Podesta mentioned "authentic weirdness" in the way HRC laugh.

Quote:From:[email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: 2015-10-22 19:35
Subject: Re: Gowdy

i emailed a very senior republican friend of mine and said, “Why is this going on for 9 hours?.” He replied, “Because its going so well for us. . . .’
> On Oct 22, 2015, at 10:32 AM, John Podesta <[email protected]> wrote: >
> I think he protested too much. Made this all about Committee's legitimacy and not what happened.
>
> On Thursday, October 22, 2015, Luke Albee <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >
> Was sensitive enough not to wear his sheet to the hearing
>
> Sent from my iPhone >
> On Sep 20, 2015, at 11:37 AM, John Podesta <[email protected] <[email protected]');>> wrote: >
>> Laughing too hard is her authentic weirdness.
>>
>> On Sunday, September 20, 2015, Luke Albee <[email protected] <[email protected]');>> wrote: >
> Thought she was really good. Really good . She sometimes laughs a little too hard at jokes that aren't that funny. Other than that...A. >>
>> Sent from my iPhone >>
>> On Jul 27, 2015, at 9:30 AM, John Podesta <[email protected] <>> wrote: >>
>>> I'll call late this afternoon
>>>
>>> On Monday, July 27, 2015, Luke Albee <[email protected] <>> wrote: >>>
We are hearing its this week. Might we have a brief conversation?
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone

Clinton staffer feeding reporters questions?

Video in link

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-21...-questions

http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/wikil...-less-men/

Clinton Foundation pays women less than men. They hypocrisy is ripe.

(10-21-2016 05:24 PM)draguer Wrote:  Clinton staffer feeding reporters questions?

Video in link

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-21...-questions

Clinton and cronies are losing their shit over RT today.
Signs of desperate swipes, by a wounded beast?

(10-22-2016 06:24 AM)El_Gostro Wrote:  Clinton and cronies are losing their shit over RT today.
Signs of desperate swipes, by a wounded beast?

link?

Most feminist bloggers (including Jessica Valenti) are DNC shills:

https://twitter.com/whenindoubtdo/status...6429437952

Quote:WikiLeaks [email protected] 2 hours ago
RELEASE: The Podesta Emails Part 15 https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/?q=...archresult … #PodestaEmails #PodestaEmails15 #imWithHer #HillaryClinton
5:50 AM - 22 Oct 2016

(10-22-2016 09:26 AM)budoslavic Wrote:  

Quote:WikiLeaks [email protected] 2 hours ago
RELEASE: The Podesta Emails Part 15 https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/?q=...archresult … #PodestaEmails #PodestaEmails15 #imWithHer #HillaryClinton
5:50 AM - 22 Oct 2016

   

   

I've met some democrats who are voting for Hillary solely because of the fact that she is the democratic nominee. They don't care about anything else just refuse to vote republican

Samseau Wrote:link?

My bad
https://www.rt.com/viral/363709-clinton-...-wkileaks/

It was in rt front-page this (european) morning.

Plenty of other articles about team Cunt-on bashing Russian media

New Anti-Hillary ad courtesy of Mike Cernovich.





Feel free to upload to facebook/twitter or wherever and share with your friends.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/e510oxta7b6exr...p.mp4?dl=0

Yes. We're about to ice the bitch. Feeling energised.

How damning would footage of Crooked Hillary have to be to receive mainstream media coverage? At this point, I'm pretty sure she could be recorded setting a man on fire with oily rags and a lighter and CNN would say, "A 'heartwarming' moment was captured earlier today between Hillary Clinton and one of her supporters."

I don't understand why they are wasting time releasing shit, people already have their ballots (dropped mine off yesterday).

(10-22-2016 08:08 PM)spokepoker Wrote:  I don't understand why they are wasting time releasing shit, people already have their ballots (dropped mine off yesterday).

I know "timing is everything" but I've wondered the same thing myself. I can understand not wanting to drop a major story over a weekend since it won't get nearly as much attention, but surely if the story was damning enough it would carry over into the next week's news cycle.

The slow drip release style of WikiLeaks makes sense because documents take a long time to read through, and if you release too much at once it makes it all the more difficult to go through everything. With a video though, they should start dropping those bombs (if they have them) any minute now.

I'm walking in and voting on election day, I thought that's how most of the country did it, I don't know what percentage of voters cast early ballots, but I would imagine its the people walking in on election day (who might need an extra kick in the ass to get there, or might be late deciders) who have the greatest effect on an elections outcome.

I'm fine with guys like Okeefe and wikileaks releasing dirt on the Clintons right up until days before the election, they've proven to have a lot of dirt, all of it quite damning, and it seems like a better strategy keeping the wave crested high right up until the week of the election instead of dumping it all by the middle of October.

(10-22-2016 07:57 PM)LeoneVolpe Wrote:  How damning would footage of Crooked Hillary have to be to receive mainstream media coverage? At this point, I'm pretty sure she could be recorded setting a man on fire with oily rags and a lighter and CNN would say, "A 'heartwarming' moment was captured earlier today between Hillary Clinton and one of her supporters."

Same way Nelson Mandela's wife was well known for setting tires on fire around her opponents' necks, and MSM refused to report it.



MSM (and obviously, people controlling them) bears 90% of responsibility in the global weakening and corruption of our Western civilizations.

...

   

   

   
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/790211011047460864

From Gab.ai:






Cankles melting down: "If that f'king bastard wins, we all hang from nooses!"