Post: #1

I just found this lame video of some hippy talking about rape. Really what these kids hes talking about did was wrong but its whatever.. then around the 4:50 mark he calls RooshV a rapist!
He calls out Roosh again around 5:30

http://www.upworthy.com/a-horrifying-thi...g=2&c=ufb1

If this is a repost my bad.. this is the first I have seen of it

Post: #2

He used the word "creep" as an offensive way to describe men like Roosh, like us, and therefore he gets no time of day from me. Roosh, has NEVER, nor have we on this forum, said rape is anything but dreadful and for him to insinuate as such is at the least distasteful, and at its worse, outright slander that could lead to something more serious.

Post: #3

This guy's day job is the bearded lady at the local freak show

Post: #4

Ah no wonder I've been getting some extra feminist hate this week.

Post: #5

(01-10-2013 05:57 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Ah no wonder I've been getting some extra feminist hate this week.

I still love you just the same Roosh
(no homo)

Post: #6

(01-10-2013 05:57 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Ah no wonder I've been getting some extra feminist hate this week.

Have you ever thought about suing people for slander, libel, or misrepresentation of your brand?

Post: #7

I didn't know Roosh had an albino twin brother.

Post: #8

(01-10-2013 06:03 PM)UgSlayer Wrote:  

(01-10-2013 05:57 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Ah no wonder I've been getting some extra feminist hate this week.

Have you ever thought about suing people for slander, libel, or misrepresentation of your brand?

And stop the free publicity?

Post: #9

Roosh, please post the feminist remarks and emails on here so that we can nuke them as well. They are a collective bunch, we are a Logical collective bunch.

Tell them to bring their A game.

Post: #10

What is this guys angle in all this? It starts off talking about the rape incident but then he goes off into a rant about the manosphere, condemning those who would have the audacity to teach men how to talk to and get with women. His lesson at the end was essentially teaching you how to not approach and just back off of women entirely.

This guy is an idiot and probably got picked on A LOT in high school. Also what the fuck was up with his tribal drums transitioning to like a 80's video game background music?

Post: #11

(01-10-2013 06:15 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

(01-10-2013 06:03 PM)UgSlayer Wrote:  

(01-10-2013 05:57 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Ah no wonder I've been getting some extra feminist hate this week.

Have you ever thought about suing people for slander, libel, or misrepresentation of your brand?

And stop the free publicity?

Really makes
Sense now
Drama brings traffic

Post: #12

4:55: "Teach them not to act creepy in the first place!"

...says the guy who looks like the prototype casting agents would use for the "creepy/weird guy" on a typical network TV show.

I guess it makes sense in some ways, though. Its guys who look and act like him (the super awkward geek/nerd set) that are probably most in need of this kind of advice. Hell, I was like that once myself (was a massive geek despite not looking the part), so I get it.

Their attack on Roosh, however, is quite simply explained as a ploy to seem "less creepy" and more tolerable to the little feministas and gamer-girls they want to try to approach at the next ComicCon. In other words, standard male feminist motivation.

Nothing new here.

Post: #13

(01-10-2013 05:35 PM)Cr33pin Wrote:  I just found this lame video of some hippy talking about rape. Really what these kids hes talking about did was wrong but its whatever.. then around the 4:50 mark he calls RooshV a rapist!
He calls out Roosh again around 5:30

http://www.upworthy.com/a-horrifying-thi...g=2&c=ufb1

If this is a repost my bad.. this is the first I have seen of it

Not to get off topic or anything, but how the hell did you ever find this?

Post: #14

This week has been crazy with feminist and PC propaganda everywhere. The false "Rape Chart" posted by the Washington Post, the ESPN "controversy" with Miss Alabama and the old announcer, and now this. Today I was listening to a radio show during the day on this supposedly right leaning channel and talk show. They had some woman professor from the US (if I am not wrong) on air and they discussed how the announcer should have apologized and how the girl was wrong to say that the announcer does not need to apologize. She further discussed how women are targeted in male sports as sex-items or something and its all the fault of male producers and men. I kept hoping that he would give her a smackdown because it is probably the most right-leaning radio channel in Toronto and usually they make good points but he ended up agreeing with her. What a bummer!

Post: #15

I can't put into words how I feel about people like this, the only words that come to mind are "look at him"
Just look at him, I can't comprehend it. How can someone like that not look in the mirror and despise what they see? How can he not see what a weak man he is?

Post: #16

If women want men that are not creepy (ie. want to have sex or at least be friends with them) and game teaches you how to be with women (ie. not creepy). Then isn't game exactly what these people are calling for. Are we not their saviors?

Post: #17

(01-10-2013 07:55 PM)WesternCancer Wrote:  If women want men that are not creepy (ie. want to have sex or at least be friends with them) and game teaches you how to be with women (ie. not creepy). Then isn't game exactly what these people are calling for. Are we not their saviors?

No, because the very act of teaching someone to better approach women is considered "creepy". You're being far too objective here-what you say makes sense logically, but women are not thinking in a strictly logical fashion when they engage in this kind of shaming language. It is their emotions that drive them.

Women want effortless attraction. They want a guy who is very attractive to them without any evidence that he's putting much effort into being that way. They very much value the romanticism of the "it just happened" kind of meeting, the idea that the guy was just there being himself and he was just right and he just happened to want her.

This is why media designed to appeal to women doesn't feature male leads who seem to consciously plan to meet the female characters. Romance/adult novels (read: chick porn) feature extremely attractive men who, more often than not, are just kind of there. There is no attempt to show the development of these men into the very attractive specimens they become, or the mistakes they make in growing and getting there. They just are.

The "Disney Princess" movie models also reads this way, and does much to shape the perception of young women as they grow. The Prince does not game the Princess-he's just there, he's naturally charming, and he wants her. She has no idea how he became a prince or what he goes through to keep that title and maintain his authority, and that stuff rarely features in the story. He's just there and he's perfect for her-The End.

In female fantasy, the ideal male just is. She could care less about the effort it takes for that man to become what he is, as long as he just is.

The fact that many guys put in an effort to build that attraction and become that better man kills the ideal of organic attraction that most women want to maintain. The fact that something like "game" exists at all is even more damaging because it implies that there are some concrete formulas and methods that produce better results than others, killing the notion of "magical love" that they'd much prefer to cling to.

In the end, this all comes down to feelings. Women "feel" uncomfortable with inorganic models of sexual attraction. Game promotes an inorganic model of attraction by telling them that there is a formula that can increase a man's appeal and that a woman can be drawn with practice and perfection of this formula. Therefore, game makes women feel uncomfortable.

"Creepy" is the catch-all label used by women for that which makes them feel uncomfortable. Hence, game is creepy.

Women also do not like the idea of losing control. Girls want the ability to choose winners and losers in the sexual marketplace-this is, in their mind, their prerogative and right.

When those winners (alpha males and guys who are just generally successful with women) and losers (dudes who don't see much sexual success) start gathering on forums likes these in mass and begin discussing and actually codifying how to do things, they begin to undermine that power women would like to keep.

It also becomes harder to tell which guys fit the "effortless attraction" model they idealize and spend most of their youth dreaming about and which guys merely look the part after a lot of effort. Girls would, generally, prefer to be able to make this distinction themselves, separating the more organic "naturals" from the others who had to work at it or are merely putting on a well practiced cover for weaknesses in their game that girls would otherwise readily see.
With "game", men take some of this ability and choice away from them.

To men, this may not seem like a bad thing since men are merely trying to give women more of what they want.

The problem is that women do not want men making this decision and taking things out of their hands. This is a threat to the feminine imperative and a challenge to the romanticized organic model I described above, so women subconsciously shy away from it.

The feminine imperative calls for control over the direction of the sexual marketplace, and male cooperation and focused effort to improve their standing in said marketplace does nothing to help this aim.

The standard response, therefore, is to shame those who participate in those discussions. The term "creepy" is a good way to do that, and it fits since the whole idea makes women uncomfortable as well (creepy = "I don't like the feeling he/it gives me").

Of course, this feminine imperative creates a dilemma for men who try to abide by it. If they put in effort and that effort is seen, that's creepy. If they don't put in effort and they're not naturals (very few men are), they are still creepy. Lose-lose.

This isn't a good place for men to be, but women generally don't care. They simply can't.

Post: #18

(01-10-2013 06:55 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

(01-10-2013 05:35 PM)Cr33pin Wrote:  I just found this lame video of some hippy talking about rape. Really what these kids hes talking about did was wrong but its whatever.. then around the 4:50 mark he calls RooshV a rapist!
He calls out Roosh again around 5:30

http://www.upworthy.com/a-horrifying-thi...g=2&c=ufb1

If this is a repost my bad.. this is the first I have seen of it

Not to get off topic or anything, but how the hell did you ever find this?

No shit bro! That was my first thought when I clicked the link.

Post: #19

(01-10-2013 08:46 PM)Athlone McGinnis Wrote:  

(01-10-2013 07:55 PM)WesternCancer Wrote:  If women want men that are not creepy (ie. want to have sex or at least be friends with them) and game teaches you how to be with women (ie. not creepy). Then isn't game exactly what these people are calling for. Are we not their saviors?

No, because the very act of teaching someone to better approach women is considered "creepy". You're being far too objective here-what you say makes sense logically, but women are not thinking in a strictly logical fashion when they engage in this kind of shaming language. It is their emotions that drive them.

Women want effortless attraction. They want a guy who is very attractive to them without any evidence that he's putting much effort into being that way. They very much value the romanticism of the "it just happened" kind of meeting, the idea that the guy was just there being himself and he was just right and he just happened to want her.

The woman does not want to know what is going on behind the curtain in the Wizard of Oz. She just wants the fairy tale part of it. She considers The Wizard (game) to be "Creepy". We on this thread know that the Wizard / Game is real and is taking place behind the curtain if you will, but there is no room for reality in her idea of the world.

Post: #20

(01-10-2013 06:31 PM)UgSlayer Wrote:  

(01-10-2013 06:15 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

(01-10-2013 06:03 PM)UgSlayer Wrote:  

(01-10-2013 05:57 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Ah no wonder I've been getting some extra feminist hate this week.

Have you ever thought about suing people for slander, libel, or misrepresentation of your brand?

And stop the free publicity?

Really makes
Sense now
Drama brings traffic

I see what you did there...

Post: #21

(01-10-2013 09:13 PM)Hotwheels Wrote:  

(01-10-2013 06:31 PM)UgSlayer Wrote:  

(01-10-2013 06:15 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

(01-10-2013 06:03 PM)UgSlayer Wrote:  

(01-10-2013 05:57 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Ah no wonder I've been getting some extra feminist hate this week.

Have you ever thought about suing people for slander, libel, or misrepresentation of your brand?

And stop the free publicity?

Really makes
Sense now
Drama brings traffic

I see what you did there...

hahahahahahahaha

Post: #22

Yo Roosh, you should post all the silly hatemail you receive.

I used to get a kick out of reading Maddox and Tucker Max's.

Post: #23

Some short haired fem nazi chick on my facebook posted the video. That is how I found it

Post: #24

Post: #25

^Someone should turn the above image into a "Future Cuckolds of America" picture.

This guy is hilarious. Looking at girls - creepy. Approaching girls - creepy. Talking to them - creepy. Assuming they might like you - creepy. Assuming that because they like you, you might be able to get anywhere with them - creepy. Assuming that you get somewhere with them and this may lead to sex - creepy.

Furthermore, being creepy is creepy. Trying to stop being creepy is creepy. Don't expect to not be creepy ever in your life, because thats creepy. Trying to find out what girls want and better yourself - creepy.

I guess with that list of don'ts, at least my children will not have to populate the world with this guy's retarded offspring.