That supposed video of Bill having sex with a 13-year-old is likely a false rumor. I'm not trying to pee on the parade here, but thinking that kind of nonsense is going to happen is probably a waste of our time.

The 33,000 Clinton emails, however, may be a goldmine if and when it ever gets dropped. One of the problems with the Podesta emails is that very few of them were actually written by HRC herself. The 33K, however, should have plenty in her handwriting.

(10-14-2016 12:56 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  Funny how life changes. I remember when Fox News hit the scene and how over a few years it became the most biased source of news the world has ever seen. It was repulsive to me when I was a young semi-liberal guy. Too many others felt the same. CNN quickly filled in that void for many liberals to moderate people. Even Conservative people watched CNN just so they could avoid too much echo chamber in their news consumption.

Now the roles have basically reversed. Fox has a BIAS Check on every other outlet, everyday, and is pretty fair. Not only do they have the same conservative talking heads, but they have "you go gurrl" liberal talking heads as well.

I hope some psychologist or historian will write a good book on how this happened. It's very interesting.

If you're into that kinda stuff, I strongly recommend checking out "The American Economy & The End Of Laissez-Faire" lecture series by Murray Rothbard.

Here is episode 1 (of 13): https://mises.org/library/1-civil-war-and-its-legacy

It's hilarious how he describes political parties flipping from pro to anti prohibition depending on the cultural makeup of their constituents, or how every appointee has some family/business tie to Rockefellers/Morgans, etc.

All the episodes are great and very informative. If you can get over Murray clearing his throat every few seconds.

(10-14-2016 03:10 PM)C-Note Wrote:  That supposed video of Bill having sex with a 13-year-old is likely a false rumor. I'm not trying to pee on the parade here, but thinking that kind of nonsense is going to happen is probably a waste of our time.

The 33,000 Clinton emails, however, may be a goldmine if and when it ever gets dropped. One of the problems with the Podesta emails is that very few of them were actually written by HRC herself. The 33K, however, should have plenty in her handwriting.

Exactly. Podesta and Mills do not seem to give up much over email. They aren't exactly stupid people. Plenty emails are "Hey need to talk". Few people are stupid enough to discuss shit at length the way we might post on this forum over email, when you deal with government stuff. Mills is a lawyer and likely was not stupid to get where she has gotten in life.

That said, Hillary's email will be proof of how stupid she might be. If they are like some of her other previously released emails, it might be alot of politico reading, gossipy 2 liners, but probably lots of classified material nested inside a trail with stuff like "Thoughts?" "Pls print" etc. at the top of the email.

One of the things I am hoping to see would be snide comments about Obama. I want to see an email with "That man" grrrr or something like that, to back up what others say she does. We could use a rift between her and the Obama camp. If she called him a nword or something just as nasty, that would be a wrap. We need them to shut up all together. Liberal blacks get bent out of shape over the most tiny amount of disrespect towards Obama. That would kill two birds with one stone, but only if released before the election, otherwise it's fucking useless.

News sites are saying wikileaks are altered? I have faggots on twitter with articles.

Do we have any sources to refute claims?

Accuser tries to get job with Trump org after alleged incident.

http://dcwhispers.com/woman-accusing-tru...4jbwsZm.99

(10-14-2016 04:18 PM)Fisto Wrote:  News sites are saying wikileaks are altered? I have faggots on twitter with articles.

Do we have any sources to refute claims?

Hillary confirmed they're real in the debate in her Abraham Lincoln answer. She was blaming something she said in wiki leaks on the movie Lincoln.

(10-14-2016 04:18 PM)Fisto Wrote:  News sites are saying wikileaks are altered? I have faggots on twitter with articles.

Do we have any sources to refute claims?

Accuser tries to get job with Trump org after alleged incident.

http://dcwhispers.com/woman-accusing-tru...4jbwsZm.99

Jennifer Palmeri @ 7:23 . She does not claim they are fake. She says she just doesn't recall the email. Then blames Russia, of course.

John Podesta posted a few tweets today:

Quote:3. I bet the lobster risotto is better than the food at the Ecuadorian Embassy.

Someones a little salty after getting hacked.

(10-14-2016 04:29 PM)kaotic Wrote:  John Podesta posted a few tweets today:

Quote:3. I bet the lobster risotto is better than the food at the Ecuadorian Embassy.

Someones a little salty after getting hacked.

Salty? That's sand in the vagina gritty!

I hope Julian's face was like this:



I want to see the last deadly sin and he get angry enough to dump all the rest.

Awesome start Podesta, brag about eating your 0.001% food instead of something that an ordinary American might put into their mouths at least once in their life.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/...isled-irs/

Clinton Foundation mislead IRS ins 2011.

Quote:An internal audit commissioned by the Clinton Foundation in 2011 revealed that the Clinton’s family charity may have misled the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) when it claimed, under penalty of perjury, that it was enforcing a policy against conflicts of interest.

Isn't that another felony?

You could lock everyone up with the amount of crimes they have for a few thousand years combined if you want to be technical.

I know it's not my place to post in the politics thread but
this is some serious shit:

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803

(10-14-2016 07:11 PM)TruckDriver9 Wrote:  I know it's not my place to post in the politics thread but
this is some serious shit:

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/07/22...e-groping/
old news bro, if youre gonna post here with <250 then at least elaborate more

Delete

   

We'll see.

More:

Quote:[–]james_okeefe_iiiVerified[S] 154 points 28 minutes ago
I know people want me to clarify that the footage directly involves HRC. Again, the answer is yes. And it's more than that. We've exposed the whole network. The dirty tricks, how they commit the voter fraud, illegal coordination -- is delegated from the top down. And we have all that on tape. And we're releasing different tapes everyday.

Sorry for the multiple posting. He was behind getting ACORN taken down:

Quote:[–]james_okeefe_iiiVerified[S] 43 points 42 minutes ago
They say they are "edited" because there is nothing else to say. When you catch someone on tape in the process, they are going to say it's fake. If you dig deep, you'l find that none of these tapes actually were edited out of context. The criticisms are all hyperbole. For example,
They claim the ACORN tapes are fake since I didn't "wear the pimp costume" when they told me how to disguise my 13 underage El Salvadorian sex girls on the tax returns. But not wearing a fur coat has nothing to do with the immoral and disgusting behavior.
Entities were "cleared of wrongdoing," therefore I'm a fraud. Well, a political prosecutor doesn't bring political charges against an entity that they like! Also, being we're not the government, there can't be the required criminal intent for both parties that would trigger laws being broken. The best way to see our effectiveness is to note that people do still resign or are fired and admit they said what they said.
We have a Democrat Inspector General come to our office and corroborate that everything was in context. Even the New York Times said our ACORN tapes were in context. : "Acorn’s supporters appear to hope that the whole story will fall apart over the issue of what O’Keefe wore: if that was wrong, everything else must be wrong. The record does not support them. If O’Keefe did not dress as a pimp, he clearly presented himself as one: a fellow trying to set up a woman — sometimes along with under-age girls — in a house where they would work as prostitutes. In Washington, he said the prostitution was to finance his future in politics. A worker for Acorn Housing, an allied group, warned him to stay away from the brothel lest someone “get wind that you got a house and that your girlfriend is over there running a house of women of the night. You will not have a career.” http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/21/opinion/21pubed.html
Here is a link to the Yonkers IG report that backed us up on our Teachers Union investigation which exposed a Teachers Union President saying."
http://projectveritas.com/2016/07/11/yon...officials/

I wonder if OKeefe utilized that tasty little seductress Hannah Giles (played the hooker in the Acorn videos) to infiltrate Hillary and Huma's inner circle?

(10-14-2016 07:49 PM)komatiite Wrote:  I wonder if OKeefe utilized that tasty little seductress Hannah Giles (played the hooker in the Acorn videos) to infiltrate Hillary and Huma's inner circle?

7/10 would infiltrate

In all seriousness tho, why is OKeefe advertising it so much? It seems lose-lose...
If it is overhyped, he lets down all of Trump Nation
Or he commits suicide with three bullets to the back of the head.

Maybe he is just trying to improve Trump fan morale in the interim?

edit, shit, he says its coming on Monday and Tuesday. Debates set for Wed. And he has a dead mans switch, plus news networks will recieve the vids as well. Very cool, hope it lives up to the hype!
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comm...h=866d3af7

(10-14-2016 07:57 PM)komatiite Wrote:  In all seriousness tho, why is OKeefe advertising it so much? It seems lose-lose...
If it is overhyped, he lets down all of Trump Nation
Or he commits suicide with three bullets to the back of the head.

Maybe he is just trying to improve Trump fan morale in the interim?

edit, shit, he says its coming on Monday and Tuesday. Debates set for Wed
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comm...h=b602aa25

Per his reddit posts: He has a team of at least 8 others that it takes to go through the hours of footage and put something together. He also has a dead-man's switch. The videos are already in certain television media's hands until Monday/Tuesday. Per him.

Other than that, I don't know. I have some criticisms over the whole ass grab vs. vote shredding video emphasis but I'm giving the benefit of the doubt, since he's presented good material.

This stuff is just barely in the nick of time. Or not. Maybe Trump is already going to destroy Hillcunt and the media is truly going to die.

Or Western Civilization is just barely hanging on by the edge of its teeth.

I'm sick of this self-promotion shit.

If any of these guys follow through, I'll be in their debt, but anyone that talks shit and doesn't deliver is going on the list.

Why is O keefe telegraphing his moves?

This gives Shillary time to prepare some sort of counter-offensive. When O Keefe's stuff comes out, expect the next wave of Trump grope accusers to come forward.