Post: #90176

(02-24-2019 04:21 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  He is a racist piece of shit because he viewed black people and others as inferior to white men. Showed the film Birth of a Nation in the White House openly. He was also a Klansman. Like other pieces of shit white nationalists, he was a white knight for women on behalf of "keeping the black man down". Putting the white woman on a pedestal sure was smart now, wasn't it?

If that offends you, please let me know so that I can add you to my ignore list. I have absolutely zero time these days to debate with trash like that.

Also, you should do more research on Wilson. He was not "pro ancestral homeland" like you think he was. He was easily one of the first Globalist presidents. He was one of the first to break from the Isolationist style of American power doctrine. He engineered America into getting into foreign European wars when public opinion wanted nothing to do with Europe. He claimed that Americans did not know better, than their betters (paraphrasing).

Also do not mock my educational background like that. There are plenty of historians more educated than you or me that hold values opposite of you and I. Feminist shaming language has no need here.

TravelerKai, I wasn't mocking your education background. That wasn't my intent and I'm sorry if it came off that way.

I have no issue with you stating facts about Woodrow Wilson or anybody else for that matter. For the record, no I don't support the KKK or any groups like them.

My issue, was your use of the word "racist". That was my only issue with what you posted.

I found a comment on YouTube a couple of days ago that puts into words better than what I ever could in regards to leftist language such as racist, white supremacist, bigot, ext. ext.

Quote:Well this has got more views than I ever expected.

SNIP..........

A few words on 'white supremacy'. White supremacy is a misnomer. That is to say, it is a label used to slur people of European ethnicity (aka white people) who try to stand up for their own interests. That's all it is.

Yes okay there are a few idiots who think that whites reign supreme over others and hate everyone else. You get idiots of all races. I don't hate any other race or nationality. But whites are being dehumanized daily and backed into a corner. Cry me some white tears, you may say. You deserve it for all the bad things your white ancestors did!

And you will only serve to make my point for me. Whites matter too.

Every race of people has their own homelands, except Europeans. Only we are expected to share our countries with everyone, while giving them special rights, which is never enough, we still get called racist every day just for existing.

It can't go on.

Now, obviously the USA is not the homeland of Europeans, but this country has historically been built up on European institutions with traditionally 85 - 90% of the country being European for most of its history, with Africans always at a steady 10 - 15% of the historical population. And yes, Africans who descend from the slaves have just as every right to reside in America as the Europeans do.

With that being said, before the usual suspects come out of the woodwork after reading that quoted YouTube comment to throw the normal leftists slurs at me such as racist, bigot, supremacist, white race troll, ponder this:

The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC)
- https://cbc.house.gov/

The Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus (CAPAC)
- https://capac-chu.house.gov/

Congressional Native American Caucus
- https://mccollum.house.gov/about-betty/c...can-caucus

The Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute
- https://chci.org/

You'll notice, that these American political caucuses, are racial political caucuses. Yes, you can find political caucuses that represent their people on the ethnic level and those caucuses also include people of European ethnicity, Asian ethnicities, ext. ext.

However, the examples that I just listed, were political racial caucuses. Put in the search engine The White Congressional Caucus. You will find nothing. Absolutely nothing.

Now black Americans aside from the recent arrivals, I will give them slack, they don't know what their ethnic groups are. But what are the excuses for the Hispanics, Asians and Native Americans for organizing as a race of people at the political level?

These groups, are clearly putting the interests of their people, their racial group of people, at the forefront. Every single group in America is allowed to organize and advocate for their interests politically on the racial level, except for whites.

The word "racist" is not just a word, it's a weapon.

Do you know how whites in America said the N word openly for the longest time? The whites used that word to hold the blacks down. The N word was a form of power, it subjugated the blacks and held them down.

Today, leftists and people on the right as well openly use the R word, "racist". That word, for at least the past decade or so, has been used to hold the whites down. The R word is a form of power, it subjugates the whites and holds them down, in the same way that the N word was used to hold blacks down.

The R word is used to to shame whites, as a racial group, of the right to organize racially on the political level and as a cohesive group. This is at a time when every other racial group in America is allowed to organize, advocate and lobby for themselves on the racial level, politically.

TravelerKai, in 1984 America, you are allowed to use the R word openly and without fear of economic, monetary and societal consequences. But just know that every time you use that word, whether knowingly or unknowingly, you are complicit in helping to keep whites down and helping to subjugate us, in the same way that the N word was used against your people for so long in this country.

Post: #90177

(02-25-2019 12:26 AM)Supernova Wrote:  I don't think Booker has much of a chance. He'll be seen as to far to the left for the middle states I think.

Someone made a joke about him being white but I didn't get the humour.. I thought 'oh, he's Italian or something..'
at which point the scales fell from my eyes. Tucker Carlson said about him a while back "everybody says that he is a stuffed suit" that he's absolutely useless..

Once I thought he was white I immediately thought: "he's Italian or something? What a fucking idiot! what an absolute fucking clown!" The things he says, the way he talks, probably the stupidest man in mainstream politics. If I had a brother like that I would want him tested for every kind of brain impairment and disability so that he could get all the help he could get going through life.
Because someone that stupid is a liability to himself. He's an embarrassment public speaking..

Then he went back to being an identity politics 'person of colour' and just another fuckwit whose hate hoaxes and hate politics I have to endure on my google feed.

Funny how the Left has used colour to force us onto the defensive. Immediately 'not wanting to be racist'.

But he's a terrible candidate. Terrible..

Post: #90178

(02-10-2019 09:35 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:  What would be the problem of militias patrolling the border?

Is there a law against that?

(02-24-2019 07:13 PM)Libertas Wrote:  I don't think Arizona is blue (yet). McSally was a fucking horrible candidate and she still only lost by about two points. Governor Ducey was reelected by a massive margin.

The biggest concern I have is Florida. It looks really good, but now it has a million new felon voters. Felon turnout is low, but Florida has such slim margins that anything can make a difference.

Trump got the Cubans in 2016 and most likely will get the Venezuelans too in 2020.

Post: #90179

(02-25-2019 12:28 AM)Uprising Wrote:  [quote='TravelerKai' pid='1944270' dateline='1551043260']

SNIP

Following on from above.. I guess its not my fight but -

Agreed as long as we can accept that Woodrow Wilson was potentially a racist. (haven't looked it up).

It doesn't bother me from this distance of time if he actually was or not, but I can see that it would bother others.

I personally think Hillary's racism was a problem. I think Obama's inverted racism was a problem. I think the Dems race plantation racism and anti-white anti-cis-male agenda is a problem.

But that shit doesn't get airtime on the MSM. What gets airtime is the anti-white 'RAYciisssm' you allude to.

Upside down clown world.

Post: #90180

(02-25-2019 12:47 AM)Bienvenuto Wrote:  Following on from above.. I guess its not my fight but -

Agreed as long as we can accept that Woodrow Wilson was potentially a racist. (haven't looked it up).

It doesn't bother me from this distance of time if he actually was or not, but I can see that it would bother others.

I personally think Hillary's racism was a problem. I think Obama's inverted racism was a problem. I think the Dems race plantation racism and anti-white anti-cis-male agenda is a problem.

But that shit doesn't get airtime on the MSM. What gets airtime is the anti-white 'RAYciisssm' you allude to.

Upside down clown world.

5 times. In 9 sentences, you used the word racism/racist 5 times. You have learned nothing from my post.

Post: #90181

Why are we arguing about Woodrow Wilson?

Post: #90182

I'm sure you can find some Jewish congressional group or white christian congressional group if you look, or at least find some very influential and wealthy lobbyist groups for white-americans. They have a bunch of freedom caucuses as well which are mostly white guys.

(02-25-2019 12:28 AM)Uprising Wrote:  

(02-24-2019 04:21 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  He is a racist piece of shit because he viewed black people and others as inferior to white men. Showed the film Birth of a Nation in the White House openly. He was also a Klansman. Like other pieces of shit white nationalists, he was a white knight for women on behalf of "keeping the black man down". Putting the white woman on a pedestal sure was smart now, wasn't it?

If that offends you, please let me know so that I can add you to my ignore list. I have absolutely zero time these days to debate with trash like that.

Also, you should do more research on Wilson. He was not "pro ancestral homeland" like you think he was. He was easily one of the first Globalist presidents. He was one of the first to break from the Isolationist style of American power doctrine. He engineered America into getting into foreign European wars when public opinion wanted nothing to do with Europe. He claimed that Americans did not know better, than their betters (paraphrasing).

Also do not mock my educational background like that. There are plenty of historians more educated than you or me that hold values opposite of you and I. Feminist shaming language has no need here.

TravelerKai, I wasn't mocking your education background. That wasn't my intent and I'm sorry if it came off that way.

I have no issue with you stating facts about Woodrow Wilson or anybody else for that matter. For the record, no I don't support the KKK or any groups like them.

My issue, was your use of the word "racist". That was my only issue with what you posted.

I found a comment on YouTube a couple of days ago that puts into words better than what I ever could in regards to leftist language such as racist, white supremacist, bigot, ext. ext.

Quote:Well this has got more views than I ever expected.

SNIP..........

A few words on 'white supremacy'. White supremacy is a misnomer. That is to say, it is a label used to slur people of European ethnicity (aka white people) who try to stand up for their own interests. That's all it is.

Yes okay there are a few idiots who think that whites reign supreme over others and hate everyone else. You get idiots of all races. I don't hate any other race or nationality. But whites are being dehumanized daily and backed into a corner. Cry me some white tears, you may say. You deserve it for all the bad things your white ancestors did!

And you will only serve to make my point for me. Whites matter too.

Every race of people has their own homelands, except Europeans. Only we are expected to share our countries with everyone, while giving them special rights, which is never enough, we still get called racist every day just for existing.

It can't go on.

Now, obviously the USA is not the homeland of Europeans, but this country has historically been built up on European institutions with traditionally 85 - 90% of the country being European for most of its history, with Africans always at a steady 10 - 15% of the historical population. And yes, Africans who descend from the slaves have just as every right to reside in America as the Europeans do.

With that being said, before the usual suspects come out of the woodwork after reading that quoted YouTube comment to throw the normal leftists slurs at me such as racist, bigot, supremacist, white race troll, ponder this:

The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC)
- https://cbc.house.gov/

The Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus (CAPAC)
- https://capac-chu.house.gov/

Congressional Native American Caucus
- https://mccollum.house.gov/about-betty/c...can-caucus

The Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute
- https://chci.org/

You'll notice, that these American political caucuses, are racial political caucuses. Yes, you can find political caucuses that represent their people on the ethnic level and those caucuses also include people of European ethnicity, Asian ethnicities, ext. ext.

However, the examples that I just listed, were political racial caucuses. Put in the search engine The White Congressional Caucus. You will find nothing. Absolutely nothing.

Now black Americans aside from the recent arrivals, I will give them slack, they don't know what their ethnic groups are. But what are the excuses for the Hispanics, Asians and Native Americans for organizing as a race of people at the political level?

These groups, are clearly putting the interests of their people, their racial group of people, at the forefront. Every single group in America is allowed to organize and advocate for their interests politically on the racial level, except for whites.

The word "racist" is not just a word, it's a weapon.

Do you know how whites in America said the N word openly for the longest time? The whites used that word to hold the blacks down. The N word was a form of power, it subjugated the blacks and held them down.

Today, leftists and people on the right as well openly use the R word, "racist". That word, for at least the past decade or so, has been used to hold the whites down. The R word is a form of power, it subjugates the whites and holds them down, in the same way that the N word was used to hold blacks down.

The R word is used to to shame whites, as a racial group, of the right to organize racially on the political level and as a cohesive group. This is at a time when every other racial group in America is allowed to organize, advocate and lobby for themselves on the racial level, politically.

TravelerKai, in 1984 America, you are allowed to use the R word openly and without fear of economic, monetary and societal consequences. But just know that every time you use that word, whether knowingly or unknowingly, you are complicit in helping to keep whites down and helping to subjugate us, in the same way that the N word was used against your people for so long in this country.

Post: #90183

(02-25-2019 01:26 AM)eradicator Wrote:  Why are we arguing about Woodrow Wilson?

Same question here.

Not 100% sure, but um, isn't he dead?

Post: #90184

(02-25-2019 12:57 AM)Uprising Wrote:  5 times. In 9 sentences, you used the word racism/racist 5 times. You have learned nothing from my post.

MMX2010...is that you ?

Post: #90185

Woodrow Wilson was a globalist puppet of course - his "racial views" being the least of the problems - Federal Reserve act being the biggest act of treason.

But it's telling that words like the Leninist "racist" and "White Nationalism" are being thrown around and applied to historical figures and past times where the views of that person were actually liberal.

The fact is that by that label even Booker T Washington would be racist because he supported racial segregation. The US itself similar to most countries in the West were "White Nationalist" states for having clear European favoring immigration and preference policies. But of course - muh racism - the US would have become just as strong if you had settled it with citizens of the Congo and given them the US constitution and legal system. Just like Liberia had received in the past - it's a land of milk and honey now.

But yeah - this discussion is useless here - still it's interesting how quickly those social justice terms and definitions are thrown around. The mental trap is indeed easy to fall into. Oh - and don't look at reality - be firmly embedded in anecdote land.

Post: #90186

(02-24-2019 09:32 PM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  What many people here have been saying.

Bannon looks old. Did he always look that old?

He is into gramps territory.

Better get a young mistress.

Post: #90187

(02-24-2019 09:20 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(02-24-2019 08:09 PM)Caduceus Wrote:  ...
I have a feeling Trump already knows this, and Kushner has advised him to trade in his Christian voters, for buttfucking faggot voters as we speak.

It seems difficult to imagine why Trump would go for this but we have to remember that Kushner is literally the kid from the Omen and has probably gained a greater mastery of his demonic powers by now.

Damn.

I think you're right.

Post: #90188

Post: #90189

RE: the current presidential field:

Ive heard it posited that the candidates being stupid is now considered a feature rather than a bug.

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world...eep-state/

Post: #90190

With no "comedian" host bashing Trump for an opening monologue, the Oscars' ratings were actually up this year. Also, America is a bunch of hate-filled racists because, and I'm only guessing, Spike Lee is upset he only got one Oscar.

Post: #90191

(02-25-2019 09:57 AM)Easy_C Wrote:  RE: the current presidential field:

Ive heard it posited that the candidates being stupid is now considered a feature rather than a bug.

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world...eep-state/

Some times voters prefer the unknown to the politician they are sick of already. Being naive and a dreamer can allow someone to say and think they can change the government. While the old realists are much less enthusiastic about change or their ability to make changes to society.

Post: #90192

(02-24-2019 04:21 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  He is a racist piece of shit because he viewed black people and others as inferior to white men. Showed the film Birth of a Nation in the White House openly. He was also a Klansman. Like other pieces of shit white nationalists, he was a white knight for women on behalf of "keeping the black man down". Putting the white woman on a pedestal sure was smart now, wasn't it?

If that offends you, please let me know so that I can add you to my ignore list. I have absolutely zero time these days to debate with trash like that.

Can we just take a moment to admire the effort and dedication TravelerKai puts into his racial grievances? Other, lesser lights might be satisfied with saying "Whites are racist" or "Old politicians were racist", but he actually takes the time to go learn about which presidents did which specially awful things, right down to what movies they showed during their term, so that he knows exactly WHY he's angry at white people.

I mean, I don't like Angela Merkel, but if you asked me what movies Angela Merkel showed during her last term, I'd draw a total blank. And she didn't even die before I was born, she's alive right now!

It's this sort of obsessive dedication towards digging up ancient hatreds that makes multi-cultural America such a fun and healthy place to be.

Post: #90193

Ok, Woodrow Wilson viewed, showed, possessed membership and white knighted. But what did he actually do? Did he beat up a black employee, confiscated African American property, raped black women, stripped African Americans of their voting rights? Give me anything. I honestly want to know.

Post: #90194

(02-25-2019 03:54 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  Can we just take a moment to admire the effort and dedication TravelerKai puts into his racial grievances? Other, lesser lights might be satisfied with saying "Whites are racist" or "Old politicians were racist", but he actually takes the time to go learn about which presidents did which specially awful things, right down to what movies they showed during their term, so that he knows exactly WHY he's angry at white people.

I mean, I don't like Angela Merkel, but if you asked me what movies Angela Merkel showed during her last term, I'd draw a total blank. And she didn't even die before I was born, she's alive right now!

It's this sort of obsessive dedication towards digging up ancient hatreds that makes multi-cultural America such a fun and healthy place to be.

It's dishonest to assume why TK knows a particular part of history. None of us are mind readers here.

As for him being angry at white men, I've never got that from his posts. Not sure what you've been reading and what I've missed. Or maybe he just thinks some of you guys are racists and you don't like that he thinks that way?

Post: #90195

(02-25-2019 04:36 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  Ok, Woodrow Wilson viewed, showed, possessed membership and white knighted. But what did he actually do? Did he beat up a black employee, confiscated African American property, raped black women, stripped African Americans of their voting rights? Give me anything. I honestly want to know.

Wilson royally fucked up black Americans, one of the most destructive legacies for black America, along with Johnson's "Great Society" welfare scheme. He did that by setting up the Fed, as SS pointed out. This incidentally also fucked up white America just as much.

Moral of the story: race-based victimhood culture is there to obscure that fact and to divert susceptible minds and minorities away from the real source of their problems, which affect the rest of the population nearly just as much; divide and conquer.

So unfortunately vast swaths of minorities still cling to notions of KKK white hoods, rope and bleach midwinter night honkie gangs, "white privilege", "The Man", and the notion that blacks are victims of racial violence rather than disproportionately being the perpetrators due to their societies being obliterated by some of the forces also ruining the rest of society.

Post: #90196

(02-25-2019 05:31 PM)911 Wrote:  So unfortunately vast swaths of minorities still cling to notions of KKK white hoods, rope and bleach midwinter nights honkie gangs, "white privilege", "The Man", and the notion that blacks are victims of racial violence rather than disproportionately being the perpetrators due to their societies being obliterated by some of the forces also ruining the rest of society.

Many of those ideas are brought to them 24/7 through liberal media. Both parties seek to divide and enrage people in order to get them to vote them into power.

In the real world, you don't get into these types of topics when talking to people. I am in a very mixed neighborhood and these types of topics never come up. We are too busy helping each other and having a beer here and there. You'd be surprised at how much bullshit people actually see.

Post: #90197

(02-25-2019 06:22 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:  Bannon looks old. Did he always look that old?

He is into gramps territory.

Better get a young mistress.

I can't remember which interview it was, but the company changed the lighting and made him look really bad.

Still, we are talking Trump and one year of Trump is like 10 years of normal reality.

Post: #90198

(02-25-2019 01:26 AM)eradicator Wrote:  Why are we arguing about Woodrow Wilson?

Because calling someone that was a legit racist from 1919 apparently triggers certain white males in 2019. I guess it is taboo to use that word now, due to overuse by SJWs.

Uprising it's a fucking history lesson, get over yourself.

I'm not responding to that wall of text that reeks of autism and MMX2010.

You would think someone like me, that has a long history of calling out shines and ignorant misbehaving blacks and others would get the benefit of the doubt, but contexts are meant to be misunderstood it appears by people of our generation.

Post: #90199

(02-25-2019 05:30 PM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  

(02-25-2019 03:54 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  Can we just take a moment to admire the effort and dedication TravelerKai puts into his racial grievances? Other, lesser lights might be satisfied with saying "Whites are racist" or "Old politicians were racist", but he actually takes the time to go learn about which presidents did which specially awful things, right down to what movies they showed during their term, so that he knows exactly WHY he's angry at white people.

I mean, I don't like Angela Merkel, but if you asked me what movies Angela Merkel showed during her last term, I'd draw a total blank. And she didn't even die before I was born, she's alive right now!

It's this sort of obsessive dedication towards digging up ancient hatreds that makes multi-cultural America such a fun and healthy place to be.

It's dishonest to assume why TK knows a particular part of history. None of us are mind readers here.

As for him being angry at white men, I've never got that from his posts. Not sure what you've been reading and what I've missed. Or maybe he just thinks some of you guys are racists and you don't like that he thinks that way?

Don't feed that dishonest race troll. He's been on my ignore list for two plus years for a reason. His post was so confusing to you because it was completely fictitious. Back dudes on rvf, except for maybe 8 guys think I am an uncle Tom or a coon. This troll and the regular WN which are more than ten and less than 15 think I hate white people, when I have personally done more for the white men on this forum over the years than their race trolling and rants have ever done. Most of them haven't met a soul and never coached anyone on game.

When you do the math, jealous ends up being the answer. Hating people over dumb things like skin color is quite the effeminate behavior is it not?

Post: #90200

(02-25-2019 06:29 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  Don't feed that dishonest race troll. He's been on my ignore list for two years for a reason. His post was so confusing to you because it was completely ficticious. Back dudes on rvf, except for maybe 8 guys think I am an uncle Tom or a coon. This troll and the regular WN which are more than ten and less than 15 think I hate white people, when I have personally done more for the white men on this forum over the years than their race trolling and rants have ever done. Most of them haven't met a soul and never coached anyone on game.

When you do the math, jealous ends up being the answer. Hating people over dumb things like skin color is quite the effeminate behavior is it not?

Yeah, I was confused. You and Kosko are consistent when calling out bad behavior no matter the race.

The race baiting has always been an issue here. I can understand the frustration. Each person will have their own experiences and then you have someone telling you what you experienced is bullshit or made up.

I guess it just shows how much we are susceptible to propaganda no matter how red pill we think we are.