These are pretty good.

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/o...ed-wikile/

but will they stick?

The Washington Times Wrote:ANALYSIS/OPINION:

The avalanche dump of emails from John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, keep coming from WikiLeaks, exposing the insider nature and corruption within the Clinton campaign and Democratic Party. Here’s an updated list.

1. Clinton Foundation donors expected “benefits in return for gifts.”

The Daily Caller uncovered an independent “governance review” by a law firm that specializes in nonprofits. The review was requested by Mrs. Clinton’s daughter Chelsea who had concerns about the Clinton Foundation and potential conflict-of-interests with its donors, and was sharply opposed by her father’s friends and donors. The review, conducted in December 2010, concluded many of the foundation’s donors had “an expectation of a quid pro quo benefits in return for gifts.”

2. Obama’s Cabinet picked by Citigroup executive — during the bailout — a month before the election.

The New Republic uncovered an email from Michael Froman, who was an executive at Citigroup during 2008’s election, that listed potential Cabinet picks in an Obama administration, a month before the general election. The bank was being bailed out at the time.

The revelations reinforce “the need for critical scrutiny of Hillary Clinton, and for advocacy to ensure the next transition doesn’t go like the last, at least with respect to the same old Democrats scooping up all the positions of power well in advance,” the New Republic wrote.

3. Mrs. Clinton tried to save a profitable Wall Street speech before her campaign launch.

Mrs. Clinton didn’t want her husband’s speech before Morgan Stanley to be canceled before her campaign rollout, despite the bad optics, Breitbart reported.

“HRC very strongly did not want him to cancel that particular speech,” Huma Abedin said. “I will have to tell her that WJC chose to cancel it, not that we asked.”

Mrs. Clinton’s campaign manager Robby Mook argued that continuing on with the speech would be a political risk, saying it would be “begging for a bad rollout.”

4. Qatar, an Islamic State funder, gave former President Bill Clinton $1 million for his birthday.

Qatar gave the Clinton Foundation $1 million for Mr. Clinton’s birthday present in 2012. Ami Desai, director of foreign policy for the Clinton Foundation, told several staffers about the check.

“[Qatar] Would like to see WJC ‘for five minutes’ in NYC, to present $1 million check that Qatar promised for WJC’s birthday in 2011,” Mr. Desai wrote.

In a 2014 email, Mrs. Clinton said Saudi Arabia and Qatar are both giving financial and logistical support to the Islamic State terror group and other extremist Sunni groups.

5. Mrs. Clinton team poll-tested attacks on Obama’s Muslim heritage.

An email exchange between Mr. Podesta, Paul Begala and a Clinton pollster worked a list of negatives about Mr. Obama in the 2008 presidential campaign. The pollster wrote, “we have reworked the Obama message into the survey as requested,” and then lists the negatives, including: “* 7 Obama (owe-BAHM-uh)’s father was a Muslim and Obama grew up among Muslims in the world’s most populous Islamic country.”

Mr. Begala told the New York Post on Thursday that the poll was to test potential right-wing attacks on Mr. Obama to prepare him for the general election and was not used by the Clinton campaign.

6. Mrs. Clinton discussed hiding emails from Mr. Obama, then deleted them.

On March 4, 2015, Mr. Podesta wrote Mrs. Clinton’s lawyer Cheryl Mills about hiding Mrs. Clinton’s emails to Mr. Obama from congressional investigators. The day before, her team was subpoenaed to turn over all of Mrs. Clinton’s emails.

“Think we should hold emails to and from potus?” Mr. Podesta asked. “That’s the heart of his exec privilege. We could get them to ask for that. They may not care, but seems like they will.”

Three weeks later, Mrs. Clinton’s team BleachBit more than 33,000 emails.

7. Mrs. Clinton’s spokesman urged her to lie to the public on whether she sent classified information.

Bloomberg News reported Mrs. Clinton’s campaign spokesman Brian Fallon urged her to issue a blanket denial that she ever sent classified information through her private email server because anything less could open her up to charges she broke the law.

“We should not think it is fine to find something that ‘should have been classified at the time,’ ” Mr. Fallon, the spokesman, wrote to other top campaign officials on Aug. 22, 2015, as they debated a statement Mrs. Clinton would make on her use of an email server in her home.

“Our position is that no such material exists, else it could be said she mishandled classified info,” Mr. Fallon wrote.

Reddit has direct lines to the Don, his family, his campaign, the media and anyone else who has their own brain and a pair of eyes. Is this the first election to be stumped by the internet?

(10-16-2016 02:10 PM)Fisto Wrote:  Rush, would you mind including a link to the email?

I'm on twitter hash tagging the shit out of stuff that is getting a lot of retweets.

A little late, but here you go.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11304

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11580

The Twitterverse is going wild lately.

Assange leaked a key file name with a code for Ecuador. The dead man's switch on twitter.

Something is up. He's never done that ever.

Will Chris Hayes disavow?

Quote:From:[email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: 2015-12-03 01:05
Subject: Re: Tweet | NBC reports a shooter's name

Better if a guy named Sayeed Farouk was reporting that a guy named Christopher Hayes was the shooter.

On Wednesday, December 2, 2015, Karen Finney <[email protected]> wrote:

Damn

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:
*From:* Matt Ortega <[email protected]
*Date:* December 2, 2015 at 9:17:26 PM EST
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* *Tweet | NBC reports a shooter's name*

*Christopher Hayes (@chrislhayes)* > 12/2/15, 9:16 PM >

NBC News now reporting a US citizen named Sayeed Farouk believed to be one > of the people involved in the shooting.
Sent from my iPhone

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11500

(10-16-2016 06:59 PM)Fisto Wrote:  Assange leaked a key file name with a code for Ecuador. The dead man's switch on twitter.

Something is up. He's never done that ever.

They look like AES 256 checksum hashes. Something so you can verify the contents of a file.

Looks like someone must have left a shitty copy of Obama's book on his desk as a threat. Either that or Pam Anderson did something weird. Still not sure why he would bother visiting that woman. Maybe she donates?

Maybe he is getting ready for Monday. Who knows.

Someone on /pol/ said there is a rumor or something that John Kerry threatened him and he has files exposing Kerry using his Sec. of State position to import peanuts from Thailand for his nut company without having to pay the tariff on them.

   

   

unlikely but:
   

(10-16-2016 07:54 PM)Nineteen84 Wrote:  unlikely but:

I'm pretty sure that tweet account is 100% full of shit.

(10-16-2016 08:02 PM)philosophical_recovery Wrote:  

(10-16-2016 07:54 PM)Nineteen84 Wrote:  unlikely but:

I'm pretty sure that tweet account is 100% full of shit.

95% I would say. But funny still.

These 4chan things are interesting. There was that one picture that shows much of what was predicted or spoken about beforehand was true.

But, if they get to Assange, that means he will immediately release the unlocking key and everyone can get to work on decrypting the insurance files. That's what, half a terabyte or so of data?

Probably has videos and other media in it. He's got something on them good.

I've asked before about the other factions at play in the government/bankster complex before. We know that the Clintons are one. What could be going on behind the scenes to stage a takeover or a switcheroo when things don't go as planned?

Who are the other factions?

I haven't seen anything so far other than collusion and general cooperation.

There have to be other factions out there that are ready to act, or acting already.

That top post is more probable. Like I said before, they should have tried that a long time ago.

I called it a while back saying they would not tolerate him leaking stuff like this slowly and get away with it. This is another reason why I said, he should have dropped it sooner and all of it. You have to give folks time to stop these evil people. If congress is on a recess, drop something strong enough for them to call an emergency session. Drop something strong enough to cause riots and demonstrations. Enough for Trump to hold up a printout at a debate and destroy her with on the spot.

I guess they figure they pay a king's ransom, like Iran's deal, to Ecuador, then have them arrest him. He's too arrogant to kill himself. If he does, it is because he knows how awful a Supermax prison is due to Manning's conditions.

If he had released everything sooner, the world would have been in a much better position to support him. By teasing everyone with relatively small leaks, we cannot do anything to stop Obama let alone Hillary. He put Trump in a position where he cannot help him indirectly either. Had he destroyed her back in September and the race isn't even close, Trump could have turned a blind eye to him and let him know that, and he could have left the embassy by March. I'm sure Trump would have probably warned him not to ever hack us or something to that affect, but he would have given him a clean slate to work with.

Throughout history many pirates or smugglers only lived as long as the governors and kings that gave them letters of marque or safe harbors/ports to dock in. You have to have alliances with someone if doing dirt is your business. Especially if you jump out of the journalist box and go full blown Non-State Actor. When you have to threaten 3 pieces of shit with paper, what happens when those 3 look at each other and decide to work together?

He may have bitten off more than he can chew. If they gave him enough time to post AES hashes, he better fucking step it up, or make another arraignment with another country. Showing dirt on your own protector is a bad sign. If Ecuador has mass graves all over the country that no one knows about, what is the UN going to do about it? Whatever he has cannot be worse than that on them. How high are the expectations for that country? Not very.

America's government is maybe the most evil it's ever been quite possibly. If the bar is low for us, no one can really help Julian avoid getting ravaged.

At this point pretty sure that 0Hour1__ account is full of shit.

(10-16-2016 08:53 PM)Gmac Wrote:  At this point pretty sure that 0Hour1__ account is full of shit.

Yeah it's mostly a troll/ joke account with a few real bits of info in between.

Having said that... I wouldn't be surprised at all if something like that does happen over the next few weeks (police raid).

The main Wikileaks Twitter account don't seem too fussed after the three encryption Tweets.
They just retweeted a basic news article about Hillary :

@McClatchyDC 25m
"New WikiLeaks emails show influence of Univision chairman in Clinton campaign"
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics...65637.html

Edit. Plus I see nothing on RT.com about Assange. You'd expect at least RT to be on top of any major events for Assange.

The equador tweet is pretty obviously a warning to equador.

It answers a question I've been wondering for a while: Why hide in the fucking Equadorian embassy of all places? It's not exactly known as a bastion of free speech and commitment to 1st amendment ideals.

Maybe he has some really nasty on somebody high up in the Equadorian government and has been blackmailing them for residency rights in the embassy?

But then again, I don't follow wikileaks super closely so I could be wrong.

(10-16-2016 08:18 PM)philosophical_recovery Wrote:  

(10-16-2016 07:46 PM)Nineteen84 Wrote:  

These 4chan things are interesting. There was that one picture that shows much of what was predicted or spoken about beforehand was true.

But, if they get to Assange, that means he will immediately release the unlocking key and everyone can get to work on decrypting the insurance files. That's what, half a terabyte or so of data?

Probably has videos and other media in it. He's got something on them good.

I've asked before about the other factions at play in the government/bankster complex before. We know that the Clintons are one. What could be going on behind the scenes to stage a takeover or a switcheroo when things don't go as planned?

Who are the other factions?

I haven't seen anything so far other than collusion and general cooperation.

There have to be other factions out there that are ready to act, or acting already.

Not sure if this has been posted here, pretty long but an interesting read. 'Anons' on 4chan with some pretty accurate predictions.

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comm...ght_about/

One claims damaging drops 2 days before the final debate. Let's see if it pans out.

Clinton Foundation emoji diagram

How convenient...

i don't know how to embed tweets but Roger Stone is claiming Kerry threatened Ecuador to silence Assange

(10-16-2016 10:59 PM)Jaydublin Wrote:  i don't know how to embed tweets but Roger Stone is claiming Kerry threatened Ecuador to silence Assange

   

I also don't know how to imbed FB posts


Here is a post made yesterday by Bernie Sanders. The top comments under this thing are all people who hate both Clinton and Trump but they seem to be extremely upset with Clinton at the moment, they all understand what he is talking about. It is a very good sign. Everyone should go check it out and share it.


"Let’s be honest and acknowledge what we are talking about. We are talking about a rapid movement in this country toward a political system in which a handful of very wealthy people and special interests will determine who gets elected or who does not get elected. That is not what this country is supposed to be about. That was not Abraham Lincoln’s vision of a government of the people, by the people, and for the people."



On a side note, I have noticed that a lot of the Bernie people seem to think that just because Trump is rich he is a Wall Street guy. Hopefully Trump can get the message out this debate or in Ads that SHE is the one taking money from b[/code]illionaires and Wall Street, not him. She has the history with Wall Street, not him.

http://lamecherry.blogspot.ca/2016/10/ma...s.html?m=1

Man this random blog is high energy, hope he is right. Says there will be three major leaks soon:
1. Hillary deleted emails that show her vast Sexual relationships with women and/or a voicemail with Huma (I wanna be your tampon, deep inside you)
2. James comey bribery details
3. Hillary on a racist rant

Obviously this guy is probably not connected but he does seem to be well researched.