Post: #26

(04-23-2019 10:03 AM)Thrill Jackson Wrote:  

(04-23-2019 10:00 AM)VNvet Wrote:  

(04-23-2019 07:51 AM)Thrill Jackson Wrote:  The whole black guys statement is racist and should get him thrown off the app.

But the principle of having standards is not a problem and the label of "misogynistic" is wrong.

You can't argue that the "principle of having standards is not a problem" and then say someone should get banned from the app for having standards that you don't like.

That's social media CEO logic.

No, if you are discriminating somebody on the basis of their skin color is not "having standards".

That's being racist, that's common sense.

What about discriminating based on their bone structure or IQ? Or on established (and statistically valid) undesirable traits that are linked to their group? You aren't allowed as an individual to say "I'm just not interested in any of you"?

Post: #27

I fail to see the negatives of someone stating a racial preference. If you belong to a group someone doesn't want to date, then that speeds up the process of finding someone else that does.

Post: #28

Any preferences are valid. Trying to shame that with labels is chick behavior.

Post: #29

(04-23-2019 08:14 AM)IveBeenFramed Wrote:  

(04-22-2019 09:54 AM)Manbeline Wrote:  The fact that his profile got not only an emotional response, but an article made of it means he did a job well done. The moment a woman is emotionally invested in you, you win. End of story. I do not use any dating app, but if I did, I would have no problem doing something similar just to rouse a response. I'd get more messages than most men who put how they like dogs/ cats, walks on the beach, etc.

Btw, here is the writer of that article:



May bang. Picture magic and not seeing the rest of her body makes me skeptical.

More accurate pic:

Fuck's sake. Why is it always the teeth!?

Post: #30

I agree with one of the posters here that the "black guy" statement is racist. Everything else that "Kirk" said is valid.

However, there is a more polite way of stating things than he did. For example, if I were on tinder, my add would say the following:

1) No kids
2) Please be HWP.
3) Please be D/D free.

Post: #31

(04-23-2019 12:32 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  

(04-23-2019 10:03 AM)Thrill Jackson Wrote:  

(04-23-2019 10:00 AM)VNvet Wrote:  

(04-23-2019 07:51 AM)Thrill Jackson Wrote:  The whole black guys statement is racist and should get him thrown off the app.

But the principle of having standards is not a problem and the label of "misogynistic" is wrong.

You can't argue that the "principle of having standards is not a problem" and then say someone should get banned from the app for having standards that you don't like.

That's social media CEO logic.

No, if you are discriminating somebody on the basis of their skin color is not "having standards".

That's being racist, that's common sense.

What about discriminating based on their bone structure or IQ? Or on established (and statistically valid) undesirable traits that are linked to their group? You aren't allowed as an individual to say "I'm just not interested in any of you"?

So all blacks have the same IQ and the same bone structure?

No of course not. All your arguments are falling flat. Please stop embarrassing yourself.

Post: #32

(04-23-2019 10:31 AM)Manbeline Wrote:  

(04-23-2019 07:51 AM)Thrill Jackson Wrote:  The whole black guys statement is racist and should get him thrown off the app.

But the principle of having standards is not a problem and the label of "misogynistic" is wrong.

All these girls bluntly state their standards all the time, particularly height on Tinder.

If the "I only date black/white guys" pictures are true that were from these dating apps, like you said, being racist is not a negative for the women.

When did I say being racist is not a negative for women?

Being racist is a negative for anybody, period.

EDIT: I'm not going to keep responding to all your people arguing for this guy's desire but please know the difference between having a PREFERENCE (ex:"I prefer white girls, not into black girls) and being RACIST (ex: "I will never date a black girl")

If you all can't understand that then we will just be running in circles.

Post: #33

(04-22-2019 01:23 AM)porscheguy Wrote:  He had 3 simple rules.
1. She could have one bastard offspring at the most. He said he wanted his own kids.
2. If she dated black guys, don’t even contact him.
3. He didn’t want money grubbing bitches.

I get your point, but this guy posting this sort of content on his Tinder profile is bad game. He needs to learn more subtlety. From a girl's perspective this comes across as close minded and racist, whether it's true or not

Post: #34

(04-23-2019 03:03 PM)Thrill Jackson Wrote:  

(04-23-2019 12:32 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  

(04-23-2019 10:03 AM)Thrill Jackson Wrote:  

(04-23-2019 10:00 AM)VNvet Wrote:  

(04-23-2019 07:51 AM)Thrill Jackson Wrote:  The whole black guys statement is racist and should get him thrown off the app.

But the principle of having standards is not a problem and the label of "misogynistic" is wrong.

You can't argue that the "principle of having standards is not a problem" and then say someone should get banned from the app for having standards that you don't like.

That's social media CEO logic.

No, if you are discriminating somebody on the basis of their skin color is not "having standards".

That's being racist, that's common sense.

What about discriminating based on their bone structure or IQ? Or on established (and statistically valid) undesirable traits that are linked to their group? You aren't allowed as an individual to say "I'm just not interested in any of you"?

So all blacks have the same IQ and the same bone structure?

No of course not. All your arguments are falling flat. Please stop embarrassing yourself.

He's not saying that, Thrill. He is telling you that everyone has a preference for something. Having a preference for not one category of people does not make it worse than if anyone chose the others. We all have the right to choose who we want to be. Humans are fickle creatures. You yourself I could estimate have a lot of preferences for who you rather be with. There is no moral high ground in the dating world. We wear different shoes, like different bands, and some of us enjoy women of certain cultures. I will never understand why someone would go after Filipino women, but I respect their decision. Much as I respect someone who do not like said women. When you say someone is racist, it destroys the conversation.

Post: #35

(04-23-2019 12:43 PM)Yatagan Wrote:  I fail to see the negatives of someone stating a racial preference.

It displays a lack of social intelligence.

Post: #36

"Why you care what color man other man no want girl he want bang to bang Mr High School drama man?"

Post: #37

Having preference is fine but totally canceling out a whole segment of girls, especially on traits she has no control over is quite dumb. When men speak in absolutes about pussy it just screams to me a lack of experience with lots of types of women. Once you fuck girls of all types and backgrounds you quickly learn that all pussy is pink and all girls be crazy.

The only real traits to be selective with in aside from aesthetic features you may find more desirable class and culture. Aside from those two no girl is offering you anything unique. Environment can play a factor as men will typically fuck what is around then and what they can have access too. You dump any guy in the middle of a city China he is going to have to learn to like Chinese girls real quick or he ain't getting no play.

But to speak in absolutes, very silly.

When dudes box themselves in to near fetish levels of race for only certain types of girls they will always nosedive in quality to stick with the they like. The classic example is yellow fever dudes who have no qualms fucking ugly Asian girls as that is just what they know.

If a dude claims he doesn't like black girls for example and you put him in a bar with ugly white girls and hot black girls what is he going to do? If you live in reality you're going to go after hottest girls you can get traction with. So there is nothing wrong finding more traits desirable (for example maybe you find very nice hair as a trait you like, some girls of different backgrounds will have very nice hair relative to others) and then building a preference. But, it isn't absolute and thier is grey to it all.

Post: #38

His issue is women that he would date who have dated black guys. He didn’t mention black women. Where this issue has its beginnings and reasons for it, we can only guess.

Post: #39

(04-23-2019 02:00 PM)Scott Wrote:  

(04-23-2019 08:14 AM)IveBeenFramed Wrote:  

(04-22-2019 09:54 AM)Manbeline Wrote:  The fact that his profile got not only an emotional response, but an article made of it means he did a job well done. The moment a woman is emotionally invested in you, you win. End of story. I do not use any dating app, but if I did, I would have no problem doing something similar just to rouse a response. I'd get more messages than most men who put how they like dogs/ cats, walks on the beach, etc.

Btw, here is the writer of that article:



May bang. Picture magic and not seeing the rest of her body makes me skeptical.

More accurate pic:

Fuck's sake. Why is it always the teeth!?

It's not the teeth that bother me; it's the lie present in the first picture.

I don't expect a real-world woman to have the synthetic perfection of an airbrushed starlet; I look more to her inner virtue than her outer beauty. Physically, this woman is well within the acceptable range for "marriage potential" - that is, she's hot enough to inspire my masculine instincts.

The lie of the above photo tells a darker reality, however. She is manifesting herself on the internet as a goddess - beautiful, blonde, and brilliant. But every morning when she looks in the mirror, she sees herself as she truly is; and out of spite tries that much harder to be something she's not. Painting herself up this way is destroying her from the inside out.

Post: #40

(04-23-2019 02:00 PM)Scott Wrote:  Fuck's sake. Why is it always the teeth!?

Dental aesthetics has never been a big thing in Britain...

Post: #41

I've been doing this type of profile for the past year (but without the racial restrictions lol). I have a list of things I don't like and write "don't waste my time" if they have one of these things. I recently added tattoos to this list and have had a lot of girls write back, "I have a couple of tattoos, is that OK?"

Some dates tell me in person that they really liked my profile. Of course, I probably filter out some hot ones because they don't meet my criteria or think I'm an arrogant 'misogynist", but the ones who do get through are very interested and already meet a lot of my minimum standards.

Post: #42

(04-23-2019 04:12 PM)tomtud Wrote:  His issue is women that he would date who have dated black guys. He didn’t mention black women. Where this issue has its beginnings and reasons for it, we can only guess.

Maybe they'd be too baggy downstairs as a result and he wasn't cool with it? I had a friend (black) who wouldn't touch black lizards who had dated white men. Why? He didn't want to be compared to white men (which happens often when any race dates any other). I've dealt with black lizards that mostly dated white guys and they would let things slip that would make me 'hmm' in interest. Just comparative things that other guys may find tiring.

Post: #43

(04-23-2019 12:25 PM)AntoniusofEfa Wrote:  I find his picture (him naked in his white underwear in a bathroom selfie) to be distasteful. The dude honestly should put some more clothes on, and do a beach pic or something. This is just not a "Chad".

He's a man...

Post: #44

He is obviously winning.

wb the typist if she ever got her teeth fixed

Post: #45

(04-23-2019 06:48 PM)eradicator Wrote:  He is obviously winning.

wb the typist if she ever got her teeth fixed

The typist

Post: #46

(04-23-2019 05:24 PM)Aurini Wrote:  

(04-23-2019 02:00 PM)Scott Wrote:  

(04-23-2019 08:14 AM)IveBeenFramed Wrote:  

(04-22-2019 09:54 AM)Manbeline Wrote:  The fact that his profile got not only an emotional response, but an article made of it means he did a job well done. The moment a woman is emotionally invested in you, you win. End of story. I do not use any dating app, but if I did, I would have no problem doing something similar just to rouse a response. I'd get more messages than most men who put how they like dogs/ cats, walks on the beach, etc.

Btw, here is the writer of that article:



May bang. Picture magic and not seeing the rest of her body makes me skeptical.

More accurate pic:

Fuck's sake. Why is it always the teeth!?

It's not the teeth that bother me; it's the lie present in the first picture.

I don't expect a real-world woman to have the synthetic perfection of an airbrushed starlet; I look more to her inner virtue than her outer beauty. Physically, this woman is well within the acceptable range for "marriage potential" - that is, she's hot enough to inspire my masculine instincts.

The lie of the above photo tells a darker reality, however. She is manifesting herself on the internet as a goddess - beautiful, blonde, and brilliant. But every morning when she looks in the mirror, she sees herself as she truly is; and out of spite tries that much harder to be something she's not. Painting herself up this way is destroying her from the inside out.

Maybe it's just me but other than the teeth I dont think she looks any better in the first than the second. . . Looks pretty plain in both.

Post: #47

Looks like a 7 or a 7.5 if you’re into that in the first pic, a 6 in the second because of the fucked up teeth. First pic looks like it has professional lighting and the second photo looks like a candid shot

Post: #48

Any pic that doesn't obviously show the weight/body of the girl is suspect to me.

Agree she is a 7 in the first pic (dateable) and a 6 in the second pic (bangable but not dateable)

Post: #49

(04-23-2019 04:12 PM)tomtud Wrote:  His issue is women that he would date who have dated black guys. He didn’t mention black women. Where this issue has its beginnings and reasons for it, we can only guess.

It may be different in the US or other countries with a more sizable black population, but at least in Australia where blacks are a niche prospect, its hard not to notice that chicks who date black men are either extremely trashy or hardcore SJWs, who are (obviously) overweight and unattractive. Maybe you could argue the trashy ones would be good for a fuck, but you could just as easily say theyre not worth the trouble.

Post: #50

(04-23-2019 08:47 PM)king bast Wrote:  

(04-23-2019 04:12 PM)tomtud Wrote:  His issue is women that he would date who have dated black guys. He didn’t mention black women. Where this issue has its beginnings and reasons for it, we can only guess.

It may be different in the US or other countries with a more sizable black population, but at least in Australia where blacks are a niche prospect, its hard not to notice that chicks who date black men are either extremely trashy or hardcore SJWs, who are (obviously) overweight and unattractive. Maybe you could argue the trashy ones would be good for a fuck, but you could just as easily say theyre not worth the trouble.

In the US, there's both skinny and fat white women into black guys. The skinny girls tend to be rebellious, and the fat ones cause the current trope is that fat girls hook up with black guys, chad or ugly level. I don't know why the fat white girl x black guy is a common thing without getting into specifics, but that is the observation I see.

Interestingly, british white girls do not mind hooking up with black men. They seem to be open to anyone.