Post: #101

Ugh... I thought it was cruel to call this girl ugly. I stayed out of this thread; didn't want to be part of disparaging another human being's physical appearance.

But a "4?" People are calling her a "4?" I've known 4's. I've fucked 4's, many times. Senator, this is no 4.

This girl looks like Andre the Giant raped Fred Gwynne and somehow created a butt baby. This girl looks like the guy who reconstructs the faces of early man from skulls for National Geographic got hammered one night in his workshop and decided to play a joke. "If she lost weight and got her teeth fixed, she'd be OK..." NO. NO. That bone structure would NEVER be OK. And those teeth can't be fixed. They're the size of fucking pizza plates, splayed out like a bridge hand. The technology does not exist to fix this abomination and won't for another hundred years. Every single thing that could be wrong with a human face is wrong with this person. No amount of weight loss is going to do shit, except drain her titties into flappy elderly Orang-Utan pancakes. Because this is a person who has lost the genetic lottery so hard that you just KNOW that that's the first place she loses weight.

This is a hideous mutant sewer creature who should have been mercifully put to death as soon as it crawled from the womb. This is violently ugly. Chromosome damage ugly. Chernobyl ugly. Ugly like the holocaust. Ugly like man's inhumanity to man.

A "4?" You would "let her suck your dick?" Let's be serious here, people: if ever there was a "1," this is a fucking 1. This is in case of ugly emergency, break glass. I would rather fuck a Portuguese Man-O-War. I would rather have the Budweiser Clydesdales run a parade over my balls than have this creation of H.P. Lovecraft within 1,000 yards of my penis.

Those of you who call this a "4:" God help you. Let me show you what a "4" really is: a thick chick with bad skin who sucks a mean dick. This woman is something that folks from the Old Country bring up to scare their kids.

Post: #102

Can someone please do me a favor and ask this grenade if while she is still in the Chipoltle on Connecticut Avenue in D.C., she could order me a carne asade burrito? I want cheese, pinto beans, but no rice. Thanks. I will be by in about ten minutes to pick it up.

Post: #103

delicioustacos: I'm in tears over here.

Post: #104

(08-09-2012 12:53 AM)delicioustacos Wrote:  Ugh... I thought it was cruel to call this girl ugly. I stayed out of this thread; didn't want to be part of disparaging another human being's physical appearance.

But a "4?" People are calling her a "4?" I've known 4's. I've fucked 4's, many times. Senator, this is no 4.

This girl looks like Andre the Giant raped Fred Gwynne and somehow created a butt baby. This girl looks like the guy who reconstructs the faces of early man from skulls for National Geographic got hammered one night in his workshop and decided to play a joke. "If she lost weight and got her teeth fixed, she'd be OK..." NO. NO. That bone structure would NEVER be OK. And those teeth can't be fixed. They're the size of fucking pizza plates, splayed out like a bridge hand. The technology does not exist to fix this abomination and won't for another hundred years. Every single thing that could be wrong with a human face is wrong with this person. No amount of weight loss is going to do shit, except drain her titties into flappy elderly Orang-Utan pancakes. Because this is a person who has lost the genetic lottery so hard that you just KNOW that that's the first place she loses weight.

This is a hideous mutant sewer creature who should have been mercifully put to death as soon as it crawled from the womb. This is violently ugly. Chromosome damage ugly. Chernobyl ugly. Ugly like the holocaust. Ugly like man's inhumanity to man.

A "4?" You would "let her suck your dick?" Let's be serious here, people: if ever there was a "1," this is a fucking 1. This is in case of ugly emergency, break glass. I would rather fuck a Portuguese Man-O-War. I would rather have the Budweiser Clydesdales run a parade over my balls than have this creation of H.P. Lovecraft within 1,000 yards of my penis.

Those of you who call this a "4:" God help you. Let me show you what a "4" really is: a thick chick with bad skin who sucks a mean dick. This woman is something that folks from the Old Country bring up to scare their kids.

The worst part is... she's got a boyfriend. She'll be breeding

Post: #105

You know the crazy part, is the DUDES that are on board with this shit. The DUDES that are running to the rescue on the internet commenting with this corny "misogyny makes me so mad" thing, and apologizing about everything, about how much courage she has and all that.

Those feminist bitches don't even care that the lame dudes are on their team. They want control. It's so fucked up you can't talk to these people either they're so bitter **and sarcastic and they don't make any sense.

Post: #106

What's weird to me is the the kind of language these people on feminist sites, reddit etc. use. A single sentence of this bullshit is enough to make me sick. Regardless of the content, they just have a bizarre, passive-aggressive way of writing, apparently learned from their tribal elders.

Post: #107

(08-09-2012 07:49 AM)RawGod Wrote:  What's weird to me is the the kind of language these people on feminist sites, reddit etc. use. A single sentence of this bullshit is enough to make me sick. Regardless of the content, they just have a bizarre, passive-aggressive way of writing, apparently learned from their tribal elders.

I KNOW. theres a recipe to it. it's like a lot of shitty sarcasm used as humor mixed with random barbs pulled out of left field, and then something about misogyny thrown in for good measure. makes no fucking sense, like my brain is being sucked into a vacuum.

Post: #108

(08-09-2012 07:49 AM)RawGod Wrote:  What's weird to me is the the kind of language these people on feminist sites, reddit etc. use. A single sentence of this bullshit is enough to make me sick. Regardless of the content, they just have a bizarre, passive-aggressive way of writing, apparently learned from their tribal elders.

They are the unfortunate omegas, the failed genetic experiments of cruel mother Nature. And they know it. Since they are too weak to kill themselves, they band together on the internet, use nonsensical terminology to demonstrate that they are part of the group, and forming a lynch mob they feel powerful and strong once in their lives.

It's the same thing with ghetto kids who join gangs, except that the reddit / jezebel losers are too pussified to put themselves in physical danger. They might die, you know? And even though death would solve all their problems, they are too afraid of it. They are in no man's land: they cannot enjoy life, and they are too afraid of death.

Post: #109

(08-09-2012 07:49 AM)RawGod Wrote:  What's weird to me is the the kind of language these people on feminist sites, reddit etc. use. A single sentence of this bullshit is enough to make me sick. Regardless of the content, they just have a bizarre, passive-aggressive way of writing, apparently learned from their tribal elders.

For the most part, feminism has very little basis in objective reality. Your dick just gets much harder for a slim, feminine woman than it does for a fat, manly one. To get around that, feminists have to adopt a whole alternate reality. Learning feminism is like learning another language. Ironically, unlike other languages, learning feminist speak will not help you bang feminists. Femtopia is the one land where you're better off refusing to learn the local customs.

Post: #110

She studied biology, but genetics did notwork for her at all

Stop giving her positive numbers! She's obviously a -1.

Post: #111

(08-09-2012 09:05 AM)j r Wrote:  For the most part, feminism has very little basis in objective reality. Your dick just gets much harder for a slim, feminine woman than it does for a fat, manly one. To get around that, feminists have to adopt a whole alternate reality. Learning feminism is like learning another language. Ironically, unlike other languages, learning feminist speak will not help you bang feminists. Femtopia is the one land where you're better off refusing to learn the local customs.

Steve Sailer summarized all of feminism in his Law of Female Journalism:

Quote:The most heartfelt articles by female journalists tend to be demands that social values be overturned in order that, Come the Revolution, the journalist herself will be considered hotter-looking.

Post: #112

(08-09-2012 12:50 PM)Icarus Wrote:  

(08-09-2012 09:05 AM)j r Wrote:  For the most part, feminism has very little basis in objective reality. Your dick just gets much harder for a slim, feminine woman than it does for a fat, manly one. To get around that, feminists have to adopt a whole alternate reality. Learning feminism is like learning another language. Ironically, unlike other languages, learning feminist speak will not help you bang feminists. Femtopia is the one land where you're better off refusing to learn the local customs.

Steve Sailer summarized all of feminism in his Law of Female Journalism:

Quote:The most heartfelt articles by female journalists tend to be demands that social values be overturned in order that, Come the Revolution, the journalist herself will be considered hotter-looking.

Thanks for linking to that guy. Seems he actually has the patience to dissect the Jezebel et al. articles that people like me can't even read.

Post: #113

@delicioustacos

Post: #114

If this grenade is a 4, than I am at least a male 12.5 and I have never had below an 8, and I've had some ugly women in my time. I used to rate women from 1 to 10. This all changed freshman year of college when my friend and I saw some horrible grenade doing a walk of shame early one Sunday morning. My friend said to me, "Look at that girl. She's not even a 1. She's like a .5." I think this girl is a .5.

Post: #115

To be fair, she is at least a 3, probably a 4, at least in USA. She's very unattractive, but she is not completely scary-ugly. There's plenty of variety at the bottom, you need to have some numbers left for the morbidly obese, physically deformed, comically way-out-of proportion features, etc. There are some seriously ugly women out there. Of course, realistically, anything under 6 is not worth discussing as most folks out here wouldn't be able to get it up for those poor creatures. But there must be a scale to measure it. Somebody somewhere posted a genius image for the 1-10 scale with several photos and description for each number. I think that should be the forum's official reference scale. This girl would be about a 4 on it.

Post: #116

Yeah, we've all yucked it up with the hyperbolic flourishes above, but let's be real. She's torn as all hell, but she's probably 3-ish country.

It's scary to think, but there's worse.

   

   

   

   

Post: #117

(08-09-2012 04:20 PM)SVK Wrote:  you need to have some numbers left for the morbidly obese, physically deformed, comically way-out-of proportion features, etc.

The above don't make it onto the rating scale.
Neither does that porcine-equine hybrid feminist.

Post: #118

This raises an interesting question. Who is in and who is excluded from the ratings pool? Generally, I'm comparing a girl to all females in the age range of 18 to 50, with the 1s and 2s largely being composed of the aged and the morbidly obese. That's why I think it's weird when dudes start rating average non-fat girls with plain features as 4s. Then again, I know that the average dude on the internet mostly bangs swimsuit models.

The chick in question is probably a legitimate 4/10 would not bang... unless i was really wasted, hadn't gotten any in weeks, and it didn't involve too much work. I would also feel really bad about myself, be a little bit mean about it, and make sure that no one ever found out. It's also possible that her face is even worse in real life and she's a 3.

Post: #119

Below is the scale I mentioned, according to that she would be a 4, maybe even a 5 on a good day. Looking at this scale again seems to be quite over-inflating the ratings (especially with people here and their "2/10 would not bang"), but again, if you want to assign any girl a rating the descriptions make sense; there's a whole lot of shades of ugly out there

Post: #120

(08-09-2012 06:42 PM)SVK Wrote:  Below is the scale I mentioned, according to that she would be a 4, maybe even a 5 on a good day.

I don't think most would agree she isn't ugly, even on a good day.

Post: #121

(08-09-2012 07:03 PM)Athlone McGinnis Wrote:  

(08-09-2012 06:42 PM)SVK Wrote:  Below is the scale I mentioned, according to that she would be a 4, maybe even a 5 on a good day.

I don't think most would agree she isn't ugly, even on a good day.

Well most of us don't encounter or see women as ugly as the 1st 2 or 3 levels on that chart so she's back to a 1 as far as I'm concerned.

Post: #122

(08-09-2012 07:36 PM)Fisto Wrote:  

(08-09-2012 07:03 PM)Athlone McGinnis Wrote:  

(08-09-2012 06:42 PM)SVK Wrote:  Below is the scale I mentioned, according to that she would be a 4, maybe even a 5 on a good day.

I don't think most would agree she isn't ugly, even on a good day.

Well most of us don't encounter or see women as ugly as the 1st 2 or 3 levels on that chart so she's back to a 1 as far as I'm concerned.

This is almost becoming a "what do you guys consider to be a 4"? thread. I don't consider her to be a 4, nor do many of the posters here.

Post: #123

Who made that chart? Pretty accurate.

Post: #124

(08-09-2012 07:49 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Who made that chart? Pretty accurate.

That chart is alright. IMO, the 1-3 scale looks equally as bad there.

Also, what they call a 9, is an 8 in my opnion. I see "9" as more of a perfect 10 rating you give to very few girls.

That chart represents the more normal view of the 10 point scale.

Post: #125

She's posted more pictures. Wow, nice tits, right?

Well....scroll down.



..
..
..
..
..
......