(10-24-2016 01:56 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(10-23-2016 02:56 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  I prefer the Chinese method.

Bullet to the back of the noggin, face in the ditch and the family has to pay for the bullet.

That might be all well and good for the rank-and-file traitors, but I think Hillary plus everyone she directly enables AND everyone who directly enables her should be hanged.

I want to be on record that I am against any extra-legal violence.

I think it is a real bad idea for this forum , to be mentioning or advocating illegal violence against anyone, including political candidates you don't like.

(10-24-2016 12:13 PM)iknowexactly Wrote:  

(10-24-2016 01:56 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(10-23-2016 02:56 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  I prefer the Chinese method.

Bullet to the back of the noggin, face in the ditch and the family has to pay for the bullet.

That might be all well and good for the rank-and-file traitors, but I think Hillary plus everyone she directly enables AND everyone who directly enables her should be hanged.

I want to be on record that I am against any extra-legal violence.

I think it is a real bad idea for this forum , to be mentioning or advocating illegal violence against anyone, including political candidates you don't like.

To be fair, I think that was merely an opinion from a very frustrated person who continues to see no justice for these people who consistently break whatever law that suits them, and seemingly has a system propping them up instead of indicting them.

Advocating violence would be saying "we should go hurt these people" or advising someone specifically to hurt these people.

(10-24-2016 12:05 PM)Mr. Accuride Wrote:  Yes, basically violating the FEC laws preventing PACs from directly coordinating with her campaign. She obviously broke them based on the video, but nobody will care.

Sad that we literally need her going off with racial slurs on tape for anyone to care.

They evidence of FEC violations are immense. Sadly they are almost as corrupt as Hillary. If she wins nothing will happen. If trump wins, slaps on the wrist.

The penalties aren't exactly strong enough for deterrent to be valuable. They keep it like this for a reason. They don't want top Democrats and Republicans going to jail over gamesmanship.

@joelcomm · 51s
Joel Comm Retweeted James O'Keefe
"Holy crap! Watergate, anyone?"

Who is Joel Comm you may ask?
An entrepreneur who I'm aware of on Twitter & an individual who rarely if ever Tweets about election matters, except to comment along the lines of - "is it over yet?".
If he's inclined to retweet & comment, plus Fox News are set to discuss the new video on their 6pm timeslot, it may resonate with certain folk moreso than what some may think.

Haven't seen this yet. Fairly easy to verify the emails are real, even though anyone could see she (Donna Brazile) was deflecting like Neo in The Matrix when asked about it.

Errata Security: Yes, we can validate leaked emails

Robert Graham Wrote:Recently, WikiLeaks has released emails from Democrats. Many have repeatedly claimed that some of these emails are fake or have been modified, that there's no way to validate each and every one of them as being true. Actually, there is, using a mechanism called DKIM.

DKIM is a system designed to stop spam. It works by verifying the sender of the email. Moreover, as a side effect, it verifies that the email has not been altered.

Hillary's team uses "hillaryclinton.com", which as DKIM enabled. Thus, we can verify whether some of these emails are true.

Recently, in response to a leaked email suggesting Donna Brazile gave Hillary's team early access to debate questions, she defended herself by suggesting the email had been "doctored" or "falsified". That's not true. We can use DKIM to verify it.

You can see the email in question at the WikiLeaks site: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5205. The title suggests they have early access to debate questions, and includes one specifically on the death penalty, with the text:
since 1973, 156 people have been on death row and later set free. Since 1976, 1,414 people have been executed in the U.S

Indeed, during the debate the next day, they asked the question:
Secretary Clinton, since 1976, we have executed 1,414 people in this country. Since 1973, 156 who were convicted have been exonerated from the death row.

It's not a smoking gun, but at the same time, it both claims they got questions in advance while having a question in advance. Trump gets hung on similar chains of evidence, so it's not something we can easily ignore.

Anyway, this post isn't about the controversy, but the fact that we can validate the email. When an email server sends a message, it'll include an invisible "header". They aren't especially hidden, most email programs allow you to view them, it's just that they are boring, so hidden by default. The DKIM header in this email looks like:

DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=hillaryclinton.com; s=google;
h=from:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc;
bh=EHIyNFKU1g6KhzxpAJQtxaW82g5+cTT3qlzIbUpGoRY=;
b=JgW85tkuhlDcythkyCrUMjPIAjHbUVPtgyqu+KpUR/kqQjE8+W23zacIh0DtVTqUGD
mzaviTrNmI8Ds2aUlzEFjxhJHtgKT4zbRiqDZS7fgba8ifMKCyDgApGNfenmQz+81+hN
2OHb/pLmmop+lIeM8ELXHhhr0m/Sd4c/3BOy8=

How do you verify this is true. There are a zillion ways with various "DKIM verifiers". I use the popular Thunderbird email reader (from the Mozilla Firefox team). They have an addon designed specifically to verify DKIM. Normally, email readers don't care, because it's the email server's job to verify DKIM, not the client. So we need a client addon to enable verification.

Downloading the raw email from WikiLeaks and opening in Thunderbird, with the addon, I get the following verification that the email is valid. Specifically, it validates that the HillaryClinton.com sent precisely this content, with this subject, on that date.



Let's see what happens when somebody tries to doctor the email. In the following, I added "MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN" to the top of the email.



As you can see, we've proven that DKIM will indeed detect if anybody has "doctored" or "falsified" this email.

I was just listening to ABC News about this story. It repeated Democrat talking points that the WikiLeaks emails weren't validated. That's a lie. This email in particular has been validated. I just did it, and shown you how you can validate it, too.

Btw, if you can forge an email that validates correctly as I've shown, I'll give you 1-bitcoin. It's the easiest way of solving arguments whether this really validates the email -- if somebody tells you this blogpost is invalid, then tell them they can earn about $600 (current value of BTC) proving it. Otherwise, no.

Further reading...
Fox: Tech blogger finds proof wikileaks emails are real
Verifying Wikileaks via DKM signatures
Daily Caller: Proof Donna Brazile's emails are real

Robert Graham Wrote:Update: In the future, when HilaryClinton.com changes their DKIM key, it will no longer be able to verify. Thus, I'm recording the domain key here:

google._domainkey.hillaryclinton.com: type TXT, class IN
v=DKIM1; k=rsa; p=MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQCJdAYdE2z61YpUMFqFTFJqlFomm7C4Kk97nzJmR4​YZuJ8SUy9CF35UVPQzh3EMLhP+yOqEl29Ax2hA/h7vayr/f/a19x2jrFCwxVry+nACH1FVmIwV3b5FCNEkNeAIqjbY8K9PeTmpqNhWDbvXeKgFbIDwhWq0HP2PbySkOe​4tTQIDAQAB

(10-24-2016 08:47 PM)Adonis Wrote:  

   

   

Anybody else notice Cankles didnt wear a flag pin at the last debate? Amazing.

At work, I couldn't help but overhear a conversation among middle-aged women about Hillary. It was painful to listen to until I heard just how inept the Clinton campaign is. All of the women receive emails from Hillary's campaign, but none of them have given money. Apparently, Hill sends out emails saying she is "disappointed" in them for not giving money. They were all pissed off about that email.

(10-24-2016 10:30 PM)Bacchus Wrote:  At work, I couldn't help but overhear a conversation among middle-aged women about Hillary. It was painful to listen to until I heard just how inept the Clinton campaign is. All of the women receive emails from Hillary's campaign, but none of them have given money. Apparently, Hill sends out emails saying she is "disappointed" in them for not giving money. They were all pissed off about that email.

Surely the Hillary crew know 'pay for play' only works for the supposed 'elites'?
Besides, doesn't Hilldawg have enough Saudi money...?

(10-24-2016 12:24 PM)kbell Wrote:  

The smoking gun for Obama

(10-25-2016 10:17 AM)rotekz Wrote:  The smoking gun for Obama

This would have been useful for news org to hit Obama himself with this a long ass time ago. Kinda too late to be frank. While this one doesn't help Trump and never would have, it would have helped silenced Obama's rhetoric these past few months and discredited him a long time ago as an outright liar.

He is literally days away from being out of office and is still causing havoc across many areas, not just the election.

Oh well.

Into the interdasting bucket it goes...

Wikileaks #17 was yesterday. Has #18 been released yet today?

(10-25-2016 11:33 AM)C-Note Wrote:  Wikileaks #17 was yesterday. Has #18 been released yet today?

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-25...-now-31500

(10-24-2016 12:24 PM)kbell Wrote:  

The boy grabbed Donald Duck by the pussy!

Sen him to a brainw...errr...reeducation facility!

This get's better and better. the 33k emails may still be around and the FBI (probably willfully) didn't do a few things to see.

http://nypost.com/2016/10/25/hillarys-33...re=twitter

That boy had a sex change and became Chelsea Clinton. The first tranny daughter of a possible president.

For all the Hag's "Russia could hack the election" fear-mongering, isn't it interesting the only voting abnormalities that have occurred thus far have been in favor of democrats by switching republicans' votes?

Of course they call it a "calibration issue" -- but you can bet your ass had such a calibration issue been switching blue votes to red, the left would've claimed it as undeniable "proof" Russia's working to put Mr. Trump in the White House.

What can we do to combat vote fraud? I cast a paper ballot for Mr. Trump, but for all we know they could be opening them up, seeing Trump votes and throwing them away. I certainly hope that isn't the case because this cunt needs to go down! #MAGA

^ Supposedly all ballot boxes are sealed and then counted under the eye of monitors from both parties. So I suppose that's some risk, that some supercuck Republicans agree to turn a blind eye.