excitedracistfrog.gif

Tomorrow looks like it's going to be exciting.

   

   

This could be big.

Dotcom has had a grudge against Clinton since she extradited him on behalf of Hollywood. I almost forgotten about this guy since hes been laying low here after getting BTFO at our last election with his attempt at taking over our government.

It would not surprise me at all if he is the source of some of the info coming out, and if he had the entire contents of Hillarys private server.

Dotcom was pretty sure that Trump would win in June:

Extremely tempted to place a bet on Trump right now...

(10-26-2016 03:16 AM)Nineteen84 Wrote:  Extremely tempted to place a bet on Trump right now...

I'd recommend it, even if it's not for the monetary gain. I've put in enough to make the return value stop people scrolling their facebook when they see it.

The New Zealand media are just as bad as the US media. When you win a good stack of cash on something like this the first question people ask is "how did you know?" which opens the door for me to reply, "You always bet on a sure thing - the media are liars and almost every story has a political agenda". Has a lot more gravity when they see you were actually willing to put your money where your mouth is.

If Trump wins I'm going to shout all the boys at work Pizza and fill the beer fridge. Then continue red pilling them.

Well, even if Kim Dotcom drops all of Hilllary's 33,000 emails tomorrow, how are Trump supporters going to read all of them, analyze them, put pressure on the media to report on it if there's some big scandals, and then get the message out to the American voters, make it disseminate well enough to make a difference, all within 12 days?

(10-26-2016 03:54 AM)Belgrano Wrote:  Well, even if Kim Dotcom drops all of Hilllary's 33,000 emails tomorrow, how are Trump supporters going to read all of them, analyze them, put pressure on the media to report on it if there's some big scandals, and then get the message out to the American voters, make it disseminate well enough to make a difference, all within 12 days?

Hopefully "IF", big emphasis on the if, someone has retrieved the emails, one would hope that either:

A.) They have already read through and stickied the most important ones or...

B.) All off the emails are incriminating, hence the reason they were deleted.

Funny if the 33k emails are super racist, anti semitic etc and then /pol/ decides to support #BasedHillary.

The craziness of this election knows no limits.

(10-26-2016 03:54 AM)Belgrano Wrote:  Well, even if Kim Dotcom drops all of Hilllary's 33,000 emails tomorrow, how are Trump supporters going to read all of them, analyze them, put pressure on the media to report on it if there's some big scandals, and then get the message out to the American voters, make it disseminate well enough to make a difference, all within 12 days?

Autism via Reddit.

(10-26-2016 04:23 AM)Nineteen84 Wrote:  

(10-26-2016 03:54 AM)Belgrano Wrote:  Well, even if Kim Dotcom drops all of Hilllary's 33,000 emails tomorrow, how are Trump supporters going to read all of them, analyze them, put pressure on the media to report on it if there's some big scandals, and then get the message out to the American voters, make it disseminate well enough to make a difference, all within 12 days?

Autism via Reddit.

Put that stuff in an excel template and any half proficient user can reduce 33000 clutter emails to 500 bombs in less than two hours.

Filters. Filter by size, filter by sender, filter by topics, Even filter by dates (check for example Benghazi date and search for mails from that day +5).

If all 33K were dropped all at once on Wikileaks site, we could find most bombs within 4-12 hours. They have search filters. Unfortunately they have decided to do these tease trickles lately. So expect breadcrumbs. We will be lucky to get something we could use to hurt Hillary in a 2 days newscycle in those emails. I think there are at least 3 things strong enough in that 33K but they likely won't release those until the very end, after the election at this rate.

As for the immediate needs to defeat Hillary, we need video of her calling Donna Brazile a fat brown cow or calling someone a nigger. Either one of those, is far more likely to hurt her than the 33K emails, election wise, with the only exception of those emails detailing an outright bribe from Saudi or Iran and she says send it to my foundation. Her black female vote percentage is still too damn high. If that got knocked down even 5-9%, we could sit on a lawnchair election day with a shit eating grin.

The Podesta emails are starting to produce some results. Yesterday's dump had the email that confirmed that Obama had lied about not knowing that Clinton had an illegal server. The mainstream media widely reported that this morning.

(10-26-2016 10:08 AM)RaccoonFace Wrote:  

Comey alluded to Obama and Hillary had emailed each other during the Congressional hearings. He just did not want to speak much on it in the open door setting, because that would be throwing his boss under the bus. Bill O may not like it, but that's the game. A standing president has alot of privilege on secrecy matters and no FBI director is going to call out his boss publicly.

Also, I do not recall, Comey saying that he ever had access to John Podesta's personal mail accounts nor Cheryl Mills' personal mail accounts. All they obtained was Hillary, and those chains did not include her, so technically, it is very possible that he did not know they were scrambling to try and hide Obama's emails to Hillary.

Wikileaks may be the only people with John Podesta's emails. If Trump's administration wants to take actions after the election, they will need to get a subpoena for them. Chain of custody will be needed, and even with DKIM and message headers from Wikileaks, it's not likely admissible in court. I would likely wager he has deleted them. His ISP might have them, but might not, if served, due to their standard retention policies. (Which might be 30-90 days long)

Other ways around that would be to get them to either cooperate or confess, which means someone is going to get a deal. Should be interesting to see which one of them squeaks first.

Jack Posobiec has just tweeted that Youtube have banned Danny Williams. What total faggots. According to Jack after 1 million views his video was popping up on the front page when someone searched 'Bill Clinton'. This was the trigger. His viral video is still viewable and mirrored all over Youtube.

^ Well that's a big nothing.

EDIT: I suppose he might be saying how HE did it, but it seems to me to be yet another over-promise re Clinton leaks.

(10-26-2016 03:02 PM)rotekz Wrote:  

Yeah that's funny until Hillary's lawyers drag the NSA into closed court hearings for testimony or start digging into how they got the emails, legality, chain of custody, privacy, inter-org spying, etc.

Once it's thrown out and she gets off again, the laughter would turn to anger.

The NSA doesn't have to help any congressman outside of the senior members of the intelligence committees on both sides. The reason they are on those committees is because they don't bother the spy agencies and just manage the budgets and optics the public sees.

There is a reason why many consider those House and Senate members more powerful than a Speaker or a Whip. It's because they have full security clearances even up to the president's level. Anytime they act aghast of some leak of what the NSA or CIA is doing, it's bullshit. They knew, they just have to feign surprise for the public and the rest of congress to not get upset with them.

If we want to stop Hillary and her crew, they have to be stopped on the civilian level, not above it.

Dupe

(10-26-2016 03:02 PM)rotekz Wrote:  

Kim Dot Com, you are officially an over-promising and under-delivering idiot.

I decided to doxx myself folks:

   

^ Good Lord what planet is that astronaut from?

(10-26-2016 03:02 PM)rotekz Wrote:  

WOW! It's fucking nothing!