I prefer the Chinese method.

Bullet to the back of the noggin, face in the ditch and the family has to pay for the bullet.

   

The sick leftists running the country have taken everything true and beautiful in America and turned it into an alien, poisoned facsimile of itself. Freedom of speech, freedom of association, marriage, family life, community, all have been destroyed from within. The enemy isn't China, Russia, or even ISIS/Al-Qaeda, it's the disgusting people running the country.

This is why you can't believe the MSM polls showing Clinton ahead by +5.

TLOZ explained how the email doesn't mean what you think it means.
https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-48360...pid1425492

delete

(10-23-2016 05:39 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

(10-23-2016 08:45 PM)RexImperator Wrote:  TLOZ explained how the email doesn't mean what you think it means.
https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-48360...pid1425492

We do not know the intended meaning. Oversampling might mean overweighting, we don't have the weights of these polls.

   
   

^^^^

Re O'Keefe: for fuck's sake don't perform stripteases unless you've actually got someone paying for the performance.

Sure, let's specify a date and time for release of a video. Let's give the Clitiron campaign a good 24-48 hours' warning to pay another porn actress to accuse Trump of rape and clog up the MSM cycle. Fucking release the thing without warning already! Stop playing by MSM rules!

When are you guys going to understand nothing, not even a good old fashioned rape story can hurt Trump anymore? The public is becoming more aware, red-pilled. unplugged from the Matrix. Nothing will stick. Timeline for the video is fine. It drums up anticipation.

From the New York Times:

"Karl Rove, the chief strategist of George W. Bush’s successful presidential campaigns, said on Sunday on Fox News that he no longer believed Mr. Trump had a realistic path to victory against Mrs. Clinton.

“I don’t see it happening,” Mr. Rove said."

Lucky it's in the NY Times, it can simply be discounted.

(10-23-2016 10:24 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  ^^^^

Re O'Keefe: for fuck's sake don't perform stripteases unless you've actually got someone paying for the performance.

Sure, let's specify a date and time for release of a video. Let's give the Clitiron campaign a good 24-48 hours' warning to pay another porn actress to accuse Trump of rape and clog up the MSM cycle. Fucking release the thing without warning already! Stop playing by MSM rules!

Yeah I also don't agree with this "announce what we're about to do" strategy.

You gotta get it warm and lubed up before you bend her over...

Dude is giving America foreplay right now.

O'Keefe hyped up the last one and it was sub-part but he didn't give anybody the deadmans switch publicly for the Huma vid, he did for the one dropping tomorrow though.

My theory is now that the reason the MSN blew up a bogus poll so quickly is to hedge against a possible drop if this video is the actual bomb where by name/voice/face Hillary finally gets stuck in her web of lies. If true a large group will simply give up on her and go hide in a 3rd ticket.

The legit polls that have Trump ahead or tied would blow up if Hillary suggest a critical drop. She has mostly stayed the same for a good 2 months now and has not really gained, but she has tons of room to drop though.

Who in her circle will get facetime tomorrow? For months with the dirty Arab money rumors and Huma maybe it is her who let's it slip. She would be the likely person to take the fall. HRC will hit her back with cash and her carrer dies if HRC implodes so she is ride or die with that old hag.

I sit and remain patient. I hold faith that God will punish Hillary for all the lives and blood she has drawn. Her quest for power and tossing all morality aside will plunge her to the flames. Tommrow might be the day she gets finished off. Maybe not..but..I still have faith it happens prior to Nov 8th.

(10-23-2016 02:56 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  I prefer the Chinese method.

Bullet to the back of the noggin, face in the ditch and the family has to pay for the bullet.

That might be all well and good for the rank-and-file traitors, but I think Hillary plus everyone she directly enables AND everyone who directly enables her should be hanged. Thereafter the corpse in it's hanged position should be bronzed, and a hanging bronzed corpse should be placed in the centre of every town square radiating out from DC until you run out of bronzed corpses.

Then the Constitution should be amended so that removing the bronzed corpses was an act of treason and punishable by death, so that they would stand as a warning to the next would be traitor that wanted to turn DC back into a swamp.

Quote:On 1/8/08, Begala, Paul <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> What's the matter? Don't you want to break federal law? And if
> you do, and by some miracle you are successful, you get to be the guy
> who killed the dream. You'll be hated by young people and
> African-Americans for the rest of your life. Gee, it sounds like such
> an attractive offer, John.
>
> I am so pissed at Penn. He has screwed this thing up and now
> it's too late. Barack will be over 50% tonight, he'll crush her in
> Nevada and South Carolina. And then, what? She's going to rally and
> beat him in California and 21 other states? Not after Penn has bled
> that campaign dry. She's toast.

Leak from today: During the 08' election cycle. I wonder what this is in reference to. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/27077

(10-23-2016 06:06 PM)Enoch Wrote:  The sick leftists running the country have taken everything true and beautiful in America and turned it into an alien, poisoned facsimile of itself. Freedom of speech, freedom of association, marriage, family life, community, all have been destroyed from within. The enemy isn't China, Russia, or even ISIS/Al-Qaeda, it's the disgusting people running the country.

Are you familiar with the Yuri Bezmenov 'destabalization' videos or the 'Naked Communist' divulged '1963 Communist Goals'? :

http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm

Quote:From:[email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: 2016-02-08 20:02
Subject: Re: OutFront Tonight

We are pushing back on this, saying it's not true, not that it will do any
good since they love this story. Likely to add but not subtract folks.

On Monday, February 8, 2016, Donna Brazile <[email protected] this story. .com> wrote:

> See below.
> Rt love this story.
> Sent from Donna's I Pad. Follow me on twitter @donnabrazile
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From:* "Buckley, Ryan" <[email protected]
> <j_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[email protected]');>>
> *Date:* February 8, 2016 at 4:25:41 PM EST
> *To:* "[email protected]
> <j_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[email protected]');>" <
> [email protected]
> <j_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[email protected]');>>
> *Cc:* "Lee, MiSeon" <[email protected]
> <j_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[email protected]');>>
> *Subject:* *OutFront Tonight*
>
> Hey Donna,

> I spoke with you earlier… I hope you’re warming up.
>
> We are going to change the topic tonight – and focus on this report out
> of Politico that the Clinton campaign is looking at a possible shake-up.

> I just wanted to get your thoughts – Do you think this is a sign the
> campaign is in trouble?

> You’ll be on with Dana Bash and Matthew Dowd (Who I have to call – but I
> suspect he’ll say it is a sign)… And I just wanted to see if you think it
> is or not?

> You can just email me back – if you’d like.

> Thanks again,
>
> Ryan

> *Ryan Buckley*
>
> *Producer*
>
> *CNN* *Erin Burnett OutFront*
>
> *212-275-7597*
>
>

When did Donna Brazile leave CNN and join Clinton's campaign? March right? That was her last month at CNN? So she's working with Podesta here in Feb while she is still employed with CNN. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/28845

(10-24-2016 08:09 AM)Rush87 Wrote:  

Quote:On 1/8/08, Begala, Paul <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> What's the matter? Don't you want to break federal law? And if
> you do, and by some miracle you are successful, you get to be the guy
> who killed the dream. You'll be hated by young people and
> African-Americans for the rest of your life. Gee, it sounds like such
> an attractive offer, John.
>
> I am so pissed at Penn. He has screwed this thing up and now
> it's too late. Barack will be over 50% tonight, he'll crush her in
> Nevada and South Carolina. And then, what? She's going to rally and
> beat him in California and 21 other states? Not after Penn has bled
> that campaign dry. She's toast.

Leak from today: During the 08' election cycle. I wonder what this is in reference to. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/27077

At a guess the "Penn" Podesta is pissed at is Mark Penn, the Clintons' pollster when she and Obama faced off for the primary. I found this article that seems to have been a contemporary post-mortem from the pseudo-intellectuals at The Atlantic on the subject:

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/arch...ll/306944/

Quote:Invariably, Penn and Bill Clinton pressed for aggressive confrontation to tear Obama down, while senior advisers like Harold Ickes, Patti Solis Doyle, Mandy Grunwald, and Howard Wolfson counseled restraint and an emphasis on her softer side that would lift her up. The two strategies were directly at odds.

On March 29, Ickes, who oversaw the targeting and budget operation with the campaign’s manager, Solis Doyle, circulated a list of the campaign’s “Key Assumptions.” (Though Penn was “chief strategist,” he was a paid contractor, and thus barred from most targeting and budget planning.) Ickes believed that Iowa and New Hampshire could determine Clinton’s fate, and that the February 5 Super Tuesday primaries would determine the nominee. No mention was made of the delegates or the later-caucus states that actually figured so decisively.

Ickes seemed attuned to the asymmetric risk that accompanies overwhelming front-runner status: the collapse of momentum that would accompany an unexpected loss. He posited that Edwards and Obama could sustain losing Iowa and New Hampshire but worried that Clinton could not; he urged that she spend “substantial” time in Iowa; and he recommended a contingency plan that would haunt the campaign when his own budget team didn’t fulfill it. Noting the difficulty of raising more than $75 million before Iowa, Ickes stressed the need to maintain a $25 million reserve, presumably as insurance against a setback. The campaign wound up raising more than $100 million—but, according to The New York Times, by the time Iowa was lost, $106 million had been spent. The $25 million reserve had vanished, and the campaign was effectively insolvent.

That e-mail is presumably dated 8 January 2008, which sort-of matches up with Clinton's last, flagging revival. The Atlantic's section of the article:

Quote:In the hours after she finished third in Iowa, on January 3, Clinton seized control of her campaign, even as her advisers continued fighting about whether to go negative. The next morning’s conference call began with awkward silence, and then Penn recapped the damage and mumbled something about how badly they’d been hurt by young voters.

Mustering enthusiasm, Clinton declared that the campaign was mistaken not to have competed harder for the youth vote and that—overruling her New Hampshire staff—she would take questions at town-hall meetings designed to draw comparative,” but not negative, contrasts with Obama. Hearing little response, Clinton began to grow angry, according to a participant’s notes. She complained of being outmaneuvered in Iowa and being painted as the establishment candidate. The race, she insisted, now had “three front-runners.” More silence ensued. “This has been a very instructive call, talking to myself,” she snapped, and hung up.

In the days leading up to her stunning New Hampshire comeback, on January 8, Clinton’s retail politicking, at last on full display, seemed to make the most difference. But any hope of renewal was short-lived. Not long after New Hampshire, in a senior-staff meeting that both Clintons attended at the campaign’s Arlington headquarters, Ickes announced to his stunned colleagues, “The cupboard is empty.” The campaign had burned through its money just getting past Iowa. And the news got worse: despite spending $100 million, it had somehow failed to establish ground operations in all but a handful of upcoming states. Now, urgently needing them, it lacked the money.

Clinton ended up agreeing to lend the campaign $5 million. But even this would enable it to compete in only some of the February 5 states. Though under heavy pressure to fire her campaign manager and chief strategist, Clinton wouldn’t drop the ax. She layered on still more advisers, including her former White House chief of staff, Maggie Williams, who settled uncomfortably alongside Solis Doyle.

On January 21, Guy Cecil, a veteran operative who had been brought aboard in September, circulated a memo laying out the game plan for February 5. Now fully alive to the challenge ahead, Cecil split the map into three categories: Obama base states, battleground states, and Clinton base states (of which there were four—Arkansas, California, New Jersey, and New York).

To maximize delegates cheaply, Cecil fell back on trying to drive up voter turnout in Clinton states. He also seems to have been the first person to spot the alarming possibility that blowout wins in weak Clinton districts could yield huge delegate gains for Obama. But here he was essentially flying blind. The Clinton campaign had long since ceased polling in unfriendly states, and now had to make do with guesswork. Cecil estimated that Clinton could net 58 delegates on February 5, significantly expanding her narrow lead.

Although the bolded section of the e-mail is intriguing. It's suggesting they are breaking federal law in some way, though figuring out exactly what is going to take some piecing together.

Sick Hillary

So, just an hour to go until the James O'Keefe video is released...

HOLY SHIT. In 2014 email from Hillary herself, she says US should put pressure on Saudi Arabia to support ISIS. If this were any other election, this would be a campaign-destroying scandal.

Hillary Wikileaks Reveals ISIS Connection

Interesting body language change starting at 1.42 by Clinton's bouncer (on our left) when she mentions Russia being responsible for the leaks.