Post: #101

(10-28-2018 12:11 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  

(10-28-2018 08:54 AM)Jetset Wrote:  While I stand by what I said that a 21-year-old getting duped by a guy who can pass for 30 and has what a 21-year-old would consider to be social proof (he was employed at a popular local bar) is understandable...

Yes but why does a local bouncer have high social proof? Bouncers tend to make minimum wage. Yes, I understand how social proof works (in fact I worked at a bar in uni so I know the deal), but it's not like a bouncer is so high status/high value that we can't expect an educated 21 y/o to be able to see through his bullshit. I knew girls who'd fuck the doormen/bartenders because of their relatively high status/popularity, and these girls tended to be idiots. My uni gf (who I dated for over three years) and my bestie's gf weren't fucking bouncers, they were in stable relationships with decent men.

Simply put because bouncer's are usually tall, strong men.

It goes back to the notion that women like to attach high minded values when they say what they are attracted to, but their actions are often instinctual, just like men. This becomes especially evident as they age, their standards and demands don't change (and often increase), when survival mode kicks in and money (or to use the feminist code word "education") becomes an ever increasing attribute, yet their value decreases.

The difference obviously is that men are honest about it.

Post: #102

(10-28-2018 12:40 PM)realologist Wrote:  

(10-28-2018 12:18 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  https://www.dallasnews.com/news/courts/2...nds-murder

White woman kills her black husband!

Well don't you know it's his fault. He didn't verify enough on her background before marrying her. He should have had multiple agencies conduct background investigations of not just her but her family going back 7 generations. If there is any hint of violence he should have went under witness protection. Can't be too safe.

Do you seriously think this woman displayed zero red flags before suddenly murdering her husband during an argument one day? Her defense is that she, a white woman, was being physically abused by her black husband. I am interested to hear which part of this story supports your argument.

Also, as more evidence has come about regarding the 21 yr old girl, it is indisputable that she was reckless, arrogant, and flat out stupid. If she managed her personal life with even a little bit of responsibility, this would never have happened.

Guess what? Sometimes people who are victims of violent crime are partly responsible for what happened to them. Either directly, because they provoked it, or indirectly, because they exposed themselves to large and unnecessary risks. If this dose of reality makes you extra sad or upset, I am sure there are some nice reddits where you would be more comfortable.

Best to just take the L here, I think.

Edit: Turns out the white lady who killed her black husband had violently attacked him before:
"One child also reported one time when Morgan Sims "jumped" on Daray Sims when he was on the phone "and scratched him with a spoon," the affidavit states."

dallasnews.com/news/courts/2018/05/11/attorney-affluenza-effect-swayed-judge-lower-bond-mckinney-woman-accused-husbands-murder

Post: #103

(10-28-2018 12:57 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  

(10-28-2018 12:36 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  

(10-28-2018 12:18 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  https://www.dallasnews.com/news/courts/2...nds-murder

White woman kills her black husband!

Excellent point. Thank you for this, now let's all start posting links to stories of interracial sexual violence, I'm sure that will lead us to conclude white-on-black violence is just as prevalent as the black-on-white kind

Your the one always posting this garbage.

Get a life.

a) It's "you're".
b) What garbage am I always posting? On Roosh's livestream just now, he said it's true that the Jews have weaponized blacks against whites. Why don't you talk shit about him? Oh right, because you stand to gain something by not doing so.

Get some principles.

Post: #104

Post: #105

(10-26-2018 08:19 PM)jeffreyjerpp Wrote:  

(10-26-2018 06:02 PM)kaotic Wrote:  She did everything right after she found out who he really was.

This is a shorthand way of saying she did everything right, except the single most important thing of all.

I love game. I love the fact that I can go out and bang chicks the same night as meeting them. As a man, that is a great recreational pleasure, and I am happy I live in a time where I can sleep with many dozens of girls in my life, as opposed to one.

But....

Jumping into bed with someone before you know them is very risky and historically unprecedented, especially for a 21 yr old woman in the USA.

We just think it's normal because society has become degenerate, and can partly insulate us from the risks we would otherwise be exposed to. Condoms, birth control, plan B, etc, have lulled us into thinking sex is "no big deal".

It actually is a big deal, especially for women, since despite modern advancements, sleeping with any man still exposes them to a ton of risk. For example, they could start sleeping with a guy, ONLY TO FIND OUT HE'S A VIOLENT PSYCHOPATH AFTER A COUPLE WEEKS. They could get pregnant, raped, etc.

If you actually care about young woman, you would want them to be aware of the risks, and behave accordingly, knowing that they will suffer the consequences (ridicule, physical harm, nude pics on the internet, etc) if they make poor choices.

Post: #106

OP has a history of race baiting and this is just another example

Post: #107

Of course, I want women to be safe and not get raped or killed.

But I say keep their judgment levels right where they're at. Maybe lower them a little since I'm getting older.

If women exercised better judgment, I wouldn't have had 99% of the sex I've had in my lifetime.

Also, I notice we got a story of a white woman killing a black guy. All of the bitches that have tried to kill me have all been white. There are not a lot of Polynesians in the world. Thus, white on Polynesian crime rates are incredibly high. Still, I will not be running background checks on the white women. I'll just fuck them very hard.

Actually, not that hard, since again, I'm getting older.

Aloha!

Post: #108

(10-28-2018 02:27 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  

(10-28-2018 12:57 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  

(10-28-2018 12:36 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  

(10-28-2018 12:18 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  https://www.dallasnews.com/news/courts/2...nds-murder

White woman kills her black husband!

Excellent point. Thank you for this, now let's all start posting links to stories of interracial sexual violence, I'm sure that will lead us to conclude white-on-black violence is just as prevalent as the black-on-white kind

Your the one always posting this garbage.

Get a life.

a) It's "you're".
b) What garbage am I always posting? On Roosh's livestream just now, he said it's true that the Jews have weaponized blacks against whites. Why don't you talk shit about him? Oh right, because you stand to gain something by not doing so.

Get some principles.

You're a troll, is that better.
Always starting these garbage race threads, others have called you out as well.

Why would I talk shit about him, when I have met him on several occasions and partied with him in Croatia!

He started this great forum and I have met some great people because of it.

Get a life troll!!!!!!

Post: #109

(10-28-2018 03:27 PM)Kona Wrote:  Of course, I want women to be safe and not get raped or killed.

But I say keep their judgment levels right where they're at. Maybe lower them a little since I'm getting older.

If women exercised better judgment, I wouldn't have had 99% of the sex I've had in my lifetime.

Also, I notice we got a story of a white woman killing a black guy. All of the bitches that have tried to kill me have all been white. There are not a lot of Polynesians in the world. Thus, white on Polynesian crime rates are incredibly high. Still, I will not be running background checks on the white women. I'll just fuck them very hard.

Actually, not that hard, since again, I'm getting older.

Aloha!

Maybe you should take it easy with the snow shoveling and concentrate on getting to your 6000th post.

If you are worried about dying at the hands of a white person, I for one vow to stop killing you with kindness.

P.S. You only want us to be ourselves so you will have something to laugh about with your island crew.

Post: #110

(10-28-2018 12:11 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  

(10-28-2018 08:54 AM)Jetset Wrote:  While I stand by what I said that a 21-year-old getting duped by a guy who can pass for 30 and has what a 21-year-old would consider to be social proof (he was employed at a popular local bar) is understandable...

Yes but why does a local bouncer have high social proof? Bouncers tend to make minimum wage. Yes, I understand how social proof works (in fact I worked at a bar in uni so I know the deal), but it's not like a bouncer is so high status/high value that we can't expect an educated 21 y/o to be able to see through his bullshit. I knew girls who'd fuck the doormen/bartenders because of their relatively high status/popularity, and these girls tended to be idiots. My uni gf (who I dated for over three years) and my bestie's gf weren't fucking bouncers, they were in stable relationships with decent men.

Because your typical Dude who goes to the sort of places that need bouncers allows the monkey to put his hands all over him, and then he wears a faggy bracelet around upon said monkey's orders.

These Millenial men love being patted down by dudes.

Post: #111

“If she is susceptible to game and attracted to big strong guys she’s just a stupid whore”- This line of thinking is taken directly from the losers of PUAhate.

Frankly it is very strange to see someone with such beliefs and misunderstandings about women and attraction get this far on the forum.

Post: #112

(10-28-2018 04:13 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  You're a troll, is that better.
Always starting these garbage race threads, others have called you out as well.

Why would I talk shit about him, when I have met him on several occasions and partied with him in Croatia!

He started this great forum and I have met some great people because of it.

Get a life troll!!!!!!

This thread wasn't started as a race thread. It's obvious you and others are overly sensitive when you see a white girl getting murdered by her black boyfriend, so much so that you feel the need to link a completely unrelated story about a white woman murdering her black husband (which by the way doesn't add or subtract to any points that have been made here).

In his livestreams Roosh has said more contentious things about interracial dating than I have said in this thread--I guess he gets a pass because he helps you get what you want, which seems to be sexual access to white women. Like I said: zero principles.

Post: #113

(10-28-2018 05:29 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  

(10-28-2018 04:13 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  You're a troll, is that better.
Always starting these garbage race threads, others have called you out as well.

Why would I talk shit about him, when I have met him on several occasions and partied with him in Croatia!

He started this great forum and I have met some great people because of it.

Get a life troll!!!!!!

This thread wasn't started as a race thread. It's obvious you and others are overly sensitive when you see a white girl getting murdered by her black boyfriend, so much so that you feel the need to link a completely unrelated story about a white woman murdering her black husband (which by the way doesn't add or subtract to any points that have been made here).

In his livestreams Roosh has said more contentious things about interracial dating than I have said in this thread--I guess he gets a pass because he helps you get what you want, which seems to be sexual access to white women. Like I said: zero principles.

Beyond pathetic!!!!

Post: #114

(10-28-2018 11:57 AM)Oak Wrote:  She found out he was a convicted rapist and pedophile, still banged him that night, let him borrow her car and then refused all offers of help.

My guess is that nobody ever taught her why "no" is a survival skill or, for that matter, why anything is a survival skill. She's from a very safe community with an accomplished family.

I'd also wager he sold her a good story about how his sex offender status wasn't what it looked like. This dude was apparently convincing enough that he even became friends with others in the dorm.

So, from clueless sheltered white girl perspective, what's the worst that can happen? Murders are totally things that only happen to bad people in the ghetto, right?

(10-28-2018 12:11 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  Yes but why does a local bouncer have high social proof?

Thought process is something like this: "My friends all know this bar. My friends are nice and fun, so this place must be, too. Bad people wouldn't work here. They work at places for bad people."

Her hometown is roughly the same size as my current city. Mine has 138 registered sex offenders in it. Hers has 7. She's probably never met one, was only barely aware that they exist outside of movies, and it definitely never occurred to her that one might look like an otherwise normal human and be employed at a place she likes to hang out, because that would be, like, so gross.

Post: #115

(10-28-2018 03:27 PM)Kona Wrote:  Of course, I want women to be safe and not get raped or killed.

But I say keep their judgment levels right where they're at. Maybe lower them a little since I'm getting older.

If women exercised better judgment, I wouldn't have had 99% of the sex I've had in my lifetime.

I agree. The stupidity of the average woman has contributed massively to my notch count. But as Roosh has pointed, game isn't necessary in a healthy society.

I actually partly envy psychopaths in west. R-selected western women love them for who they are. They've never had to study game or put on an act.

It's not surprising that so many players become deeply conservative traditionalists once they've gained so much experience with women. Women's liberation makes no sense once you realise how irrational they are, and how easily you can hijack their decision making-process using game.

Liberating women is not good in the long-term despite helping players.

No rational man would be happy for their daughters to live the life of the average american girl.

Post: #116

I don't have anything to say in this thread except this: game save lives. The guy simply lied and manipulated the girl, then stalked and killed her. That's a fucked up mindset. He should've just walked away.

Post: #117

(10-28-2018 06:15 PM)Oak Wrote:  

(10-28-2018 03:27 PM)Kona Wrote:  Of course, I want women to be safe and not get raped or killed.

But I say keep their judgment levels right where they're at. Maybe lower them a little since I'm getting older.

If women exercised better judgment, I wouldn't have had 99% of the sex I've had in my lifetime.

I agree. The stupidity of the average woman has contributed massively to my notch count. But as Roosh has pointed, game isn't necessary in a healthy society.

I actually partly envy psychopaths in west. R-selected western women love them for who they are. They've never had to study game or put on an act.

It's not surprising that so many players become deeply conservative traditionalists once they've gained so much experience with women. Women's liberation makes no sense once you realise how irrational they are, and how easily you can hijack their decision making-process using game.

Liberating women is not good in the long-term despite helping players.

No rational man would be happy for their daughters to live the life of the average american girl.

The only thing you are not correct on in this thread is the "helping players". Not to bring everybody down, but all of this stuff is a net loss for everyone. If you can't see that by now, I don't know what you really think about the term or idea of "decline."

Post: #118

(10-28-2018 05:32 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  

(10-28-2018 05:29 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  

(10-28-2018 04:13 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  You're a troll, is that better.
Always starting these garbage race threads, others have called you out as well.

Why would I talk shit about him, when I have met him on several occasions and partied with him in Croatia!

He started this great forum and I have met some great people because of it.

Get a life troll!!!!!!

This thread wasn't started as a race thread. It's obvious you and others are overly sensitive when you see a white girl getting murdered by her black boyfriend, so much so that you feel the need to link a completely unrelated story about a white woman murdering her black husband (which by the way doesn't add or subtract to any points that have been made here).

In his livestreams Roosh has said more contentious things about interracial dating than I have said in this thread--I guess he gets a pass because he helps you get what you want, which seems to be sexual access to white women. Like I said: zero principles.

Beyond pathetic!!!!

Zero Principles... while the Philippine thread is 257 pages long

   

Post: #119

(10-27-2018 04:23 PM)Eugenics Wrote:  All this race-baiting and white knighting.

Who was white-knighting?

I and others who responded early on had no indication then of some of the subsequent revelations. The information we had access to was not enough to rebuke her. Plain and simple.

Women can't be put in the virgin angel or Jezebel whore categories alone, especially when preliminary details are sketchy.

What we know now changes things (her reaction after his sex offender status was revealed was abysmal) but there's a pestilence going around these parts whereby anyone who doesn't immediately morally bodyslam a woman for being a reprehensible, truly evil slut is given the label "white knight".

Reactions to this story from a gender perspective have been measured and in accordance with the evidence we've been presented with.

Post: #120

(10-29-2018 08:06 AM)david.garrett84 Wrote:  

(10-27-2018 04:23 PM)Eugenics Wrote:  All this race-baiting and white knighting.

Who was white-knighting?

I and others who responded early on had no indication then of some of the subsequent revelations. The information we had access to was not enough to rebuke her. Plain and simple.

Everyone who said something along the lines of "Poor girl got taken by a man with superior game, she had no way of knowing and bears no responsibility for what happened to her, RIP" and acting as if no further analysis is warranted. And when I point out that in a case like this the woman does bear some responsibility, I get labeled a game denialist (even though my thoughts on game and society are almost exactly the same as Roosh's).

Also, my OP included info such as: he was blackmailing her with compromising photos of the pair, meaning she allowed pornographic images to be made. I can't blame anyone for not picking up on that part, since I initially missed it myself. No point in reiterating an argument that I and others have already made clear.

Post: #121

(10-29-2018 09:41 AM)Thot Leader Wrote:  Everyone who said something along the lines of "Poor girl got taken by a man with superior game, she had no way of knowing and bears no responsibility for what happened to her, RIP" and acting as if no further analysis is warranted. And when I point out that in a case like this the woman does bear some responsibility, I get labeled a game denialist (even though my thoughts on game and society are almost exactly the same as Roosh's).

Also, my OP included info such as: he was blackmailing her with compromising photos of the pair, meaning she allowed pornographic images to be made. I can't blame anyone for not picking up on that part, since I initially missed it myself. No point in reiterating an argument that I and others have already made clear.

I love the way you twist things to make yourself sound in the right. Also you have compared your views to Roosh's like 3 or 4 times on the last few pages... I assume an attempt to make your views seem more creditable ?
Sad

Post: #122

(10-29-2018 09:41 AM)Thot Leader Wrote:  Everyone who said something along the lines of "Poor girl got taken by a man with superior game, she had no way of knowing and bears no responsibility for what happened to her, RIP" and acting as if no further analysis is warranted. And when I point out that in a case like this the woman does bear some responsibility, I get labeled a game denialist (even though my thoughts on game and society are almost exactly the same as Roosh's).

Also, my OP included info such as: he was blackmailing her with compromising photos of the pair, meaning she allowed pornographic images to be made. I can't blame anyone for not picking up on that part, since I initially missed it myself. No point in reiterating an argument that I and others have already made clear.

No, she bears no responsibility for being gunned down by some psychopath. If she had stayed with him after finding out he was a psychopath, then you may have a argument.

So what if she had some pictures taken of her while banging the guy? That is quite the leap to what you're trying to say, that she is responsible for the guy shooting her.

Some of you guys need to change the way you think. It is poisonous and your life will be much harder for you in the long term if you continue with that line of thinking.

Post: #123

Wouldn't the fact she allowed footage/pictures of sexual encounters with this guy add more weight to the theory that he was versed in dark triad/psychopath game and that this is a case of a naive sheltered middle to upper middle class girl who got taken advantage of? I realize we there's a need to not put the pussy on a pedestal and think all women are these innocent angels that are incapable of doing wrong, but we're not talking about some alpha widow or Dubai porta potty here.

Post: #124

Threads like these always make it easy to spot out who loves women and who fucks vs. who hates women and who doesn't.

Post: #125

(10-29-2018 07:56 PM)realologist Wrote:  Threads like these always make it easy to spot out who loves women and who fucks vs. who hates women and who doesn't.

This is a really compelling point, logic and evidence are nothing compared to your ability to tell "who fucks".

Dare I say this is even better than snarky gifs and the hilarious use of the word "creditable" (although those were good, too).

It's an interesting trend in this argument. One side seems to rely on facts and reason, the other is leaning on baseless ad hominems. Why is that?