Post: #301

"than any human" female.. you mean.

Can she make me a rueben sandwich? Complete with o'rdeorves?

The real test.

Post: #302

(11-18-2018 02:05 PM)Max RNR Wrote:  "than any human" female.. you mean.

Can she make me a rueben sandwich? Complete with o'rdeorves?

The real test.

Now if I ran that test on the women I've dated, the results would be...

Post: #303

(11-18-2018 01:31 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  While this isn't a ban on sexbots per se, it doesn't bode well since feminists have been trying to get sexbots banned through various editorials.

Right, but they are female robots, and it should be no surprise that women will side with a female robot over a male man any day. The sisterhood extends to robots, holograms, characters in movies, TV shows, or women in song lyrics.

The more abstract, the better. If you can convince a man that a character in a comic book is more important than he is, you have earned your stripes as a modern woman.

A good example of this comes from a doc a while back called "No Sex Please We’re Japanese " and there is a scene, at about the 15:47 mark, where a couple of Japanese guys tell a female BBC reporter about a Nintendo game called Love Plus they play that gives them the illusion of having a relationship with a teen age girl on the screen.





And the nutty BBC harridan tries to insinuate that they are creepy pedos because they are older and *lying* to the girl in the game. (At 17:29)

This is the magic of female empathy. Even a few lines of code can be one of the girls if it means a flesh and blood woman has an opportunity to shame a flesh and blood man.

Post: #304

(11-18-2018 01:31 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  In Harris County, Texas (which includes Houston), the county just voted unanimously to ban a proposed sexbot brothel.

One claim being made is that such a business would be a "haven for human trafficking," which is clearly bullshit since no actual human women would be involved. They're also talking about "protecting" their community. From what? Inhumanoids? Aspie nerds?

While this isn't a ban on sexbots per se, it doesn't bode well since feminists have been trying to get sexbots banned through various editorials. Feminists say sexbots are a "tool of patriarchy" (cache link here), while the chivalrous Christian contingent continues its witch hunt against imaginary "traffickers." Not a good combo.

https://www.christianpost.com/news/sexbo...ounty.html

The good thing about christian women is, they are honest.

They make up bullshit reasons for the press, but if you talk to them in person, they are honest. They want men CONTROLLED. Men's sexuality is their control mechanism, in fact, it is women's only control mechanism for men, and has been for human history. Once they lose that control mechanism,, it is game over.

Are they scared? Shit yes.

Feminist morons have spent the last 40 years taunting and abusing men en masse, creating a generation of men who are utterly hostile to women. Now sexbots are going to remove the only protection women have agains't men's hatred. What can I say. I am trying to prepare my daughters.

Post: #305

(11-18-2018 01:31 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  In Harris County, Texas (which includes Houston), the county just voted unanimously to ban a proposed sexbot brothel.

One claim being made is that such a business would be a "haven for human trafficking," which is clearly bullshit since no actual human women would be involved. They're also talking about "protecting" their community. From what? Inhumanoids? Aspie nerds?

While this isn't a ban on sexbots per se, it doesn't bode well since feminists have been trying to get sexbots banned through various editorials. Feminists say sexbots are a "tool of patriarchy" (cache link here), while the chivalrous Christian contingent continues its witch hunt against imaginary "traffickers." Not a good combo.

https://www.christianpost.com/news/sexbo...ounty.html

I hate to get all NIMBY but if they were putting that in my neighborhood I would start a petition on whatever grounds I needed to get signatures/support.

Post: #306

(11-18-2018 12:58 PM)Max RNR Wrote:  

(11-18-2018 12:49 PM)questor70 Wrote:  We're not going to revert back to might-make-right warlordism anytime soon.

You obviously lead a sheltered life?
( No hate, bro! )

Sure, as do most all here, unless we have some posters from Venezuela, Yemen, or Syria. I know some here are probably looking forward to some mutant zombie biker scenario of cultural collapse where they can rise up to become the "big man" in what used to be the local cul-de-sac suburb but the odds of that happening in a reasonable timeframe in the West are low.

Most of what the manosphere are concerned about at the macro level is associated with the mid to upper levels of maslow's hierarchy of needs, which is a luxury.

Post: #307

You've no doubt heard of the term "uncanny valley" in terms of CGI & robotics failing to have that quintessential human element.
Well, Instapundit came up with a brilliant play on words - Uncanny Vulvas :

Quote:#METOO AS A DRIVER FOR THE SEXBOT INDUSTRY: UNCANNY VULVAS.

The current political climate around courtship and interactions between the sexes is more powerful than the market forces that are replacing jobs, because escalating costs aren’t transparent and neither is the punishment for not paying them. If a business owner wants to adhere to employment laws, he reads them, the costs of courtship are codified nowhere.

The average single man paying attention to contemporary social fashions will struggle to understand the new rules of meeting, courting, or having sex with women. Something as banal as trying to converse with a woman wearing headphones is now often considered harassment. A man’s chances of mating success increase when he approaches many women, but so too do his chances of a gaining reputation as sexist, exploitative, or immoral. To take a fraught example, how does a man know that a woman is genuinely consenting to sex? A lack of ability to pick up on cues can incur catastrophic costs.

Men high in conscientiousness, who are sensitive to social disapproval but who nonetheless have difficulty reading subtle social cues, could make good husbands for women. These men are unlikely to want to take the risk of approaching women. As substitutes like sex robots and virtual companions become better and cheaper, they will monopolize the attention of such men.

As I’ve said before, today’s “sex robots” are basically just dolls, but they’re improving every year. Evolution gave real women a headstart, but they’re not improving, and in some ways are actually becoming less attractive to men than in the past. The consequences of this change are likely to be significant.

Plus: “Underpinning feminist anxiety is the specter of female replaceability. Having long been concerned with governing male desire, the feminist project now faces the possibility of being routed around. Men can build alternatives to a sexual market that has been made less navigable because of ideology. Substitutes are built and bargaining power dissipates. Sex robots are to gender politics as scabs are to labor relations.”

https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/313412/#respond


Uncanny vulvas. Golf clap good sir!

Post: #308

I fail to see much difference between sex bot, fleshlight® (BTW willing to give a good price to any RVF'er who wants a lightly used standard model, assuming I can find the thing in my storage locker, PM if interested), jerking off with bare hands. The main thing that has always held guys back from replacing women with masturbation is shame and desire for validation.

Regarding shame, look around you, it's being obliterated. 50 years ago, a thing like Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner wouldn't have even been reported. Only a small group of medical professionals, mainly psychiatrists, plus maybe a few high level police, judges and establishment clergy would have been alerted with the details of how an American sports hero had gone batfuck insane and best not talk about it too much lest boys who'd grown up watching Wheaties commercials somehow become morally corrupted themselves. Now you have this freak being paraded about everywhere like it's the most normal thing in the world. And someone who knows more about such things can fill us in with the details of what kids are being taught regarding sex in public schools nowadays. Jerking off to Playboy, like I did in junior high, is real tame stuff by comparison.

If shame is the negative force holding masturbation down, desire for validation is the positive force holding real partner sex up, and that too is being chipped away at. We have a society where a majority of people not only make no attempt to make themselves beautiful by staying slim and in shape, but on the contrary actively try to uglify themselves with tattoos, piercings, etc. Validation from winning the competition only means something when there is competion. Not when everyone around you has given up on competing.

Once you eliminate both shame and validation, masturbation compares very well with real sex. No it's not a perfect substitute, no more than a microwave dinner is a perfect substitute for real food, but it's good enough.

Corruption of morals that is the real force that will destroy women's sexual value. Ordinary wanking to porn without even the fleshlight®, much less sex bots, just bare hands. So far, my impressing is more young women have dropped partner sex in favor of masturbation than young men, which is why the sexual marketplace is so bad for young men. But I predict the young men will soon catch up. Already something like that in Japan.

Post: #309

There is no way the matriarchy will allow you to have a sexbot, and make them meaningless and powerless overnight.

They will make them illegal somehow (already started by saying they promte rape/pedofilia etc) and the legislation will happen for them.

Post: #310

(11-19-2018 10:51 PM)Shemp Wrote:  I fail to see much difference between sex bot, fleshlight® (BTW willing to give a good price to any RVF'er who wants a lightly used standard model, assuming I can find the thing in my storage locker, PM if interested), jerking off with bare hands. The main thing that has always held guys back from replacing women with masturbation is shame and desire for validation.

Man.

Post: #311

(11-20-2018 04:48 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

(11-19-2018 10:51 PM)Shemp Wrote:  I fail to see much difference between sex bot, fleshlight® (BTW willing to give a good price to any RVF'er who wants a lightly used standard model, assuming I can find the thing in my storage locker, PM if interested), jerking off with bare hands. The main thing that has always held guys back from replacing women with masturbation is shame and desire for validation.

Man.

Post: #312

Not sure where you guys are meeting chicks that will deep throat your dick, rim your ass, eat your poo and piss on you. Most women I've met in my life were so reluctant to do more than basic intercourse. In that case a robot or even a high end rubber doll wins if the competition is dead fish roleplay.

Still I got no idea how I am suppose to lug around a robot or a doll yet. I'm not even if doll brothels are safe considering some STIs can be exposed to oxygen and still live for hours.

Post: #313

Robot bitches be Hooooooooosss!

Post: #314

#AllSexRobotLivesMatter...

Post: #315

Relevant

Post: #316

(11-19-2018 10:51 PM)Shemp Wrote:  I fail to see much difference between sex bot, fleshlight® (BTW willing to give a good price to any RVF'er who wants a lightly used standard model, assuming I can find the thing in my storage locker, PM if interested), jerking off with bare hands. The main thing that has always held guys back from replacing women with masturbation is shame and desire for validation.

Regarding shame, look around you, it's being obliterated. 50 years ago, a thing like Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner wouldn't have even been reported. Only a small group of medical professionals, mainly psychiatrists, plus maybe a few high level police, judges and establishment clergy would have been alerted with the details of how an American sports hero had gone batfuck insane and best not talk about it too much lest boys who'd grown up watching Wheaties commercials somehow become morally corrupted themselves. Now you have this freak being paraded about everywhere like it's the most normal thing in the world. And someone who knows more about such things can fill us in with the details of what kids are being taught regarding sex in public schools nowadays. Jerking off to Playboy, like I did in junior high, is real tame stuff by comparison.

If shame is the negative force holding masturbation down, desire for validation is the positive force holding real partner sex up, and that too is being chipped away at. We have a society where a majority of people not only make no attempt to make themselves beautiful by staying slim and in shape, but on the contrary actively try to uglify themselves with tattoos, piercings, etc. Validation from winning the competition only means something when there is competion. Not when everyone around you has given up on competing.

Once you eliminate both shame and validation, masturbation compares very well with real sex. No it's not a perfect substitute, no more than a microwave dinner is a perfect substitute for real food, but it's good enough.

Corruption of morals that is the real force that will destroy women's sexual value. Ordinary wanking to porn without even the fleshlight®, much less sex bots, just bare hands. So far, my impressing is more young women have dropped partner sex in favor of masturbation than young men, which is why the sexual marketplace is so bad for young men. But I predict the young men will soon catch up. Already something like that in Japan.

Did you get any PMs asking about the Fleshlight?

Would using a pre-owned fleshlight make you an eskimo brother with the previous owner?

Post: #317

When I am an old man I will buy one them sex robots. Fully intent to die while being pleasured by one. Hopefully my body be found by a female. That be fun.

Hopefully by that time it be possible to marry a robot. I want it to give a speech during funeral and then walk away with all my money.

My last troll.

Post: #318

(11-20-2018 12:19 AM)RatInTheWoods Wrote:  There is no way the ((( matriarchy ))) will allow you to have a sexbot, and make them meaningless and powerless overnight.

Let me correct that.

Post: #319

(11-22-2018 03:53 PM)HD668B Wrote:  

(11-20-2018 12:19 AM)RatInTheWoods Wrote:  There is no way the ((( matriarchy ))) will allow you to have a sexbot, and make them meaningless and powerless overnight.

Let me correct that.

Money has a will and a way.

It will just be more economic warfare against underclass men in western society. If you got money to travel like most Rooshvers then you're probably not part of this underclass. This is just a problem for the future Daniel Conners who will be married to fat Feminists (think of the TV show Rosanne).

Post: #320

(09-10-2017 06:31 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Game changer.

Australian tech expert issues dire warning about the dangers of killer sex robots

https://www.digitaltrends.com/business/killer-sex-robots/

[...]

(09-11-2017 09:18 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  EDIT: Never mind, the Contrarian got there first.

Me, I can't wait for the piratebay releases on how you can hack Cherry 8000 to flip her switch from spit to swallow.

(09-17-2017 01:50 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Well.
That escalated quickly...

App lets users have second-hand sex dolls ‘warmed up’ and delivered to their door

http://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/inventions/app-lets-users-have-secondhand-sex-dolls-warmed-up-and-delivered-to-their-door/news-story/6c452056c1d0e0ab5bcf0a371d64ca6e

[...]

Fembots are a honey trap. There's a possibility that any potential AI powered fembot will go Skynet:



Watch out for the weaponised bots:



_______________________________________________
"Take care when you make a wish, because it may come true." #190

Post: #321

(11-22-2018 06:32 AM)MPD Wrote:  Relevant

Herbie Hancock wants his gimmick back.

Post: #322

I want a killer sex bot.

Post: #323

The best sexbot story ever is by our good friend Delicious Tacos.

https://delicioustacos.com/2018/03/31/2052/#more-5924

Post: #324

This was predictable.

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/a2...hollywood/

Quote:In order to have sex with Harmony, partners have to rack up "conversational points" with Harmony before she "consents" to sex.

Post: #325

^
Re: 'Harmony'.

Not really sure that is the best way to market such devices.