@ Rigsby.

I'm not exactly risking life and limb. They don't care about these message boards. Only on Twitter and Facebook will they take action, for now.

If they can slam dunk you with your twitter handle saying mean things and it is admissible in court you are in trouble and I keep off of it for that very reason. Too much oversight on activities.

If online forums were targeted we would have seen Reddit, /pol /b and 4chan taken off the internet long ago.

(10-22-2016 05:12 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Let us first import 20 mio. young single hot girls into the US & Europe and see if we need more. We'll call if we need more violent low-IQ rapists who want to live off welfare. Let us first deal with the wave of young Latinas, Thai, Ukrainian and Belarus girls - then we will see.

We hadn't those problems if:
A: The Elites don't want it like that way
B: Even without Elites, it seems like Politics and Media is driven by a certain agenda
C: No Elites, no hidden Agenda, just a bunch of fools with no balls to take action because they are to soft in their views

No way you spin it, the solutions would be simple. Many simple things without cruel violence are mention here. Many of those things are also discussed in Germany. Inside the politics, some media and the police. Still nothing happen. I have more the feeling that our political system is not able to react to any uncommon thing. They are great to hunt you down for hate speech, when you don't pay your taxes or anything like that. Everything that "triggers" their believe that we face a horde of savage invaders.

Its amazing how many normal but also higher police officers say they have no go areas, arab clans that for a mob, criminal gangs. That most heavy crime is related to migrants from a muslim background. The refugee situation is just a faster increase of all the existing problems. The ignorance to find solutions is so strange. It has to be a complete mental fucked up at the top or it is all by intention.

I'm seriously starting to think that the first step to bringing this PC nonsense to an end is to openly embrace negative labels in ways that cannot effectively be policed against.

For example. If you walked the streets with a shirt emblazoned with the words "misogynist" I'm not sure anyone would know how to react. Particularly if you were polite and well mannered. The laws aimed at marginalising us are aimed at the speech. But openly professing to be a racist or a mysoginist or a nationalist or a patriarch-ist is not actually against the law, is it.

So imagine if the trend caught on and just one in a hundred people started doing it. Low income shitlords with little to lose or guys that want to get into it (have your mobile phone ready). Do it in a pack. Five big guys maybe. No screaming. No threats. Just a shirt that says "misogynist" or "nationalist". I mean, the laws are supposed to suppress speech and in doing so suppress the idea that such people with those ideas even exist in meaningful numbers. Imagine if you could trounce that idea so that, without committing "hatespeech" you were still revealing that the politically correct majority is not as major as they'd have you believe.

It'd be an interesting social experiment. That's for sure.

delete

(10-22-2016 07:42 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  If every dollar spent on trying to get high level immigrants was instead spent subsidising successful middle class families to breed more then you would have homogeneity AND a reasonable population.

In Australia we had something called the baby bonus.

But of course, "politics". ...

I've read Singapore has/had something like that. If you had a Master's or better, they paid you to have a kid. If you had not graduated high school, they fined you.

(10-23-2016 05:26 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I'm seriously starting to think that the first step to bringing this PC nonsense to an end is to openly embrace negative labels in ways that cannot effectively be policed against.

For example. If you walked the streets with a shirt emblazoned with the words "misogynist" I'm not sure anyone would know how to react. Particularly if you were polite and well mannered. The laws aimed at marginalising us are aimed at the speech. But openly professing to be a racist or a mysoginist or a nationalist or a patriarch-ist is not actually against the law, is it.

So imagine if the trend caught on and just one in a hundred people started doing it. Low income shitlords with little to lose or guys that want to get into it (have your mobile phone ready). Do it in a pack. Five big guys maybe. No screaming. No threats. Just a shirt that says "misogynist" or "nationalist". I mean, the laws are supposed to suppress speech and in doing so suppress the idea that such people with those ideas even exist in meaningful numbers. Imagine if you could trounce that idea so that, without committing "hatespeech" you were still revealing that the politically correct majority is not as major as they'd have you believe.

It'd be an interesting social experiment. That's for sure.

I think we are in the early stages of a social movement where there will be a hardcore of shitlord nationalists, whatever label we end up being called, and that we will still be a minority, but everyone will know we are there and not to be messed with. First, the ranks of the cuckservatives must be decimated leading only the strong to fight shitlibs/globalists. This will occur quite fast if Trump loses. We will be under the hammer and come out as hardcore as a Caucasus hill tribe.

(10-23-2016 05:26 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I'm seriously starting to think that the first step to bringing this PC nonsense to an end is to openly embrace negative labels in ways that cannot effectively be policed against.

For example. If you walked the streets with a shirt emblazoned with the words "misogynist" I'm not sure anyone would know how to react. Particularly if you were polite and well mannered. The laws aimed at marginalising us are aimed at the speech. But openly professing to be a racist or a mysoginist or a nationalist or a patriarch-ist is not actually against the law, is it.

So imagine if the trend caught on and just one in a hundred people started doing it. Low income shitlords with little to lose or guys that want to get into it (have your mobile phone ready). Do it in a pack. Five big guys maybe. No screaming. No threats. Just a shirt that says "misogynist" or "nationalist". I mean, the laws are supposed to suppress speech and in doing so suppress the idea that such people with those ideas even exist in meaningful numbers. Imagine if you could trounce that idea so that, without committing "hatespeech" you were still revealing that the politically correct majority is not as major as they'd have you believe.

It'd be an interesting social experiment. That's for sure.

It's a good idea, in the beginning antifa types might attack you though.

Based blog post by Vox Day:

Vox Day Wrote:The suicidal altruism of Western women

But stupidity always has its consequences. Women's rights are rapidly proving to be the mortal wounding of the West:

Daily Mail Wrote:A woman opened her heart and her door to a 12-year-old boy who had fled the horrors of war in Afghanistan after losing his parents - or so she thought. In reality, not only was the boy in her care, Jamal, almost a decade older than she had been duped into believing, but he also had Taliban and child abuse material on his phone.

A dentist's check found his age to actually be around 21 and a subsequent investigation uncovered the shocking content on his mobile, according to the Sun. She took Jamal to a climbing centre, where he displayed upper body strength far beyond his supposed years and also was able to completely strip a rifle at a shooting range.

While in her care, he shared a room with three children aged between 12 and 14.
Rosie told the paper's Nigel Bunyan and Chris Pollard: 'It’s ridiculous how everybody else could see it but not the social workers.' Although she could not confirm if he was a terrorist, she was adamant he had spent time in a training camp.

She added that his last words to her were 'I’ll kill you and I know where your children are.'

It probably would be a useful object lesson to the women of the West if he did. Unfortunately, female solipsism is such that too many women would merely scoff at the example, and argue that the object of their virtue-signaling, Abdul, is a wonderful boy who just loves to babysit for her two younger children.

There is a reason why the conquerors of the world either slaughtered the children of their enemies or enslaved them and turned them into slave-warriors. Because children always grow up. All these altruistic idiots are doing is ensuring that the next war between Christendom and the Dar al-Islam and will be fought here rather than there.

And the fact that Christendom is far less fundamentally Christian than the Dar al-Islam is fundamentally Muslim means that the odds are increasing in the latter's favor. Bringing secularism to a civilizational war is akin to bringing a rubber knife to a gun fight.

That's damn right.

Never should've let 'em vote.

Nurses, kindergarten teachers, social workers etc. all those kind of women have a natural helper syndrome. It's needed for their task but it make them blind for the dangers in their real life. When you look at girls that have guys that beat them, abuse them or fall for this kind of stuff. Its mostly women from this field. They look for a duty and desire to help people. This make them blind in their own way. Naive to the core.

(10-23-2016 01:42 PM)Parzival Wrote:  Nurses, kindergarten teachers, social workers etc. all those kind of women have a natural helper syndrome. It's needed for their task but it make them blind for the dangers in their real life. When you look at girls that have guys that beat them, abuse them or fall for this kind of stuff. Its mostly women from this field. They look for a duty and desire to help people. This make them blind in their own way. Naive to the core.

Or worse. What if they're deliberately blind because the're masochists.

How many copies did "50 Shades" sell again?

(10-23-2016 02:20 PM)Ghost Tiger Wrote:  

(10-23-2016 01:42 PM)Parzival Wrote:  Nurses, kindergarten teachers, social workers etc. all those kind of women have a natural helper syndrome. It's needed for their task but it make them blind for the dangers in their real life. When you look at girls that have guys that beat them, abuse them or fall for this kind of stuff. Its mostly women from this field. They look for a duty and desire to help people. This make them blind in their own way. Naive to the core.

Or worse. What if they're deliberately blind because the're masochists.

How many copies did "50 Shades" sell again?

It's mostly not masochism but a willing decision to submit to a man. Also violence is sexually exciting to many women (up to a degree). Women are psychologically evolved to like that in a man and there is a good reason for this, but in our situation it is not useful.

In the novel it is a highly intelligent self-made billionaire who does the violence (most of it psychological) - in reality it is the low-life low-IQ drug dealer or Muslim rapefugee who gives you more low-IQ violent children destroying civilization in the wake.

You've made me remember my 6th and 7th grade teacher. We had an individual in the class which was pretty much the poster kid for juvenile delinquency. He couldn't even read and write properly despite being 14 years old (class repeater) and our "progressive" minded teacher took pity at the unfairness of the system against this poor uncomprehended and discriminated member of society and made him pass both times!
Never saw him again but heard rumours he had been shot down when he tried ro rob a car from a cop in civilian clothes.

I guess the teacher fits this description of nurturing social service workeress that Parzival alludes to

(10-24-2016 06:48 AM)El_Gostro Wrote:  You've made me remember my 6th and 7th grade teacher. We had an individual in the class which was pretty much the poster kid for juvenile delinquency. He couldn't even read and write properly despite being 14 years old (class repeater) and our "progressive" minded teacher took pity at the unfairness of the system against this poor uncomprehended and discriminated member of society and made him pass both times!
Never saw him again but heard rumours he had been shot down when he tried ro rob a car from a cop in civilian clothes.

I guess the teacher fits this description of nurturing social service workeress that Parzival alludes to

There is a lesson learned in this.

They only get away with this stuff if they're allowed too. As soon as the hammer comes down they either die or get such a shock they cannot operate properly for some minutes.

I remember a lot of problem boys at my High School. The only time they were brought in line was when a man got in their face or they were expelled and the police tracked them and their parents.

Sexual and physical violence on the scale we see now is the result of not doing anything and allowing the behaviour to continue. Whats worse is the perps believe they are above the law and cannot be questioned or brought to heel.

Get rid of their defenders and they will fold.

5900 more migrants have been ferried into Italy by the Italian coast guard over the weekend. That's just one weekend. Back in the days I would have freaked out if something like this had hit the news just once per year.



A snapshot of the future scientists, engineers, brain surgeons, and architects we are being blessed with. Broken record alert: Western Europe cannot be saved - we are importing our own destruction. The numbers are simply stacked against us and this will continue full blast as long as the Left controls Brussels and the majority of Western European administrations.



Here's some eye bleach for you guys...

Watch out for increasing levels of drugs, prostitution and exploitation in areas where they end up. Migrants with nothing else and want power will go through the drug trade.

Just go to Berlin Friedrichshain to experience it in real live. They are standing there every 10 meters in the street to the club area.

Interestingly they seem to not be very fond of more rural areas and/or places with less piblic transportation available

As far as I know, German government does not sponsor cars if you are on welfare. So they will always go to cities, because public transport there is getting you to every place you need. Public transport in rural areas is shit.

Thank God.

(10-22-2016 05:12 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  ^

Fuck the 'best immigration' selection.

The only groups I would let in:

1) Single young fertile women - Muslim girls if they become ex-Muslim - no brothers, cousins or uncles coming with them - have to marry a local in order to get to stay.
2) Super-high-IQ geniuses or otherwise male top-performers that clearly show a love and deep desire to assimilate in the host country and want nothing else but to become a German/Irish etc. They will have years where they have to prove their worth to their new country - any transgression or lack of performance will mean instant deportation. Also they have to fully embrace the country's language, values, habits and lifestyle not only accepting it, but loving it fully.

Other than that - we'll call if we need more. But my guess is that there would be enough women coming in to Europe and the US - hardly any men would qualify. And finally the West would become deserving pussy-paradises where the cocks are the minority. Feminism would be a luxury that Western girls could no longer afford. And that is what the West should do - you are the most prosperous and successful countries in the world - you make the rules.

Immigration would be really simple if we all decided. Western countries could even pay for air fare and relocation of those girls. Let us first import 20 mio. young single hot girls into the US & Europe and see if we need more. We'll call if we need more violent low-IQ rapists who want to live off welfare. Let us first deal with the wave of young Latinas, Thai, Ukrainian and Belarus girls - then we will see.

As a rural fellow, I moved to the city for cultural enrichment myself. Access to lots of women, good and interesting jobs, lots to do in my spare time, interesting people of all walks, race and creed.

I own real estate in one of the worlds most expensive cities, and I would love to raise my son here. Yet....

How long til cities start to fall?

I used to live in Malmo/Lund and these cities feel close to the brink. Also London and Paris have that feeling, even though they are glossed over due to their tourism and fantastic history.

Even here, San Francisco is dead to me. It feels that already the city has fallen yet its reputation will keep it floating for some time to come.

If I cash out now I will have $700k in my pocket to start over. No matter how much I want to raise my son in the city, some days just feel like it will only ever be downhill from here, that I am just fighting the inevitable; the real estate correction, the importing of the welfare class from around the world, the divide between the doers and the leeches.

I want this to work out, I want the world to stay sane and to go back to a time in 1986 where the high water mark of western happiness seemed to have left a permanent chalk line on our memories.

(10-24-2016 02:55 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(10-23-2016 02:20 PM)Ghost Tiger Wrote:  

(10-23-2016 01:42 PM)Parzival Wrote:  Nurses, kindergarten teachers, social workers etc. all those kind of women have a natural helper syndrome. It's needed for their task but it make them blind for the dangers in their real life. When you look at girls that have guys that beat them, abuse them or fall for this kind of stuff. Its mostly women from this field. They look for a duty and desire to help people. This make them blind in their own way. Naive to the core.

Or worse. What if they're deliberately blind because the're masochists.

How many copies did "50 Shades" sell again?

It's mostly not masochism but a willing decision to submit to a man. Also violence is sexually exciting to many women (up to a degree). Women are psychologically evolved to like that in a man and there is a good reason for this, but in our situation it is not useful.

In the novel it is a highly intelligent self-made billionaire who does the violence (most of it psychological) - in reality it is the low-life low-IQ drug dealer or Muslim rapefugee who gives you more low-IQ violent children destroying civilization in the wake.

Why do western women require these imported savages for sexual excitement? Because western men have become cucks, that's why. We fix our civilization by fixing men. The women will follow. They're just starved for masculinity.

(10-24-2016 06:07 PM)Laner Wrote:  As a rural fellow, I moved to the city for cultural enrichment myself. Access to lots of women, good and interesting jobs, lots to do in my spare time, interesting people of all walks, race and creed.

I own real estate in one of the worlds most expensive cities, and I would love to raise my son here. Yet....

How long til cities start to fall?

I used to live in Malmo/Lund and these cities feel close to the brink. Also London and Paris have that feeling, even though they are glossed over due to their tourism and fantastic history.

Even here, San Francisco is dead to me. It feels that already the city has fallen yet its reputation will keep it floating for some time to come.

If I cash out now I will have $700k in my pocket to start over. No matter how much I want to raise my son in the city, some days just feel like it will only ever be downhill from here, that I am just fighting the inevitable; the real estate correction, the importing of the welfare class from around the world, the divide between the doers and the leeches.

I want this to work out, I want the world to stay sane and to go back to a time in 1986 where the high water mark of western happiness seemed to have left a permanent chalk line on our memories.

Interesting that you mentioned 1986. Last night I was just enjoying one of the greatest movies of all time, "Big Trouble in Little China" released in 1986. Lots of red pill wisdom on game and race in America in that gem.

And so, in honor of that great masterpiece of film-making, and to lighten the mood of this solemn thread (for those of you that know and love this movie), I give you... David Lo Pan Style.

(10-24-2016 06:07 PM)Laner Wrote:  As a rural fellow, I moved to the city for cultural enrichment myself. Access to lots of women, good and interesting jobs, lots to do in my spare time, interesting people of all walks, race and creed.

I own real estate in one of the worlds most expensive cities, and I would love to raise my son here. Yet....

How long til cities start to fall?

I used to live in Malmo/Lund and these cities feel close to the brink. Also London and Paris have that feeling, even though they are glossed over due to their tourism and fantastic history.

Even here, San Francisco is dead to me. It feels that already the city has fallen yet its reputation will keep it floating for some time to come.

If I cash out now I will have $700k in my pocket to start over. No matter how much I want to raise my son in the city, some days just feel like it will only ever be downhill from here, that I am just fighting the inevitable; the real estate correction, the importing of the welfare class from around the world, the divide between the doers and the leeches.

I want this to work out, I want the world to stay sane and to go back to a time in 1986 where the high water mark of western happiness seemed to have left a permanent chalk line on our memories.

The enrichment does not like the countryside - both Africans as well as the new Muslim enrichers hate the woods, the wide open spaces and little infrastructure.

Rural areas are the way to go, though globalist Agenda 21 will keep on making living there ever more expensive. But there are some enclaves where super high net worth individuals live. If you cannot afford living there, then picking a remote area is good.

Though I might add - you never know which town and village will be picked for the next rapefugee cocntainment center or relocation plan. Personally I don't see any future for the West and also for Eastern Europe.

Today I just realized that even countries like Poland had their cultural best days behind them. Yes - they are doing economically better than before and there is little diversity here, but as I drove past an upper middle class town close to Warsaw I suddenly became aware of how empty those places are. I talked with folk and girls who were young in the 1980s. Back then the entire town was bursting with small kids playing and women staying at home (they were more prosperous there). Now both father and mother are working and if they have kids, then they drop them off at one of the numerous daycare centers. The entire town is deserted and the gardens are unused - it's almost dead.

This is the future of the West demographically speaking. The replacement Europeans are scum in comparison and nothing will change that anytime soon.


(Another funny example of a 16 year old Calais child migrant.)

And Poland is too close for WWIII and Western diversity not to hit them hard in the next decades.

And by the way - next town to theirs is an upper class place. That town is alive and well, because contrary to the even upper middle classes their women are not working. Their women are walking around with the kids, the maid or enjoying a coffee in a restaurant. The small upper class town is far more alive.

So in our world you either move up financially or move into areas where the country and population is at a bearable indoctrination level - Singapore, Hong Kong, China, Japan - also set to remain that way for the next decades at least.

Because sooner or later enrichment is going to come for you and your family.