Post: #2126

First time using the site. Two dates in two nights and banged them both, all for the cost of a few drinks, a hotel, and some fast food. It's almost unfair how easy this is.

Post: #2127

I got a PM asking about how I worked the hotel room and how I made it happen, but I'm not able to respond to the PM, so I'll post it here.

Pretty simple, actually. During the date, we had great conversation and built good rapport, as should be expected. Throughout the night, I physically escalated, touching hands, thighs, lower back, etc. About 3/4 of the way through the date, I went in for the kiss (we were still at the bar). Kissed her a few more times as the date wound down. Bar was closing, and I said to her, "bummer, I don't really want the night to end yet." She asked what else I wanted to do. I didn't say a word, but I gave her a knowing look (if I looked in the mirror, it would probably resemble something like a predator eyeing at his prey before devouring it lol).

The hotel was her idea. She said, "how about we go to XXXX hotel and keep drinking there?" The rest is history. Also, no mention from her about any sort of "arrangement." Successful night all the way around.

Post: #2128

(03-04-2019 11:26 AM)Pride male Wrote:  I have been seeing a lot of beautiful girls without money and have wondered why arent they dating ballers. Is it difficult for a hot girl to get herself a sugar daddy or what?

Tech is helping, and hurting, a bit here. Ultimately it is a net negative due to the fact that these connections aren't social circle and trust, so they are the "out of left field" connections in a society where parents and communities no longer match anyone.

The idea that there is an avenue for women to be successful in life (like a man is) is the most dangerous idea going for a society or civilization that wants to last. The Wall™ is the proof of this but no one wants to talk about. It simply isn't in a woman's biological interest to achieve in this manner, though it may be in her (untaught) self interest.

Back to the question, even the hottest girls, it's funny because I know it's hard to imagine, are just as boring (if not more) if they provide nothing else than what most others in the West do: the testosterone whims of men. In an escalating society of attention whoring, tech, and increasing availability of these types, these "hot" girls just get nexted due to their increasing demands, which diminishes every breath they take.

Realizing also that without a relationship with one that's sincere, and that there are world populations with much better women all in all, who cost 10x less, it hurts any girl nowadays that can't hack the 50+ chubster.

Post: #2129

(03-11-2019 10:26 AM)jcrew247 Wrote:  Has anyone heard of "The League" dating app. It sounds like a variation of the sugar daddy except its for career girls that want a beta bucks husband. Tried to get in but was not accepted. Any else have luck with that app?

I have been on the League for several years and not once met anyone w/only a few matches. Unless you pay a pretty high price you are only allowed to see 3 profiles a day. Its a waste of time.

Post: #2130

If im not wrong the girls who register on this website do it with the intention of finding guys that will reward them economically. The website name "seeking arrengement" says it all.

They could have drinks or dinner with any guy in the world, but no, they meet you on a sugardaddy website and have sex with you for no money in return.

Are you serious?

Post: #2131

(03-23-2019 11:15 AM)luigi Wrote:  If im not wrong the girls who register on this website do it with the intention of finding guys that will reward them economically. The website name "seeking arrengement" says it all.

They could have drinks or dinner with any guy in the world, but no, they meet you on a sugardaddy website and have sex with you for no money in return.

Are you serious?

I'd say you're partially wrong. Only a fraction of women are on there to exchange sex/time for money. Most are on there for a shot at a guy with inherent value/status/attitude due to his appearance and game, and perhaps a bit of facade being that he's on the sugar daddy site. Some are just on there for the thrills, adventure and vagina tingles. And yes, some are pros but not as many as you seem to think.

Also, you sound bitter and in denial about all this. Perhaps read through the thread and see for yourself.

Post: #2132

(03-23-2019 12:09 PM)Monkey Business Wrote:  Partially wrong. Only a fraction of women are on there to exchange sex/time for money. Most are on there for a shot at a guy with inherent value/status/attitude due to his appearance and game, and perhaps a bit of facade being that he's on the sugar daddy site. Some are just on there for the thrills, adventure and vagina tingles. And yes, some are pros but not as many as you seem to think.

Also, you sound bitter and in denial about all this. Perhaps read through the thread and see for yourself.

Didnt think that way. I thought it was the opposite, the majority expecting to make cash.

Post: #2133

(03-23-2019 12:09 PM)Monkey Business Wrote:  

(03-23-2019 11:15 AM)luigi Wrote:  If im not wrong the girls who register on this website do it with the intention of finding guys that will reward them economically. The website name "seeking arrengement" says it all.

They could have drinks or dinner with any guy in the world, but no, they meet you on a sugardaddy website and have sex with you for no money in return.

Are you serious?

I'd say you're partially wrong. Only a fraction of women are on there to exchange sex/time for money. Most are on there for a shot at a guy with inherent value/status/attitude due to his appearance and game, and perhaps a bit of facade being that he's on the sugar daddy site. Some are just on there for the thrills, adventure and vagina tingles. And yes, some are pros but not as many as you seem to think.

Also, you sound bitter and in denial about all this. Perhaps read through the thread and see for yourself.

No mate all the women know what this site is for. They know its for getting money from men and making them pay to have sex with them. Its 2019 and the secret is out. They got support forums and everything. A lot of them write that they want a monthly allowance.

They're going to make you pay to get that pussy.

Post: #2134

(03-23-2019 01:49 PM)luigi Wrote:  

(03-23-2019 12:09 PM)Monkey Business Wrote:  Partially wrong. Only a fraction of women are on there to exchange sex/time for money. Most are on there for a shot at a guy with inherent value/status/attitude due to his appearance and game, and perhaps a bit of facade being that he's on the sugar daddy site. Some are just on there for the thrills, adventure and vagina tingles. And yes, some are pros but not as many as you seem to think.

Also, you sound bitter and in denial about all this. Perhaps read through the thread and see for yourself.

Didnt think that way. I thought it was the opposite, the majority expecting to make cash.

Yes they're all expecting to make money. This isn't 2012 where girls were just curious.

Post: #2135

Decided to take the plunge on seeking. Every girl has something about a mutually beneficial relationship in their profile. How are you guys smashing without paying? I'm down to buy dinner or drinks but not much beyond that

Post: #2136

(03-23-2019 11:15 AM)luigi Wrote:  If im not wrong the girls who register on this website do it with the intention of finding guys that will reward them economically. The website name "seeking arrengement" says it all.

(03-23-2019 04:39 PM)Markcrist Wrote:  No mate all the women know what this site is for. They know its for getting money from men and making them pay to have sex with them. Its 2019 and the secret is out. They got support forums and everything. A lot of them write that they want a monthly allowance.

(03-23-2019 04:42 PM)Markcrist Wrote:  Yes they're all expecting to make money. This isn't 2012 where girls were just curious.

(03-24-2019 05:02 PM)TeddyR_ Wrote:  Decided to take the plunge on seeking. Every girl has something about a mutually beneficial relationship in their profile.

Emphasis mine. Yup, the gig is up. After letting my profile go dormant for a few months because the site had dried up so much, I re-upped about a month ago, and... it's even worse. Despite DeepDiver's post upthread about how "Seeking is trending back to its core mission connecting Life Experienced Prosperous Gentlemen and intelligent high SMV College Women or recent grads," the name change from SeekingArrangement to just Seeking hasn't fooled anyone. Its "core mission" always was "sugar daddy" relationships; i.e., guys paying girls to date them. So they changed the name, and got rid of the "lifestyle expectation" section of the profile. Big deal. These girls still know exactly why the website was created. They still use words like "arrangement, "allowance," "mutually beneficial." They must be being coached, because the latest catch phrases are "financial assistance" or "financial support." I swear, the profile of every single girl within a 50 mile radius of me contains the word "financial." I've never created a fake female profile, so I don't know whether it's the site itself, or 3rd-part support forums that are coaching them this way, but someone is. Plus, though they got rid of "lifestyle expectation," they added the ability for girls to pick these tags that describe what they're looking for, and "tuition and school support" and "rent assistance" are the most popular ones. Even girls whose profiles don't mention money will bring it up in private messages. And that's assuming you can actually successfully exchange messages with any of them, because what I said a few months ago about it becoming more like any other dating site still holds true: swarmed with fat girls and post-wall women, and you have to spam-message 20 girls to get 1 reply.

The one thing I'd believe still might work is what the guys were doing at the beginning of this thread. They actually weren't dating these girls or making plates out of them. What they were doing is meeting them at some hotel bar, putting on their best multimillionaire playboy act, so that the girl just assumed she'd be getting paid if it went anywhere, consented to the first bang as a sort of implicit "test drive," but then going ghost on the girl. And because they had never told the girls their real names, nor where they lived, and had used a burner phone and email address they only used for that site, the girls had no way to contact them, complain, or get vengeful.

Post: #2137

(03-24-2019 09:19 PM)Arcite Wrote:  The one thing I'd believe still might work is what the guys were doing at the beginning of this thread. They actually weren't dating these girls or making plates out of them. What they were doing is meeting them at some hotel bar, putting on their best multimillionaire playboy act, so that the girl just assumed she'd be getting paid if it went anywhere, consented to the first bang as a sort of implicit "test drive," but then going ghost on the girl. And because they had never told the girls their real names, nor where they lived, and had used a burner phone and email address they only used for that site, the girls had no way to contact them, complain, or get vengeful.

First you would actually need to actually get a high volume of girls to respond and actually come out. You have to spam 100s of of girls to even get a few responses. Those few responses you have to screen out the ones asking for money.

Its hard to even get them out. Even if you get them to come out they will ask you for money even if they mentioned nothing in the texts.

This reddit forum is responsible for advising girls. Giving them advise to talk about an arrangement over the phone and to make them get the cash upfront before any sex happens. They should be shut down for advising girls on how to be a prostitute.

https://www.reddit.com/r/sugarlifestyleforum/

Post: #2138

Sometimes I feel like writing a copy and paste letter to congressmen warning them of this site that has been used for sex trafficking and other crimes, just to fuck with Beta Cuck Fux Brandon Wade and his little biz. Use the #metoo shit against them.

He’s blaming Apple for removing the SA app saying Apple doesn’t want “successful dating” to happen. Nah, it’s becsuse they know it’s still whoredom, even if you remove arrangement from your brand name.

Post: #2139

Anyone try to create a fake female profile to see how girls are being “coached?”

Post: #2140

They're being coached by this cuck.

Tells the sbs to hold of having sex as much time as possible.

Fucking bastard cuckold.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plMNOBc8zCM

Post: #2141

Different cities gave me different outcomes. Same profile, same openings . In some places bange few of the hottest girls in my book for free. In others they are total pro bitches

Post: #2142

Been trying out seeking for a couple days now. Kind of fun watching women trip over themselves to talk to you. Had this one chick text me 6 times before I got back to her. I’m not dumb, obviously it’s cause they want money, but hey, money is the great equalizer. Speaking of money, about 90% of the girls on here are prostitutes. Which most of you know, but worth repeating. Some are actual escorts that advertise elsewhere, most are prostitutes, but don’t want to call themselves that. One girl said she’s “looking for a per meet allowance of $450”. Aka she’s willing to fuck for 450. If she can get guys to pay that then good for her. But it’s funny watching them use different terminology to act as if they’re not prostitutes. I’m not on here for p4p, unless I’m getting the deal of the century. That’s not what I’m looking for.

When girls ask what I’m looking for I’ll say something like “I’m new to the area, want to explore the city, go out for drinks etc.” Some girls won’t respond. Some will say they need financial assistance or an allowance, out of curiosity I’ll ask how much. Average in my area seems to be like ~$400 per meet. This is DC for reference, guess the high COL transfers to prostitutes. Had one girl say 800 and another 2k for a monthly arrangement. I block and move on. There is definitely some potential on here though. Some girls, with no talks of financial arrangements, will say they’re down to meet for drinks or whatever. So I’m meeting two girls for drinks this weekend, and another next week. Now I know they can always spring the money question on me at anytime, and in that scenario I’ll wish them a good night. I’m treating it like any random tinder date, meet up, be cool, and get them back to my place. From here it’s all about game. The girls who are willing to just meet tend to be younger (18-23), many times in college, and many times new to the area. A lot have said they don’t like dating college boys. So I’ll meet some of em and see what happens. Only doing this for a month, so will try to get as many prospects as possible, I’ll update.

Post: #2143

(03-26-2019 07:26 PM)TeddyR_ Wrote:  One girl said she’s “looking for a per meet allowance of $450”. Aka she’s willing to fuck for 450. If she can get guys to pay that then good for her. But it’s funny watching them use different terminology to act as if they’re not prostitutes.

Or maybe, you know, she could have mispelled "meat"

Post: #2144

(03-27-2019 04:24 AM)luigi Wrote:  

(03-26-2019 07:26 PM)TeddyR_ Wrote:  One girl said she’s “looking for a per meet allowance of $450”. Aka she’s willing to fuck for 450. If she can get guys to pay that then good for her. But it’s funny watching them use different terminology to act as if they’re not prostitutes.

Or maybe, you know, she could have mispelled "meat"

any one know what the spam limits are currently. 100 people/day 24h ban?

Post: #2145

Nah. I can’t remember how many but I sent a shit ton. Like at least 250.

If you do it again too soon you get banned, I think. Ironically my latest attempt near the last week of my subscription it appeared there wasn’t a limit as long as you didn’t send 100 in 10 seconds.

Post: #2146

Either way, stick to normie talk on this thread as bitches can read it. Save strategies for private convo.

Post: #2147

(03-27-2019 12:43 PM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  Either way, stick to normie talk on this thread as bitches can read it. Save strategies for private convo.

we are forum lurkers, 99% of people havent visited a forum in their life, dont be paranoid

Post: #2148

(03-27-2019 12:42 PM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  Nah. I can’t remember how many but I sent a shit ton. Like at least 250.

If you do it again too soon you get banned, I think. Ironically my latest attempt near the last week of my subscription it appeared there wasn’t a limit as long as you didn’t send 100 in 10 seconds.

There is a limit but it can be removed. I spammed 1000 before eventually unable to send messages. So I emailed their support and got it removed. Then I was back to spamming again.

Post: #2149

This is hypocrite prostitution, for a girl not to feel like a prostitute and for the guy not to feel like being a creep and go to prostitutes. Nothing more, nothing less.

Post: #2150

(03-27-2019 03:09 PM)luigi Wrote:  

(03-27-2019 12:43 PM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  Either way, stick to normie talk on this thread as bitches can read it. Save strategies for private convo.

we are forum lurkers, 99% of people havent visited a forum in their life, dont be paranoid

You sound like a woman. The forum has been quoted on multiple sugar baby websites and reddit.

(03-27-2019 03:35 PM)Rakers Wrote:  

(03-27-2019 12:42 PM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  Nah. I can’t remember how many but I sent a shit ton. Like at least 250.

If you do it again too soon you get banned, I think. Ironically my latest attempt near the last week of my subscription it appeared there wasn’t a limit as long as you didn’t send 100 in 10 seconds.

There is a limit but it can be removed. I spammed 1000 before eventually unable to send messages. So I emailed their support and got it removed. Then I was back to spamming again.

If you spam again too fast too soon after the suspension, your account will get banned. Trust me on this.

What exactly are you referring to removing the limit? Asking them to clear the spam suspension?