Post: #276

(03-01-2018 06:14 AM)Piankhi Wrote:  Given his fathers behaviour and that of King Edward this is hardly surprising. Not to mention what effects in breeding can have on the mind.

Pretty sure that Charles is not his father - but rather the bloke his mother had a long affair with:



That alone would be reason enough to execute Diana - being pregnant with that other bloke would have tipped the scale.

In Harry's case they don't particularly mind, since he won't continue the Royal mantle anyway. Also bastards are no novelty among the aristocracy - very tough to prove especially when women were concerned.

Post: #277

I doubt it. There are pictures that show Prince Harry looking more similar to Prince Philip (Prince Charles' father) when he was younger. The similarities in hair color and complexion don't mean much because Diana's family has those traits as well as Prince Philip. It's easy to make two people look more alike when they are making the same facial expression and the other people are making different facial expressions.

I think these are conspiracy theories that have been dis-proven. Too many people came out saying that Diana never met James Hewitt until Harry was a few years old, Harry looks like the men on his father's side of the family, and I think DNA tests were done.

In either case it must suck to have a bunch of media drama about whether or not you are a bastard child.

I just think it sucks that Harry seems to be repeating a cycle family dysfunction. He is at the peak of wealth, status and fame but he appears to be going through some of the same issues that many normal men like us go through. For example, most of his male relatives are betas and he doesn't have red-pilled men to advise him. If one of my friends was caught up in the emotions of a new relationship and about to marry a hypergamous, domineering, "red flag" woman such as Markle then I would have a long conversation with them about the risks.

It's obvious that he is seeking out his mother in this relationship. You would think people like this would have a team of investigators, psychologists, and other experts to help them with these situations. We are just a bunch of random dudes on the Internet who know more about women than the average guy and the problems are so easy for us to see.

The thread title says it best - "red flag woman"

Post: #278

< Fine - so he is Charles' son. Still a Blue Pill cuck for marrying a woman older than him and so well-ridden at Hollywood couches.

Post: #279

(02-27-2018 10:36 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

Of all the things SJWs complain about, how come they haven't attacked this kind of legit - patronizing, racist, insufferable virtue signaling - photo op.

It's incredibly racist to do the whole "Mother Theresa with the happy, poor wildlings of Africa" bit.

Post: #280

To be clear Markle is no Grace Kelly. Harry should of married into aristocracy (or upper class) or at least someone that was a better actress, actually feminine, with class, no political agenda (because being a spouse of a royal is supposed to be apolitical), etc.

Post: #281

I'm pretty sure Lenny Kravitz wrote a song about this...

Red flag woman, stay away from me
Red flag woman, mama let me be
Don't come hanging around my castle
All your social justice warrioring is a hassle
I got more important things to do
Than spend my time with an old woman like you
Now woman, stay away
Red flag woman, listen what I say

Post: #282

(03-01-2018 07:35 PM)birthday cat Wrote:  I'm pretty sure Lenny Kravitz wrote a song about this...

Red flag woman, stay away from me
Red flag woman, mama let me be
Don't come hanging around my castle
All your social justice warrioring is a hassle
I got more important things to do
Than spend my time with an old woman like you
Now woman, stay away
Red flag woman, listen what I say

Lenny Kravitz didn't write this song. Guess who really wrote it!

Post: #283

(03-01-2018 10:16 AM)birthday cat Wrote:  I doubt it. There are pictures that show Prince Harry looking more similar to Prince Philip (Prince Charles' father) when he was younger. The similarities in hair color and complexion don't mean much because Diana's family has those traits as well as Prince Philip. It's easy to make two people look more alike when they are making the same facial expression and the other people are making different facial expressions.

I think these are conspiracy theories that have been dis-proven. Too many people came out saying that Diana never met James Hewitt until Harry was a few years old, Harry looks like the men on his father's side of the family, and I think DNA tests were done.

In either case it must suck to have a bunch of media drama about whether or not you are a bastard child.

I just think it sucks that Harry seems to be repeating a cycle family dysfunction. He is at the peak of wealth, status and fame but he appears to be going through some of the same issues that many normal men like us go through. For example, most of his male relatives are betas and he doesn't have red-pilled men to advise him. If one of my friends was caught up in the emotions of a new relationship and about to marry a hypergamous, domineering, "red flag" woman such as Markle then I would have a long conversation with them about the risks.

It's obvious that he is seeking out his mother in this relationship. You would think people like this would have a team of investigators, psychologists, and other experts to help them with these situations. We are just a bunch of random dudes on the Internet who know more about women than the average guy and the problems are so easy for us to see.

The thread title says it best - "red flag woman"

It is widely known both Diana and Charles cheated on each other non-stop. Charles had a mistress in that that hag Camilla nearly the whole time he was with Diana. He refused to drop his long time love and kept her around while married and is still with her to this day. Royal family wouldn't let Charles marry Camilla who they saw as a 2 cent tramp of a lower set.

Charles and Diana were an arranged marriage and they never actually got along. Prince William was "part of the deal" to churn out a son and by luck she did so first try! Diana never wanted any part of having goofy Charles spawn. Apparently she tried to shove herself down the stairs with William and mysteriously suffered a miscarriage during her second pregnancy. Harry was fine. Likely Harry was was fine because Diana got to shack up with one England's top alpha dogs at the time.

I'm not sure why it's hard to think Diana cucked Charles. After she did her "duty" to give tell family a spawn she turned her back on the family as much as she could without alienating her two boys.

You look at Harry and William as kids they have the mother's fair traits, but, Harry looks nothing like Charles or any men in the family, William has the fathers traits and is balding like the rest of the males on his side.

It's hard to find when Harry ever looks like Charles. You can find moments when William looks like the dad or mother throughout his years. These kids were the most photographed kids in the planet, just scanning pictures from various years of them you can see they are not pure all from the same parents.

I hope dudes don't use these lax associations with their own kids...

Post: #284

^Even if Charles isnt Harrys biological father, being raised by a limp wristed cuckold would help Harry in the romance department.

On the other hand maybe he can turn a ho into a housewife, like Kanye West and Kim. And Charles seems like a good guy who would make a good king.

Post: #285

(03-01-2018 12:51 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(02-27-2018 10:36 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

Of all the things SJWs complain about, how come they haven't attacked this kind of legit - patronizing, racist, insufferable virtue signaling - photo op.

It's incredibly racist to do the whole "Mother Theresa with the happy, poor wildlings of Africa" bit.

"In the future, rich people will travel great distances to look at poor people." - Talking Heads

Post: #286

(03-01-2018 10:24 PM)kosko Wrote:  It is widely known both Diana and Charles cheated on each other non-stop. Charles had a mistress in that that hag Camilla nearly the whole time he was with Diana. He refused to drop his long time love and kept her around while married and is still with her to this day. Royal family wouldn't let Charles marry Camilla who they saw as a 2 cent tramp of a lower set.

Charles and Diana were an arranged marriage and they never actually got along. Prince William was "part of the deal" to churn out a son and by luck she did so first try! Diana never wanted any part of having goofy Charles spawn. Apparently she tried to shove herself down the stairs with William and mysteriously suffered a miscarriage during her second pregnancy. Harry was fine. Likely Harry was was fine because Diana got to shack up with one England's top alpha dogs at the time.

I'm not sure why it's hard to think Diana cucked Charles. After she did her "duty" to give tell family a spawn she turned her back on the family as much as she could without alienating her two boys.

You look at Harry and William as kids they have the mother's fair traits, but, Harry looks nothing like Charles or any men in the family, William has the fathers traits and is balding like the rest of the males on his side.

It's hard to find when Harry ever looks like Charles. You can find moments when William looks like the dad or mother throughout his years. These kids were the most photographed kids in the planet, just scanning pictures from various years of them you can see they are not pure all from the same parents.

I hope dudes don't use these lax associations with their own kids...

I think this is a very interesting thing to consider.

The nobles have always used arranged marriages as a way to keep power, however arranged marriages come at a cost, which kosko points out:

Cheating and bastards.

This is not likely the only case, I bet you'd see a lot of strange looking children.

Maybe this is an accepted but unspoken feature of the royal breeding system?

They have these bastards as a way to acquire the alpha, rogue genes that arranged marriages can't provide? After all, it is always the second child who is a bastard, never the first. The bastard will never have inheritance, but will be able to spread his genes my marrying into other noble families due to his name.

You see a different strategy with jews today. They marry into successful gentile families to acquire the alpha genome. Rothschild marrying a Hilton, Kushner marrying a Trump and so on. They literally marry into families which were their enemies in the past.

Smart move if you ask me, but the problem can be, can they long term retain enough of their own identity? On the other hand, arranged marriages can create strong cultural cohesion over centuries.

Post: #287

(03-01-2018 10:24 PM)kosko Wrote:  

(03-01-2018 10:16 AM)birthday cat Wrote:  snip

snip

I never said Diana didn't cheat on Charles. I said the opposite in this comment.

I couldn't agree more that men should be skeptical about women, get paternity tests, include mandatory paternity testing in prenup agreements, etc.

There is still no evidence to support the gossip about James Hewitt being Prince Harry's father. Two guys having the same hair color and looking similar in pictures when they have the same facial expressions is not evidence.

Harry looks much more like the older pictures of his paternal grandfather.

Most of this gossip is because they have the same hair and skin color. This doesn't mean anything because Diana's family had these traits and Harry's paternal grandfather had similar traits. I've got blond hair but both my parents and two sisters have dark brown hair....but I still have very similar facial features to my father and his other family members and several people in his family have blond hair. This is extremely common.

Do some google searches on these guys.

You will find articles like this.

And articles about DNA testing like this.

And pictures like these that show Harry looks just like his paternal grandfather:

Post: #288

It's interesting that Phillip was/is a real man's man. He was handsome and alpha when he was young, and he enjoyed all kinds of manly activities. However, none of his sons were as manly as him. Elizabeth must have brought bad genes. Harry seems like the most masculine of the family, so Diana must have brought good genes, and then if Harry really is Charles's son, Phillip's genes must have skipped a generation and showed up in Harry.

Post: #289

So William isnt manly?

Post: #290

(03-03-2018 01:07 AM)Piankhi Wrote:  So William isnt manly?

William isn't manly.

Post: #291

(03-03-2018 01:23 AM)Bienvenuto Wrote:  

(03-03-2018 01:07 AM)Piankhi Wrote:  So William isnt manly?

William isn't manly.

Horsey, yes.

What's the point of being the royal heir and then marrying a 6?

I've seen pasty near-midgets from the midlands score better babes.

Post: #292

Honestly I am not following the gossip stuff too much, but when I saw mainstream media outlets talking about this parentage issue, then it should be clear that this is not real.

What they usually do is that they are almost totally quiet and there is absolute silence on it from all major outlets. So in effect - they simply would not address it.

Harry looks close enough to his grandfather and brother of his mom. Some just look more like their mom or other parts of the family.

Still - chances that his kids if she can have any - won't look very much like him.

Post: #293

(03-03-2018 01:07 AM)Piankhi Wrote:  So William isnt manly?

Charles and his brothers are all odd ducks, that don't seem to take after their father at all. William is pretty normal, but he's a dutiful beta. Harry actually seems like a ballsy, high T dude. He is handsome, fit, and cocky in a way none of the other men in his family are. Phillip looks like he was that way as a young man, so if Harry really is Charles's son, I think he inherited Phillip's traits.

Post: #294

Prince Harry rejects drafting a pre-nup citing his determination to make the marriage with the divorcée work.

Meanwhile, Princess Royal invites “Christian Grey” into the royal box at Cheltenham.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...rtune.html

Post: #295

(03-17-2018 02:19 AM)N°6 Wrote:  Prince Harry rejects drafting a pre-nup citing his determination to make the marriage with the divorcée work.

Meanwhile, Princess Royal invites “Christian Grey” into the royal box at Cheltenham.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...rtune.html

He must know he's almost certain to be divorced. This is just a screw you to the royal system to blow some of the money.

Post: #296

Different tastes for different men. A 6 to you could be a 9 to another. A friend of mine used to bang white 8s/9s but ultimately fell in love with a black female that’s a 5 to me but probably a 9 in his book.

Post: #297

(03-17-2018 10:07 AM)RoastBeefCurtains4Me Wrote:  

(03-17-2018 02:19 AM)N°6 Wrote:  Prince Harry rejects drafting a pre-nup citing his determination to make the marriage with the divorcée work.

Meanwhile, Princess Royal invites “Christian Grey” into the royal box at Cheltenham.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...rtune.html

He must know he's almost certain to be divorced. This is just a screw you to the royal system to blow some of the money.

Most of the wealth of the Royals is in trust funds who are put in trust funds - some of the biggest lumps are set in funds that no country on Earth has access to. In fact it is even unknown what the Royals actually own since some of the legal entities are not displaying the actual holdings.

Princess Diana had no prenup and had to fight in court to get a bigger lump sum and some relatively modest 500.000 pounds per year - and that was after giving birth to 2 sons - one being the heir of the throne.

I personally don't think that she will have a divorce. She cannot have that lottery win again. The only thing that might itch her would be to fuck some other bloke and then Harry will rather divorce her.

Harry's net assets also will never be touched upon. The family might pay her off with a sum - one that will depend on whether she will have some children.

The Royals are better protected financially than billionaires with a prenup.

Post: #298

(03-17-2018 10:26 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(03-17-2018 10:07 AM)RoastBeefCurtains4Me Wrote:  

(03-17-2018 02:19 AM)N°6 Wrote:  Prince Harry rejects drafting a pre-nup citing his determination to make the marriage with the divorcée work.

Meanwhile, Princess Royal invites “Christian Grey” into the royal box at Cheltenham.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...rtune.html

He must know he's almost certain to be divorced. This is just a screw you to the royal system to blow some of the money.

Most of the wealth of the Royals is in trust funds who are put in trust funds - some of the biggest lumps are set in funds that no country on Earth has access to. In fact it is even unknown what the Royals actually own since some of the legal entities are not displaying the actual holdings.

Princess Diana had no prenup and had to fight in court to get a bigger lump sum and some relatively modest 500.000 pounds per year - and that was after giving birth to 2 sons - one being the heir of the throne.

I personally don't think that she will have a divorce. She cannot have that lottery win again. The only thing that might itch her would be to fuck some other bloke and then Harry will rather divorce her.

Harry's net assets also will never be touched upon. The family might pay her off with a sum - one that will depend on whether she will have some children.

The Royals are better protected financially than billionaires with a prenup.

Yes, such as Canada. The Royal family is the larger land owner here and owns lands through a trust vehicle known as the "Crown" the Provinces and Federal government act as stewards to the trust and have the ability to use it for rental useage when allowed to, but they don't own it. Crown land makes up about 70% of the land mass with the rest private and Federal or Provincial lands.

Post: #299

(03-17-2018 10:26 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(03-17-2018 10:07 AM)RoastBeefCurtains4Me Wrote:  

(03-17-2018 02:19 AM)N°6 Wrote:  Prince Harry rejects drafting a pre-nup citing his determination to make the marriage with the divorcée work.

Meanwhile, Princess Royal invites “Christian Grey” into the royal box at Cheltenham.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...rtune.html

He must know he's almost certain to be divorced. This is just a screw you to the royal system to blow some of the money.

Most of the wealth of the Royals is in trust funds who are put in trust funds - some of the biggest lumps are set in funds that no country on Earth has access to. In fact it is even unknown what the Royals actually own since some of the legal entities are not displaying the actual holdings.

Princess Diana had no prenup and had to fight in court to get a bigger lump sum and some relatively modest 500.000 pounds per year - and that was after giving birth to 2 sons - one being the heir of the throne.

I personally don't think that she will have a divorce. She cannot have that lottery win again. The only thing that might itch her would be to fuck some other bloke and then Harry will rather divorce her.

Harry's net assets also will never be touched upon. The family might pay her off with a sum - one that will depend on whether she will have some children.

The Royals are better protected financially than billionaires with a prenup.

Don Jr's wife is in nearly the same situation, and she's leaving.

Post: #300

(03-17-2018 10:39 AM)RoastBeefCurtains4Me Wrote:  Don Jr's wife is in nearly the same situation, and she's leaving.

Seriously?



Don Jr. met his wife while she was 26 still in her prime. The next 14 years she spent at Don Jr's side giving him 5 children and being his wife. Now aged 40 she may be interested in getting frisky with other men or Don Jr spent too much time fucking other women.

THAT SITUATION IS NOT SIMILAR. The other broad is already 36, divorced, about to hit the wall hard, zero children. Venessa has given Don Jr. very close to her hottest years after starring in her biggest role next to Jack Nicholson.

She had 15 years in the limelight and her position as a mother to Don Jr's children cannot be taken away ever. Whether it makes her happy to go the path of Ivanka Trump and fuck around with younger hotter men is really irrelevant. Of course she won't struck it out as big as Don Jr, but she does not have to.

Harry's broad has divorced a much lesser man who she married for money and status mostly. Now she struck bigger gold with the difference, that there is no upside to it.

Also I might add - Vennessa Trump will get much more cash than Harry's wife will be ever given.

So no - the situation in terms of life-cycle, child-bearing and safety is all different. A 26yo marrying in her prime is not a 36yo marrying at the wall. In addition I might add - Harry is not a total simp. He is a good-looking self-confident bloke. If Meghan Merkle dumps him, then he can easily have an assortment of 22yo models after her. She will have 50yo men after her who feel inclined to take a dump on her.

Also - if she divorces Harry, then she will get 1 mio. $ per year and a few million $ in a lump sum - that is if she even bears one child. Maybe she can go back to Hollywood and return to the casting couches.