Post: #1

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/articl...d=11978029

Jacinda Ardern, the 37 year old socialist prime minister of New Zealand, has announced after less than three months in office that she is pregnant. Of course she refers to the father as her "partner" who she has also announced will be a stay at home dad and primary care giver. And of course they haven't found any good reason to get married at this stage.

The happy couple:


Jacinda will be taking a total of six weeks off work when she gives birth. During this time the role of prime minister will be assumed by deputy PM Winston Peters from the New Zealand first party, with whom her Labour Party formed a coalition to form a majority. Given the timing, she fell pregnant during these negotiations, and would have certainly known she was pregnant when she took the role as PM. Perhaps this information would have been important for someone taking one the role of national leader.

There was significant controversy during the elections when questions were asked about a possible pregnancy if she became prime minister. She refused to answer, and the media shut down anyone who raised any similar questions.

And now the media and celebrities are gushing. Here's one example from a leading media personality:

Post: #2

Is anyone taking bets that he is not the real father?

Post: #3

I see no way this could go wrong.

Post: #4

A woman in her late 30s will have her biological clock ticking very loudly so not surprising to see something like this. I'm with a woman atm (36) who broke the "I want a baby now" thing on me the other night. I was taken aback but can totally understand things from her perspective. She was married before but for about a year.

In the case of Ms Ardern, it is more than likely she did a bit of

Post: #5

(01-19-2018 09:28 AM)Horus Wrote:  

After seeing that tweet and looking at the image, the first association that came to my mind was "abortion".
Weird how the human mind works.

It's just that illustrating your pregnancy announcement with an image of spiked hooks seems a bit unfortunate.
But maybe that's just me.

Post: #6

(01-19-2018 09:28 AM)Horus Wrote:  ...

...

At first I just assumed those were the tools the doctor was going to use to pull out the aborted foetus.

Post: #7

So what should happen, is that she would resign a month or so before the due date to concentrate on being a mum. But as I understand it she is going to go girl power on this and only take 6 weeks off. Letting all the NZ voters know that I'll still be PM and everything will be fine.

So what she is really is saying to the NZ voters. Don't worry about the baby I'm just going to be a shit mum for you.

Post: #8

So..in the white ethnostate how will stuff like this be dealt with?

Australia and New Zealand is more or less the U.S. without the history of slavery and it still went off the deep end.

Aboriginals don't count.

White anglo women (and jews) absolutely own the culture in more ways than can be counted.

Post: #9

(01-19-2018 10:45 AM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  ...
Aboriginals don't count.

I know. We tried to teach them for ages but it never sticks.

But seriously, folks. We majority-white nations down here are getting our own dose of POZ, and although we're perhaps between 5 and 15 years behind the USA/UK our so called leaders are doing their level best to catch us up.

My particular state is extra white and we're still politically retarded. Fuck all violent crime to speak of, though.

We really need some sort of global catastrophe or at least a severe depression to unfuck ourselves.

Post: #10

(01-19-2018 10:53 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(01-19-2018 10:45 AM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  ...
Aboriginals don't count.

My particular state is extra white and we're still politically retarded. Fuck all violent crime to speak of, though.

This sounds like the State of Vermont (have property in VT and lived there for a while). Vermont is basically Sweden with fewer Muslims / rapefugees (for now... the power that be want to import them).

Post: #11

I'm going to beat this horse until it's dead, if it's not already, and then I'm going to keep beating it anyway.

Ethnocentrism reduces the amount of problems your society will have but it is not a cure-all.

The universal franchise is the inevitable death of all nations under its sway. Why? This:



Grant the franchise only to those who make a personal sacrifice of their time and efforts (military service, for example). The franchise must be small enough that the dregs are not given access to it, and large enough that the rich cannot simply buy it.

Otherwise your nation will only ever be ruled by the very smart manipulating the very dumb.

Post: #12

So how do white men plan on bringing white women back under control or is that totally off the books in the white ethnostate?

I'm not being snarky I genuinely want to know how this process will go down to rehabilitate a totally ruined female counterpart of the civilization.

Look, I understand why white men run to asia and the idea of hapa futurism and all the anime and /pol cosplay shit makes me laugh.

Still..the question remains how will white women be un-fucked from the current state?

Post: #13

Just wait and see how pissed off Muhammad is when he finds out she had his baby and didn't name his son after him.

Post: #14

(01-19-2018 11:16 AM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  So how do white men plan on bringing white women back under control or is that totally off the books in the white ethnostate?


Still..the question remains how will white women be un-fucked from the current state?

There is a line from the book 'Lucifer's Hammer' about how feminism ended the moment the comet in the book impacted on earth.

Looking through history, full blown societal rot ended with collapse. A primary example is the collapse of the Western Roman Empire, which took society and 500 years worth of technology with it.

Literacy in the former empire didn't reach 2nd century levels again until the 20th century.

Post: #15

(01-19-2018 11:16 AM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  So how do white men plan on bringing white women back under control or is that totally off the books in the white ethnostate?

I'm not being snarky I genuinely want to know how this process will go down to rehabilitate a totally ruined female counterpart of the civilization.

Look, I understand why white men run to asia and the idea of hapa futurism and all the anime and /pol cosplay shit makes me laugh.

Still..the question remains how will white women be un-fucked from the current state?

Women are only ever one war away from being returned to slave status regardless of the victor or one generation away from being replaced by daughters who don't want to end up like their whore mothers. To some degree we are seeing this already.

You have to live routinely with women to understand how instantly malleable they are when the shit hits the fan. The switch flips from "strong and independent" to "I'll do whatever you tell me" in about point five of a second.

If we get a collapse then hopefully we learn from some of our mistakes and don't give women the vote for as long as our cultural memory lasts.

If we don't get the collapse then things are invariably going to get much worse anyway. At some point it doesn't matter if a strong, independent woman is making her own cash and living her own life. If she can't walk home without getting mugged or raped then tribal reality is going to set in pretty fast. Feminism doesn't get far in Africa, and the more like Africa we become the more feminism is going to retreat.

Already the sane men and women are voting with their feet and moving to places where tradition and natural gender roles are respected. As the gap between the insane places and the sane places widens there will inevitably come a rift where one side demands the other fall in line and the other refuses. At that point you will have two countries instead of one. A traditionalist country and soon-to-collapse progressive shithole.

All politics are circular. We can assume that whether we end up with a white ethnostate or a civic nationalist diversistate that we will inevitably make the same mistakes again, but hopefully not for another two to three hundred years.

Post: #16

This chick was showing the warning signs when chosen for PM a few months ago... I remember thinking something was up:

Quote: During the campaign, she endured controversies over questioning by local reporters about whether she planned to have children and about what outfit she would wear for the leaders’ debate, but her adept and unruffled handling of such questions only seemed to win her further admirers.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10/...kingmaker/

Post: #17

Heh.
Oh good, now they get to put her 'it doesn't matter if I get pregnant' diatribe to the test.

Hell if nothing else.
Does two large islands of only ~4million people really require that much in the way of government...?

Post: #18

I can't see how this is a bad thing.

The problem with the West is many leaders are childless, and thus don't have a stake in the ongoing future.

That, and a role-model like here would get all the pet mums to fulfil their biological duty to continue humanity.

Post: #19

Politics & 'girl power' nonsense aside.
Whether it's the day to hassles of pregnancy, giving birth or the interrupted nights after birth.

Interesting she'd be dismissive of the difficulty of a whole process that she's never experienced before.
A rather involved experience at that.

Or will this kid simply be palmed off to staff & nannies it's whole infancy & young life...?

Post: #20

Merkel: childless
Macron: childless
Corbyn: childless
May: childless
Juncker: childless

Post: #21

(01-19-2018 11:16 AM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  So how do white men plan on bringing white women back under control or is that totally off the books in the white ethnostate?

I'm not being snarky I genuinely want to know how this process will go down to rehabilitate a totally ruined female counterpart of the civilization.

Look, I understand why white men run to asia and the idea of hapa futurism and all the anime and /pol cosplay shit makes me laugh.

Still..the question remains how will white women be un-fucked from the current state?

Actually El Chinito - this deserves its own thread and I'm serious. Over here in Spain I get to see a pretty good sample size of women from all across Europe throughout the year. And all I see are broken, self-absorbed, self-entitled, arrogant, tattet up the wazoo, brain washed, iPhone addicted, right swiping, 'liberated', multi-cultural, right swiping, feminist skanks. There are a few exception out there but Lauren Southern's recent video in London pretty much wraps it up for white men in the 21st century:





Yes, we are fucked.

I don't have any good answers. The gangrene has gone too deep at this point. Europe pretty much has been invaded by a sleeping army and the U.S. is on the same course with the Donald being our last hurrah. The odds are not in our favor unless we are willing to profound cultural changes. Good news is that the pendulum seems to be swinging back however I fear that it's way too late at this point. I don't think this situation can be resolved peacefully, at least over here in Europe. We all know where things are heading over the next decade or so.

By the way: I just looked down from my balcony and I'm seeing one older white woman and a blond fat one, both making out with a tall North African migrant (obvious from their clothing and their demeanor). That's where we are at, gentlemen.

The only way to stop this trend is to shame these bitches into oblivion. Fat chance doing that however giving how much support they're getting within their cultural echo chamber.

Post: #22

(01-19-2018 03:56 PM)Dragan Wrote:  Merkel: childless
Macron: childless
Corbyn: childless
May: childless
Juncker: childless

Exactly.

Duterte: 4 children
Trump: 5 children.
Putin: 2 children.
Marine Le Pen: 3 children.
Margaret Thatcher: 2 children. (Not a fan, but at least she wasn't a suicidal nihlist.)

Post: #23

(01-19-2018 04:11 PM)Transsimian Wrote:  

(01-19-2018 03:56 PM)Dragan Wrote:  Merkel: childless
Macron: childless
Corbyn: childless
May: childless
Juncker: childless

Exactly.

Duterte: 4 children
Trump: 5 children.
Putin: 2 children.
Marine Le Pen: 3 children.
Margaret Thatcher: 2 children. (Not a fan, but at least she wasn't a suicidal nihlist.)

This reminds me of a comment that got Hans-Hermann Hoppe in quite a bit of trouble, probably because it's risky to say things that acknowledge different preferences between different people:

"My Battle with Thought Police" by Hans-Hermann Hoppe

Quote:As one brief example, I referred to homosexuals as a group which, because they typically do not have children, tend to have a higher degree of time preference and are more present-oriented. I also noted--as have many other scholars--that J.M Keynes, whose economic theories were the subject of some upcoming lectures, had been a homosexual and that this might be useful to know when considering his short-run economic policy recommendation and his famous dictum "in the long run we are all dead." https://mises.org/library/my-battle-thought-police[/b]

Post: #24

Fucking typical woman. Get safe in a job and gets pregnant. A national leader suffering from morning sickness and other pains!

Post: #25

(01-19-2018 09:43 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  Fucking typical woman. Get safe in a job and gets pregnant. A national leader suffering from morning sickness and other pains!

That's just it.
Quick to dismiss something she's never experienced.
Plus at age 37, what's to say it will be an easy & uncomplicated pregnancy?