(02-27-2017 01:19 AM)Moma Wrote: Excelsior, it CAN be left out of the discussion because you can't do anything about it. You can NOT improve your looks. If you look like Flavor Flav, no matter how much you intellectualise the process, no matter how much you whine, you will not suddenly look like Tyson Beckford..point blank.
I fundamentally disagree, and I speak as someone who has substantially improved his looks over time. One may not gain height or Beckford-esque facial features, but via style, diet, and fitness, one can substantially enhance their physical appearance. It isn't wise at all for any man (especially those who are young, like many here writing/browsing the forum) to assume that there is no room for improvement here. You should hone your physique and enhance your style just as you enhance your understanding of game.
Quote:If you are working a decent job making 150K per annum as a 25 year old, you will seem like a pauper if you are in a room rammed full of A-list Hollywood actors, Jamie Foxx, Kevin Hart, Matthew Mcconaughley. No matter how hard you complain, no matter how hard you think, you will NOT change your financial situation there.
I fundamentally disagree here as well. Enhancing one's financial/professional situation has many benefits. The fact that it doesn't guarantee one the ability to compete head-to-head with Jamie Foxx is really a very poor argument against the process of financial self-improvement.
This is basically what you're saying: "Even if you make a ton of cash [$150k at age 25 is well within the 1 percent for someone that age], you'll feel poor next to multi-millionaire Hollywood actors, so there's no benefit there."
That's just nonsensical. First, it presumes that A-List Hollywood Actors are the only point of reference here. They aren't - you're not always in competition with them and need not be in order to be successful. Second, it presumes that there are no benefits to getting to such a healthy financial state beyond the ability to out-clout Hollywood stars. That's also false.
You absolutely can change your financial situation (via increases in your actual income or geo-arbitrage that allows the financial status you currently have to get you to a much higher level), and those changes absolutely can be very consequential and beneficial for all areas of your life, up to and including your game. It is not wise for any man to write this off - this is a part of a man's life that should be focused on and invested in just as one invests in their game.
Quote:The area of improvement in which you can contend, where you can 'up the ante' is the psychological aspect of the field..game. Game can shift odds in your favour and open up the field. There is no point bringing up other stuff as that is intellectual masturbation. Observe the no fap rule on that. No matter how you word it, spin it and spice it, it still boils right back down to game.
You can up the ante financially, physically, and psychologically. All of those options can and should be put on the table for a man looking to improve. This goes doubly for younger men. It is downright dangerous to tell a man he’s stuck financially, stuck physically, and can only invest in game and game alone. That’s not just wrong, but it does a disservice to those men.
Game can shift odds in your favor and open up the field. So can money and so can enhanced physical fitness (and, again, I can speak directly to this). Improving one’s financial and physical situation can very clearly and significantly enhance one’s game as well. None of that is “intellectual masturbation”. It is reality, and it does nobody any good to ignore it.
I have to say, I’m quite fascinated by the perspective here. It seems that some here want no “limiting beliefs” imposed on the concept of game – the sky is the limit and it’s the only avenue of growth. But strangely, at the same time, these same guys put strict limiting beliefs up with regard to finance and fitness. As far as they are concerned, men should just assume they’ve hit the ceiling financially and physically, but presume no ceiling at all when it comes to game.
I push back against this perspective because it isn’t wise (as explained earlier, you CAN improve in those other non-psychological realms and should aim to do so), but it also isn’t realistic. Not every man is the same – just as not every man will grow to the same height, not every man will reach the same level of game, finances, or physique. Just about all can and should reach basic/intermediate competency in game, for example (which can take a lot of effort in and of itself), but precious few have the love of the game and the personal composition necessary to become, say, WIA. As I said in a post a few weeks ago in this thread, some guys are going to be Michael Vicks and Cam Newtons, while others are just going to be Tajh Boyd and/or Logan Thomas in the game.
So what if it turns out that I can improve my physique and finances further than I can improve my game? What if it turns out that, when it comes to game, I’m only ever going to be Logan Thomas (solid NCAA QB, short NFL career), but financially I can be Tyrod Taylor (pro-bowl NFL QB) or better. What if my game is only ever going to be Tajh Boyd (again, great NCAA QB, not an NFL QB) but I can be a physical Russell Wilson? This calculus is clearly going to alter the answer depending on which guy is answering. If your game is on a Cam Newton level but you know financially your ceiling is probably Tajh Boyd, perhaps the answer you give isn’t going to be the same answer another guy gives.
And, again, all of this is ignoring the fact that the holistic approach can clearly lead to the maximization of benefits for any individual guy. Even if you realize your game ceiling is Logan Thomas and not Cam Newton, there are still immense benefits to maximizing that potential because, when it is combined with a realm in which you have a higher ceiling (ex: let’s say your physique potential is Cam Newton) you are therefore able to
become the best possible version of yourself. Similarly, if your game is Russell Wilson but your financial potential is just Logan Thomas, there is still great benefit to be had by maximizing that financial potential because that makes you the
best possible version of yourself.
Thus, you can see that even if your game is elite, there are huge upsides to upping one’s financial and physical status to their full potential. Doing so just makes you better all around – you become the very best possible version of yourself, and that ought to be the goal of any man here. There’s no way to reach that goal if we dedicate ourselves to ignoring key components in the equation (looks and money).
Quote:The only thing that entered my mind as I lucked out in that club was that I need to tighten up my game. My release needs to be quicker and more fluid like Drazen Petrovic jumper. I don't need to be taller, whiter nor richer. Isaiah Thomas (5'9 allstar for the Boston Celtics) doesn't go in the game wishing he was bigger and taller and could jump higher. He is finished growing. He takes more shots in practice, stays in the gym longer and does wind sprints, pushups, box jumps, stretches, watches tapes of players with his size and build with his role (see where I am going here?) so that when the buzzer sounds and the game is done, he has dropped 30 points and 8 dimes on the opposing team. Stop watching tapes of Deandre Jordan if you are built like Dwayne Wade.
Yes, I see where you are going, and it makes my point. As I just said above, not all men are built the same way with the same ceilings in the same categories. Let’s say I’m someone with Cam Newton potential game, Tajh Boyd potential looks, and Logan Thomas financial potential. How much good does it do me to watch tape on the guy with the Tajh Boyd game, Logan Thomas looks, and Russell Wilson finances? Maybe I can get something out of it, but clearly my final approach to life will differ from that guy.
Strengths vary between men, and that necessitates a varied holistic approach. What you instead propose is a rigid, non-variable, singular approach narrowly tailored to game and game alone. That doesn’t make sense.
Improve yourself to your max potential in all fields and do not neglect any of them (because that makes you the best you can be), and then play to your strengths (which may not be the same strengths the guy next to you has). If you have Tajh Boyd game it can still be helpful to watch and learn from the guy with the Mike Vick game (if only to guarantee that you reach your own lower ceiling/potential in game and become the best you can be in that realm), but its ok if you never actually become Mike Vick in game – play to your other strengths instead. Maybe you’re a physical Mike Vick or a financial Mike Vick – if that’s the case, adjust your strategy accordingly.
Quote:I see rough Nigerians and Jamaicans constantly roll off the ship fresh as fcuk and start smashing white lizards prematurely. If I were to complain to them about my shortcomings in not being able to get gyal, they laugh at me like I'm some sarf fish and chips eating loafter and they are right. The rough Naija or Jamo guy pulling lizards is not pulling them cos lizards like rough guys, he is pulling lizards because he doesn't give a fcuk, has immutable self confidence. Often a lizard ends up spreading for a guy because the guy she likes didn't have the scrotum contents to go up and claim his prize. She ends up sleeping with who is available and had the gall to approach her and propose his penis instead with whom she really desired.
Not everyone has the personality or upbringing necessary to mimic the rough Jamaican guy fresh off the boat. At the end of the day, you need to be who you are and play to your strengths. Shore up yourself in all realms to be the best you can be, and then approach life in a manner best served to what YOU are, not what some random fresh-off-the-boat Caribbeans are.
Quote:What will say I notice is that as we enter the tail end of the winter months, some of you lot start whining on irrational stuff. I am blessed to be in the tropics but I spent decades in countries with crappy spirit sapping winter seasons so I totally understand. But bear in mind that since your rationales are very likely shifted due to environment and dig deeper, turn on your sun lamps and stick to game principles and allow this winter blow over.
I am not irrational, I am not whining, and the end of winter has nothing to do with it. I just don’t agree with you. Reasonable minds are free to differ.
Quote:In summary, you have to accept that game is the answer and learn it, there are no ifs and buts about it. If you deny it, you continue to be the prey instead of the predator.
Here is what I have to accept:
Game is ONE answer. You must learn it, and there are no ifs/ands/buts about that.
Game is not the ONLY answer. You can and should learn of the other answers as well. Failure to do so will result in your failure to become the best you can be, and nobody should settle for that.