Post: #226

Because anyone in the academic or popular conversation has been endlessly indoctrinated to believe that Christianity is corrupt, backward, closed minded, and ignorant.

Not even directly. Watch a movie and who are the ignorant fools?

So that is the world that educated people are born into.

Now imagine if you meet a couple of truly ignorant or intolerant Christians in your personal life.

Can you blame people for dismissing Christianity for the rest of their lives?

It is actually part of the inversion agenda.

Post: #227

(03-02-2019 12:33 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  Because anyone in the academic or popular conversation has been endlessly indoctrinated to believe that Christianity is corrupt, backward, closed minded, and ignorant.

Not even directly. Watch a movie and who are the ignorant fools?

So that is the world that educated people are born into.

Now imagine if you meet a couple of truly ignorant or intolerant Christians in your personal life.

Can you blame people for dismissing Christianity for the rest of their lives?

It is actually part of the inversion agenda.

To follow up on this comment, specifically the bolded, a good example is a movie I watched a few weeks ago.

It shows how the anti Christian attitude, while never exactly explicit, is woven into the fabric of many popular movies in a way that is similar to a hypnotic suggestion.

Your conscious mind will not readily contradict something that hasn't even been made explicit, but is only assumed by the writer, director, and main character of a movie.

Now imagine that many many movies all assume the same thing, then it appears that the attitude is merely part of a person's background experience, a little piece of common wisdom, an article of faith, or in this case unfaith, that everyone agrees on.

In order to understand how you are being persuaded, you have to take the time to decipher what arguments have been assumed by the creators of the movie.

Fair warning, there will be general spoilers to this movie, however, there are no real plot twists, the thing is predictable, and having a general idea of what is coming will in no way ruin a movie like this one.

The movie is called "Summer '03," and stars Joey King as a nymphet coming of age in her sixteenth year, in other words what is on the surface just your standard teen movie:



She's coming into her own, she lives, she loves, she hurts, she learns!

That's it, that's the movie.

In the background though, is the Catholic church. Now I am not going to make too much of the (((ethnicity)) of the writer/director of this movie except to say that with that in mind, the attitudes towards the church make perfect sense.

The main girl and her tight clothes and great body, as well as her mom, are tough smart sexy funny blah blah blah, just know you are meant to sympathize with them in all their awesomeness and take their sides when ever there is a problem.

They are stuck with a goy husband and his goy mom who is dying in the hospital and, though they never say this, because she is a Catholic, she is a horrible, ignorant, judgmental person who is trying to cause as much pain as possible before she goes.

She tells her son, the dad of the main character, that he doesn't know his father, tells his wife that she never trusted her, tells the main character, her granddaughter, that she had her secretly baptized, and tells another grandson, still a kid, that she is afraid he is gay.

And that, is how Christians are represented from the very beginning of the movie, as a monster in human form.

Confused, the main character goes to sit in the church to see if she belongs there, only to meet a cute seminarian who she sets out to seduce even though she is jail bait.

Because what else would you do?

So she shows up to a Mass at the church in the sluttiest clothing she can find and tries to distract the seminarian because apparently, his decision to give his life to God and the service of a religion she doesn't belong to have no dignity or meaning and exist only as obstacles to her getting to give her first blow job.

To take this even further, because once they start going after the church, they can't help but pile it on, in a heart to heart between the seminarian and the Lolita, he tells her that he is becoming a priest because once you do, you will always have a free place to live and free food and be taken care of.

Yes, that is what a calling to be a priest is, just the wish by a cowardly boy, to be taken care of for life.

You get the idea.

The point is though, none of these attitudes towards the church are explicit, and they aren't even emphasized, it is all slipped in in passing, assumed.

Meanwhile, the main character is the bitch of the century and does what she wants, ignoring how it affects other people, and then when she doesn't get what she wants, she burns down all her relationships, gets the seminarian thrown in jail, and disrupts grandma's funeral.

All of this though, the moral of the story even, it is that all of this is okay, just growing pains, just stuff that happened in the summer of "03.

Lessons learned and she forgives herself and moves on with life.

None of this would be a big deal if in the next movie you saw, it was corrupt Jews and a morally upright church and Christian characters.

Then it would just be an interesting plot point.

Keep your eyes open. See when you ever see a Christian or a Christian church being given the place of moral high ground in a popular movie.

Because I never seem to see it.

And that is why it is perfectly normal for the average person to have completely internalized that the Christian church is an archaic, judgmental, hypocritical institution that has no real point.

Post: #228

if you change the word "modern" into "Satanic" everything will make sense:

-modern architecture --> Satanic architecture
-modern art --> Satanic art
-modern nutrition --> Satanic nutrition

etc...

Post: #229

(03-06-2019 02:27 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  if you change the word "modern" into "Satanic" everything will make sense:

-modern architecture --> Satanic architecture
-modern art --> Satanic art
-modern nutrition --> Satanic nutrition

etc...

Veganism --> Satanism

Post: #230

Apparently they're banning Michael Jackson songs over abuse allegations.

I find this odd because there's other allegations where the singer in question is still celebrated, beloved, and played flippin' everywhere. Any thoughts?

Post: #231

Michael Jackson probably wasn't a pedophile, he's weird and nurtures a Peter Pan syndrome, but I doubt he's a pedo. So the guy who isn't a child molester/predator gets relentlessly hammered in the entertainment media, and the ones that are, like Singer or Allen get shielded from criticism. So here's that inversion again, applied by the entertainment industry...

MJ is one of many artists who have dared to challenge their masters and paid the ultimate price for that, like Tupac, Prince, and probably Hendrix.

He broke two major rules, first he was a skilled, smart businessman who made a killing by purchasing the Beatles' catalog back when they were somewhat burried, only to emerge a decade later as the most valuable pop music act catalog, kind of like buying a mint 1974 911T in 2000 for $12k, which today would be worth over $50k, or perhaps something more dramatic like a 1973 Lamborghini Muira, which went for $40k in 2000 and are worth over half a million today.

So MJ became a media mogul instead of a high-wage singer/slave, first strike. On top of that, he called out the tribe ruling the music industry, which is a particularly sleazy segment of that community, unlike say, doctors.

Post: #232

Michael Jackson is a scapegoat. A lot of collaborating hearsay paints him as being a safe harbor which automatically set him against the Pedos That Be.

Post: #233

Yep.
Rather odd timing that when pedo exposure in Hellywood is gaining traction.

'They' suddenly feel the need to rant about a dead guy, when we all knew something was up with Michael Jackson while he was alive.

Post: #234

(03-06-2019 04:21 PM)DeadlyReed Wrote:  Michael Jackson is a scapegoat. A lot of collaborating hearsay paints him as being a safe harbor which automatically set him against the Pedos That Be.

"Pedos That Be" is a classic phrase.

Post: #235

It was all fun and games when Roosh was banging random sluts, but as soon as he achieved consciousness and started exposing the agenda, he was vilified. Not a coincidence.

Post: #236

Huh...

"Rich neighborhoods being exempted from 5G requirements."

Town Manager Tom Bradford said Tuesday that Palm Beach and some other coastal communities have been exempted from legislation that would limit local control on the installation of 5G transmission equipment.
The legislation has passed the House and Senate and is awaiting Gov. Rick Scott’s signature, Bradford said at a meeting of the Underground Utilities Task Force.
“We have been carved out,” Bradford said. “That law does not apply to us.”
The exemption or “carve out” is welcome news in Palm Beach, where Bradford and Mayor Gail Coniglio have warned the new law would be an aesthetic disaster.
The legislation severely limits state and local government control over of public rights-of-way where 5G, or fifth generation wireless technology, is being installed. The legislation’s sponsors, Sen. Travis Hutson, R-Palm Coast, and Rep. Mike La Rosa, R-St. Cloud, say it will promote the use of much faster digital service throughout Florida.
“We in essence could have every public right of way marred by a utility we have no control over,” Coniglio has said. Coniglio traveled to Tallahassee last month to lobby for the exemption and against a flurry of bills that attack home rule – the ability of counties and municipalities to exert local control.
Bradford said the exemption means the town will have much more control in regulating where the 5G equipment — “small cells” that are the size of a suitcase or small refrigerator — will be located. Coniglio could not be reached for comment Tuesday.

https://www.palmbeachdailynews.com/news/...reless-law


Perhaps Elysium, the new Alita: Battle Angel & other similar films, are their attempts to get the 'cattle' accustomed to living under their shadow...?

Post: #237

(03-06-2019 04:08 PM)911 Wrote:  Michael Jackson probably wasn't a pedophile, he's weird and nurtures a Peter Pan syndrome, but I doubt he's a pedo. So the guy who isn't a child molester/predator gets relentlessly hammered in the entertainment media, and the ones that are, like Singer or Allen get shielded from criticism. So here's that inversion again, applied by the entertainment industry...

MJ is one of many artists who have dared to challenge their masters and paid the ultimate price for that, like Tupac, Prince, and probably Hendrix.

He broke two major rules, first he was a skilled, smart businessman who made a killing by purchasing the Beatles' catalog back when they were somewhat burried, only to emerge a decade later as the most valuable pop music act catalog, kind of like buying a mint 1974 911T in 2000 for $12k, which today would be worth over $50k, or perhaps something more dramatic like a 1973 Lamborghini Muira, which went for $40k in 2000 and are worth over half a million today.

So MJ became a media mogul instead of a high-wage singer/slave, first strike. On top of that, he called out the tribe ruling the music industry, which is a particularly sleazy segment of that community, unlike say, doctors.

Could you elaborate?

Post: #238

Nebraska grandmother acts as surrogate for gay son

Quote:A 61-year-old Nebraskan woman has told of her joy after giving birth to her own grandchild, acting as the surrogate for her son and his husband.

Cecile Eledge carried the daughter of her son Matthew Eledge and his husband Elliot Dougherty to term, giving birth to baby Uma Louise last week.

Mrs Eledge said she made the offer when her son and Mr Dougherty first said they wanted to start a family.

"Of course, they all laughed," Mrs Eledge told the BBC.

Mrs Eledge, who was 59 at the time, said her suggestion remained a sort of joke among family at first, not a realistic path forward.

"It just seemed like a really beautiful sentiment on her part," Mr Dougherty said. "She's such a selfless woman."

But when Mr Eledge and Mr Dougherty, who live in Omaha close to Mrs Eledge and her husband, began exploring options to have a baby they were told by a fertility doctor that it could be a viable option.

Mrs Eledge was brought in for an interview and a series of tests, all of which gave a green light to the surrogacy.

"I'm very health conscious," she said. "There was no reason whatsoever to doubt that I could carry the baby."

With Mr Eledge providing the sperm, Mr Dougherty's sister Lea served as the egg donor.

Mr Dougherty, who works as a hairdresser, said that while straight couples may consider IVF the last resort, for them it was their "only hope" for a biological child.

"We always knew we had to be unique and think outside the box with this," Mr Eledge, a public school teacher, added.

Mrs Eledge said the pregnancy was smooth throughout, the regular symptoms simply "elevated a little bit" compared to her previous pregnancies with her three children.

In fact, the most obvious sign of her age came less than a week after Mrs Eledge was implanted with the embryo, when Mr Eledge and Mr Dougherty bought her a home pregnancy test to see if the transfer had been successful.

"We were told not to, but the boys couldn't wait," Mrs Eledge said, laughing.

She looked at the test and was devastated to see the results were negative. But when Mr Eledge came over later that day to comfort her, he saw something she hadn't: a second pink line on the test, confirming a pregnancy.

"That was really a joyous moment," Mrs Eledge said, accompanied by jokes about her failing eyesight.

"She can't see anything, but she'll be able to deliver," Mrs Eledge recalls Mr Eledge and Mr Dougherty saying.

Mrs Eledge said the response to her pregnancy has been mostly positive, accompanied by a slight "shock factor," particularly for her two other children, Mr Eledge's siblings.

"When everyone got the full picture it was nothing but support," she said.

But the pregnancy exposed some persistent markers of discrimination against LGBT families in Nebraska. Though gay marriage has been legal in the state since the landmark Supreme Court decision in 2015, Nebraska has no state laws banning discrimination based on sexual orientation. Up until 2017, the state maintained a decades-old ban on gay and lesbian foster parents.

Mrs Eledge said she fought, unsuccessfully, with her insurance company over health expenses that would have been covered if she was giving birth to her own child. And due to a law designating the person who delivers the baby as mother, Uma's birth certificate lists Mrs Eledge alongside her son, and excludes Mr Dougherty.

"This is just one small, micro example of the things that create road blocks for us," Mr Eledge said.

Mr Eledge made headlines four years ago when he was dismissed from his job at Skutt Catholic High School after he informed school administrators that he and Mr Dougherty planned to get married.

Mr Eledge's treatment sparked outrage in his community, prompting parents and former and current students to create an online petition calling for an "end to employment discrimination against Mr Eledge and future faculty".

The petition, now closed, garnered 102,995 supporters.

Typically a private family, Mrs Eledge says they chose to share their story to counter these examples of "hate" towards LGBT individuals and families, and convey "that there's always hope out there".

"I'm learning not to take it personally," said Mr Eledge of the negative responses to him and his family. "At the end of the day, we have a family, we have friends, we have a huge community that supports us."

And week after Uma's birth, Mrs Eledge says that she and her granddaughter are doing well.

"This little girl is surrounded by so much support, she's going to grow up in a loving family," Mrs Eledge said.

"This was how it was meant to be."

Post: #239

NOT LOGOS

Post: #240

Yeah, gross, FTGE.

Aurini: I am not well-informed on Tupac, but both Prince and Hendrix were clean at the time of their death. Jimi was supposedly getting clean and starting to detach himself from the degeneracy of the scene he had helped create.

Prince is the most clear-cut case of outright murder, he had not only successfully fought off and outfoxed the industry for his musical rights, but he had also come out against the degeneracy he has helped propagate earlier in his career, the all-out bisexual hedonism which became part of his musical brand, but he was also a devout Christian. He was technically a Jehovah's Witness (a sect founded by a satanist) but like most of its devotees, he was an honest well-meaning member of that misguided flock.

PS: I enjoyed your E michael Jones interview, good job bro.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjCZ9r95Dxc

Post: #241

(03-02-2019 12:33 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  Because anyone in the academic or popular conversation has been endlessly indoctrinated to believe that Christianity is corrupt, backward, closed minded, and ignorant.

Not even directly. Watch a movie and who are the ignorant fools?

So that is the world that educated people are born into.

Now imagine if you meet a couple of truly ignorant or intolerant Christians in your personal life.

Can you blame people for dismissing Christianity for the rest of their lives?

It is actually part of the inversion agenda.

Also the myriad of Cults masquerading under the name of Christianity and the abuses that closes many of ex-members off forever.

Post: #242

(02-20-2019 03:47 PM)Sooth Wrote:  ^ Truth is not by consensus.

I read a book years ago called Spirit Universe by Jerome Jochem. I can't find it anywhere online so I'll have to hunt for it on my old hard drives.

It's by a deliverance minister that has been working supernatural problems for a long time. He describes everything and more in the above tweet thread but from a Christian point of view.

The pastor emailed a while ago and told me he'd found an editor and was preparing to release on Amazon and his own site. I'll definitely give the updated version a read when he releases it.

Post: #243

(03-01-2019 03:10 PM)Malone Wrote:  You're right, I'm sure the Christian view is the minority one here.

That said, as much as I hate fucking Woke bullshit and moral relativity, I really want the universe to be more complex than the Christians believe it is. I want a vast chaotic spirit world where Jesus and his Father are just one of the powers. I want Fae and Machine Elves and competing factions, good and evil.

That's straight up blasphemy to the Christians, and I am falling under the influence of Satan for wanting it. But why should I believe that one tribe of jews in the desert a couple thousand years ago got this exactly right and no one else ever did? Bullshit.

I think it does exist when you pay attention:




But it doesn't really get too much mention in the bible. So as to avoid the dangers of idolatry.

Post: #244

(04-02-2019 06:13 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  "This was how it was meant to be."

Post: #245

The inversion agenda is hard at work in Catholic Colombia

The inversion agenda is in our daily lives, nevermind the fucked up articles you might read online. I see it more and more.

Last week, the small city of Pereira had an unveiling of some Artwork on one of the main drags. They reworked pavement to a nice pink brick in these areas, including the cross walk, everything really looks really quite nice and clean. The issue is the statues are ugly as can be. Both Modern, but this one reminded me of some of the satanic concepts where statues do not have a head or heart.

I can tell you that nobody thinks this statue is beautiful. I know art quality is often presented as perspective, but so sad to see a relatively poor city by western standards, shelling out cash for demonic modern art on an otherwise beautiful main street.

Apparently it is supposed to represent the founders of the region. But I'm really not seeing it. Why not show a working man on a horse and a pregnant woman and child? Terrible.

Classic styled white mansion behind, fun multi coloured restaurant and salsa bar behind, demonic statue in front. I don't understand what it is, flailing arms and a fully digged out chest and decapitated head. The cuts are surrounded by some kind of tears, or hairs. I would have said weird one year ago, I feel like thanks to the forum I am more aware of what this represents.

   

Closer Look
   

This city is within perhaps most conservative & Christian region of Colombia. I recently read in a magazine that less than 22% of the country (omitting Bogota) believes in Abortion, and was impressed.
"The People" are obviously still majority Christian, but they are not aware of what this art above represents.
   

It pisses me off to walk by the thing, because of the way it makes me feel. Now I am feeling some empathy for those types who want to take statues down. But still, those were men, this is just flat out Satanism. Fucck

Post: #246

That needs to be destroyed.

It feels like they're putting this shit in place to trigger a literal demonic invasion. One can only imagine that dark entities cluster around these statues waiting for the opening in souls created by people simply looking upon them with such dread.

It should be melted into slag and then dumped in the Marianas trench. Make careful note as well who made it and who funded it then put them on your local list.

Post: #247

(04-06-2019 10:24 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  That needs to be destroyed.

It feels like they're putting this shit in place to trigger a literal demonic invasion. One can only imagine that dark entities cluster around these statues waiting for the opening in souls created by people simply looking upon them with such dread.

It should be melted into slag and then dumped in the Marianas trench. Make careful note as well who made it and who funded it then put them on your local list.

This point reminds me of an ugly African mask that my mom had when I was younger. I believe her dad got it when he lived in Haiti for work, so my mom felt some familial attachment to it despite being an Anglo.

Anyway, that thing completely terrified me as youngster (0-7 y/o). I screamed and cried whenever I saw it. Eventually my parents hid it because it stressed me out too much. Even as a teenager my brother and I would hide it whenever we slept on the couch. We always thought it was looking at us.

I'm now realizing that it was most likely Satanic. I'll dig it out of storage and destroy it when I return home.

Post: #248

You might want to be somewhat specific about how you do it.

There's a lot of old wives tales about people thinking they could just burn something or toss it in the rubbish to get rid of it only to find out the hard way that it wasn't that simple. It's said that entities can attach to places and people and only inhabit an item specifically until they're removed from it. Point being that destroying the object doesn't necessarily rid you of the spirit.

I used to think that it was all hokey spiritual crap but now I'd rather hedge my bets at best.

Contact some of the better posters in the God Pill thread and get some serious advice about how to be rid of it safely.

edit: As an aside, your personal story reminds me of what assholes parents can be when deciding a child has to "just learn to get over their irrational fears". God alone knows how many young souls have been imperiled because mum and dad "knew better" than to believe that there was more to this stuff than meets the eye.

Post: #249

(04-07-2019 01:50 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  You might want to be somewhat specific about how you do it.

There's a lot of old wives tales about people thinking they could just burn something or toss it in the rubbish to get rid of it only to find out the hard way that it wasn't that simple. It's said that entities can attach to places and people and only inhabit an item specifically until they're removed from it. Point being that destroying the object doesn't necessarily rid you of the spirit.

I used to think that it was all hokey spiritual crap but now I'd rather hedge my bets at best.

Contact some of the better posters in the God Pill thread and get some serious advice about how to be rid of it safely.

edit: As an aside, your personal story reminds me of what assholes parents can be when deciding a child has to "just learn to get over their irrational fears". God alone knows how many young souls have been imperiled because mum and dad "knew better" than to believe that there was more to this stuff than meets the eye.

Thanks, will do. I used think this was all baloney, but I'm believing it more and more. Those stories of priests driving out spirits from a house built on an Indian burial site remind me of that.

Unfortunately, we do have a lot of very weird stuff from my grandpa working in the Caribbean, South America, and Africa. It'll be a process getting it all removed. Hopefully our local Church will help.

As for improperly destroying this stuff, that happened one time. My dad was chasing a flying cockroach around the house (yeah, I know) and accidentally destroyed a very crudely made "screaming soul" African statue. I'm not sure the deeper meaning of it, but I'm sure it was there.

The cockroach got away too.

Post: #250

(04-07-2019 01:17 AM)VNvet Wrote:  

(04-06-2019 10:24 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  That needs to be destroyed.

It feels like they're putting this shit in place to trigger a literal demonic invasion. One can only imagine that dark entities cluster around these statues waiting for the opening in souls created by people simply looking upon them with such dread.

It should be melted into slag and then dumped in the Marianas trench. Make careful note as well who made it and who funded it then put them on your local list.

This point reminds me of an ugly African mask that my mom had when I was younger. I believe her dad got it when he lived in Haiti for work, so my mom felt some familial attachment to it despite being an Anglo.

Anyway, that thing completely terrified me as youngster (0-7 y/o). I screamed and cried whenever I saw it. Eventually my parents hid it because it stressed me out too much. Even as a teenager my brother and I would hide it whenever we slept on the couch. We always thought it was looking at us.

I'm now realizing that it was most likely Satanic. I'll dig it out of storage and destroy it when I return home.

I remember reading stuff from hardcore occultists like Helena Blavatsky saying something like how you shouldn't instantly buddhist statues just because you like them, because there's been many massacres in east asia and many of the items in the sacrificial rooms have been sold outseas, so they're most likely cursed. I unironically believe that some objects can hold so called "curses" or whatever. I don't know whether it's stuck energy, a bounded entity or something but there definitely exists object that can scare the shit out of you just by their presence.