Post: #126

(11-28-2017 04:22 PM)Matt3B Wrote:  Anyone deciphered his weird hand symbolism that he keeps making an effort to get into all of his public photos? "Body language experts" are saying he's subconsciously covering his vital organs because he's nervous.

Surely it's some sort of cult symobolism.

This thread will answer that question:

/thread-53191.html

Post: #127

I say there are centuries of royal tradition and customs being followed behind this marriage. People say I'm wrong.

Others say it's Islamization and illuminati and the deep state behind this marriage. That must be it!

I love you all.

Aloha!

Post: #128

(11-28-2017 09:07 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  ...
Again to recap, once you get to the two year mark on an LTR, let em go unless you want to marry them.

I'm stealing this for the LTR/Marriage thread.

Post: #129

Islamic Caliphate of Britain does not sound so bad now. It will teach the LGBTQXYZ and radical feminist locust swarm just how bad they have it with Toxic Masculinity, Patriarchy and a societal culture borne out of oppressive christianity.

Post: #130

Seriously, what is it with the depressing news coming out of England these days?

Where is the pride of national identity whose empire RULED the world 100 years ago, but now seems to be whimpering and cowering into a corner as foreigners take over, and post-wall American divorcees become royalty's choice of bride?

Post: #131

As soon as I saw this, the first thing that sprung to mind is it relates to him losing his mother at a young age.

I hope on a human level it works out well for him but god damn, chances are it won't.

Choose wisely or suffer the consequences.

Post: #132

(11-28-2017 07:49 PM)Slam Wrote:  Where is the pride of national identity whose empire RULED the world 100 years ago, but now seems to be whimpering and cowering into a corner as foreigners take over, and post-wall American divorcees become royalty's choice of bride?

Post: #133

Meghan has been triumphantly explaining that Harry got down on one knee.

It just gets worse.

Post: #134

When lil' old Rush from bum fuck Aust... Eh, PNG has [Occasionally] fucked younger hotter women than the woman an actual fucking Prince is marrying... Something is really fucked up with the sexual market place.

Post: #135

(11-27-2017 08:36 AM)Scoundrel Wrote:  I guess being a prince doesn't get you as much as it used to.

He must've used Tinder to find her and she was like "Umm, a prince. Yeah, might give him a shot, he might be good enough".

Post: #136

Now all aging spinster going to expect a prince to marry, literally. Thanks Harry.

Post: #137

(11-29-2017 02:46 AM)GreenHills Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 08:36 AM)Scoundrel Wrote:  I guess being a prince doesn't get you as much as it used to.

He must've used Tinder to find her.

The reaction from manosphere blogs from ROK, Tomassi, Chateau Heartiste, Dalrock to the various MGTOW personalities will be very interesting.

Some will say that Prince Harry's personality is flawed (likely from the trauma of losing his mother) while others will point to the total collapse of value that untrained heterosexual men have in the SMP. Although I think the UK and Toronto influences on Harry's buying power is a factor, he should have been immune to these market forces.

I side with flawed personality because a prince doesn't need a lot of game. His lifestyle should reflect the results of inner confidence that comes from years of perfected Lifestyle Game at the very least.

The decline of monarchies via-a-vis celebrities only goes so far because Prince Rainier of Monaco of a lower house than Harry's married Grace Kelly who looked like this when she was 43:

Post: #138

(11-28-2017 12:57 AM)911 Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 10:29 PM)Going strong Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 10:18 PM)TooFineAPoint Wrote:  In my very brief experience with high class British women in London, they are the apex beauties of the world, as much as the common Englishwoman is the absolute dregs.

There is a caste system of English beauty.

Well, I dare say we have women like that in France, in the middle-class, by the hundreds of thousands. Truth be told, the woman above is just a 6,5 with subtly-applied make up and a fancy dress, and you give her a 8-ranking because she's thin and, as an American, it seems to you something remarkably rare...

It's more than that, how a woman holds herself, puts herself together makes a very big difference. Elements of charm, grace, elegance and femininity do matter a lot, a woman should get a significant uptick for having those qualities, and a significant downgrade for lacking them.

Russian and EE women look more feminine, project an image of class, but they often lack real substance of class, because the aristocratic elements in their culture have been thoroughly genocided and obliterated over the last century. The Bolcheviks first rounded up and culled all the aristocrats, then they went for the bourgeoisie. Anyone who was well-dressed or spoke well was at risk of getting deported.

Part of the reason why EE countries are so corrupt is that they were built on this faulty foundation.

Britain is pretty corrupt if you know where to look- and it all traces back to the feudalist gang. Check out "Prince" Andrew aka the paedo's friend. Don't forget its not a new state having to evolve and handle the outside induced destruction of things like shock capitalism. "Monarchy" has been proven time and time again to be anything but a healthy foundation for a modern state.

If you look at the "class" thing in detail, it starts to crumble down very quickly. Its basically a marketing stunt by them, and an effort to close ranks against outsiders. But like whores, they sell out to the highest bidder. Get close to it, and you'll see how ugly, tacky, lame and dsyfunctional it really is. I've seen this from my own family who socialised with "royals" or had "titles" in the past. Give me an East European ANY DAY of the week over a bunch who's cousins are spouses. If you want an example of the fakeness of class, I suggest Googling "Prince" Andrew. He's exactly the reason why most of the world has got shot of their "monarchies", as is the rest of his family (even though they manage their pr better).

There is an element of hot bitches marrying up. Working class girls marry into middle class. Lower middle into upper middle etc. But those are the ones that stand out. The genuine English "upper class" (and European) tend to have a particular look. ANd its by no means hot. The young women tend to have bony, hard looking faces. With slightly pointed chins, a little masculine looking. The hot girl genetics they try and absorb is cancelled out pretty rapidly in the generations, in general terms.

(11-27-2017 03:47 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  "Royalty" in 2017...

What a joke.

Well said mate. If more people (hangers on excluded) had experience of feudalists, they wouldn't be so keen to defend or even "admire" them.

Post: #139

(11-27-2017 05:14 PM)Cuchulainn2016 Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 02:04 PM)BelyyTigr Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:59 PM)Baphomet Wrote:  

(11-27-2017 01:38 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  Please dont tell me that people here are dumb enough to believe that any royal "love story" is anything more than tabloid bullshit and PR. These marriages are by and large arranged for basically genetic engineering.

I don't know why anyone would care about "Royals" at all. "Royals" are "Royal" because of the vagina they pop out of, not because of anything they've accomplished.

Well said. He's a benefit scrounger on a MONUMENTAL scale.
This garbage was the FULL 30 mins in the evening news.
I'm truly sickened and embarrassed to be a British citizen tonight.
Most of all, I'm embarrassed most of all by the amount of gimps kissing the arses of this feudalist parasite and his muppet of a girlfriend.

PS I notice she's trying the "discrimination" card already, because she's half black.

Well, he flew CAS for me in that sandy middle eastern place where westerners go to die, and played a significant role in me being able to extricate myself and my subordinates from a deadly scrape. And despite rumours to the contrary he was at significant risk himself.

So, I wouldn't describe him as a benefit scrounger, as unlike the prolie scum who are benefit scroungers, he didn't choose it for himself.

Well firstly, do you KNOW for a fact that Harry Hewitt was taking risks? After all, his family have a huge history of pr stunts and propaganda. Secondly, even if he did take a risk, its only what vast numbers of soldiers do. Soldiers who are often turfed out and find themselves without a job, or home or anything Except these soldiers aren't given billions of pounds each from non-consenting taxpayers.

Hewitt was never forced to take the taxpayers billions. He's free to renounce his so called "title". Free to refuse the billions or hand them back to people who actually go out and EARN what they get. But he won't because he's onto a nice easy ticket.

As for benefit scrounging, the only real benefit scroungers I've ever seen have been 3rd world immigrants. Sometimes a crook who uses benefit claiming as a "front". Sometimes mentally ill people are classed as "avoiding work". VERY occasionally there's the British slapper with 6 kids - but big deal. If it wasn't for them, Britain would probably be majority Muslim already. Benefits payments are tiny, whereas Hewitt is conning the public out of BILLIONS of their money.
Attacking working class white Brits and the benefits system is like saying capitalism should be banned because some businessmen dodge taxes. The fact is, its a bullshit claim invented by Harry Hewitt's kind. Just like Hitler used to say, "when you tell lies tell big ones, because no one will believe you had the audacicity to make them up".

If Brits want a "monarchy", then fine, we can vote for one. But we won't have a referendum, because everyone knows they'll be booted out on the ears. A German Greek family masquerading as a "British tradition". You couldn't make it up! Greece and Germany booted their own leeches out long ago. And that sums it up.

Post: #140

(11-28-2017 08:36 PM)Ryoto Wrote:  As soon as I saw this, the first thing that sprung to mind is it relates to him losing his mother at a young age.

Id attribute it more to a lack of a strong male father figure in his life. I mean how much manliness could a kid learn from this guy?



Looks like the cover of Poofter magazine

Post: #141

One of the problems with royalty is they believe in royalty and hierarchical order more than anyone. Who likely had more influence over William and Harry? That’s right, the queen. Not their father. Even though they have a father, you can bet they were raised to be men by a single woman. I remember when Diana died on a Saturday night and there was some controversy as the queen demanded they attend mass the following morning.

Their father is essentially a cuck. His deepest sexual desire was to be a camilla’s Tampon. I won’t say he’s had sexual relations with a man, although Europeans are far more open to such things. But I will bet he’s been sexually dominated by a woman which is just as bad.

When William got married they made a point to mention that his wife had an ex boyfriend in the audience, and he was cool with that. “She’s friends with her ex” they said. That’s some cuck shit right there. The fact that dudes at your wedding have fucked your soon to be bride kind ruins the whole white wedding thing IMO. I have no doubt that this was planned by some trusted royal advisor who wanted to present an image of the young prince as hip, cool, and just like everyday people.

I’m sure the same advisor convinced the queen to order Harry to wife up this aging, divorced, carousel rider of indeterminate background so yet again, the royal family could appear hip and relevant. It’s kind of like what they said in the usual suspects. The greatest feat the devil pulled off was convincing the world he didn’t exist. In this case, the royal family wants you to think they’re just like you, but in reality, ain’t nothing further from the truth.

Post: #142

(11-28-2017 02:43 AM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  There are mixed reports about whether Engelson himself has also found love. While the Daily Mail reported that the Hollywood producer is dating 24-year-old Baywatch star Charlotte McKinney, other sources report that he is really, really single.

I'm gonna say he traded up with a much hotter chick who's a decade younger.

Post: #143

(11-29-2017 03:29 AM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  Looks like the cover of Poofter magazine

Not sure if this is true or fake...

Post: #144

I can understand him marrying a mixed chick because he grew up with and is probably tired of all the plain jane white chicks around him but to marry a 36 year old woman when you have practically any choice of woman in the world is insane to me.

Even my "broke ass" has a plate 10 years younger.

To add insult to injury she is already divorced too. Cmon man.

Post: #145

Is this jew? Uhh. I mean. Is this true?

Post: #146

(11-29-2017 06:53 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

Is this jew? Uhh. I mean. Is this true?

Jew can't make this stuff up.

Post: #147

(11-29-2017 03:29 AM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  Id attribute it more to a lack of a strong male father figure in his life. I mean how much manliness could a kid learn from this guy?

Plenty of the officers in the British army in WW2 would have looked and dressed like that when not at war.

Post: #148

(11-29-2017 06:53 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

Is this jew? Uhh. I mean. Is this true?

If in doubt, always bet on jew.

Post: #149

^ Can you get any more Beta than Harry? He secretly wants to bang the blonde (relatively) hot, still young matchmaker, ends up marrying the old plain-Jane divorcee actress...

In any case, great success for Hollywood: they have shifted focus and public attention, away from their fallen old White male pervs, to their (middle-aged but somehow still looking a tiny bit young) acclaimed "Diverse" female strong and successful actresses.

Post: #150

(11-29-2017 06:57 AM)Teedub Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 03:29 AM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  Id attribute it more to a lack of a strong male father figure in his life. I mean how much manliness could a kid learn from this guy?

Plenty of the officers in the British army in WW2 would have looked and dressed like that when not at war.

So thirty years later they gave Charles their clothes?

Aloha!