Post: #2151

(03-27-2019 09:37 PM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  

(03-27-2019 03:09 PM)luigi Wrote:  

(03-27-2019 12:43 PM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  Either way, stick to normie talk on this thread as bitches can read it. Save strategies for private convo.

we are forum lurkers, 99% of people havent visited a forum in their life, dont be paranoid

You sound like a woman. The forum has been quoted on multiple sugar baby websites and reddit.

(03-27-2019 03:35 PM)Rakers Wrote:  

(03-27-2019 12:42 PM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  Nah. I can’t remember how many but I sent a shit ton. Like at least 250.

If you do it again too soon you get banned, I think. Ironically my latest attempt near the last week of my subscription it appeared there wasn’t a limit as long as you didn’t send 100 in 10 seconds.

There is a limit but it can be removed. I spammed 1000 before eventually unable to send messages. So I emailed their support and got it removed. Then I was back to spamming again.

If you spam again too fast too soon after the suspension, your account will get banned. Trust me on this.

What exactly are you referring to removing the limit? Asking them to clear the spam suspension?

They just blocked me from messaging new people. I emailed them and they removed that block, so I could start messaging again.

I spammed again after a week and messaged well over a 1000 with no spam limit this time so its all good.

Did you get banned for spamming?

Are you still having success on this site?

Post: #2152

(03-23-2019 10:17 AM)dccab Wrote:  I got a PM asking

I didn't send that PM, but thanks for sharing with the forum.

Post: #2153

I can't take apps like Seeking seriously. The overt message for money exchange for sex is too much for me.

I've tried it before and it's absolutely hilarious to switch gender roles (the women wanting something from you and chasing you).

This is where my sadistic side comes out. Oh you want a monthly allowance? Can I put it in your butt? Can I get a free trial? "Yes." "Okay, let's start monday." Then ghost and watch the fireworks come out:

Hello? Are you there?
I guess I'll just delete your number then.
Wtf! You are the worst ugly piece of shit ever! I was gonna scam your ass anyway! You wouldn't even have had a shot at a princess like me!
I know mad people in the city Imma ruin your reputation if you don't answer!

Wash, rinse, repeat, laugh.

Post: #2154

Seems like the only sensible way to do this is when you are traveling and you meet them at your hotel?
You don't want these type of people at your permanent residence specially when you don't deliver on the thing they were looking for (money).
I doubt I ever join seeking but sometimes I get this revenge fantasy when I read about sugar dating.

Post: #2155

(04-11-2019 02:30 PM)Graft Wrote:  I can't take apps like Seeking seriously. The overt message for money exchange for sex is too much for me.

I've tried it before and it's absolutely hilarious to switch gender roles (the women wanting something from you and chasing you).

This is where my sadistic side comes out. Oh you want a monthly allowance? Can I put it in your butt? Can I get a free trial? "Yes." "Okay, let's start monday." Then ghost and watch the fireworks come out:

Hello? Are you there?
I guess I'll just delete your number then.
Wtf! You are the worst ugly piece of shit ever! I was gonna scam your ass anyway! You wouldn't even have had a shot at a princess like me!
I know mad people in the city Imma ruin your reputation if you don't answer!

Wash, rinse, repeat, laugh.

Bro please teach me how you're getting free trials?

Post: #2156

(03-11-2019 10:26 AM)jcrew247 Wrote:  Has anyone heard of "The League" dating app. It sounds like a variation of the sugar daddy except its for career girls that want a beta bucks husband. Tried to get in but was not accepted. Any else have luck with that app?

There's a plenty of younger girls there too and with respect to them the app could remind SA a bit in a way. I've had matches every day but the quality was way lower than what I typically get on bumble - my matches varied between 5.5 and 7.5 points. There are hotties there as well, but if you're not an insta-famous music producer or a model, then I would rather stay with bumble/tinder.

Post: #2157

You can get really cheap hotel rooms on HotelTonight in most places. I never bring them home. Their place, sure.

Post: #2158

Talking to a woman from SA thats a diplomat. She didn't post her pic on the site but got her number lmao.

Post: #2159

(04-16-2019 05:06 PM)DonnyGately Wrote:  You can get really cheap hotel rooms on HotelTonight in most places. I never bring them home. Their place, sure.

How do you smoothly do that?

Post: #2160

The amount of pros on this site has gotten out of hand lol. And don't bother using it in certain areas. The bay Area especially is flooded with pros.

Might still be decent in places like LA or NYC with volume and a reputation for having hot girls.

Post: #2161

Anyone ever try seeking arrangements in Asia? What is your success like? Do girls usually want to sleep with you on the first date?

Post: #2162

Excuse me, don't You guys find seeking.com somewhat pricey? Around 90 bucks per month.. I know, it sounds maybe ridiculous, but it reminds me some entrance fees to natural parks. What I want to say is that if someone sells me something what he does not own (seeking obviously does not own all these girls), makes me find alternatives. However, I admit that the alternatives might be much less effective , or?

(04-15-2019 03:57 PM)EwartGrogan Wrote:  

(03-11-2019 10:26 AM)jcrew247 Wrote:  Has anyone heard of "The League" dating app. It sounds like a variation of the sugar daddy except its for career girls that want a beta bucks husband. Tried to get in but was not accepted. Any else have luck with that app?

There's a plenty of younger girls there too and with respect to them the app could remind SA a bit in a way. I've had matches every day but the quality was way lower than what I typically get on bumble - my matches varied between 5.5 and 7.5 points. There are hotties there as well, but if you're not an insta-famous music producer or a model, then I would rather stay with bumble/tinder.

Post: #2163

(04-23-2019 11:42 AM)Former Master Wrote:  Excuse me, don't You guys find seeking.com somewhat pricey? Around 90 bucks per month.. I know, it sounds maybe ridiculous, but it reminds me some entrance fees to natural parks. What I want to say is that if someone sells me something what he does not own (seeking obviously does not own all these girls), makes me find alternatives. However, I admit that the alternatives might be much less effective , or?

It's expensive but you won't be using it continuously. Within a month you will easily have enough contacts to work on for a few months. I set up a profile saying I made 150k and was able to get 12 lays in a month and only paid for a few drinks. I'm sure someone with experience would kill it.

Post: #2164

(04-23-2019 11:42 AM)Former Master Wrote:  Excuse me, don't You guys find seeking.com somewhat pricey? Around 90 bucks per month.. I know, it sounds maybe ridiculous, but it reminds me some entrance fees to natural parks. What I want to say is that if someone sells me something what he does not own (seeking obviously does not own all these girls), makes me find alternatives. However, I admit that the alternatives might be much less effective , or?

(04-15-2019 03:57 PM)EwartGrogan Wrote:  

(03-11-2019 10:26 AM)jcrew247 Wrote:  Has anyone heard of "The League" dating app. It sounds like a variation of the sugar daddy except its for career girls that want a beta bucks husband. Tried to get in but was not accepted. Any else have luck with that app?

There's a plenty of younger girls there too and with respect to them the app could remind SA a bit in a way. I've had matches every day but the quality was way lower than what I typically get on bumble - my matches varied between 5.5 and 7.5 points. There are hotties there as well, but if you're not an insta-famous music producer or a model, then I would rather stay with bumble/tinder.

If I am getting value for my $90, then I consider paying the price worthwhile. Ideally, that price (or higher) would tend to keep out the posers so that the quality (defined by me as young and sexy) girls would stick around.

Post: #2165

(03-11-2019 10:26 AM)jcrew247 Wrote:  Has anyone heard of "The League" dating app. It sounds like a variation of the sugar daddy except its for career girls that want a beta bucks husband. Tried to get in but was not accepted. Any else have luck with that app?

I got in. Found it to be pretty dry as you only get 3 potental matched a day unless you forked over a huge sum of cash. The subscriptions wer

Free
249/week
599 month
999 month.

They do have events and groups which is pretty useful. You won't find it too hard to meet people at an event or any drinking group.

Post: #2166

I went there for looks & laughs - all it takes is a throwaway email address. Skimmed a couple and it looks like they've added functionality to verify using various social media profiles (FB, IG, etc).

Not sure how many women are doing this but this feature just being there makes the whole operation look and feel more like a legit dating site. It's fascinating to witness - the decline of online dating and the "respectability" of online prostitution sites. Socially, the script is being flipped like few could have imagined even ten years ago.

As one might expect, there's some serious confusion going on with some of these thots though - one one hand they accept the idea that they're being prostitutes (even if they don't say so), on the other hand they put things in there that read like they're looking for Mr. Right.

Many are just flat out bad at marketing. For example, there is one 21 year old in NYC who says:

Quote:...not trying to sound like an asshole, but unfortunately money is my top priority now and it is hard to filter out who is legit and who is just trying to use me . So make me an offer I can't refuse. No Trump supporters, please.

She doesn't sound like an asshole, she sounds like a prostitute, and not a very smart one at that. Qualifying based on political opinion? Like their money would be any less green. No wonder she keeps getting salted.