Post: #1

A detailed study on splooging habits reveals some interesting proclivities.

Quote:

• Men prefer giving facials 3.3 times more than women enjoy receiving them
• 16% of external eruptions end up on the face
• 24% of guys like to flop one off on her bobs
• 60% of women have taken a load in the face
• porn wankers of both genders are more likely to want to give/receive a face blast
  

But most interesting is the preference of feminist women.

9% of non-feminist women prefer to end sex with a facial, compared with 14% of feminists - a difference of 36%.

While 50% of feminist men prefer to end with a facial, compared with 38% of non-feminist men.

These are the same men and women who will sneer at the housewife or the young-married mother and say she's chained to the kitchen sink.

Yet they are considerably happier to be held down while someone unloads their balls on their face.

What's going on?

Post: #2

I've never been fond of the money shot. Such a waste to splatter it on the face. Psychologically, I can see why they want it. It's dehumanizing. Women get off of being made into an object. I use to think this was wrongthing, but then I got with several women, some of them rapid feminists. They change completely into women while submissive as if they wanted to be that way all along. Reading through these threads and watching several videos later, I realized that the natural state of women is to have a protector. Women are angry all the time because despite having money, jobs, and social media, they are lacking the one thing their body responds positively to, and that is to a man. Someone to take control, to lead their lives, to put a house over their heads.

When you release God's warm essence onto the face of the feminist, it is like being baptized by the Holy Spirit, upon which she raises her head high in thankfulness for being blessed by the dominant man before her. I am also going to hell.

Post: #3

I like the term Female Supremacists , the best synthesis of the feminist movement I ever came across

Example of hardcore feminist specimen

Post: #4

Funny you should mention that.

The previous poster's commentary echoed almost line for line her comments in an interview where she defending being a pornstar as "empowering". Whatever bug in the brain makes them feminists is the same one that makes them get off on being treated like literal fucktoys.

Post: #5

Feminism as a movement is an artificial social construct that inverts nature. Cum craving sluttiness is just over-compensation for that unnatural imbalance

Post: #6

(04-21-2019 01:14 PM)gework Wrote:  A detailed study on splooging habits reveals some interesting proclivities.

Quote:

• Men prefer giving facials 3.3 times more than women enjoy receiving them
• 16% of external eruptions end up on the face
• 24% of guys like to flop one off on her bobs
• 60% of women have taken a load in the face
• porn wankers of both genders are more likely to want to give/receive a face blast
  

But most interesting is the preference of feminist women.

9% of non-feminist women prefer to end sex with a facial, compared with 14% of feminists - a difference of 36%.

While 50% of feminist men prefer to end with a facial, compared with 38% of non-feminist men.

These are the same men and women who will sneer at the housewife or the young-married mother and say she's chained to the kitchen sink.

Yet they are considerably happier to be held down while someone unloads their balls on their face.

What's going on?

Yeah, from the dude who's ass-ramming them.

Post: #7

(04-21-2019 01:43 PM)TutorGuina Wrote:  Female Supremacists

It's how I always think of the word and it's increasingly the case. It would be the literal etymology. Just as racist refers to someone who thinks a race is superior.

(04-21-2019 03:20 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  The previous poster's commentary ...Whatever bug in the brain makes them feminists is the same one that makes them get off on being treated like literal fucktoys.

I met a guy who had a number of pornstars as contacts on WhatsApp. He'd met them at expos. One of them was the above photographed Belle Knox. The messages were pure vulnerability pitches. Those girls open themselves up to the world and end up getting railed. They probably have to come up with some narrative to cope and feminism gives it them ... appearing on FacialAbuse is progressive. It's breaking down barriers and shattering taboos. One person's dirty is another person's empowering. More power to you!

Who wouldn't want their daughter to make her mark on the world for being the first woman...



... quoted gagging on a glans.

(04-21-2019 03:24 PM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  Feminism as a movement is an artificial social construct that inverts nature. Cum craving sluttiness is just over-compensation for that unnatural imbalance

This is my main thought.

The women who have been most successful in reproducing in civilisations were more feminine and pliable. The flighty spinster often ended up of the scrap heap of living with her brother or something like an au paire.

Before that it was women who could latch herself onto a strong man.

Women have been selected and then breed in a way that produced more of the ones who had ideals of a powerful, but fair man.

In places like Asia it's often the norm for women to be pinning for their prince from around the age for 16-18 and be married to him shortly after they leave school. It used to be the same here, but it's diminishing for a few reasons.

When reading feminist diatribes one thing you're bound to come across sooner or later is that they used to have a dream of finding their prince, but they grew out of it.

Add a biologically driven drive to find a good and powerful man with a negative self-image and outlook from finding those that fit that bill either aren't interested in them or only interested in them for a short while - the inherent desire for such a man contorts into wanting to be hate fucked. Just as some people's desire for positive attention can contort into cutting if they don't get it.

The other thing is that feminists are of the idea they are raging against the machine. Hard to see why when any real backlash and repercussion is to be found opposing feminism. They associate sexual taboos with the patriarchy, capitalism or whatever else they are angry at. And they convince themselves they need to do certain things to cement themselves in their faux counter-culture and to assault their enemy's culture.

But not to sure why feminist men would be more into it. Maybe it's the same. Rage over the princesses that had no interest in them, covered up with the same progressive smokescreen.

Post: #8

(04-21-2019 01:14 PM)gework Wrote:  What's going on?

Feminists are a bit more likely to watch porn.

Guys... I think being redpilled means that by definition we realize that Feminists are still women and have the same general nature as other women.

The difference is that traditional women fight back the negative part of their own nature. Feminists fully embrace hypergamy, and any other form of negative behavior.

(04-21-2019 04:29 PM)gework Wrote:  Add a biologically driven drive to find a good and powerful man with a negative self-image and outlook from finding those that fit that bill either aren't interested in them or only interested in them for a short while - the inherent desire for such a man contorts into wanting to be hate fucked. Just as some people's desire for positive attention can contort into cutting if they don't get it.

The other thing is that feminists are of the idea they are raging against the machine.

But not to sure why feminist men would be more into it. Maybe it's the same. Rage over the princesses that had no interest in them, covered up with the same progressive smokescreen.

My experience with Feminists is that they are people who are unhappy with their current situation. I think it's not unlike many people who come to RVF, looking for something to fix their current situation. The main difference is that feminism teaches them to blame the world and so they seek to change everyone else for their own benefit. This is why their worldview fits with socialism so well.

RVF members already know that changing the world to fit what we want is not going to happen. Instead we focus on changing ourselves, so that we can achieve our life goals. We talk about and share strategies on achieving this. Not the bullshit 'chicken soup for the soul' type of stuff... but real, effective, and useful strategies.

This is one of the reasons so many feminists are fat bitches. They are ugly and most women are judged on their beauty... so they hate the system and want to change it.

Feminist men come in 2 varieties. The first are men who do not believe they could ever measure up to tradition masculinity. The second are people who just say feminist stuff because it's popular.

Being a male feminist isn't going to get you pussy, but it can help if you know how to play the game. I tell you this because a lot of the fake feminist guys keep that non-judgmental air that makes women feel more comfortable with casual sex. There are some other benefits, but the one above is the most important.

I'm just going to leave you guys with this one thought. The more alpha a woman acts... the more she will want a guy who is even more alpha than she. Feminists are reading 50 shades of grey just like everyone else... because they still want a dominant man.

Post: #9

16% of external eruptions end up on the face



Is that 100% on the Island where Kona lives?

Post: #10

(04-21-2019 04:29 PM)gework Wrote:  I met a guy who had a number of pornstars as contacts on WhatsApp. He'd met them at expos. One of them was the above photographed Belle Knox. The messages were pure vulnerability pitches.

Would it be a problem for you to expose these messages? Must be an interesting read, like snooping into a lunatic's diary. Your explanations may be into something

I don't believe I got the psychology expertise to make deep analysis, but it's obvious the mental illness rate in the feminism movement is off the charts and that it attracts problematic people in itself
Commies, Libertarians and racial supremacists in general don't get even close to the likes of Chanty Binx and Lena Dunham, only LBGT activists are similar imo

The moderate feminists, on the other hand, are just opportunists and herd followers

Post: #11

The more they complain.
Fair bet.
The more they want to be dominated...

Post: #12

(04-21-2019 06:49 PM)TutorGuina Wrote:  Would it be a problem for you to expose these messages? Must be an interesting read, like snooping into a lunatic's diary. Your explanations may be into something

I don't have any contact with the guy. But it was in 2015, so must have been close to the time Belle Knox wobbled her way back into the woodwork - she exited the industry, deleted her accounts and kept her head low.

I just watched her early 2014 interview with Piers Morgan and in it she complained about how the patriarchy and 1000s of years of religion had repressed her and society - so people should just be free, get naked and have their sex acts uploaded to the internet. i.e. she was infused by the anti-traditional narrative I mentioned.

However, after being ridiculed about being a feminist before then choked, slapped and spat on the road to the empowering facial pop, she became a bit elusive and then disappeared.

This guy was talking to her shortly before she disappeared. I don't remember specific content, but it was all very ditsy Marylin Monroe type fainting tricks mixed with the same libertarian "just go free" rhetoric. I interpreted it as her trying to fall on this guy, who though a bit soy was fairly wealthy. It was the beta bux part of the recipe.

As this NY Post article reveals she later essentially sided with the views of the patriarchy and religion and completely repressed herself from the public sphere.

She obviously had some considerable trauma as she revealed in an interview that she scrawled PIG in her thigh with a broken mirror; and, if I remember correctly, tried to perform liposuction on herself. What kind of 18 year old goes into porn and then blabs such things to the media? It's like lying on the floor with your legs in the air - an advert for predators.

I think that this in some way relates to the inherent desire of women for their prince. A desire which is being masked in The West with disastrous effect. There is an archetype that has been with us for at least a few thousand years - the damsel in distress - a woman who is laid bare to danger and saved by a valiant man. Note the article says the damsel in distress archetype is seen as sexist.

There is a lot of evidence that while women find male strength irresistible, men find female vulnerability and delicacy irresistible. The latter is your chaste virgin, in national dress, walking through the fields in the morning. Not cake-face, pornographic whores.

That hyper-feminist, libertarian Belle Knox made herself a damsel in distress (the archetype of female vulnerability) shows just how skewed out of reality these people are. In her desire to ignore her fragility, the manifestation of her vulnerability became delete-yourself-from-the-web toxic. It's not in her conscious mind, as EndsExpects touches on. And when something is not in you conscious mind you tend to manifest the opposite of what is in the unconscious as a defence against ever knowing who you are. For example from unconscious insecurity comes arrogance.

An empowered woman wouldn't need to tell you she's empowered. Always be suspect if someone positively characterises themselves. An empowered woman, especially in the face of the left/mainstream, is one who admits her limitations.

So with the feminists and the sexually liberated who have a leaning towards turning themselves into whores I'd say they suppress as much of their vulnerability as they can. That suppression leaves in their conscious an extreme openness to prove to themselves they are not vulnerable; and the idea that they can go up against the likes of the psychos at FacialAbuse.

This suppression is also widely cultural. Women in the upper half of society don't generally dare say anything vulnerable or feminine, because they know their heads will be jumped on. Feminism has killed femininity as much as it has killed masculinity, because it's the value structure of fat dykes, not women. Until we can get back to reality where the obvious trends in differences between men and women define society, people will continue to not get what they want.

Post: #13

(04-21-2019 01:14 PM)gework Wrote:  A detailed study on splooging habits reveals some interesting proclivities.

Quote:

• Men prefer giving facials 3.3 times more than women enjoy receiving them
• 16% of external eruptions end up on the face
• 24% of guys like to flop one off on her bobs
• 60% of women have taken a load in the face
• porn wankers of both genders are more likely to want to give/receive a face blast
  

But most interesting is the preference of feminist women.

9% of non-feminist women prefer to end sex with a facial, compared with 14% of feminists - a difference of 36%.

While 50% of feminist men prefer to end with a facial, compared with 38% of non-feminist men.

I always hate polls that ask women what they want/prefer. Women don't know what they want.

If some alpha Chad blows a load on her face because "it's hot", then the woman will definitely like it and want it again. 100% chance.

If some soyboy asks if he can blow his soy load on her "beautiful face" like a chauvinist pig, then she won't like it.

This applies to everything with women. I've banged women of all classes and a bunch of different nationalities and they all enjoyed the whips, rope, handcuffs, rough sex, etc.

Women aren't that different.

Post: #14

Gonna have to start carrying around a portable black light.

Post: #15

delete