Post: #176

(05-14-2017 01:04 PM)Sherman Wrote:  Muslims aren't the problem. Take the Syrian refugees for example. Think about it. Syria was a peaceful country until 2011. That was the year of the "Arab Spring" encouraged by the Obama Administration. The globalists have decided they want to take out Assad and they will do anything to achieve their goal. The Syrians are being killed and their villages bombed because of the geostrategy of elites they have no control over. How can you say that people fleeing bombs are doing it as a sophisticated strategy to destroy the West? It goes beyond all rationality and logical thought. Ever since the end of World War I, the West has massively interfered in Muslim countries and not the other way around. Focusing on the Muslims is a massive diversion from seeing the real causes.

If someone kicks a hornet's nest do I deserve to get stung?. Does it mean I have to like it and do nothing?

Doesn't matter who stirred them up. Im still going to deal with the hornets: they are the problem

Post: #177

(05-14-2017 01:37 PM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  

(05-14-2017 01:04 PM)Sherman Wrote:  Muslims aren't the problem. Take the Syrian refugees for example. Think about it. Syria was a peaceful country until 2011. That was the year of the "Arab Spring" encouraged by the Obama Administration. The globalists have decided they want to take out Assad and they will do anything to achieve their goal. The Syrians are being killed and their villages bombed because of the geostrategy of elites they have no control over. How can you say that people fleeing bombs are doing it as a sophisticated strategy to destroy the West? It goes beyond all rationality and logical thought. Ever since the end of World War I, the West has massively interfered in Muslim countries and not the other way around. Focusing on the Muslims is a massive diversion from seeing the real causes.

If someone kicks a hornet's nest do I deserve to get stung?. Does it mean I have to like it and do nothing?

Doesn't matter who stirred them up. Im still going to deal with the hornets: they are the problem

You will keep having hornets unless you stop the big thug who keeps kicking their hive.

Post: #178

(05-13-2017 09:57 PM)911 Wrote:  

(05-13-2017 11:31 AM)stugatz Wrote:  

(05-11-2017 03:44 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(05-11-2017 03:28 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  Drunk guy on the beach flipped out, apparently because an Arab guy did a little white-knighting for damsels in distress. Arab guy's family within earshot was also speaking Arabic. Arab guys remained pretty calm considering. Another guy tried to calm him down. Props to him, but shithead came back to rant obscenities and proclaim his Christianity. Jesus would not approve.





Word got back to his hometown.

Waterford man arrested for racist tirade on beach in Texas

I find it interesting that you use the Islam-apologist angle.

1. He was arrested for insults! That should tell you something. How many Muslims would get arrested for saying dirty white Christian whore? Zero. Though to be fair he was arrested for public intoxication and unruly behavior which is fine.

2. In how many Muslim countries would that man be executed? Probably at least a dozen - in another dozen he would be killed by an angry mob.

3. If insults were the worst things that Muslims did in the West, then no one would be overly concerned about them.

Sure - he was a low-IQ man with lack of impulse-control, but all he did was insult someone. Hate-speech and racism is a very dangerous term being used for an ideology like Islam. What race is Islam again?

Of course he did not even know that there are millions of Christian and non-Muslim Arabs, but that is also connected to his low IQ.

As far as I can see he did not hurt anyone and at best he should be given a fine for threatening behavior, not words uttered. If every Muslim in the West would be punished for saying insulting things to Christians and Westerners, then not even the Gulf States could be paying the fines.

Also this incident was triggered as an Arab man was White Knighting against the badly done advances of a White man. Yeah - if that isn't the perfect irony among the rape-jihad happening in the West. Every weekend a Muslim rapes and harrasses multiple women in the West (at statistical rates of 1.000% higher than the locals, but hey - that is no problem). Nah - this guy is the problem and we are being taught that white men are the biggest Islamophobic racists and that this is indeed the biggest problem out there.

If all Muslims were like that moronic bloke on the beach, then no one would be getting panicked like in Spain recently when a few shouted Allahu Akbar in a crowd.

I watched about ten seconds of his, oh, 84-IQ rant, and that was all I needed to see. The guy's an idiot. Yeah, creeping Sharia and the culture war over stuff like this is a legitimate subject to be angry about, but he seems to be too stupid about how to deal with it properly. You don't start yelling tirades at strangers unless we're already in a state of civil war, with Muslims suicide bombing parts of the United States every few days.

(I'd also mention that not all Arabs are Muslims, but such a teeny number are other religions it's safe to assume that if you see an Arab in the US, he's a Muslim.)

He also stopped short of hitting anybody and deserved a misdemeanor charge at worst. How is this a felony?! If he swung by with a small group of likeminded rednecks wanting to beat up Mohammed and Aziz, then, sure, that's criminal behavior...but this was just some angry, drunk loser screeching a group of people that had multiple men capable of defending themselves. Charging him with a felony is just virtue-signaling.

Actually, most Arab Americans are Christian, only about a quarter are muslim, the reason being is they mostly come from Arab countries with sizeable Christian minorities like Lebanon and Syria.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Ameri...background

I stand corrected. I'd always wondered why it was so easy to find Maronite and Coptic churches.

Post: #179

(05-14-2017 01:04 PM)Sherman Wrote:  Muslims aren't the problem. Take the Syrian refugees for example. Think about it. Syria was a peaceful country until 2011. That was the year of the "Arab Spring" encouraged by the Obama Administration. The globalists have decided they want to take out Assad and they will do anything to achieve their goal. The Syrians are being killed and their villages bombed because of the geostrategy of elites they have no control over. How can you say that people fleeing bombs are doing it as a sophisticated strategy to destroy the West? It goes beyond all rationality and logical thought. Ever since the end of World War I, the West has massively interfered in Muslim countries and not the other way around. Focusing on the Muslims is a massive diversion from seeing the real causes.

What Syrians? What are you talking about?

In the beginning only 20% of migrants were from Syria - most from the peace regions and unemployed black sheep of the family.

Now the number of migrants from Syria is just bloody 3% (most still from the peaceful part of Syria).

As for Muslims milking the system of 100k per year - only they can realistically do it. It works by getting 4 wives (none legally married, but only wed in the mosque) and having kids. All 4 wives get apartments or houses and that is included in the 100k. Normally for anyone else this would never work because your baby-mamas would all say - go fuck yourself - to you, but Islam gives them this power and usually those women are from backwards country and they are happy living in the West.

Post: #180

(05-14-2017 02:04 PM)Sherman Wrote:  

(05-14-2017 01:37 PM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  

(05-14-2017 01:04 PM)Sherman Wrote:  Muslims aren't the problem. Take the Syrian refugees for example. Think about it. Syria was a peaceful country until 2011. That was the year of the "Arab Spring" encouraged by the Obama Administration. The globalists have decided they want to take out Assad and they will do anything to achieve their goal. The Syrians are being killed and their villages bombed because of the geostrategy of elites they have no control over. How can you say that people fleeing bombs are doing it as a sophisticated strategy to destroy the West? It goes beyond all rationality and logical thought. Ever since the end of World War I, the West has massively interfered in Muslim countries and not the other way around. Focusing on the Muslims is a massive diversion from seeing the real causes.

If someone kicks a hornet's nest do I deserve to get stung?. Does it mean I have to like it and do nothing?

Doesn't matter who stirred them up. Im still going to deal with the hornets: they are the problem

You will keep having hornets unless you stop the big thug who keeps kicking their hive.

Perhaps but in the meantime until the "big thug" can be stopped I still wouldn't sit idly by while the bugs make a nest in my living room

Post: #181

(05-14-2017 03:36 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  The reality is that one of them bottles your wife/girlfriend/daughter in the back of the head before he and his four friends drag her into the bushes and rape her. They blend back into the increasingly large islamic ghetto nearby and you get to live with a damaged woman in your life until either one of you is dead.

Many women carry guns, too. I also wouldn't be surprised at all if an incident like this would result in a gang going into the neighborhood and torching the whole thing. Ever hear of the Greenwood Race Riot?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsa_race_riot

Quote:The reality is that one of them gets in a rental truck and runs over 50 concealed carriers before they even realise what the fuck just happened.

Are you serious about this? Running over ten people with a truck is difficult. Running over 50 would be impossible. They would shoot the driver and the tires.

Post: #182

Portland Reporter Fired For Posting Video of Muslim Speaker Saying Atheism is Punishable by Death

Quote:Portland State University’s campus newspaper, The Vanguard, has fired an editor following his coverage of an interfaith conference. The paper accused journalist Andy Ngo of endangering a student’s life after he tweeted out a video of the panel, which featured the Muslim student saying that apostasy and atheism must be punishable by death.

Writing for National Review, the former multimedia editor of the campus paper explained how he was fired for unofficially covering the event, which included speakers from Muslim, Hindu, Jewish, Christian and atheist backgrounds.

The unnamed Muslim student speaker took a question from the audience, who asked him if the religion permitted killing atheists and apostates for their religious views. The panelist responded in the affirmative, stating that under “Quranic law,” being a non-believer is considered criminal in countries that impose it.

He added: “So in that case, you are given the liberty to leave the country. I am not going to sugarcoat it. So if you go to a different country…but in a Muslim country, a country based on Quranic law, disbelieving or being an infidel, is not allowed, so you will be given the choice.”

In other words, apostates and atheists can either choose to leave or suffer the consequences where such strict interpretations of the law are imposed.

In National Review, Ngo says that The Vanguard editor-in-chief Colleen Leary called him into a meeting with managing editor Tim Sullivan, and newspaper advisor Reaz Mahmood. The team admonished him for sharing the unedited video clip on social media.

Despite never sharing the Muslim panelist’s name, he was fired for supposedly “endangering” the student’s life with a report that inconvenienced the student paper. Ngo writes:

Quote:My editor [Leary], whom I deeply respected at the time, called me “predatory” and “reckless,” telling me I had put the life and well-being of the Muslim student and his family at risk. She said that my tweets implied the student advocated the killing of atheists. Another person [Mahmood] in the meeting said I should have taken into account the plight of victimized groups in the “current political climate.” The editor claimed I had “violated the paper’s ethical standards” by not “minimizing harm” toward the speaker.

The Vanguard’s coverage of the event and the ensuing fallout states that the paper is “committed to minimizing harm,” and abiding by the Society of Professional Journalists’ Code of Ethics, as if Ngo had personally violated them by sharing unedited footage of the panel exchange. It calls the event’s coverage on “markedly biased media outlets” a “type of dangerous misrepresentation.”

Ironically, The Vanguard’s efforts to censure Ngo to preserve a narrative is precisely everything the SPJ’s Code of Ethics is designed to safeguard against.

I asked Andy Ngo what he thought whether Mahmood intended for him to censor himself with the comment on taking the plight of victimized groups “in the current political climate” into account. Ngo says:

Quote: “As you know, those who work in media never use the word ‘censor’ even if that is what they mean in practice. The media adviser said I should have known better than to share the video of the Muslim panelist since I attended a mandatory training session on social justice in the media.

At the training, we were taught to always consider which groups of people are ‘privileged’ and which are ‘oppressed’ in our work as leaders of student media. Non-Christians were defined as targets of oppression.

I transgressed by treating the Muslim panelist the same way I’ve treated others in my multimedia tweets.”

Given the outcome of Ngo’s coverage of the panel, I asked him what he thought of the enforcement of “acceptable narratives” in the media, and its effects on journalism.

“The perpetuation of ‘acceptable narratives’ in journalism weakens media as a whole,” Ngo says. “It is a media sickness that affects all political slants and biases. It gives too much power to the few decision-makers at the top to determine what truths people can or should know.”

“It’s no secret that the American public are highly distrustful of news media,” he added. “An unfortunate outcome is that many are turning to only social media instead, where disinformation runs rampant. It’s time we start valuing truth and accuracy over ideology and narrative.”

Post: #183

(05-15-2017 02:52 AM)puckerman Wrote:  

(05-14-2017 03:36 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  The reality is that one of them bottles your wife/girlfriend/daughter in the back of the head before he and his four friends drag her into the bushes and rape her. They blend back into the increasingly large islamic ghetto nearby and you get to live with a damaged woman in your life until either one of you is dead.

Many women carry guns, too. I also wouldn't be surprised at all if an incident like this would result in a gang going into the neighborhood and torching the whole thing. Ever hear of the Greenwood Race Riot?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsa_race_riot

Quote:The reality is that one of them gets in a rental truck and runs over 50 concealed carriers before they even realise what the fuck just happened.

Are you serious about this? Running over ten people with a truck is difficult. Running over 50 would be impossible. They would shoot the driver and the tires.

I die a little inside when I see posts like this.

Nobody who's ever fired a gun at a moving target talks lightly about "shooting out the tires", much less insists that a bunch of surprised cc-ers are going to whirl around and start blasting away like Navy Seals. Do you even know how long it takes a tiny little car tyre to deflate when shot, much less a truck tyre? And shooting a truck driver as he swerves wildly into people at 60 miles an hour?

I'm am disappoint, son. You've completely exposed yourself here.

Running over 50 impossible? Good grief. The Nice attack was just a few short months ago.

Quote:On the evening of 14 July 2016, a 19 tonne cargo truck was deliberately driven into crowds celebrating Bastille Day on the Promenade des Anglais in Nice, France, resulting in the deaths of 86 people[2] and injuring 434.[4][5][6]

As for the Tulsa race riots, you're right, I'd completely forgotten how it irrevocably put all blacks on notice to never rape, rob or murder a white person ever again.

Post: #184

(05-14-2017 02:04 PM)Sherman Wrote:  You will keep having hornets unless you stop the big thug who keeps kicking their hive.

What a great example.

You don't peacefully coexist with hornets/wasps if you want to sit in your back yard in peace. You find the nests and exterminate them. Wasps don't require kicking to be aggressive and annoying and neither does Islam.

Post: #185

(05-14-2017 12:41 PM)911 Wrote:  The Pakis have the Bomb, Zel, they've had a nuclear program for decades.

(05-14-2017 09:46 AM)Latinopan Wrote:  

(03-05-2017 11:31 AM)Laner Wrote:  In Canada, out of 250,000 immigrants a year, about 57,000 are Arab or Islamic.

These 57,000 cost Canadians more than the others all combined. My friends retired SAS father is obsessed with the growing threat of Islam, and has been since the 70's. Most of his SAS life was spend in places like Yemen, and he has no illusions to the bullshit that the government is pushing on the people, and for what purpose.

Like Australia, Muslims here make over $100k a year milking the system. I mentioned the two ex Muslim friends I have, and how they had to quit mosque when they got a job. They were ostracized by their peers for working. Smarter politicians in Canada and especially in Denmark - along with Trump! - are saying that work should be required for immigration. This is to combat Islam. Once young muslims start to work, they often make native friends who by contrast are much more friendly, open and interesting than those from their mosque/family.

This is due to the philosophy of Islam that is all about "infidels pay us", in all history of Islam you can see how Islam uses infidels to extract as much money as possible and expand, the no-Muslim tax is real and the Western Welfare system has become just a new way to tax no-Muslims, young native people in Europe and Canada cannot have kids because taxes are too high due to the massive welfare system being sucked out by the Muslim population, Hamed can have 3 wives and 10 kids living on welfare while the infidel is working 12 hours and getting all taxed in order to pay for Hamed and his family.

Quote:How does one milk the system for $100k/year, and how prevalent is that? Does a muslim immigrant steal more from the system than say, one from the Caribbean?

They milk the system because the man with 4 wives and 12 kids is only married legally to, the other 3 are technically single moms which is a default welfare money, the man does not work because most of the time they don't even speak the new country language, even when they are born in the country the integration is not existent, each kids is a check, there is an intensive for immigrants to reproduce.

Immigrants in general always take more from the system than the native population, but people from the Caribbean are not causing social change to the native nation, if France and Germany were getting mass immigration from Japan and Korea, you will not have to worry about the same thing we do now.

Post: #186

(05-15-2017 05:17 PM)Latinopan Wrote:  

(05-14-2017 12:41 PM)911 Wrote:  

Quote:How does one milk the system for $100k/year, and how prevalent is that? Does a muslim immigrant steal more from the system than say, one from the Caribbean?

They milk the system because the man with 4 wives and 12 kids is only married legally to, the other 3 are technically single moms which is a default welfare money, the man does not work because most of the time they don't even speak the new country language, even when they are born in the country the integration is not existent, each kids is a check, there is an intensive for immigrants to reproduce.

Immigrants in general always take more from the system than the native population, but people from the Caribbean are not causing social change to the native nation, if France and Germany were getting mass immigration from Japan and Korea, you will not have to worry about the same thing we do now.

I can't speak for Germany and Sweden's free-for-all open door
refugee policy, but in western countries like Canada or Oz,
you have a point system that makes sure that immigrants
speak the language and have some kind of professional qualification.

The problem in countries like France or Italy is that they are
more or less mandated by the EU and run by globalist traitors
like Macron. In France Fillon was going to move towards that
kind of a system, but with Macron it's full-blown national
cuckery plan known locally as the "Grand Remplacement".
Italy and Greece are very important as transit points, hopefully
Beppe and the nationalist alliance will win next year.



The leader of Italy's anti-establishment Five Star Movement has sparked outrage over a tweet which appeared to calling for a stop of migrant invasion

Post: #187

Typical of Muslims, both as far as the perp is concerned and his support group around the world:

https://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/201...ng-rapist/

Quote:Muslims start hashtag to free Saudi convicted of enslaving, raping woman in Colorado

You hear this quite often of Saudis behaving like they do in Saudi Arabia. They can essentially enslave poorer individuals in the Gulf states, so why not do it in the US. They can buy themselves free, can't they?

Turns out that the rule of law - a Western invention by the way - does not protect you even if you are a billionaire in the US (and that is the Western part, because even in Asia you could do a lot when rich, the rule of law even for the powerful was revolutionary).

Quote:Saudi national Homaidan Al-Turki has been imprisoned in the United States since 2006, when he was sentenced to 28 years in prison for several horrific crimes he was convicted of committing against his family’s Indonesian domestic worker. The crimes included withholding the young woman’s wages, keeping her a virtual slave for four years and 12 counts of rape for the years of sexual assault the jury concluded he had put her through.

The 28-year sentence was later reduced to 8 years to life due to his good behavior as a prisoner. Now, Al-Turki is up for parole and his Arab supporters have started an online campaign, with the trending hashtag #AlTurkiParole, in an attempt to influence US officials deciding his fate.

And even that reduction of the prison sentence is something that is related to his money and influence.

But now they urge the US to pardon him, so he can return to Saudi Arabia. He will imprison, rape and behead a couple of Indonesian maids back at home.

Quote:In the ” Freedom country ”
His freedom is stolen .. #HomaidanAlTurki#AlturkiParole pic.twitter.com/VpPkOhP9xJ

— ابشر بسعدك . (@4gff2) May 2, 2017

Quote:Unsurprisingly, there is no mention in any of their tweets about justice for the young Indonesian woman, identified in court documents only as Z.A., that Al-Turki was convicted of horribly mistreating and sexually assaulting for years.

Those charges were denied by Al-Turki at his trial, during which he said that that case against him was due to his religion and Saudi culture.

In relation to the charge that they had withheld Z.A.’s salary for years, court documents filed by Al-Turki’s lawyers said that “there are Saudi Arabian customs regarding a host family’s retention of funds for their domestic servant until she leaves their service.”

Yeah - racism and Islamophobia is to be blamed because he fucked, raped, mistreated her for years and kept her as a penniless prisoner. That is just customary in Saudi Arabia. Yeah - I bet it is, but on US soil you would want to have sharia. According to Linad Sarsours sharia is just interest-free credit card (yeah, but with even higher fee structure than interest).

Sp5 and other Muslim apologists are more concerned about insults of a drunk at a beach, but these transgressions here - they are nothing. This is just a misunderstanding of Saudi customs.

Quote:In regards to the charges that she was not allowed to leave their home and not allowed to contact her friends, Al-Turki defended himself by saying, “The restrictions placed on her contact with non-relative males were also the same as those applicable to my daughters and other Muslim women in our community. You cannot ask somebody from a different religion to be American to the fullest. You cannot ask them to go dancing, go to the bars. We are Muslim. We are different. The state has criminalized these basic Muslim behaviors. Attacking traditional Muslim behaviors is a focal point of the prosecution.”

So yeah - he was just keeping her at home 24/7 without pay for her own Islamic safety. You are such Islamophobes for even calling him out on that!

Quote:Prosecutor Ann Tomsic provided evidence that the couple brought Z.A. to the US from Saudi Arabia to work for them when she was still a teenager. The affidavit says she was forced to care for the children, cook and cleaning for 12-hours a day, seven days a week without any time off from 2000 to 2004.

When she wasn’t working, the young woman was confined to an unheated basement and allegedly sexually assaulted by Al-Turki. Z.A. was only allowed out of the house by herself to take out the trash, bring in the mail and clean the yard.

There you have it your libertarian work environment. 7-day-84-hour-weeks - all unpaid for years with no time off.

She obviously could have fled, but likely did not know that the US would treat her differently than Saudi or Indonesian authorities (Indonesia cucks to the Saudis as seen in the recent case of the fled Saudi girl who was intercepted by Indonesian police [against international law] and was sent back to the Saudis for honor killing).

Quote:Privacy laws mean the identity and fate of Z.A. remain unknown, but she was paid some compensation money by Al-Turki’s family in exchange for some of the charge’s against him being dropped. The defense had argued that she had fabricated her accusations in an attempt to be able to stay in America, but she left for Indonesia immediately following the trial and never returned, despite having the legal right to stay in the country under the 2000 Trafficking and Violence Protection Act.

So they partly even paid her off, because he probably tortured her a bit or maybe let his sons rape her as well, maybe his visiting friends, which would add additional charges. Money can do that even under rule of law and frankly if you pay a victim well enough, then I guess I would allow it. If they gave her an extra 100k, then she is set for life in Indonesia with that. I would also recommend her to change her name and disappear rather to a different country. The lovely Muslim family might send hitmen after her.

Quote:The Indonesian government banned domestic workers from going to Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern countries in 2015 due to innumerable cases of abuse, sexual misconduct, and enslavement. However, many desperate Indonesian women ignore the ban and continue to travel to the Middle East to acquire work in those countries illegally, a situation which puts them at even greater risk of abuse.

Haha - Indonesia had to ban their women from going there, because there were so many cases of being treated like trash by this Arab Supremacist Cult.

Quote:As we noted the last time al Turki was denied parole when the hashtag received nearly a million tweets, and Jihad Watch notes now: Colorado: Muslim who kept sex slave refuses to speak with female therapists, says doing so would be un-Islamic.

He wants to be returned to Saudi Arabia because what he did isn’t a crime there. He wouldn’t serve any more time.

A million Tweets for that and he does not consider it a crime.

And you have guys here wondering why we think Islam is a culture of evil that fosters such behavior. Even if you have served with Muslims in the military, even if you have met plenty of great people as I have - never underestimate the pure crap coming out of this ideology and influencing everyone. That would be tantamount to saying that there would be nor problem in the world if Nazi Germany had won and we would be all living under Nazi ideology - certainly nothing ever would color our thinking at all if we were taught that stuff from birth to grave and Hitler being exalted as the perfect most human being that walked on Earth. But strangely if it is Islam it is off limits for criticism.

Post: #188

It'd be a real shame if that Indonesiam woman took some of that settlement money and used it to have Mohammed al Saudi shanked a day before he got out of prison...

Post: #189

I don't know anything about the case but I include a link below from a more neutral source. I see a lot of feminist buzz words here: "human trafficking", and "sex slave". It just shows how vulnerable a man is to even hiring a nanny in America. American men are even afraid to talk to woman at work or smile at them in an elevator.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homaidan_Al-Turki

Post: #190

(05-16-2017 09:24 AM)Sherman Wrote:  I don't know anything about the case but I include a link below from a more neutral source. I see a lot of feminist buzz words here: "human trafficking", and "sex slave". It just shows how vulnerable a man is to even hiring a nanny in America. American men are even afraid to talk to woman at work or smile at them in an elevator.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homaidan_Al-Turki

I think you have finally outed yourself as a Muslim troll here. Trying to equate this case with fake rape allegations a la Mattress girl and depicting that bloke as just a guy who hired a nanny and was falsely accused - the gall of you is incredible.





Sherman - anything you say from here on now - go say it at Huffpo and WaPo and NYBetaTimes. They will lap it all up. Also if Mexican - I hear that there are quite a few converts there. Entire streets in the US - all Mexicans convert over some bullshit that some Imams have lied to them about Islam. Over 90% of them leave that cult again after even cursory reading through the Quran and the Hadiths or finding out what else is going on with the ideology.

Post: #191

(05-16-2017 09:36 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(05-16-2017 09:24 AM)Sherman Wrote:  I don't know anything about the case but I include a link below from a more neutral source. I see a lot of feminist buzz words here: "human trafficking", and "sex slave". It just shows how vulnerable a man is to even hiring a nanny in America. American men are even afraid to talk to woman at work or smile at them in an elevator.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homaidan_Al-Turki

I think you have finally outed yourself as a Muslim troll here. Trying to equate this case with fake rape allegations a la Mattress girl and depicting that bloke as just a guy who hired a nanny and was falsely accused - the gall of you is incredible.





Sherman - anything you say from here on now - go say it at Huffpo and WaPo and NYBetaTimes. They will lap it all up.

I said I don't know anything about the case. But you are giving the prosecution side of the case, so I tried to find a more objective source. By the way, he maintains he is innocent. He is a father of five children, and many witnesses who met him say he is a civilized person to be around. Pushing the theme of "sex slave" is something that an aggressive prosecutor would do as an emotional appeal.

Post: #192

(05-16-2017 09:47 AM)Sherman Wrote:  I said I don't know anything about the case. But you are giving the prosecution side of the case, so I tried to find a more objective source. By the way, he maintains he is innocent. He is a father of five children, and many witnesses who met him say he is a civilized person to be around. Pushing the theme of "sex slave" is something that an aggressive prosecutor would do as an emotional appeal.

This argument is so intellectually dishonest that I would have to puke on the bullshit.

An entire country like Indonesia BANNED THEIR WOMEN FROM BEING HIRED BY SAUDIs and you assume that keeping a woman effectively enslaves without pay and letting her work 80 hour weeks (which is absolutely normal in Saudi households) - that this is some kind of exaggeration of the prosecution?

It is even allowed for Muslim men to have sex slaves - currently they are more servants, but maids are taken advantage of every day.

Enough - you are a bullshiter - likely a Muslim troll hiding it out for a long time. Bye.

Post: #193

I notice that there are also Muslim women defending him. And he is honored by his culture and his women for being a father. Why are we always attacking and demonizing men in our culture? Isn't this what we want to stop?

[attachment=36682]

Post: #194

I don't know, because there is more to a story than just being a fucking father:





You can be very nice to your family, then turn around and kill a slave in the most brutal way just because she disobeyed you.

There are people in the Middle East sitting for years for trumped up fake charges and this shithead is being rightfully incarcerated and you also defend him.

Thus it is clear that you are an undercover Muslim festering this stupid cult here, blasting anti-White, anti-Western propaganda, pro-Islam crap and thinking that you can actually get us by offering some Red Pill lingo.

Yeah - embrace Islam, that will make you instantly Red Pill. Yeah - and going back to the caves will make us free of caring about carbon footprint forever.

Next I expect you to defend moderate ISIS beheaders and truck-drivers of peace, then of course the usual defense of honor killings of daughters as crimes of passion.

Post: #195

This is what I want men to notice. I have heard a lot of men in America, even here, say they are not interested in meeting a woman and having a family because it is too dangerous. There is even a whole movement MGTOW dedicated to this proposition. But notice this guy. He has five children and is willing to go to prison. An Arab man says "fuck it" I am going to have a family. We can learn from his example. Next time I am in an elevator with a woman, I am going to say hello.

Post: #196

Quote: An Arab man says "fuck it" I am going to have a family. We can learn from his example. Next time I am in an elevator with a woman, I am going to say hello.

Tell her you were inspired to do it by an Arabic man who abused his sex slave. Total alpha move and guaranteed panty-dropper.

Post: #197

(05-16-2017 02:42 PM)Sherman Wrote:  This is what I want men to notice. I have heard a lot of men in America, even here, say they are not interested in meeting a woman and having a family because it is too dangerous. There is even a whole movement MGTOW dedicated to this proposition. But notice this guy. He has five children and is willing to go to prison. An Arab man says "fuck it" I am going to have a family. We can learn from his example. Next time I am in an elevator with a woman, I am going to say hello.

Post: #198

Pointing out some decent values - like the importance of family- in Islam is not the same as being an apologist for Islam. Sherman is a good dude, I can tell from his posts here.

Zel, look man, you're beginning to sound like a broken record. We get that Islam sucks and it's dangerous, but that doesn't mean we can't coexist (sorry for using an SJW term). The way forward is to separate ourselves foreign-policy wise from the Muslim world, and just trade with them or just have some sort of mutually beneficial economic relationship.

Like I said, bombing the shit out of them, supporting Israeli expansion and aggression is only going to exacerbate things and piss them off more. Then we'll have another 9/11 and more guys screeching "fucking Muslim savages!" and so on. Samseau made a good point that as of right now there's not a single Western politician on the horizon who is advocating for non-interventionism. They are all fully on board with the Jew agenda. That includes Trump. So we'll see where it goes, but I ain't shedding any tears next time a Muslim lone wolf strikes. We elected this government and that is what they do.

Post: #199

(05-16-2017 04:31 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  Pointing out some decent values - like the importance of family- in Islam is not the same as being an apologist for Islam. Sherman is a good dude, I can tell from his posts here.

Zel, look man, you're beginning to sound like a broken record. We get that Islam sucks and it's dangerous, but that doesn't mean we can't coexist (sorry for using an SJW term). The way forward is to separate ourselves foreign-policy wise from the Muslim world, and just trade with them or just have some sort of mutually beneficial economic relationship.

Like I said, bombing the shit out of them, supporting Israeli expansion and aggression is only going to exacerbate things and piss them off more. Then we'll have another 9/11 and more guys screeching "fucking Muslim savages!" and so on. Samseau made a good point that as of right now there's not a single Western politician on the horizon who is advocating for non-interventionism. They are all fully on board with the Jew agenda. That includes Trump. So we'll see where it goes, but I ain't shedding any tears next time a Muslim lone wolf strikes. We elected this government and that is what they do.

These are not posts defending family values. These are posts defending a guy who admits that he kept a poor Indonesian woman on US soil for years without pay (ok - 1500$ for several years), without papers, taking away her passport and letting her work 80 hours. He considered this a normal work-contract between employer and slave. Oh yeah - he certainly was going to pay her 96.000$ when she may have been allowed to depart. Also it is close to certain that he abused her sexually - Indonesia has not banned those contracts for lack of reason.

Sherman has cucked for that man on the grounds that he has children and not on the grounds that he essentially enslaved a woman.

I know that trifle things like that are irrelevant, because who cares about enforcing sexual slavery and keeping a worker slave prisoner in the Land of the Free, when you keep a rich man from his children. He was likely guilty of more, but paid her off.

So Sherman is not defending family values, he is defending a criminal who essentially used his backwards practices based on Islam as an excuse for all his actions.

A good guy. Indeed. What has globalist interventionist policy and the Israel meddling and conflict anything to do with this? Who forced a wealthy Saudi family to do this on US soil, who forces the European migrants to rape and plunder their way through Germany, France and Sweden? Do you really think that they based their actions on the hostilities of Bush, Obama and co?

Post: #200

^Aren't the policies of Bush, Obama and Co the reason why there's so many rapefugees in Europe these days?