Post: #51

4’6

Post: #52

I thought I liked short girls, but recently banged a 5 footer (I'm 6'3) and looked back at her legs in the air and they looked like little chicken wing drums, lol. I miss having long legs stretched out sky high.
I think it's just the fetish factor that drew me to short women.

Post: #53

Probably 5' or 4'11.

I don't think small girls are that attractive, but they're more fun in bed than taller or curvier chicks - easier to throw them around.

Post: #54

I love small chicks, the are cute. I think my smallest was around 5. But any girl who is as tall or taller then me, I feel no chemistry with. It is just too strange.

Post: #55

On the flip side, I don't think I've banged a girl taller than me yet.

Maybe some have been about my height 5'8"-5'9", but none 5'10" or higher.

I like shorter girls, my last mini-relationship was an Asian girl, 5" with D tits. Easy to control and do whatever you want to their bodies.

JohnKreese told me one of his past lays was a solid 5 or 6 inches taller than him. Have to respect that, but gotta imagine banging girls much taller than you has to involve some extra considerations in the bedroom.

Post: #56

3' 10 1/2

Post: #57

j/k

Post: #58

I would bang a midget for the lulz.

Post: #59

(02-11-2018 10:15 PM)louiebeans Wrote:  I would bang a midget for the lulz.

The lulz are a sufficient reason to bang anyone.

Post: #60

5 foot

Post: #61

They're easy to handle and they really get off the size difference (however short they are they're height princesses), but on the other hand sometimes it feels like you're fucking a child.