Post: #151

Not sure which of those categories they've got you on unless they're calling Thottery a "sexual orientation" or a "disability". Also fail to see how that comment is a threat, promotion of violence or harassment anyway.

Post: #152

(11-27-2018 09:31 AM)Roosh Wrote:  Twitter deleted my ThotAudit thread after it received 3 million views. Very small price to pay.

"Online sex workers are finding out that all income generated from their [gender-neutral sex characteristics] is taxable."

Post: #153

(11-26-2018 06:20 PM)Chiosboy90 Wrote:  

She loves being hated as much as adored because in the end it still makes her the center of attention.

Post: #154

(11-27-2018 09:33 AM)JimBobsCooters Wrote:  Not sure which of those categories they've got you on unless they're calling Thottery a "sexual orientation" or a "disability". Also fail to see how that comment is a threat, promotion of violence or harassment anyway.

I'm pretty sure that at this point the Twitter mods have an "assign random reason" button when they shut something down.

We passed the "words are violence" goalposts quite some time ago. Attempting to glean some kind of translation between the text and how they've interpreted it is no longer a meaningful exercise.

(11-27-2018 10:02 AM)questor70 Wrote:  

(11-26-2018 06:20 PM)Chiosboy90 Wrote:  

She loves being hated as much as adored because in the end it still makes her the center of attention.

Consider this insanity from her point of view.

Imagine you had accounts on every form of social media and all day long you were getting messages from women telling you how hot and funny and incredibly talented you were.

Imagine you only had to slap on a muscle shirt and sit on Twitch eating cereal, and women would send you money hand over fist for existing.

It's a wonder she doesn't consider herself royalty.

Post: #155

(11-26-2018 02:25 PM)Soy Jooce Wrote:  Roosh is getting free publicity in a (fake) Newsweek article

Newsweek used to be about national and international politics. Now it's about toblerone tunnels courtesy of women who muse on whether the US could elect a socialist president. Muh unbiased journalistic integrity, huh?

Cultural rot intensifies.

Post: #156

Post: #157

Post: #158

Post: #159

(11-27-2018 10:02 AM)questor70 Wrote:  

(11-26-2018 06:20 PM)Chiosboy90 Wrote:  

She loves being hated as much as adored because in the end it still makes her the center of attention.

Yeah. She is obviously trolling. She knows a video like this will drive people crazy.

Just ignore it.

Post: #160

^^^^ I was tempted to ask whether or not she actually had a mirror at home. But that obviously is the case. Poor girl, she's already approaching the wall and the impact won't be a pretty sight to behold.

Post: #161

That video of her sounds obviously sarcastic, no one is that tone deaf and delusional and able to amass a decent number of followers

Post: #162

Post: #163

Yeah, she is already about to blow up (signs are there) and with that pig nose she'll be looking like a hog soon.

Post: #164

OK, I'm triggered.

For those of you who don't know, Philip DeFranco is a pretty big, Old School YouTube personality. He runs a daily (fairly sensationalist) news show, with each video garnering around one million views (although these appear to have dropped off lately ).

Yesterday's video (currently on 881k views) featured the Audit, and he name-drops Roosh (holla - he uses a great pic).

The story starts out fairly factual, but then Phil attempts to correct Roosh's original statement about the 30% whistleblower kickback by saying "Yes, but mostly no." Then simply reads off the link Roosh has previously provided, but goes out of his way to point out that they need "solid information". Bitch, why do you think these guys have been collecting messages from these thots with all their details in? This isn't people trawling Twitter and just reporting people off their profiles; there's a serious amount of effort going on across various sites to trap thots in the act.

He then points out that the "chance of getting 30% [requires] $2 million or their annual gross income must be more than $200,000". Now, I'm not saying all these thots are on that much money, but I've seen some seriously big Patreon numbers out there before they gave the ability to turn that off. I'm sure that there will be some cases that easily meet that threshold.

Immediately afterwards, he then sticks the caveat on that cases that don't meet that threshold could be still eligible for up to 15%. So what he's saying... is that you can still get a reward for blowing the whistle, but framed it in a way to be directly contrary to Roosh's original statement (which wasn't even about the 30% - just the reward).

To give him credit, DeFranco then makes clear that any income is taxable and that payments through Snapchat aren't gifts, and that the IRS can likely track payments made through online services. He goes from this high of saying "You probably shouldn't fuck around with the IRS" to quoting Boogie (fat YouTuber) with a stupid non-commital statement (ending "Let them and their clients fap in peace folks"), purely so he can put him in the thumbnail.

What a terrible, chaotic way to summarise an ongoing story.

The worst part, is the comments:



""Satire.""

But there's some funny ones too:

Post: #165

(11-27-2018 10:23 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Consider this insanity from her point of view.

Imagine you had accounts on every form of social media and all day long you were getting messages from women telling you how hot and funny and incredibly talented you were.

Imagine you only had to slap on a muscle shirt and sit on Twitch eating cereal, and women would send you money hand over fist for existing.

It's a wonder she doesn't consider herself royalty.

As I read your post, I did think "I'd probably be mean and tell my friends 'look at these ugly girls sending me money haha"... but in truth I would genuinely feel quite guilty, exploitative, and cruel.

That's the difference I think between modern men and modern women: modern men feel genuinely empathetic about taking advantage of the vulnerable, women don't. Unless it's migrants they can use as pets to virtue signal. They'd order the deaths of 100 Somalians (privately behind a computer screen) if it meant they got a three month mini-relationship with a Chad that they could show off on Instagram.

Post: #166

The BBC have probably been sat on this for a while - but chosen to publish it now given all the publicity around these girls. No mention of the Audit though.

The TL;DR is that this girl makes £4k on Snapchat a month (I wonder if she pays taxes heh) but spends most of the article whining about her career. Lots of schadenfreude for the discerning man here:

Quote:She has not had a boyfriend for months and says many men judge her.

"They don't really want to date me after [I tell them my job]. Or they do, but for the wrong reasons," she says.

(Good lads!)

Quote:Jodie allows her subscribers who pay her £200 a month to save the material she sends them to their phones.

It means she loses control of the content, and does not know how it will be used.

Hoe, here in the real world we call that "risk management". It means if you think the commercial benefits don't outweigh the risk of being exposed or your stuff being reposted, then you don't take that risk.

Quote:"When [sexualised comments are] the only attention you're getting as a woman, it can make you feel quite worthless," she says.

"All I get is like, 'show me your boobs' or 'I want to see you in underwear now', or 'you're dirty, you're filthy'.

"I sometimes cry. It's very upsetting, because I don't actually get any nice attention."

TBH there's probably an opportunity here to sell an app where you can only give girls "nice attention".

The Lesson: Guys, if you think your side hustle will fail, or there's not enough customers for you to make a living off your hobby just remember, a 26 year-old alien is making £4k a month fingering herself. The economy is great.

Post: #167

^ I'm not sure you know what 'Alien' is a euphemism for mate. But, good post nevertheless! Absolutely absurd the amount of these girls that are out there. I wonder if any of my FB female friends are secret cam/twitch/snapchat girls? I'm probably a bit too old, I imagine if I was in my early 20s there might be one or two.

Post: #168

Cheers pal.

RE: Alien - I took one look at that nose and that monthly income and knew it to be true.

Post: #169

^ No worries mate, guessing you're British, good to have you on board.

All this reminds me of when Laura Loomer (an alien for what it's worth) pretended not to know who Martin Sellner was in a catty playground insult to Brittany Pettibone on that livestream with Roosh. Roosh laughed when she said "some guy", feigning not to know him (and badly disgusing her jealousy at one of the only tradthots [does she qualifiy?] people have got any respect for) and so did Aurini and most of the listeners. Bitch, you move in right wing internet circles, of course you know who he is.

Go to about 2 hours 11 mins, it's funny.





Someone mentioned political tradthots earlier, Pettibone is getting married to Sellner next year, so I reckon she gets off the hook. I mean, she has to put up with being called 'Nazi Barbie' for the rest of her days!

Post: #170

(11-27-2018 11:40 AM)Soy Jooce Wrote:  

I don't know what was a greater force: the absolutely giddy anticipation of this being a (plausibly, considering it IS Donald Trump) real tweet, or my rational side coming back with a vengeance and smacking down those hopes with logic (and the fact that, as it turned out to my great disappointment, was indeed fake.)

Post: #171

Post: #172

Post: #173

Quote:“"They are specifically targeting us because we’re women, because we’re using our sexuality to profit, and because we’re not giving it to them for free."”
— California sex worker on #ThotAudit

Still waiting with bated breath for all the female sex workers to talk about the unfair wealth transfer that are taxes from men to women in the endless social programs that benefit women only. Any day now...

Post: #174

(11-27-2018 02:00 PM)Scott Wrote:  

Quote:Jodie allows her subscribers who pay her £200 a month to save the material she sends them to their phones.

It means she loses control of the content, and does not know how it will be used.

OH, THE HUMANITY!

Post: #175

(11-27-2018 06:09 PM)Emancipator Wrote:  why would someone make this picture