Post: #26

(04-16-2019 06:03 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  [quote='CaptainChardonnay' pid='1966727' dateline='1555451070']
How does this beast become chief executive of rugby australia

Why else? The CEO of the National Rugby League was replaced with a Jewish CEO. Once this happens, they'll move their Subversive Agents of Change into play.

By complete coincidence, right after this, the NRL starts forcing its players to engage in constant, tedious virtue-signalling for Reform Jew Causes, such as Homosexuality, Open Borders, 'Consent' and Feminism, because if you offer an Goyim Alpha Male a whiff of whatever appeals to his passions, (money, power, sex), he'll sell out everyone and everything around him to be allowed to freely-indulge them, like the Slave he is.

^^^^^DING DING DING!!! WINNER WINNER WINNER!!!

Good on Folau. Hopefully he'll continue to see it completely through and not cuck. EVER. I'm hopeful for once. Waiting for the day when a WHITE GOY who's cut from a similar cloth doesn't back pedal. Have a funny feeling I'll be waiting for quite a while...

Post: #27

(04-16-2019 08:51 PM)Rorogue Wrote:  ...

I saw a title of an article in fox sports Australia: "The worrying thing about Folau is his conviction".

They are terrified of a man of principle standing up and not giving a fuck about whether he loses shekels or not.

...

It's not quite that in my opinion.

Western society has been conditioned to revile conviction because keeping an "open mind" is the doorway to the social manipulators sinking you in the the tar pit of moral relativity.

Almost a year ago now I was having a conversation with someone close to me who had become increasingly bitter that I wasn't comforming to social norms anymore. We used to have long conversations about lots of thing but unfortunately red-pill road is a lonely place because the list of viable conversation topics you can have with the blue pill crowd becomes infintescimal. Thanks to climate change you can't even talk about the bloody weather anymore.

Anyway, he wanted to talk about some movie and I said that I don't watch Hollywood shit anymore. Of course he demanded to know why and since I refuse to make up lies I told him I wasn't going to support a bunch of pedophiles who despise my existence.

And then he accused me of something that seemed so utterly bizarre. He accused me of having conviction. He really meant it, too. He almost spat the word like an inquisitor would spit the word "sin". It was like being accused of being jacked or generous or smart. It was more or less the time I realised I couldn't meet him in the middle anymore.

These people are sludge and they revile all which holds even the most basic shape or form because by definition anything with form will rise above sludge.

Note that the ham-beast CEO is allowed to have conviction as are those that violently tow the party line. To them conviction, or the ability to take form and thus rise above the sludge, is a privilege that must be jealously guarded, violently if necessary.

Post: #28

Ain't that cute; AnonymousBosch's link from earlier, about the gay/pedophile network in Rugby and Hollywood, wound up connecting to Ellis, the author of American Psycho.

I hated that book; didn't make it past the first two chapters. Nothing but a meandering stream-of-consciousness diatribe about what brand names and fashion labels everybody else is wearing (I don't know most brand names so this was Greek to me). Wound up watching the movie eventually, and it wasn't much better.

It all makes sense now that I realize it wasn't about a serial killer, it was about being a homosexual. Narcissitically obsessing over the attributes of everybody around you (the homo means that you're both directly comparable), obsessing over what the crowd thinks of you, and fantasizing their murders - this could be a metaphor for AIDS or merely the natural antipathy one has to people they lie to.

Man, people loved that movie. So dark triad and sexy and alpha. Patrick Bateman: American Homosexual.

Post: #29

That reminds me, I should watch Snerican Psycho again. It’s a favorite of mine

Post: #30

(04-16-2019 09:06 PM)JoeSomebody Wrote:  Good on Folau. Hopefully he'll continue to see it completely through and not cuck. EVER. I'm hopeful for once. Waiting for the day when a WHITE GOY who's cut from a similar cloth doesn't back pedal. Have a funny feeling I'll be waiting for quite a while...

Don't let black women overtake you.

Post: #31

Quote:'hell awaits' for 'drunks, homosexuals, adulterers, liars, fornicators, thieves, atheists, idolators'.

So I wasn't sure what a fornicator was...but Wikipedia says "Fornication is generally consensual sexual intercourse between two people not married to each other"

So according to Israel Folau..."hell awaits" just about every guy on this forum

Post: #32

(04-17-2019 03:43 AM)Sgt Donger Wrote:  

Quote:'hell awaits' for 'drunks, homosexuals, adulterers, liars, fornicators, thieves, atheists, idolators'.

So I wasn't sure what a fornicator was...but Wikipedia says "Fornication is generally consensual sexual intercourse between two people not married to each other"

So according to Israel Folau..."hell awaits" just about every guy on this forum

And do you see us whinging like the gays?

Post: #33

I find gays and trans revolting.

Darwin made me that way, probably has to do with reproduction or something.

Science.

Post: #34

(04-17-2019 04:38 AM)Rorogue Wrote:  

(04-17-2019 03:43 AM)Sgt Donger Wrote:  

Quote:'hell awaits' for 'drunks, homosexuals, adulterers, liars, fornicators, thieves, atheists, idolators'.

So I wasn't sure what a fornicator was...but Wikipedia says "Fornication is generally consensual sexual intercourse between two people not married to each other"

So according to Israel Folau..."hell awaits" just about every guy on this forum

And do you see us whinging like the gays?

I for one am deeply offended on behalf of the drunks and fornicators. Shut it down!!!11

Post: #35

Quote:The row has also engulfed England's Billy Vunipola, who 'liked' the post on Instagram and later defended the Australian player, remarking that 'man was made for woman to procreate'.

Nope.

I'm not buying it from Vunipola or Folau or any Tongan.

Google Fakaleiti. Its a Tongan tradition. They defend it like it's their constitution. These guys are going around saying gays should be damned, but then their own culture supports faggotry in its own little way. Bullshit.

Tongans are all about family and patriarchy and religion and all things conservative. OOOPS, They always forget about the mahu in the family though!

Basically, the family raises one of their sons as a girl. That girl blows all its brothers. I'm not joking. The mahu brother or sister or whatever you call it becomes like the third in command of the family. It's fucked up.

I've lived around Tongans my whole life. It's a hypermasculine culture. Fakaleiti is the dirty little secret. I know some, and every other word out of their mouths is fag. In back of my head I think "brah, your brother sucked your dick when you were ten and your mom showed him how" but I don't say it.

These guys need to look at themselves before they go around running their mouths. Stupid they going to lose money over it.

Aloha!

Post: #36

(04-17-2019 03:43 AM)Sgt Donger Wrote:  

Quote:'hell awaits' for 'drunks, homosexuals, adulterers, liars, fornicators, thieves, atheists, idolators'.

So I wasn't sure what a fornicator was...but Wikipedia says "Fornication is generally consensual sexual intercourse between two people not married to each other"

So according to Israel Folau..."hell awaits" just about every guy on this forum

It is true though, hell awaits every guy on this forum who has not accepted the salvation of Jesus. It doesn't even matter if they are monogamous or fornicators.

It is an interesting issue though. If an atheist homosexual was threatened with hell, why would they even care...if God doesn't exist to them, then why would an eternal damnation? Yet they rage against such a statement. If an RVF 'fornicator' truly was immune to God's Will a statement such as Folau's would also be irrelevant, like if an Odinist told him his flabby arms would keep him out of Valhalla. Yet, the threat of hell always seems to carry even just the smallest pull on one's soul when it is heard or read.

There truly is power in God's word and Jesus' name. The energy that the darkness of the world is pouring out against it today, and 'controversy' it causes when it is spoken is proof enough. It is a great time to be alive, its like you can almost see the Lord's winnowing fork separating the wheat from the chaff.

If you are an RVF fornicator and are on the fence about if it will lead to hell or not. Seek Jesus first, then the answer will come, and know he welcomes his prodigal son.

Post: #37

(04-17-2019 05:35 AM)Kona Wrote:  

Quote:The row has also engulfed England's Billy Vunipola, who 'liked' the post on Instagram and later defended the Australian player, remarking that 'man was made for woman to procreate'.

Nope.

I'm not buying it from Vunipola or Folau or any Tongan.

Google Fakaleiti. Its a Tongan tradition. They defend it like it's their constitution. These guys are going around saying gays should be damned, but then their own culture supports faggotry in its own little way. Bullshit.

Tongans are all about family and patriarchy and religion and all things conservative. OOOPS, They always forget about the mahu in the family though!

Basically, the family raises one of their sons as a girl. That girl blows all its brothers. I'm not joking. The mahu brother or sister or whatever you call it becomes like the third in command of the family. It's fucked up.

I've lived around Tongans my whole life. It's a hypermasculine culture. Fakaleiti is the dirty little secret. I know some, and every other word out of their mouths is fag. In back of my head I think "brah, your brother sucked your dick when you were ten and your mom showed him how" but I don't say it.

These guys need to look at themselves before they go around running their mouths. Stupid they going to lose money over it.

Aloha!

I googled it, and regret it.

Post: #38

^^ I'm not lying.

Samoans, Tahitians, Hawaiians, Maori, etc. don't do it anymore. You still get mahus, but its not celebrated, and most of them are also the drug addict in the family.

Tongans are all about it.

Aloha!

Post: #39

Taking nothing away from Folau's brave actions and defiance, it must be nice that people whom share his cultural identity have rallied to his defence. Such a bond does not exist amongst white people anymore. It cannot be stressed enough how powerless individualism is, if the clown world turns on you.

Post: #40

For a man of his position, with fame and fortune, it takes some serious balls and great faith to say something like that in a western country today.
It seems like he can rely on a strong and close pacific islanders community to support him in the upcoming storm.
Something most western men don't have anymore unfortunately...

Post: #41

I always try to think of witty and well-thought out responses to the age-old lefty trap of "What do you have against gays?!!"

Then I recently heard E. Michael Jones put it incredibly succintly and beautifully:

"the anus is not a sexual organ". Hard to argue with that one.

Post: #42

Wonder how this forum will reinterpret things if he gets reinstated after his hearing or if they simply claim they are terminating him without cause and pay him according to his contract?

But Look! It's already morphed into an issue of "freedom of religion" and "cultural identity." Target hit.

Post: #43

(04-17-2019 07:50 AM)_Different_T Wrote:  Wonder how this forum will reinterpret things if he gets reinstated after his hearing or if they simply claim they are terminating him without cause and pay him according to his contract?

For my part, I'd interpret him as having one virtue: courage. Per Nassim Taleb, it's the one virtue you can't fake, because it necessarily means you have skin in the game.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #44

(04-17-2019 11:16 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  For my part, I'd interpret him as having one virtue: courage. Per Nassim Taleb, it's the one virtue you can't fake, because it necessarily means you have skin in the game.

Fair enough. Look at his instagram. He has been making claims like this for a long time.

But at some point, are we going to ask why you think it takes "balls" or "courage" to make a claim like his?

Owen Benjamin discussed a possible interpretation of his falling out with Rogan this way. That maybe Rogan was really thinking "dude if you don't stop saying this stuff they will take away all the money and blowjobs."

Post: #45

I googled Fakaleiti and really regret it.

I’m glad Kona stays active on the forums because no one else knows about this shit.

Aloha!

Post: #46

(04-17-2019 11:23 AM)_Different_T Wrote:  

(04-17-2019 11:16 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  For my part, I'd interpret him as having one virtue: courage. Per Nassim Taleb, it's the one virtue you can't fake, because it necessarily means you have skin in the game.

Fair enough. Look at his instagram. He has been making claims like this for a long time.

But at some point, are we going to ask why you think it takes "balls" or "courage" to make a claim like his?

You can ask now if you like.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #47

(04-17-2019 12:11 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  You can ask now if you like.

Why do you classify his claim as requiring courage?

Post: #48

Because he takes a personal and financial risk that he wears directly for what he says. He bears the direct consequences of what he says. That's the definition of skin in the game. And what he has said is an open statement of his beliefs, knowing it's going to be unpopular, knowing how powerful the homosexual lobby is, knowing he could or will lose money or work as a result. That is to take a real risk. That's only possible if he has the virtue of being courageous.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #49

(04-17-2019 12:16 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  That is to take a real risk. That's only possible if he has the virtue of being courageous.

A "real" risk as opposed to what? Surely you wouldn't call someone who exercises "courageous," though it stresses the body?

To avoid the obfuscation charge: both your post and Roosh's OP point towards a lack of "courage" being responsible for some bad thing you see in the world and that a new found courage would "fix" some things.

edit: IOW, the implicit claim is that fear of (((them))), they, etc. is responsible for what we're now calling "clown world" and that people are going along out of this fear. However, simply read this thread. "Folau's making claims about his 'religious beliefs' and he has a right to them." "Folau has a strong 'cultural identity,' but poor white Westerner's don't."

Post: #50

(04-17-2019 11:16 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

(04-17-2019 07:50 AM)_Different_T Wrote:  Wonder how this forum will reinterpret things if he gets reinstated after his hearing or if they simply claim they are terminating him without cause and pay him according to his contract?

For my part, I'd interpret him as having one virtue: courage. Per Nassim Taleb, it's the one virtue you can't fake, because it necessarily means you have skin in the game.

Also per NN Taleb, this incident also shows you the power of having FU money.