Post: #14976

More people seem to be waking up. This morning on Zerohedge:

Quote:The Vatican said that Frau Merkel and the Pope discussed the need “for the international community to combat poverty, hunger, terrorism and climate change.” Ms. Merkel, in an obvious swipe at US President Donald Trump, said that “we are a world in which we want to work multilaterally, a world in which we don’t want to build walls but bring down walls.” The reference to “walls,” of course, was to President Trump’s promise to construct a wall on the Mexican-American border. The pope, too, has been critical of Mr. Trump’s proposed plan.



Ms. Merkel also lamented about the Trump Administration’s decision to opt out of the 2015 Paris climate accord. Pope Francis urged President Trump to remain in the accord and gave him a copy of his encyclical, “Praise Be,” when they met earlier this spring. The encyclical elevated “climate change” and protection of the environment as “moral obligations” while it criticized “perverse” economic development models that “enrich the wealthy at the expense of the poor.”

As has been the case since the Second Vatican Anti-Council (1962-65), popes have spent most of their time on secular concerns in which they have little competency and less on matters of the Faith. Pope Francis has taken this to a new level and rarely preaches on doctrine. This, in one sense, is good because when he does speak on religion, he usually spouts out some heresy or falsehood which scandalizes the Church. His many blasphemies and heresies, plus the fact that he was never ordained as a priest in the traditional Catholic rite or traditionally consecrated as a bishop (neither was Benedict XVI), makes him ineligible to be a true Catholic pope.

The latest fraud that these two cretins are now pushing is the supposed threat of global warming. The idea that “climate change” has had some nefarious effect on the environment has long ago been debunked by legitimate scientists and scholars. Climate change is a ruse used by global elites to further tax, regulate and enslave humanity.

Facts and sound theory, however, do not bother the collectivist minds of Pope Francis and Angela Merkel. What they are interested in is power and control and they intend to keep it through lies like global warming and by coercive massive migration which will fundamentally alter Europe’s demographics to their New World Order masters’ advantage.

Had it not been for the likes of Pope Francis and Ms. Merkel, it is unlikely that Europe would be under a deluge of mostly Mohammedan “asylum seekers.” The claim that the invasion was “spontaneous” due to the turmoil in the Middle East from US and Western nation-states military intervention is implausible. The region has been unstable for decades. Why all of a sudden is there a mass exodus and why it is mostly of young single Muslim men?

The invasion of Europe was carefully orchestrated and planned by the world’s power elite whose goal is to eliminate what is left of the Continent’s white Christian heterogeneous male population. Pope Francis and Ms. Merkel are the New World Order’s puppets carrying out their marching orders.

While the outlook for Europeans may currently appear grim, it is not hopeless. While Pope Francis and Angela Merkel cannot at present be deposed for their crimes, they can be defeated in the court of public opinion. For Europe to become once again the center of human civilization, the ideals of multiculturalism and the fraud of global warming must be slain on ideological grounds.

This is the duty that confronts those that seek a return of Europe’s previous glories. While the task appears monumental, it must be remembered that the pagan Roman Empire was eventually converted by the teaching of twelve men and one indomitable former Pharisee from Tarsus.

WOW- this could have been a post right here on the forum or on ROK.

Post: #14977

^^^^ Someone posted this comment over on ZH:

Quote:problem with Europe?

Maybe this:

Macron, fr. President - no children

Merkel, ger. Kanzler - no children

May, brit. PrimeMinister - no children

Gentiloni, it. PrimeMinister - no children

Rutte, PrimeMinister holland - no children

Löfven, PrimeMinister sweden - no children

Bettel, PrimeMinister Luxembourg - no children

Juncker, the drunker - no children

I think that pretty much says it all. The upside of course is that at least those fuckers aren't procreating.

Post: #14978

(06-20-2017 06:07 AM)redpillage Wrote:  ^^^^ Someone posted this comment over on ZH:

Quote:problem with Europe?

Maybe this:

Macron, fr. President - no children

Merkel, ger. Kanzler - no children

May, brit. PrimeMinister - no children

Gentiloni, it. PrimeMinister - no children

Rutte, PrimeMinister holland - no children

Löfven, PrimeMinister sweden - no children

Bettel, PrimeMinister Luxembourg - no children

Juncker, the drunker - no children

I think that pretty much says it all. The upside of course is that at least those fuckers aren't procreating.

It does not matter that they are not procreating. The globalist elite families does - their daughters rarely are childless and neither are they themselves.

Their servants may be chosen from the childless, but that is probably only increasing the likelihood that they will push policies which destroy current system for the local population.

Who will have plenty of children are the migrants - the new ones barely even bother working, it is more profitable for them to get plenty of welfare-created kids and pool resources - even better if they can have multiple wives (officially only baby mamas) who will quadruple their finances.

Their kids won't work either except for some additional side-work or crime. But at least there will be plenty of soldiers for the Caliphate wars which are slowly beginning.

Meanwhile the propaganda must flow:


Why are they not defiant and standing together?

The likelihood of them dying versus the infidels in terror or backlash attacks is ridiculously low.

The shitheads will only have to fear something when the Western leaders will turn on them - and they will, because they know that a Muslim Europe would simply be a nightmare that could not be controlled.

Post: #14979

This is big.

So the EU wants now to force Eastern European countries to take in not stray single refugees, but entire villages - thus creating automatic no-go zones in Eastern European countries.

I guess EE is not enriched enough and urgently needs them in far greater numbers than the UK, France and Germany. So I guess they want them to take in millions of rapefugees to get the same benefits of mass rapes, assaults, terrorist attacks and general lack of safety!

But I expected this. This shit will never end. The globalists will keep on fucking with the Western countries until they are all gone or exist in a solid constant civil war - later hot war with Islam.

That is why I plan to move to Asia/South America one day.

Post: #14980

EE is stupid for even joining the same club as Western Europe. I keep saying they should not trust the governments here but they can't easily get out of it.

Post: #14981

I can't imagine Eastern European countries will ever take in the 'refugees. People from this part of the world are liberal when it comes to living in places like France and the United Kingdom, especially the women. But they have a thin line and become very nationalistic when it comes to things like this. Even the middle class ones who are educated over in the West.

Post: #14982

(06-20-2017 07:57 AM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  EE is stupid for even joining the same club as Western Europe. I keep saying they should not trust the governments here but they can't easily get out of it.

Everyone is conquered by the same central bankers. You cannot be free unless you first issue your money interest free on your own (and you are not a banana republic, but EE hasn't been that for a long time).

I talked with people about the economic situation before the EU vote. There was something funny that happened right before the votes happened in EE. The economic situation was really strong in the end 90s and up to 2001. I talked with folk who said that they actually made good money. Pay was low, but the economy was booming and the ones being in sales or owning businesses in a country like Poland were making more cash than now.

Then suddenly everything seemed to collapse. It was as if someone snuffed out the light out of Poland. There was not even a reason for it. The Dotcom bubble was not relevant to the Polish economy. So what the fuck happened?

The globalists can restrict money supply willy nilly - they can restrict credit tremendously and thus snuff out money supply, they can even order big corporations to stop hiring, lower pay dramatically. And this is actually what happened. The ripple effect was felt across the entire EE.

The people had to be prepared so to accept the EU. And the EU vote did bring the opportunity to leave the country which 2 mio. have done moving mostly to the UK and Ireland. Also it helped by massively raising real estate prices (many people in EE have self-owned real estate and if that appreciates by 1000% within a few years you profit for sure) and now it attracted some in-EU offshoring companies that created jobs. The general productivity of those people was already higher than in Southern Europe by far - the people are hard-working and ambitious.

All the measures however would not have been necessary - in fact it would be better if Poland had stayed independent IF THE ECONOMY AND BANKS BELONGED NOT TO THE GLOBALISTS. But this is not going to happen - when Woergl in Austria did the interest free money demurrage in the 1930s and 500 other towns wanted to follow suit in Germany an Austria, then the globalists threatened to lead the army to the towns and enact martial law.






But of course they don't and voting NO would have resulted in bigger austerity. Also no one even in the West told them that voting for the EU will get you millions of rapefugees who will make your countries into no-go-zones.

80% would have voted to get out ASAP in the 1990s. Most would have voted against the Euro if they knew that prices would increase and weaker countries in the south would be squeezed out.

So all musings as to why they were so stupid are really futile. At least they resist more and less brainwashed than the Western Europeans.

Post: #14983

(06-20-2017 07:57 AM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  EE is stupid for even joining the same club as Western Europe. I keep saying they should not trust the governments here but they can't easily get out of it.

In Croatia, we were bombarded with gentle sounding threats and promises of being in club where all the cool kids are. I noticed subliminal messages implanted in brochures and various MKUltra like code words repeated through the media.
Around half of the population went out to the referendum and majority (but not all of them) voted YES.

I felt then what it meant to be Anti EU. See, in my class, we were divided in groups where some were pro EU and others were anti EU. The goal was for some to create Powerpoint presentation and for some to make a huge poster with their sentiments.
My group arguably made the best poster, as after all I put myself as a whole to tell the people why EU must be a no for Croats.
What happened is that while the professor agreed to some of the bullet points, my group got a lower grade than the ones which were pro EU and all had the worse made posters/presentation.

Post: #14984

Based EastEuro nations have come to the realisation that there is virtually nothing the EU can do to them that is worse than accepting these invaders.

And the EU slavemasters are realising that if they can't force the based EastEuro nations to take the invaders then their narrative of diversity being strength will be utterly revealed for the suicide it is.

But what are their options? They moved heaven and earth to stop Greece from going bankrupt so they obviously have extremely limited fiscal options to put pressure on these nations.

Are they seriously going to start issuing arrest warrants for national leaders?

What on earth can they threaten them with?

And what's laughable is that every extra day they fail to force their quotas on these nations is one more day that the program keeps hurtling toward that inevitable wall of total catastrophe.

You think WE have stress? Imagine what it's like for these globalists right now.

Post: #14985

(06-20-2017 08:35 AM)sterling_archer Wrote:  What happened is that while the professor agreed to some of the bullet points, my group got a lower grade than the ones which were pro EU and all had the worse made posters/presentation.

Just wondering, does he drive a car?

Post: #14986

I don't remember, it was years ago. Probably.

Post: #14987

(06-20-2017 07:57 AM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  EE is stupid for even joining the same club as Western Europe. I keep saying they should not trust the governments here but they can't easily get out of it.

Not really, up to this point EE countries have arguably gained more from participation in EU then lost due to wealthier EU countries paying for business projects and infrastructure projects of the poorer EE countries.

Part of Brexit and Old European dislike for EU is not only dislike for Muslim Migrants, but also dislike for huge tax money redistributed to EE.

With rules to settle migrants in however situation is changing and EE should get out, it is no longer desirable for them to remain. The cucked EE leaders are however only seeing money and do not care much about culture and non-monetary well being of people are willing to remain in EU. The common people of EE are however much against islam, migration, homosexuality and other liberal pet issues. Criticism of these things is not taboo in EE like it is in Western Europe and people are much more red pill then in west. There is a great schism growing between common folk and EU funding loving elites of these countries.

My bet is - as EU starts to stagnate and economy will get worse to support welfare and migrants, EU will lose ability to offer freebies to EE and will be able to offer but punishments for those who do not meet migrant quota. EE countries will become more and more dissatisfied and nationalists will eventually win. I am rather optimistic that my countrymen will not accept Islam like the cucked westerners.

Post: #14988

(06-20-2017 08:35 AM)sterling_archer Wrote:  

(06-20-2017 07:57 AM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  EE is stupid for even joining the same club as Western Europe. I keep saying they should not trust the governments here but they can't easily get out of it.

In Croatia, we were bombarded with gentle sounding threats and promises of being in club where all the cool kids are. I noticed subliminal messages implanted in brochures and various MKUltra like code words repeated through the media.
Around half of the population went out to the referendum and majority (but not all of them) voted YES.

I felt then what it meant to be Anti EU. See, in my class, we were divided in groups where some were pro EU and others were anti EU. The goal was for some to create Powerpoint presentation and for some to make a huge poster with their sentiments.
My group arguably made the best poster, as after all I put myself as a whole to tell the people why EU must be a no for Croats.
What happened is that while the professor agreed to some of the bullet points, my group got a lower grade than the ones which were pro EU and all had the worse made posters/presentation.

You gotta look some things from the Machiavellian prospective.


For the record, I am also not a fan of the EU, but, to be honest, Croatia gained a lot when it became part of the EU.



First, a lot of capital projects are being done at the moment, thanks to EU money. For example, the Pelješac bridge (a VERY vital bridge for us) is financed in full by the EU. Thanks, EU taxpayer, your are welcome.



Second, thanks to the EU, Croatia became a regional leader, which allows us to project our power more effectively under the guise of EU integration(s). That is evident in Bosnia, for example. Before Croatia joined the EU, it was rather indifferent towards the Croats there, and even openly hostile when the Gypsy (Mesić) was in power. That severely constricted our soft power. Now, when we are in the EU, and have more normal leadership (but by no means perfect!), we are no longer afraid to project our power in that country.



And finally, thanks to the EU, we got rid of most UDBA remnants in our government (see the Perković case). Without the EU...we would never get rid of him (and others).



Again, I would take as much money from the EU as possible, and expand our influence under the guise of EU integrations, before EU inevitably collapses.

Post: #14989

(06-20-2017 01:39 PM)Mage Wrote:  

(06-20-2017 07:57 AM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  EE is stupid for even joining the same club as Western Europe. I keep saying they should not trust the governments here but they can't easily get out of it.

Not really, up to this point EE countries have arguably gained more from participation in EU then lost due to wealthier EU countries paying for business projects and infrastructure projects of the poorer EE countries.

The funny part is that even the so-called supreme net-gainers like Poland only ostensibly gained a lot:

https://polskaniepodlegla.pl/opinie/item...europejska

You can google translate this article.

Even not long ago I too thought that there were massive gains for the countries entering the EU, but the truth is as I reported before here:

Quote:The national average salary has increased and is increasing quite rapidly since 2004. It is said that this is also thanks to the European Union. Do you agree with this?
Unfortunately, hard statistics show that when Poland was outside the European Union, wages in our country grow up to two times faster. Well, according to GUS data, in 1995-2004 the average gross salary in Poland after adjusting for inflation (in real terms) increased by as much as 56 per cent., While in the years 2004-2014, when Poland was already a member of the Union grew by only 26 percent . But even worse, if we look at the purchasing power of certain products. In 2004. Net average salary could buy 1,358 m 3 of natural gas and transmission, in 2014. Only 1022 m 3 , which represents a decrease of 25 percent. (Poland, the EU did not help in the fight with Russia on lower prices of raw materials). In the year of accession to the EU the average national wage Pole could buy 558 liters of diesel, and in 2014. - only 499 l of fuel (EU forced the increase in excise duties). In 2004. The average net salary could buy 1,200 loaves of bread, 1,200 liters of milk, 112 kg of cheese and 142 kg of beef, and in 2014 only 680 loaves, 850 liters of milk, 82 kg of cheese or 94 kg of beef. As regards cigarettes, in 2004. Net average salary could buy packages of 340 and last - 209.

Quote:Interestingly, outside the Union also grew faster Polish exports and imports. In the period 1995-2004, the value of foreign trade after adjusting for inflation increased by 130 per cent., While in 2004-2013 - only 69 percent. It is worth noting that all EU grants over 10 years amounted to just less than 3 percent. Polish GDP.

So essentially what happened:

+ most of the so-called transfer payments are connected to partly useless and over done infrastructure projects that are usually created by 50% debt - something similar happened in Spain and Greece during the boom years of the EU transfer payments before - essentially most of those projects are useless to create jobs.
+ prices went up more, people's incomes did not rise as fast
+ economic activity adjusted more towards the EU and not the fast more unfettered pace it had before, since most EE economies were more liberal than the EU in many matters
+ however what appreciated tremendously are real estate prices and that is why the people got richer - their purchasing power however went down in general
+ and the debts one day need to be repaid, since most of those transfer payments are just used for infrastructure that does not earn cash in most instances

Even when you look at the billions of payments from the EU - a lot is also being blown back for highly increased costs and a massive expansion of debts that will sooner or later create an austerity spiral a bit similar to Southern Europe. EE is doing better, but keep in mind that a low economic cycle will wreak greater havoc one day. If they have to pay now for enrichment the billions, then it gets tougher.

The EU is one big con and nothing else. No one should have joined in that globalist pet project similar to the private UN. Either way - it is at is.

Post: #14990

(06-20-2017 02:19 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(06-20-2017 01:39 PM)Mage Wrote:  

(06-20-2017 07:57 AM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  EE is stupid for even joining the same club as Western Europe. I keep saying they should not trust the governments here but they can't easily get out of it.

Not really, up to this point EE countries have arguably gained more from participation in EU then lost due to wealthier EU countries paying for business projects and infrastructure projects of the poorer EE countries.

The funny part is that even the so-called supreme net-gainers like Poland only ostensibly gained a lot:

https://polskaniepodlegla.pl/opinie/item...europejska

You can google translate this article.

Even not long ago I too thought that there were massive gains for the countries entering the EU, but the truth is as I reported before here:

Quote:The national average salary has increased and is increasing quite rapidly since 2004. It is said that this is also thanks to the European Union. Do you agree with this?
Unfortunately, hard statistics show that when Poland was outside the European Union, wages in our country grow up to two times faster. Well, according to GUS data, in 1995-2004 the average gross salary in Poland after adjusting for inflation (in real terms) increased by as much as 56 per cent., While in the years 2004-2014, when Poland was already a member of the Union grew by only 26 percent . But even worse, if we look at the purchasing power of certain products. In 2004. Net average salary could buy 1,358 m 3 of natural gas and transmission, in 2014. Only 1022 m 3 , which represents a decrease of 25 percent. (Poland, the EU did not help in the fight with Russia on lower prices of raw materials). In the year of accession to the EU the average national wage Pole could buy 558 liters of diesel, and in 2014. - only 499 l of fuel (EU forced the increase in excise duties). In 2004. The average net salary could buy 1,200 loaves of bread, 1,200 liters of milk, 112 kg of cheese and 142 kg of beef, and in 2014 only 680 loaves, 850 liters of milk, 82 kg of cheese or 94 kg of beef. As regards cigarettes, in 2004. Net average salary could buy packages of 340 and last - 209.

Quote:Interestingly, outside the Union also grew faster Polish exports and imports. In the period 1995-2004, the value of foreign trade after adjusting for inflation increased by 130 per cent., While in 2004-2013 - only 69 percent. It is worth noting that all EU grants over 10 years amounted to just less than 3 percent. Polish GDP.

So essentially what happened:

+ most of the so-called transfer payments are connected to partly useless and over done infrastructure projects that are usually created by 50% debt - something similar happened in Spain and Greece during the boom years of the EU transfer payments before - essentially most of those projects are useless to create jobs.
+ prices went up more, people's incomes did not rise as fast
+ economic activity adjusted more towards the EU and not the fast more unfettered pace it had before, since most EE economies were more liberal than the EU in many matters
+ however what appreciated tremendously are real estate prices and that is why the people got richer - their purchasing power however went down in general
+ and the debts one day need to be repaid, since most of those transfer payments are just used for infrastructure that does not earn cash in most instances

Even when you look at the billions of payments from the EU - a lot is also being blown back for highly increased costs and a massive expansion of debts that will sooner or later create an austerity spiral a bit similar to Southern Europe. EE is doing better, but keep in mind that a low economic cycle will wreak greater havoc one day. If they have to pay now for enrichment the billions, then it gets tougher.

The EU is one big con and nothing else. No one should have joined in that globalist pet project similar to the private UN. Either way - it is at is.

Post: #14991

Well...Sweden deserved it because they submit too easily like little bitches.

Post: #14992

(06-20-2017 06:07 AM)redpillage Wrote:  ^^^^ Someone posted this comment over on ZH:

Quote:problem with Europe?

Maybe this:

Macron, fr. President - no children

Merkel, ger. Kanzler - no children

May, brit. PrimeMinister - no children

Gentiloni, it. PrimeMinister - no children

Rutte, PrimeMinister holland - no children

Löfven, PrimeMinister sweden - no children

Bettel, PrimeMinister Luxembourg - no children

Juncker, the drunker - no children

I think that pretty much says it all. The upside of course is that at least those fuckers aren't procreating.

People in Asia have noticed how retarded Europeans and some Asian countries are when it comes to children - this is from a Hong Kong newspaper:

Baby dearth: why rich societies like Hong Kong are committing demographic suicide

Quote:As a newly married man in Singapore many years ago, my hairdresser once asked me when my wife and I were going to have our first child. I replied, like many people do even today, that it was too expensive to have a child and to bring one up. He said that people who were earning a fraction of what we were and living in a one-room flat were still able to have two children and bring them up, and so could we.

It is a truism that we put up with hardships to do things we want to do while making a lot of excuses to justify what we don’t want to do.

Travelling between northeast Asian countries such as Japan and Hong Kong and Southeast Asian countries such as Malaysia and the Philippines, one is struck by children running all over the place in public places in the generally poorer Southeast Asian nations and the grim old people walking stiffly in north Asian societies. Affluent Singapore, though in Southeast Asia, is an exception, but even within Singapore it is the less affluent Singaporeans who seem to be having more children.

Personal experience and statistics show that merely giving a bigger flat to an average Hong Kong family won’t solve the problem of demographic extinction that is looming over the city, which has one of the lowest fertility rates in the world, at 1.2.

Societies are like individuals, too; some are energetic and outward-looking during periods of their life, while at other times, “anomie” takes over. That’s when individuals and societies go through life depressed and fearful while trying to hide it with empty indulgences, whether it is drinking or shopping, which one American philosopher called “joyless hedonism”.

Until this value system changes, many “affluent” societies of today will become so depressed that they will commit demographic suicide.

The rich and powerful, as those who have read about the ancient feudal male rulers with their large harems will know, used to take delight in fathering as many children as possible. Genghis Khan seems to have fathered so many children that his genetic marker is said to be found in about 10 per cent of the population within the old Mongol empire.

Female queens such as Elizabeth I, who died childless, do not seem to have shared the desires of male despots to breed aggressively.

Perhaps the main reason why modern societies, still dominated by men, are not increasing even at replacement levels must be that the “affluent” world still has not found a way to reorganise itself into a “female” and therefore “family” friendly way.

Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte and South African President Jacob Zuma openly flaunt their multiple relationships. Yet in the European Union – where an entire continent seems to be marching like lemmings to demographic suicide – many leaders are childless and may therefore be less likely to promote child-friendly policies. Among the current European leaders without children are Germany’s Angela Merkel, France’s Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Theresa May, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, Italian Prime Minister Paolo Gentiloni, Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Lofven, Scotland’s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, and Jean-Claude Juncker, president of European Commission.

Children are even seen as a nuisance by some in Northern Europe. As one of my European friends pointed out, many restaurants in Germany will not allow children in but are happy to accommodate pet owners and their dogs! However, it is something of a mystery why Italy, where the “Italian Mother” is celebrated and whose main religion is Catholicism, also has a low birth rate.

We read about war-devastated societies such as Germany and Japan or post-war Vietnam springing back to life in a couple of decades, only to seem to lose the will to reproduce within a generation. It really does seem that T.S. Eliot was right and that end of the world will come not with a bang but a whimper, but it will not be a whimper from a baby.

There have also been societies slowly committing suicide while competing to raise tall structures. No, we are not talking about Hong Kong but, rather, remote Easter Island in the Pacific and the haunting stone structures that are the only ones left behind after that society committed suicide by cutting down all its trees while trying to raise ever more tall stone structures. History records that the population collapsed after the trees were gone and the few who were left behind were taken by slave ships to work in the mines of Latin America.

When asked about the meaning of life and civilisation, Karl Marx, known for getting to the point quickly, said that it is “production and reproduction”. Modern societies have succeeded spectacularly on the production front but have failed equally spectacularly on the “reproduction” front. Hong Kong is only an extreme and concentrated example of what will happen in other societies soon.

For the record, I should state that we have just one child, therefore not enough for replacement and even lower than Hong Kong’s average of 1.2 per woman. We did try to beat the average, but without success.

Post: #14993

(06-20-2017 03:38 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  

Well...Sweden deserved it because they submit too easily like little bitches.

In the BB article:

Quote:“The violence against us in the police and the paramedics and firefighters, has become much worse. We’re talking about stone throwing, violence, fires. It has become much worse in recent years,” Swedish police Sergeant Peter Larsson told Norwegian state broadcaster NRK.

Fucking pussies. You were issued a sidearm, right? Why don't you use it? Someone throws a rock, a firebomb, spits at you, or threatens you, anything even remotely considered a hostile attack and you drop those assholes without as much as a warning. I just don't bloody understand how the Swedish (and for that matter British, French, or German) police sees its role in fighting an immigrant uprising.

You idiots basically just handed them their own territory where the sovereignty and Swedish rule of law is effectively suspended. I mean, what is the average IQ among native Swedes? It's still ranked at #8 (99) in the world rank, would probably be a few points above that if it wasn't for a certain growing minority (hum hum). That ought to be sufficient to grasp the basic concept of territorial integrity. Fine, move the police out and instead move in the military and turn the entire area into a combat zone. Women and children are free to leave after an extensive security and background check. Any hostile acts moving forward result in incarceration or deportation.

You do this once or twice and there won't be a single burning car this Christmas.

Post: #14994

Nah brother, Sweden is long gone in a mushroom powered trip up its own ass

Post: #14995

< It is not the fault of the Swedish cops. There are probably more shitlords among them than in the general population (discounting the women there). They leave their jobs in massive numbers.

They could not get people there who wanted to serve in that station, because you would have to pay them double or triple and also issue them the right to fucking rip the Muslim shitheads a new one every time they go out of line. But what am I kidding? That entire region is a no-go zone and has to put under military rule, the entire brood has to be disbanded and all the apartments searched diligently. Any ISIS supporters get instantly either deported for life or sent to a green concentration camp in the high north close to the arctic circle. And if they violently oppose the cops, then they get killed instantly. If they even attack a cop or fire man or even fucking city official, then they get 20 years behind bars or straight to the Muslim gulag in the arctic circle.

The cops cannot deal with the situation in the PC hellhole of Sweden. If they lash out stronger, then they get reprimanded and even sued for racism personally. If they don't fight back, then they risk life and limb for those shitheads.

The no-go zones have recently expanded by 8 more.

Sweden will be the first country to descend into an Islamic Caliphate. Too bad that this will take still years and years. If it happened fast, then the other countries would have a funny view into their future.

-------------------------

Quote:Perhaps the main reason why modern societies, still dominated by men, are not increasing even at replacement levels must be that the “affluent” world still has not found a way to reorganise itself into a “female” and therefore “family” friendly way.

K-selected societies with the current feminist model react strongly to economic and other factors. All societies are impacted. Non-orthodox Jews in the US also are below replacement levels - they reach German reproduction levels. This is a common problem around the world.

The reason why this happens is not because of too little reorganization into a female friendly way, but because of feminist fem-centric bullshit.

When women don't want to marry early and have children, but prefer to study, work, fuck the bad boys and then settle down sometime in the end 20s or 30s, then it is going to impact the situation. Another point of lesser brunt is economics.

It is not even those bullshit reasons given that couples don't want to have children. The truth is that the underclass and the upperclass both have plenty of children. The welfare brood procreate, the migrants are part of the underclass and the upper class do so too, because their women don't work and have enough time. Many of them have 2+ children, some go out and have 4-6. You don't hear about it that much.

Either way - all is well:


By the way - another suicide bomber this time in a Brussels train station. He only killed himself blowing himself up and being shot for good measure by the militarized cops. Ah - I can smell the enrichment.

----------------------------


British actress will be more careful now. She should feel lucky that she has not have her face burned with acid or found her brains splattered across the living room floor. The beating is just a quick reminder.

Islamic enrichment comes in many ways and forms of greater and lesser glory and degree of blessing.

Post: #14996

Sweden represents the ultimate proof that intelligence is a vastly overrated quality and it's actually wisdom that produces all those fancy-looking statistical life indicators usually attributed to IQ.

Post: #14997

(06-20-2017 03:58 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

(06-20-2017 06:07 AM)redpillage Wrote:  Children are even seen as a nuisance by some in Northern Europe. As one of my European friends pointed out, many restaurants in Germany will not allow children in but are happy to accommodate pet owners and their dogs! However, it is something of a mystery why Italy, where the “Italian Mother” is celebrated and whose main religion is Catholicism, also has a low birth rate.

That comes down to globalisation and the economy, both of which feminism influence.

Italy has one of the lowest rates of female participation in the workforce, which, assuming you had a decent average wage, would usually guarantee a higher birth rate. Italy's problem is that its unemployment rate is massive: 11% or so. Such employment as there is, isn't secure. No traditional Catholic girl is starting a big family unless she has a man with a half-decent amount of money to support her - that is the part of the responsibility of the man who wants a standard patriarchal family, only an arsehole would consign his wife and kids to poverty deliberately, he has a patriarchal obligation to not make it happen.

Feminism puts an extra, horrible twist on this because Italian women are apparently starting families after they've been through university in their 20s and 30s. And on top of that, the problem with Italy will be that it has to compete with androgynised, globalist nations where the women are as slaved to the working wheel as the men are. It comes down to labor costs, and under a patriarchy, those costs are higher because it's only one person working who demands a decent wage to support three or four.

Catholicism's principal opponent has always been Mammon.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #14998

(06-21-2017 02:59 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

(06-20-2017 03:58 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

(06-20-2017 06:07 AM)redpillage Wrote:  Children are even seen as a nuisance by some in Northern Europe. As one of my European friends pointed out, many restaurants in Germany will not allow children in but are happy to accommodate pet owners and their dogs! However, it is something of a mystery why Italy, where the “Italian Mother” is celebrated and whose main religion is Catholicism, also has a low birth rate.

That comes down to globalisation and the economy, both of which feminism influence.

Italy has one of the lowest rates of female participation in the workforce, which, assuming you had a decent average wage, would usually guarantee a higher birth rate. Italy's problem is that its unemployment rate is massive: 11% or so. Such employment as there is, isn't secure. No traditional Catholic girl is starting a big family unless she has a man with a half-decent amount of money to support her - that is the part of the responsibility of the man who wants a standard patriarchal family, only an arsehole would consign his wife and kids to poverty deliberately, he has a patriarchal obligation to not make it happen.

Feminism puts an extra, horrible twist on this because Italian women are apparently starting families after they've been through university in their 20s and 30s. And on top of that, the problem with Italy will be that it has to compete with androgynised, globalist nations where the women are as slaved to the working wheel as the men are. It comes down to labor costs, and under a patriarchy, those costs are higher because it's only one person working who demands a decent wage to support three or four.

Catholicism's principal opponent has always been Mammon.

Exactly - it is as I said - high-IQ k-selected societies react to stimulus. If suddenly you doubled and tripled male wages while having an economic boom, then virtually overnight many women would say "Fuck it - I am getting knocked up pronto." They love children, but when young lawyers even get paid 1000EUR per month and actual unemployment rate among the under 30 group is way over 30-40%, then who the fuck can have children?

While we are on the topic of children - even if you have them, then you need to fight against the brainwashing:

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/06/bbc-t...que-attack


http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/06/...rk-attack/

Quote:“IS are a group based in the Middle East, mainly in Iraq and Syria, who have extreme religious beliefs. They use brutal violence against anyone who doesn’t agree with their views.

“They claim to follow the religion of Islam, but many people say their beliefs of hatred and violence have little to do with what the majority of Muslims believe.”

Not true - ISIS is 100% Islam as followed directly what Mohammed had done and said.

Post: #14999

Just found this on a social network, thought it might deserve repeating.
My analysis is that the offender was just looking for an excuse to start a fight but for whatever reason the actual altercation never took place (very likely the narrator attempted to ignore the insults)

Quote: This is another personal story about the political situation in Germany.
I'm on the train to work, when suddenly a black guy approaches me. He looks friendly, I thought he might ask where this train is going or some small talk, but no! "Are you Polish?" I don't look Polish at all, so slightly confused I answer "How did you guess?", "You people are doing some bad shit", "What?", "There will be consequences" Then he takes the seat behind me and says "Fucking Pole! luckily there will soon be a lot less Poles around here!" And then he continues to mutter things like "Hitler did nothing wrong gassing the Poles" for a few minutes. In all the years I've lived in Germany I've never been harassed for being Polish (although I have been harassed for being German). So why did it start now? Where do those anti-Polish resentments come from? I think, from the mainstream media. Whenever Poland is mentioned in German state-TV it's always made out to be this evil dictatorship, the third most despicable country after Trumps USA and Putins Russia. Don't get me wrong, I don't like the current Polish government, and they're doing a lot wrong, but the MSM almost never criticizes those flaws, they only focus on the "fascist xenophobia".

Post: #15000

(06-21-2017 03:44 AM)El_Gostro Wrote:  Just found this on a social network, thought it might deserve repeating.
My analysis is that the offender was just looking for an excuse to start a fight but for whatever reason the actual altercation never took place (very likely the narrator attempted to ignore the insults)

Quote: This is another personal story about the political situation in Germany.
I'm on the train to work, when suddenly a black guy approaches me. He looks friendly, I thought he might ask where this train is going or some small talk, but no! "Are you Polish?" I don't look Polish at all, so slightly confused I answer "How did you guess?", "You people are doing some bad shit", "What?", "There will be consequences" Then he takes the seat behind me and says "Fucking Pole! luckily there will soon be a lot less Poles around here!" And then he continues to mutter things like "Hitler did nothing wrong gassing the Poles" for a few minutes. In all the years I've lived in Germany I've never been harassed for being Polish (although I have been harassed for being German). So why did it start now? Where do those anti-Polish resentments come from? I think, from the mainstream media. Whenever Poland is mentioned in German state-TV it's always made out to be this evil dictatorship, the third most despicable country after Trumps USA and Putins Russia. Don't get me wrong, I don't like the current Polish government, and they're doing a lot wrong, but the MSM almost never criticizes those flaws, they only focus on the "fascist xenophobia".

Don't worry - they deal with the Poles first. They don't like the Germans, French, Brits and Swedes neither. They all have to bow to Islam. The only difference is that Poland fights back and sees the writing on the wall. He should come to Poland and start randomly attacking men - best the guys streaming out of a football match. I am certain that he will have a chance to find out how he will be made welcome.