoshoped here, then WB without a doubt.
She looks like she likes getting spanked.

of course.. as ass cconnoisseurs....we know, that more than likely the real thhing is gonna have a lot of extra flab to it

ill wait till her off season...

(01-19-2015 11:38 PM)Bacchus Wrote:  

My response in Mandarin:

(01-19-2015 11:38 PM)Bacchus Wrote:  

I would absolutely wreck her, that's not even close to borderline.