Decent synopsis to pass around on social media.

Jack Posobiec and Roger Stone on some of Hillary's crimes:

https://www.periscope.tv/w/1nAKEkNADOAJL

Here she is.

(10-17-2016 11:09 PM)Latinopan Wrote:  Here she is.

Any Trump supporter who was injured by protesters could have been filing lawsuits against the individuals in these videos in their state. If only they had come out about a month and a half ago or more.

Not for the purpose of necessarily winning a suit, but for the chance to do legal discovery on these individuals and groups and try to force more information and get rights to investigation.

At this point it is too late and the legal process wouldn't be fast enough before the election.

Officially gone viral. 1,000,000+ views. I cant wait for tomorrow.

(10-17-2016 11:09 PM)Latinopan Wrote:  Here she is.

She got paid $1610 plus a burner phone. I don't think these people want what they're asking for.

https://m.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/commen...mpact=true

Daily Kos is reporting that Assange's internet access was severed owing to accusations of sending lewd pictures to an 8 year old.

Sounds like they are planning to destroy his character do mitigate the risk of him becoming a martyr.

Anyone else hear this?

Someone posted this under a video about Benghazi

So here's the REAL story. Amb. Stevens was sent to Benghazi post haste in order to retrieve US made Stinger missiles supplied to Ansar al Sharia without Congressional oversight or permission. Hillary brokered the deal through Stevens and a private arms dealer named Marc Turi. Then some of the shoulder fired missiles ended up in Afghanistan used against our own military. It was July 25th, 2012 when a Chinook helicopter was taken down by one of our own Stingers, but the idiot Taliban didn't arm the missile and the Chinook didn't explode, but had to land anyway. An ordnance team recovered the serial number off the missile which led back to a cache of Stingers being kept in Qatar by the CIA. Obama and Hillary were now in full panic mode and Stevens was sent in to retrieve the rest of the Stingers. This was a "do-or-die" mission, which explains the stand down orders given to multiple commando teams. It was the State Dept, not the CIA that supplied them to our sworn enemies, because Petraeus wouldn't supply these deadly weapons due to their potential use on commercial aircraft. Then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus after he refused to testify that he OK'd the BS talking points about a spontaneous uprising due to a Youtube video. Obama and Hillary committed treason...and THIS is what the investigation is all about, why she had a private server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and why Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was because of a Youtube video, even though everyone knew it was not. Further...the Taliban knew that this administration aided and abetted the enemy without Congressional approval when Boehner created the Select Cmte, and the Taliban began pushing the Obama Administration for the release of 5 Taliban Generals. Bowe Bergdahl was just a pawn...everyone KNEW he was a traitor. So we have a traitor as POTUS that is not only corrupt, but compromised...and a woman that is a serial liar, perjured herself multiple times at the Hearing whom is running for POTUS. Only the Dems, with their hands out, palms up, will support her. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft was called in...because the administration knew our enemies had Stingers.

(10-17-2016 11:17 PM)eljeffster Wrote:  

(10-17-2016 11:09 PM)Latinopan Wrote:  Here she is.

Any Trump supporter who was injured by protesters could have been filing lawsuits against the individuals in these videos in their state. If only they had come out about a month and a half ago or more.

Not for the purpose of necessarily winning a suit, but for the chance to do legal discovery on these individuals and groups and try to force more information and get rights to investigation.

At this point it is too late and the legal process wouldn't be fast enough before the election.

She's at 17:30 in this youtube video laying it on really thick.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uMzYaO2...e=youtu.be

"Daily Kos is reporting that Assange's internet access was severed owing to accusations of sending lewd pictures to an 8 year old.
Sounds like they are planning to destroy his character do mitigate the risk of him becoming a martyr.
Anyone else hear this?"

No, but anybody who's stupid enough to believe it needs to have their voting privileges revoked.

As we continue towards Nov 8th and energy levels (and desperation) increase, here is something to always keep in mind:

everyboysfantasy Wrote:Tech guy here with the details on the ridiculous censorship going on over twitter and other social media websites right now.

1). Twitter changes the internal auto-fill information for popular anti-hillary hashtags, currently the "Birddogging" hashtag auto corrects to "Birddoggin" to force the tag to die off. This happens constantly on nearly every tag we seem to create.

2). Twitter has two removal systems. -One is people manually removing tags that contain mostly anti-hillary content from trending lists. A prime example is "#BirdDogging" which has nearly 3.5 MILLION TWEETS currently, and is actually one of the most talked about things in twitter's HISTORY. Yet it's absent from the twitter trending lists entirely.

-The second removal system is automatic link recognition. If you post with a standard link for example the O'Keefe video It'll be censored from multiple locations and streams automatically because of how easy it is to automatically filter that unique string. BUT if you use a URL shortener and make a unique URL for the video It'll go right through without them being able to do anything but manually prune the video by hand (which takes them much longer).

SO HERE'S HOW YOU BEAT THE SYSTEM.
1). PICK A TOP TRENDING HASHTAG, ANYTHING THAT'S EVEN SLIGHTLY RELEVANT TO THE ELECTION, GOOD CHOICES RIGHT NOW ARE -BroadwayforHillary -Lucifer -BillyBushMadeMeDoIt

CHECK TRENDS AND PICK ONE YOU LIKE

THEN: IMPORTANT GET A CUSTOM LINK TO YOUR CONTENT, WHATEVER IT IS YOU'RE POSTING, MAY IT BE A VIDEO, OR ARTICLE. MAKE YOUR OWN INDIVIDUAL LINK THAT NOBODY ELSE IS POSTING, IT STILL GOES TO THE SAME CONTENT ,BUT IT CAN'T BE MASS BLOCKED!

THEN POST AWAY UNDER THE HASHTAG, AND WATCH YOUR CONTENT NOT BE AUTOMATICALLY FILTERED.

Remember, this works for ANY website

HERE'S A PASTEBIN OF LINK RESOURCES TO LET YOU BYPASS CENSORSHIP TO YOUR HEART'S CONTENT http://pastebin.com/CDSREyAf
copied

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comm...rddogging/

(10-18-2016 12:54 AM)N°6 Wrote:  Daily Kos is reporting that Assange's internet access was severed owing to accusations of sending lewd pictures to an 8 year old.

Sounds like they are planning to destroy his character do mitigate the risk of him becoming a martyr.

Anyone else hear this?

(10-18-2016 01:34 AM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  "Daily Kos is reporting that Assange's internet access was severed owing to accusations of sending lewd pictures to an 8 year old.
Sounds like they are planning to destroy his character do mitigate the risk of him becoming a martyr.
Anyone else hear this?"

No, but anybody who's stupid enough to believe it needs to have their voting privileges revoked.

I wrote about that here on this post:

(10-12-2016 04:39 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  Looks like Julian is being accused of trying to solicit an 8 year old in the Bahamas, via a dating site called Todd and Claire based in the US. It looks like they reported it to the United Nations?

https://archive.fo/b5CNT#selection-1501.0-1501.16

https://www.unglobalcompact.org/system/a...042016.pdf

The TLDR is that they claim he approached the dating site wanting to support KATIA, because Noam Chomsky supports it, citing that he is a male feminist that wants to help rape victims in Sweden, etc. KATIA is some anti-rape project bullshit or something. They claim he tried to solicit the 8 year old sister of some 22 year old woman on that dating site.

It wasn't that long ago the UN was a big fan of his and declared that he be let free. Now they are gunning for him with some wild accusations now that the leaks are underway?

Looks like Obama and Hillary took my advice of thinking outside of the box too seriously. Either that or the dude is starting to lose his mind in that embassy or was always a degenerate and is sloppy.

Being a liberal doesn't pay either way. He is going to get his red pills nonstop until he dies. He bit them, they are biting back harder. Liberal cannibalism at it's finest! Hard left bleeding heart liberals locking horns with evil and rich hard left left fascists. Ha! You could not make this shit up.

Male Feminist? LOL! If he really did identify himself as such to these people, his deserves every bit of punishment he gets for being a whiteknight and not learning his lesson the first damn time.

If you think about it, constantly accusing him of sex crimes makes him appear to have a weakness or illegal perversions, like Tiger Woods. If the Ecuadorian government actually believed he did that, they probably would just kick him out. Maybe they figure it is better to cut his access so that he cannot be tied to sex related drama if he has no access. They know he can do his job without it.

It's also very well plausible he did that shit or tap danced on the line. They have records of his webtraffic likely unless he always uses a VPN, which I am sure he does. If they demanded to see if he had lewd photos etc. and he said no don't touch my laptop, then I can see them cutting his internet access for that. Maybe the UK or UN sent some kind of evidence to the embassy.

If Ecuador is afraid of John Kerry that would be silly. If I were them I would at least wait to see who wins the election. Ditto for the rest of Latin America. What else can they do to them, they haven't already done? They have flooded Latin America with more guns than the Bush Administration has, which destabilized it and allowed ultra violent gangs like MS-13 and cartels to keep growing. Central America has gotten it the worse.

Either way, the more damaging the leaks, the more likely they will use this UN report to justify grabbing him. Problem with that is Interpol couldn't barge into an embassy to grab an international criminal, what makes them justified in doing so over mere allegations of improper communications with an 8 year old? I think they better try a little harder than that.

If it weren't so serious, it's funny how Obama and the Democrats constantly repeat lies over and over expecting people to believe it as true. They used to accuse Bush and the Republicans of the same exact thing. Strange world.

Podesta email part 11 just dropped.

Going to let the_donald do all the heavy lifting. But, I found this linked by someone. The attachments cover a meeting with George Soros.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15455

Quote:This memo outlines our analysis of the political landscape and progressive strengths and weaknesses going into the 2008 elections. It is intended as background for our meeting on September 27th, 2007, and not as a concrete set of recommendations about what to do in the upcoming year. Our proposed agenda for this meeting is included in the accompanying document.

Although the prospects for continued electoral gains are solid—and the assets of the progressive movement far better than in years past—several gaps remain to be filled. Chief among these is better connection between ground activity and substantive content and messaging. In order to win next year, we must do a better job of controlling the public dialogue and overall framework of the election.

If 2008 is about President Bush, getting out of Iraq, achieving universal health care, tackling our energy problem and global warming, and helping economically stressed families, we will likely score sweeping victories. If 2008 is about the weaknesses of our candidate, congressional stasis, terrorism, tax hikes, and fear of radical change, we could easily fall back and lose progress on multiple fronts.

Quote:Ensure that demographics is destiny. An “emerging progressive majority” is a realistic possibility in terms of demographic and voting patterns. But it is incomplete in terms of organizing and political work. Women, communities of color, and highly educated professionals are core parts of the progressive coalition. Nationally, and in key battleground states, their influence is growing. Latinos and young voters are quickly solidifying in this coalition as well. But many of these voters are new to the process. All of these groups—in addition to working class voters and independents picked up in 2006—will require significant long-term engagement in order to keep them reliably on our side.

Quote:Step one: Expand support among base voters.

Women. Democrats traditionally do much better among women than men. But the true areas of strength are among single, working, and highly-educated women. This is a very positive trend given the importance of women in the electorate. Single women are now almost half—46 percent—of adult women, and if present trends continue, they will become a majority of women in the next couple of decades. Kerry carried single women 62-to-37 percent, college-educated women 54-to-45 percent (60-to-38 percent among those with a postgraduate education) and working women 51-to-48 percent.

Professionals. From the 1988 through 2000 presidential elections, professionals supported the Democratic candidate by an average of 52 percent to 40 percent. In 2004, they supported Kerry by a 63-to-37 percent margin. This sector of the electorate is also growing in influence. Professionals constitute around 17 percent of the work force and in another 10 years, this group will be 18 percent to 19 percent of the work force. Nationally, they account for about 21 percent of voters; in many Northeastern and far Western states, they form probably one-quarter of the electorate

African-Americans. The most reliable bloc in the Democratic camp, African-American voters continue to be a critical focus for electoral efforts. Kerry’s margin among African-Americans (88-11 percent) was the highest since exit polling began in 1976. These voters make up about 10 to 11 percent of the electorate—a percentage that is not likely to change much in coming years.

Quote:Step two: Solidify groups that are trending Democratic.

Millennials/Gen-Y. Young (18- to 29-year-olds) voters today are fairly well established as a progressive constituency but given the tenuous nature of their political participation and socialization this group will require sustained focus. Kerry won young voters 54-to-45 percent, compared to a narrow 48-to-46 percent margin for Gore in 2000. Kerry’s showing in 2004 marked the fourth straight presidential election in which Democrats have won the youth vote. It was also, of those four elections, the one in which youth’s Democratic support was most out-of-line with the rest of population. In 2000, youth were only two points more Democratic than all voters; in 1996, they were 11 points more Democratic than all voters; and in 1992, they were four points more Democratic than all voters. These voters also trended heavily Democratic in 2006, supporting Democratic candidates by a 60-38 percent margin.

Latinos. Considered a swing group by many analysts, Latinos appear to have become much more Democratic over the Bush years. In the 2004 election, it was initially reported that they gave Bush 44 percent of their vote. However, the exit poll is now widely acknowledged to have been flawed and the generally accepted estimate is that Kerry carried Hispanics 58 percent compared to Bush’s 40 percent. Still, that represents a significant improvement of 5 percentage points in Bush’s support among Hispanics over 2000. Latino support for the Democrats appeared to go up substantially in 2006, with the group as a whole favoring Democrats by a 69-to-30 percent margin

The rapid increase in demographic importance of Latinos will continue for decades. Hispanics have surpassed blacks as the nation’s largest minority group, and Census projections indicate that by about mid-century Hispanics will be one-quarter of the U.S. population (at which point or shortly thereafter, the United States will become a majority-minority nation). Importantly, Latinos should not be considered monolithic in their politics. There are serious differences based on country of origin, geographical location, age and social status that need particular political focus. This is an election that could really solidify a cross-section of this community and this work should be considered a top priority.

There's more there, but these are just confirming what happened in Europe is happening here.

   

Up to Donald to pre-seed the debate with all this shit. He should be doing social media videos and press conferences like he did at the second debate, then hit the hag HARD right out of the gate.

Also I recall many of us saying that the Chicago riot in March was not done by Bernie's people but by paid agitators. This seems to confirm it.

I missed something big in the word doc in that attachment:

Quote:To accomplish these goals, we would need the kind of sophisticated and strategic coordination that is the equivalent of the top management of the presidential campaign itself. That is a daunting task, but it has to be done. Ideally, media would not be independent of the voter mobilization effort, but would be coordinated so that each would support and echo the other.

Ideas are popping up all over about how to organize this effort.


Wes Boyd has discussed with some of you the idea of creating a multi-purpose outside war room (perhaps modeled on Americans Against Escalation in Iraq) to drive strategic campaigns and paid media in both traditional and new media through an organization that would drive research, media, and online activities through the cycle. Wes envisions a budget for this work of approximately $128 million.

Read this, Podesta and Soros rep scheming about replacing Scalia, looks like less than 24 hours after his death and referencing a prior conversation on it.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/14273

Another case where Hillary supporters peacefully protest: http://gothamist.com/2016/10/18/naked_hi...ue_nyc.php

(10-18-2016 11:08 AM)Fisto Wrote:  Read this, Podesta and Soros rep scheming about replacing Scalia, looks like less than 24 hours after his death and referencing a prior conversation on it.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/14273

10PM on Feb 13 is when Podesta replied, but I do not see a timestamp on the sender.... Did we all know he died then?

That was close. I guess they are saving the smoking gun for a later release if they have it.

(10-17-2016 11:09 PM)Latinopan Wrote:  Here she is.

And still no mainstream media reports about this.

A friend of mine said, "Well, maybe they're just fact checking and taking their time."

A) When the hell does the media check anything now? They sure as hell didn't sit on the Trump pussy tapes this long.

B) Fact checking has already been done by the weaponized autism online. See image above. So people who dedicate their lives to journalism need over 24 hours to fact check, but random dudes online find detailed supporting evidence in a few hours?

Wow.

BTW, I don't want to go down too far this rabbit hole as its off topic to this thread, but: if a political campaign by a major party candidate will initiate large-scale violence for its own means...maybe the CIA/FBI/etc doing violent false flag ops on American soil isn't so far-fetched after all. I think I owe an apology to all of the people I thought of as "conspiracy theorists," at least for dismissing their claims outright.

Been busy packing the last few hours as I'm about to leave EE for home. Took a quick break to check out the recent WikiLeaks Podesta Part 11 and came across this gem.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/16506

Quote:From:[email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: 2015-07-30 01:44
Subject: Re: Talked to Diane Feinstein

Great. Adrienne do you want to follow up with her people to discuss details/next steps?
> On Jul 29, 2015, at 6:53 PM, John Podesta <[email protected]> wrote: >
> she wants to be a surrogate on Benghazi. Senate Intel did a bipartisan report while she was chair finding no wrongdoing. She also talked to IC IG yesterday who repeated no criminal referral but said he was still concerned about classified info on the thumb drive and possibly the server. Diane later talked to HRC and reiterated offer to help

Wiki just dropped a nuke, unencrypted insurance file.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-18...nd-unencry

https://file.wikileaks.org/file/

freddy-balzan-emails-2005-2008/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
galvin-report-2008/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
gifiles/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
gitmo-supreme-court-censorship-2009/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
hmulv-lcag-thw-kueken/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
icwatch/ 28-May-2016 09:05 -
iges-bmwi-pkv-2010/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
iran-kamayeshe-kousar-2007/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
iran-telco-attachments-2009/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
iraq-iplo/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
italy-child-sex-2008/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
jappah-bribery-affair/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
jp1_02/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
julius-baer-stalking/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
kenya-imanyara-threat-2009/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
kenya-renditions-and-raila-odinga-mou-2007/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
kenya-the-cry-of-blood/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
kkw-kruemmel-brand-juni-2007/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
korea-candlelight-protest-photos-2008-5-31/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
loveparade2010/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
mara-land-grab/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
mfc-leak2-2009/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
mfc-problems/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
mod-wl-sep09/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
nsmfargo-hotmail-emails-2009/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
nsw-workcover-2009/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
ole-nydahl-diamond-way-buddhism-cult-teachings/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
opcca/ 01-Jan-1984 01:01 -
peru-petro-audio-mp3/

^^^
Are those the 33,000 Hillary State Dept emails?