Post: #76

I hadn't heard of Christina Sommers until recently, but her Twitter feed is a good source of anti-feminist links.

   

Post: #77

Sommers is as close to a female ally as we have. I like how she is attempting to put Lindy in her place. More women need to step up and police their own kind. Women naturally tune out any man they do not respect or know. We really have no idea what effect other women would have because most red pill like women are too busy raising families and being a real woman.

Older ladies like Sommers see the writing on the wall for the future generations and wants to help. I wish more like her would at least try instead of sipping tea like kermit the frog as if it's none of their business. Natural leadership comes from men anyway so perhaps that is too much to ask of older women to do.

Post: #78

Caroline Kitchens seems to be in a similar camp to Sommers.

She clearly doesn't buy the dogma of current feminism.

Post: #79

Caroline Kitchens is hot but has a five head. WB and high five. She doesn't write her own stuff, just for Summers. I guess she is some sort of intern.

Post: #80

That woman Susan Sommers has been a soldier for a very very long time!! If you read her book about the war on boys, there's some stories about her going to feminist conference and being denied access or being threatened by the attendees! At one point she always had to go to these conference with a friend to avoid any risk!

It's crazy how any action can be justifiable in our SJW society by saying that we are preventing the proliferation of hate speech. People like her and Warren Farrell have shown that their mission is to bring true equality with love and kindness, and have gotten some love from the masses, and nothing but hate from the elite and academics. It's still a hard pill for me to swallow that being good means absolutely nothing publicly

Post: #81

Glossing over Caroline's twitter feed, I think I like her. She kinda reminds me of my wife a little bit. She's cute too, which helps actually. We shall see though. Sommers gets my respect for that amazing book The War on Boys, that and she is not ugly and lazy like her disgusting enemies.

Post: #82

(09-20-2014 04:24 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  Glossing over Caroline's twitter feed, I think I like her. She kinda reminds me of my wife a little bit. She's cute too, which helps actually. We shall see though. Sommers gets my respect for that amazing book The War on Boys, that and she is not ugly and lazy like her disgusting enemies.

This is true, but I'm questioning the relevance of these women and Dr. Helen and the rest of them. Feminism is a secular religion to most educated liberal women, and even for those who wouldn't claim to be strongly committed, the tenets of the movement are the "default" position for them, before any thinking starts. Some contrarian women posting anti-feminist links isn't going to do much.

The best way to fight feminism is to become an attractive and successful man, and be good enough at it that you can Next the feminist broads and not have to deal with their shit. If girls thought that even 10% of hot guys were going to stop dating self-professed feminists, they'd change up real quick, quicker than if a female academic at a centre-right think tank wrote some op-ed pieces.

Post: #83

^^^I see your line of thought, but I think a lot of these women are feminists because desirable men don't date them.

This is why no one can judge them or they shout misogynist, and they are desperately trying to flip on it's head the standard of beauty for women (but not men). It's no surprise that these qualities that feminists demand be found attractive are ones they almost always possess: Fat, unfeminine, worthless masters degree, sarcasm, and fat. After all, has anyone ever heard a feminist state that perhaps they should also look for similar qualities in men? Of course not.

From wiki, Caroline Sommers herself was quoted as saying (although she denies saying it)

"There are a lot of homely women in women's studies. Preaching these anti-male, anti-sex sermons is a way for them to compensate for various heartaches-- they're just mad at the beautiful girls."

Post: #84

(09-21-2014 12:39 AM)CRR Wrote:  ^^^I see your line of thought, but I think a lot of these women are feminists because desirable men don't date them.
...
From wiki, Caroline Sommers herself was quoted as saying (although she denies saying it)

"There are a lot of homely women in women's studies. Preaching these anti-male, anti-sex sermons is a way for them to compensate for various heartaches-- they're just mad at the beautiful girls."

I agree with you there, but that doesn't change the fact that commentary on the issue (even from critical women) isn't going to change people's minds as much as successful guys speaking with their actions and not kowtowing in their personal lives to women who espouse man-hate. It almost doesn't matter that fat feminist chicks don't have a shot with hot guys to begin with, the bogeyman alone is motivating.

Post: #85

But I think by and large desirable men do speak with their actions, which is what the feminists have a problem with, and why they are trying to change what men find attractive.

I'm not saying Louis CK is at the top of most desirable men, but this article touches on this subject:

http://www.returnofkings.com/36177/louis...acceptance

Post: #86

Here's the posts she has put up so far, mostly celebrity and pop culture filler:

http://www.gq.com/contributors/lindy-west

For her last 10 posts, she's averaging 3.3 comments each.

Post: #87

(09-30-2014 03:58 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Here's the posts she has put up so far, mostly celebrity and pop culture filler:

http://www.gq.com/contributors/lindy-west

For her last 10 posts, she's averaging 3.3 comments each.

Her writing style has toned down.

Still, what is the point her writing articles like 'Michael Strahan's Be-Thonged Junk to Star in Magic Mike XXL' in a men's magazine, or is GQ aimed at gay men? (I thought Men's Health was more their thing).

Post: #88

(09-30-2014 10:45 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  ...
Her writing style has toned down.

Still, what is the point her writing articles like 'Michael Strahan's Be-Thonged Junk to Star in Magic Mike XXL' in a men's magazine, or is GQ aimed at gay men? (I thought Men's Health was more their thing).

What the fuck are they thinking hiring a feminist for a men's magazine? Even if they expect "snarky" comments, her feminist hamster cap will color really funny stuff you could write about celebrities - though most jokes would classify as "sexist", "rapey" etc.

And the amount and size of contributions rather speaks of a "freelance"-engagement than on being part of the staff.

Post: #89

I'm looking forward to this added baggage (no pun intended) bringing down the already thoroughly feminist and feeble-minded GQ.

Post: #90

Does GQ think we care what some fat chick thinks about man fashion?

Post: #91

(10-01-2014 01:38 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(09-30-2014 10:45 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  ...
Her writing style has toned down.

Still, what is the point her writing articles like 'Michael Strahan's Be-Thonged Junk to Star in Magic Mike XXL' in a men's magazine, or is GQ aimed at gay men? (I thought Men's Health was more their thing).

What the fuck are they thinking hiring a feminist for a men's magazine? Even if they expect "snarky" comments, her feminist hamster cap will color really funny stuff you could write about celebrities - though most jokes would classify as "sexist", "rapey" etc.

And the amount and size of contributions rather speaks of a "freelance"-engagement than on being part of the staff.

You're genuinely surprised that GQ would hire some feminazi cunt like Lindy West?



GQ went over to the dark side a long time ago. It's the kind of magazine SJW's believe men should read. It is hardly what I would call male-friendly.

Post: #92

(10-01-2014 01:35 PM)Lord_Perseus Wrote:  

(10-01-2014 01:38 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(09-30-2014 10:45 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  ...
Her writing style has toned down.

Still, what is the point her writing articles like 'Michael Strahan's Be-Thonged Junk to Star in Magic Mike XXL' in a men's magazine, or is GQ aimed at gay men? (I thought Men's Health was more their thing).

What the fuck are they thinking hiring a feminist for a men's magazine? Even if they expect "snarky" comments, her feminist hamster cap will color really funny stuff you could write about celebrities - though most jokes would classify as "sexist", "rapey" etc.

And the amount and size of contributions rather speaks of a "freelance"-engagement than on being part of the staff.

You're genuinely surprised that GQ would hire some feminazi cunt like Lindy West?



GQ went over to the dark side a long time ago. It's the kind of magazine SJW's believe men should read. It is hardly what I would call male-friendly.

Men's magazines have usually had a couple of 'empowered female typists' on board, but the articles they churned out were related to male interests, such as giving her mind-blowing orgasms and dating tips. West is churning out moral scolding over 'Family Guy' and celebrity gossip, and I fail to see an audience for it.

No heterosexual man cares about a male stripper movie, or whatever the hell a broken gutter slut like Lindsay Lohan is up to in 2014, and I suspect gay men are far too solipsistic to want to read a magazine where everything isn't filtered through the gay filter, because their identity is tied to conspicuous-consumption of gay products and services.

Why is she at the table, other than to prove men have no safe space from female voices?

Post: #93

Wow. It's funny how quickly her feminist fangs got pulled. I can't wait to see her reviewing movies for the Sheboygan Times-Herald.

Post: #94

(10-01-2014 08:41 PM)not_dead_yet Wrote:  Wow. It's funny how quickly her feminist fangs got pulled. I can't wait to see her reviewing movies for the Sheboygan Times-Herald.

If she can look up from the popcorn bucket long enough to see the screen...